One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
My,my, my, hogface trump goes on russian tv to criticise the United States
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11 next>>
Sep 10, 2016 16:31:54   #
UncleJesse
 
BigMike wrote:
The spirit of America has already been destroyed, obviously, if people are willing to be led by the criminal hag.


The whole spirit of the political campaign is to ruin the character of the opponent so, the word "criminal", after taking the political filter off, translates into "we want you to believe she is a criminal". But with Trump, you take the word "con man" and remove the political filter and the best it translates into is, "he can sell bs to a politician" which is what he is doing to the GOP (except for some, maybe a third who just don't need the GOP to earn a living). I believe that Trump actually has gone overboard mentally after years of bs and surrounding himself with admiring children and "yes men", that he actually believes the bs he is saying.

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 16:38:43   #
UncleJesse
 
eagleye13 wrote:
You can learn a lot about a man by knowing who his enemies are, and what they are up to:
“GANG OF 50”
The “Gang of 50” or, as Limbaugh calls them the “50 clowns,” can be found in various positions of privilege within the ruling establishment. They are men who serve the power elites who run with the global oligarchy. Simply, they are men whose allegiance is not to America but to their international masters and their New World Order agenda. They have no real interest in American sovereignty or prosperity. For the most part they operate in stealth and have extensive influence in US domestic and foreign affairs.

GANG OF 50 (KEY NAMES):
CFR • Michael Hayden: former CIA and NSA Director.....by Thomas Ertl
You can learn a lot about a man by knowing who his... (show quote)


Probably so, who knows? It's all conjecture but even if not these people, then likely there will be others anyhow. Always some group opposing the direction of an administration for one reason or another. What is self-interest and NWO to one can be claimed to be altruistic betterment for mankind to others. Like NATO, for example.

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 16:39:53   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
A few HRC quotes:
"I don't recall" - Hillary Rodham Clinton
"I don't recall" - Hillary Rodham Clinton
"I don't recall" - Hillary Rodham Clinton
How many more like this will there be? 40 and counting so far.
http://www.mediaite.com/election-2016/heres-all-40-times-hillary-clinton-told-the-fbi-she-couldnt-remember-something/
The FBI and corrupt Attorney General, Janet Neapolitan, accepted that.
Works at the IRS for Democrats also?


UncleJesse wrote:
The whole spirit of the political campaign is to ruin the character of the opponent so, the word "criminal", after taking the political filter off, translates into "we want you to believe she is a criminal". But with Trump, you take the word "con man" and remove the political filter and the best it translates into is, "he can sell bs to a politician" which is what he is doing to the GOP (except for some, maybe a third who just don't need the GOP to earn a living). I believe that Trump actually has gone overboard mentally after years of bs and surrounding himself with admiring children and "yes men", that he actually believes the bs he is saying.
The whole spirit of the political campaign is to r... (show quote)

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 16:55:34   #
UncleJesse
 
eagleye13 wrote:
A few HRC quotes:
"I don't recall" - Hillary Rodham Clinton
"I don't recall" - Hillary Rodham Clinton
"I don't recall" - Hillary Rodham Clinton
How many more like this will there be? 40 and counting so far.
http://www.mediaite.com/election-2016/heres-all-40-times-hillary-clinton-told-the-fbi-she-couldnt-remember-something/
The FBI and corrupt Attorney General, Janet Neapolitan, accepted that.
Works at the IRS for Democrats also?


They actually did themselves a favor. They purposely made the questions so she would be led into answering that way over and over again. That way, they could end the investigation and get back to their normal criminal investigations. Because if they really wanted to get HRC, they knew she was actually the one that the email was sent to. And if you look at the over 100 emails of interest, it was a long, long chain mail. And all the people on that chain who were sending her the email would have to be prosecuted. So you are talking about hundreds of millions of dollars and federal prison time for non-political state department workers. It just didn't make sense. HRC was shielded by the reality that if she is going down, a lot of others were going with her. The FBI doesn't want to go there especially because all of the over 100 emails were the lowest classification anyway, "confidential". None of the emails were classified top secret or secret.

It's like with RWR and Iran Contra. The questions were purposely made so he would be led into answering "I don't recall" in order to get it over with and get back to real criminal investigations.

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 17:07:38   #
oldroy
 
moldyoldy wrote:
do you have a video to back that up?


Moldy, you don't seem to understand what Obama said about we Americans. Not only did he call us lazy he also failed to realize that he failed to know how many states there were in the United States back when he was running for President. Remember when he said very unsurely that we had 57 states. In this video he says something about us not knowing about the world geography when it was him that said we had 57 states. He has the temerity to say that and then say that we don't really know a lot of world geography. I think he admitted that he, as a citizen of the US, didn't know much about the geography of the United States.

Is this the kind of video you wanted? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzcpXdKbhOE

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 17:14:06   #
Ricko
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
If you think the whole media is in the tank for Hillary then you obviously do not watch FOX News. Either way, Hillary or Trump America is the loser.


Liberty Tree- Fox is the only channel I watch. Those who lean left are Shepherd Smith, Megyn Kelly, Britt Hume and Howard Kurtz. Most try to be objective but every once in a while their left wing preference is evident. Smith is the most obvious of the group. We already know that Hillary is a disaster. Her record of failures proves that beyond any doubt. Trump is an unknown politically but he does have common sense and has been successful. Our economy is stressed and who better to handle that situation, a person who has created thousands of jobs or one who has never created any ? National Security is at risk, who prefers to build a wall, beef up its patrolling, and get a handle on illegals who overstay their visas or one who favors open borders and feels we are secure enough and who wants to bring in thousands more Syrian refugees? Who can we trust with foreign policy, one who has had one failure after another and wants to continue down the same path, or an outsider who wants to defeat ISIS at its source and who will consult those with experience to get the job done ? Hillary failed as First Lady, as Senator, and as Sec of State. Why would anyone want her in the Oval Office ? Good Luck America !!!

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 17:16:06   #
oldroy
 
UncleJesse wrote:
They actually did themselves a favor. They purposely made the questions so she would be led into answering that way over and over again. That way, they could end the investigation and get back to their normal criminal investigations. Because if they really wanted to get HRC, they knew she was actually the one that the email was sent to. And if you look at the over 100 emails of interest, it was a long, long chain mail. And all the people on that chain who were sending her the email would have to be prosecuted. So you are talking about hundreds of millions of dollars and federal prison time for non-political state department workers. It just didn't make sense. HRC was shielded by the reality that if she is going down, a lot of others were going with her. The FBI doesn't want to go there especially because all of the over 100 emails were the lowest classification anyway, "confidential". None of the emails were classified top secret or secret.

It's like with RWR and Iran Contra. The questions were purposely made so he would be led into answering "I don't recall" in order to get it over with and get back to real criminal investigations.
They actually did themselves a favor. They purpos... (show quote)


I think that if you paid any attention you would know that many retired FBI agents are mad as hell at Comey. Also, many agents who are still working are just as unhappy with him. He is the old friend of the Clintons, not the other agents. I was pretty sure he would lie when he reported and sure enough he did just that. Clinton had more people in that Q&A meeting than Comey did since he wasn't there.

The e-mails that could still be read were classified "confidential" but they were the ones that BleachBit hadn't made impossible to read. There were certainly more that were classified higher than confidential that got destroyed. I never did see anything in my Top Secret clearance that said anything about how seriously high anything I should let out but wonder if I would be out of the can yet although it would have been 50 or 60 years ago when I could have released any serious material. Don't go around trying to classify the things that came through her office, like that.

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 17:18:26   #
padremike (a regular here)
 
UncleJesse wrote:
I thought they were exaggerating at the time but now I see why Rubio and then later, Romney, said Trump is a con man. At first I thought I wouldn't vote but the way it's turned out, I will vote for Hillary because the guy is a mental case and it is scary looking at his history of destroying things he takes over (like a kid building a sand castle and then smashing it all up) followed by some weird enjoyment of being in the spotlight blaming others for the destruction. I don't want to see what things he destroys with the presidency.
I thought they were exaggerating at the time but n... (show quote)


I guess we're to understand that the Republic that will unquestionably be destroyed by Hillary is more acceptable to you? And obviously you haven't been observing Obama and his mob of Marxist progressives, including Hillary, destroying things and conveniently blaming the Conservatives? Maybe you'd be satisfied for a third term for Obama? Maybe you just don't know what's going on all around the entire world thanks to the complete failure of the Obama mob?

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 17:18:28   #
robmull
 
Ricko wrote:
DJRich-Trump is absolutely correct. Putin is more of a leader than Obama can ever hope to be. Putin is well aware that he can walk all over Obama. Putin also knows, that although Trump respects him as a leader, he would not dare taunt Trump the way he has Obama. Trump is also correct that the entire media is in the tank for Hillary and they will twist his every word to suit their agenda. That is plainly obvious to anyone with a modicum of common sense . Good Luck America !!!






You got THAT right, Ricko. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP!!!

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 17:20:44   #
oldroy
 
UncleJesse wrote:
The whole spirit of the political campaign is to ruin the character of the opponent so, the word "criminal", after taking the political filter off, translates into "we want you to believe she is a criminal". But with Trump, you take the word "con man" and remove the political filter and the best it translates into is, "he can sell bs to a politician" which is what he is doing to the GOP (except for some, maybe a third who just don't need the GOP to earn a living). I believe that Trump actually has gone overboard mentally after years of bs and surrounding himself with admiring children and "yes men", that he actually believes the bs he is saying.
The whole spirit of the political campaign is to r... (show quote)


Have you seen anything about the words of Pelosi and her supporters concerning the campaign? Do you know why I call what you call BS, Pelosi?

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 17:23:14   #
robmull
 
padremike wrote:
I guess we're to understand that the Republic that will unquestionably be destroyed by Hillary is more acceptable to you? And obviously you haven't been observing Obama and his mob of Marxist progressives, including Hillary, destroying things and conveniently blaming the Conservatives? Maybe you'd be satisfied for a third term for Obama? Maybe you just don't know what's going on all around the entire world thanks to the complete failure of the Obama mob?








I know it was a little hard for me to understand also, padre, that there are truly a large force of anti-American, "Marx/Alinskyites" in America that are not at all shocked and awed at the intended "fundamental transformation" of our "Imperialist" nation; "left" from the TOP!!! Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP!!!

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 17:31:45   #
padremike (a regular here)
 
robmull wrote:
I know it was a little hard for me to understand also, padre, that there are truly a large force of anti-American, "Marx/Alinskyites" in America that are not at all shocked and awed at the intended "fundamental transformation" of our "Imperialist" nation; "left" from the TOP!!! Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP!!!


Makes one actually wonder if there are actually two competing parallel universes. It has to be more complex than ideologies and philosophies especially when the truths and realities of good and evil are no longer considered absolutes.

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 17:40:13   #
UncleJesse
 
padremike wrote:
I guess we're to understand that the Republic that will unquestionably be destroyed by Hillary is more acceptable to you? And obviously you haven't been observing Obama and his mob of Marxist progressives, including Hillary, destroying things and conveniently blaming the Conservatives? Maybe you'd be satisfied for a third term for Obama? Maybe you just don't know what's going on all around the entire world thanks to the complete failure of the Obama mob?


It never did bother me with the libs and the social stuff, drone wars and whatever else is supposedly destroying America. To me, any stuff they've done is piddly work compared to the actual near destruction from the wars and the subprime mortgage. Compared to those who call for the abolishment of government and forcefully taking public property, the marxist progressives are turning out to be far more patriotic too. The whole thing is upside down nowadays from what it used to be. What used to be called Marxist and Communist used to actually mean Marxism and Communism but nowadays its all twisted up that anyone who is for a Federal Bureau of Investigation or a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is being called a Marxist and Communist.

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 17:41:42   #
moldyoldy (a regular here)
 
oldroy wrote:
Moldy, you don't seem to understand what Obama said about we Americans. Not only did he call us lazy he also failed to realize that he failed to know how many states there were in the United States back when he was running for President. Remember when he said very unsurely that we had 57 states. In this video he says something about us not knowing about the world geography when it was him that said we had 57 states. He has the temerity to say that and then say that we don't really know a lot of world geography. I think he admitted that he, as a citizen of the US, didn't know much about the geography of the United States.

Is this the kind of video you wanted? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzcpXdKbhOE
Moldy, you don't seem to understand what Obama sai... (show quote)


I had not heard that before, but the context is true. Many of us do not think it is worthwhile to know about any other country. Like the Libertarian about Allepo.

| Reply
Sep 10, 2016 19:29:10   #
BigMike (a regular here)
 
UncleJesse wrote:
The whole spirit of the political campaign is to ruin the character of the opponent so, the word "criminal", after taking the political filter off, translates into "we want you to believe she is a criminal". But with Trump, you take the word "con man" and remove the political filter and the best it translates into is, "he can sell bs to a politician" which is what he is doing to the GOP (except for some, maybe a third who just don't need the GOP to earn a living). I believe that Trump actually has gone overboard mentally after years of bs and surrounding himself with admiring children and "yes men", that he actually believes the bs he is saying.
The whole spirit of the political campaign is to r... (show quote)


Hogwash! She destroyed evidence that had been subpoenaed by Congress. She lied repeatedly to everyone about everything. They won't prosecute her because they're afraid of other things that might come out. Period. This isn't about Trump. It's about retaking the Republic before it's gone forever.

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.