NO CHANCE - Of Retaking our Gov't by Working within the system !
Sep 7, 2016 08:45:16 #
Clinton versus Trump and the co-option of the liberty movement
by Brandon Smith
Most of my readers are well aware of my position on e******n 2016 and U.S. e******ns in general – they are an eternal farce meant to give false hope to the masses. They are designed to make the public feel as if we are participating in our own governance, when in reality, we are only ever allowed to choose from a list of candidates that the elites pre-select. This does not mean that all politicians are corrupted or controlled, but according to the evidence I have seen, the majority of government represents the desires of a select few, and not the majority of the citizenry.
There is absolutely no chance of retaking our current government by working within the system. To be blunt, the system is now structured to protect itself and nothing else. To think that it can be influenced through “e******ns” is an absurd notion.
For the past decade, though, I have seen a powerful shift in the public psyche towards a realization that our government is built upon a fraudulent paradigm; the false left versus the false right. I also understand that if I can see it, so can the numerous think tanks funded by the elites. The elites do not always try to obstruct changes in public awareness; this would be an unrealistic and fruitless effort. Instead, they often work to co-opt these changes and exploit them to the benefit of the establishment.
Consider, for instance, the aggressive takeover of the Tea Party movement by the neoconservative guard. I joined activist efforts in 2007 when the Tea Party was small but growing and organized primarily around the goal of auditing and/or shutting down the Federal Reserve. Many people are not even aware that the Tea Party was launched by Ron Paul among other libertarian voices.
As the movement began to grow exponentially, there were some attempts to stifle it. Accusations of “homegrown terrorism” were thrown around, not necessarily by Democrats, but by the Republican Party. When the strategy of demonization failed, the same Fox News supported neocons that called for our heads suddenly began hijacking our bandwagon. I’ll never forget the day I saw a supposed Tea Party event featuring main speakers like Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee; it was then that I knew there was no more Tea Party.
Of course, the elites were able to pirate the name (or the “brand”) and pirate some of the events, but they were never able to steal away the idea and the principles behind the movement. This seemed to confound the establishment. No matter what tactics they used, the movement, which I and many others have always called the “Liberty Movement,” just simply would not go away.
What the elites did not seem to grasp at that time was that the movement was not rooted in a single organization, or a single candidate, or even a group of “leaders.” Instead, the liberty movement was and still is rooted in a set of principles. Normal co-option tactics could not possibly work. They could take over the Tea Party, but true liberty activists could simply walk away and start another group or groups. We are adaptable, and because we do not have a traditional centralized leadership, we are difficult to pin down and control.
No matter what the elites have tried, they have not been able to lure liberty activists back to the neocon reservation. However, the establishment is not averse to trying new methods and new avenues of attack.
The first and most common strategy of co-option is to fool the target movement into adopting a leader or leaders that they think are friendly but who are actually working against them. As mentioned earlier, this was attempted with the Tea Party, but it failed. Liberty activists left the Tea Party and continued their efforts elsewhere. When simpler methods elude the establishment, they tend to add complexities.
For example, I have written extensively on a concerted effort by the Russian government controlled RT network and others to paint Eastern governments as “victims” of g*******t aggression. As I have outlined and thoroughly evidenced, nations like Russia and China work hand-in-hand with g*******t institutions like the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, the Bank of International Settlements and the United Nations. It is undeniable that the East is a part of the so-called “New World Order.” They are not opposed to it.
Despite the considerable evidence to the contrary, there is still a percentage of the liberty movement that clings to the notion that globalism is a construct of the West alone, and that the East is “fighting against it.” One purpose of this propaganda is, I believe, to continue the effort to co-opt the liberty movement. If the movement can be convinced to develop adoration for g*******t puppets like Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping, then we can eventually be lured into negative actions under false pretenses. Fortunately, the false East/West paradigm is losing its edge and liberty activists mesmerized by it are coming to their senses once again.
Many people will not understand why such measures on the part of the establishment would be necessary. The fact is, the liberty movement is the single-most vital activist movement in modern history. It is the core of a great awakening that is accelerating but still fragile.
This awakening, if left to grow, will result in the erasure of all false paradigms and the elites behind them. A problem that has plagued humanity for centuries, the problem of centralization and collectivism (community by force rather than by consent), could finally be dismantled.
Some will claim such statements amount to “delusions of grandeur,” but if that were true, the elites would not need to spend vast amounts of energy and capital trying to co-opt or demonize us. If we were not a threat, or if our claims were nonsensical “conspiracies” with no validity, then they would let us operate without harassment. Instead, we have well-funded organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center dedicated to endlessly misrepresenting who we are and what we believe in.
With the false East/West paradigm not achieving the desired effect, and the hack and slash tactics of the SPLC and the mainstream media doing little to deter the expansion of the movement, the elites have become more sophisticated.
Whenever you have a r*******n focused on the inherent ideals of freedom, totalitarian institutions struggle to intervene. The issue is, freedom is not only moral, but practical. Wherever true freedom exists, people are not only happier, but more productive and prosperous. It’s hard for a tyrant to fight a r*******n based on freedom because the idea is more powerful than any weapon or any form of treachery. No matter how advanced the tyranny is, and no matter how many rebels they imprison or k**l, the idea of freedom endures.
The only way to destroy a r*******n like this, a r*******n like the liberty movement, is to make it about something other than freedom. The powers that be have to convince that movement to support policies that are destructive to their own ideals. If this can be done, then that r*******n has lost the advantage of principle – the only advantage that really matters.
So what does any of this have to do with the 2016 e******n?
As I have pointed out for many months, the e******n of 2016 is an obvious dividing point for our nation. This is how I was able to predict back in March that the final e******n would be Donald Trump versus Hillary Clinton – the match-up made too much sense.
Clinton was always a given. No other Democratic candidate could possibly encompass the pure evil of the establishment guard more than her. And, the only candidate conservatives could revile more than Barack Obama is Hillary Clinton. Clinton is even despised by many on the political Left. This is a perfect scenario for the elites.
I have been trying to recall any e******n in the past century in which more negative and potentially damning information was released about a candidate. Clinton’s numerous lies on the B******i attacks are still fresh in the public consciousness. No one can deny, at the very least, that she had real-time confirmation as head of the State Department that the diplomatic station in B******i was under direct attack, and that under her watch no aid was ever sent though it was readily available. Despite her dismissals in congressional hearings, her own emails confirm that she was aware of the terrorist event, but told the American people a fabricated story about “protests” rather than a violent assault.
The motives behind Clinton allowing Ambassador Chris Stevens among others to be murdered in Banghazi have yet to be revealed. I suspect that the then-secret arms flow from Libya into Syria and the covert U.S. support of ISIS may have had something to do with it.
Through constant email hacks and leaks, Clinton has been proven over and over again to be either a liar or completely incompetent. Her misappropriation of taxpayer funds for her husband’s foundation, her mishandling of classified materials and the misuse of her position within government to dole out favors to her financial patrons is so egregious that if government actually followed the rule of law she would be imprisoned for the rest of her life.
In fact, Clinton’s only defense so far for her misdeeds has been to argue essentially that because of her health condition she is too incompetent to be blamed for her behavior.
Add to this her open pandering to insane cultural Marxist groups like third-wave feminists and Black L***s M****r and it would be hard to find a more cartoonish or cinematic monster. So, people will have to forgive me when I say that anyone who thinks the establishment is stupid enough to place all their eggs in the basket of the Clinton campaign is living in a fantasy world. Clearly, a Clinton presidency is not the end game for the elites.
Trump’s public persona is the exact antithesis to Clinton’s. Readers know that for months I have been predicting a Trump presidency. Those not familiar with my position can read my article “2016 Will End With Economic Instability And A Trump Presidency.”
To summarize, the elites need a patsy for the breakdown of the financial system they have engineered. That patsy will not be Trump per se, but conservatives in general. Whether Donald Trump is aware of this program or not, I do not know. I have no hard evidence indicating that Trump is anti-constitution; then again, I don’t have much evidence indicating he is pro-constitution. All I have at present to go by is his rhetoric, and rhetoric counts for nothing.
What I do know is that triggering a fiscal crisis under the watch of Trump and blaming conservatives is far more useful to the elites than triggering a crisis under Clinton and risk blame falling on international banking syndicates.
I can say with a high level of certainty that millions of conservatives in the U.S. will not tolerate a Clinton presidency. It’s just not going to happen. I give it a year or less before she begins implementing draconian measures above and beyond Obama’s efforts and Americans respond with physical r*******n. In this event, the U.S. will be torn apart by outright civil war.
Those who think this is an exaggeration should consider the fact that we have already been on the edge of conflict with the federal government during the Bundy Ranch incident, and that was over property rights and government abuse of protesters. Imagine the reaction to a Clinton gun grab.
I do not think this is the plan, though.
Rather, the plan may be in part to lure the liberty movement, which is now more influential than ever before, back under the purview of the Republican umbrella. With Trump at the helm, there is an assumption among many liberty activists that the establishment has “stumbled” and lost control. Keep in mind that without Clinton as the opposing super-villain, this narrative does not work.
Only Clinton could frighten liberty activists enough to forgo their understanding of the false left/right paradigm and rejoin the Republican Party. Only Trump, with his brand of rhetoric, could convince them that perhaps the party has been shaken up and the neocon rats scattered. I’m just not buying it.
I believe Clinton is meant to lose. If this is the case and Trump is inaugurated in January of next year, the liberty movement needs to ask itself if Trump is truly an obstacle for the elites, or if he is an ally to the elites.
The greatest threat to our movement will be if we centralize and fall in line behind one man or one mainstream organization. In our fervor to defeat Hillary Clinton, who is admittedly a truly despicable person, will we find ourselves willingly blind to any trespasses by Trump? Imagine for a moment that the elites do indeed crash our financial system with Trump in office; will we still hold Trump to the same constitutional standards as we would a president under non-crisis conditions?
If Trump responds to the crisis with martial law or other constitutional abuses, will we make excuses for him because we want to believe he is anti-establishment, or will we stand against him as we would Hillary Clinton?
Perhaps these are presumptuous questions. Perhaps there will be no Trump presidency. Perhaps he does take office but there is no financial crash (though simple mathematics dictate otherwise). Perhaps Trump will magically invigorate our economic structure, the elites will walk away in solemn defeat and America will return to a golden age of prosperity. Yeah, we can all dream.
The bottom line is, far more important than the U.S. e******ns, far more important than a Clinton defeat or a Trump win, far more important even than economic crisis is the continued independence and vitality of the liberty movement. The temptation to sacrifice that independence for some activists will be overwhelming. It will seem far easier to hand over responsibility for the future of this nation to a more “official” entity. But in this sacrifice of responsibility lies the death of freedom. Again, the liberty movement is the most important movement in modern human history, and the only way it can be k**led is if we help k**l it. The only way it can be co-opted is if we allow it. The risk going into November and 2017 is greater than it has ever been.
Even if you disagree with the potential for every scenario I present here, all I ask is that you increase your vigilance at this time and wh**ever happens, don’t forgo your principles for the sake of what you think is a lesser evil.
— Brandon Smith
by Brandon Smith
Most of my readers are well aware of my position on e******n 2016 and U.S. e******ns in general – they are an eternal farce meant to give false hope to the masses. They are designed to make the public feel as if we are participating in our own governance, when in reality, we are only ever allowed to choose from a list of candidates that the elites pre-select. This does not mean that all politicians are corrupted or controlled, but according to the evidence I have seen, the majority of government represents the desires of a select few, and not the majority of the citizenry.
There is absolutely no chance of retaking our current government by working within the system. To be blunt, the system is now structured to protect itself and nothing else. To think that it can be influenced through “e******ns” is an absurd notion.
For the past decade, though, I have seen a powerful shift in the public psyche towards a realization that our government is built upon a fraudulent paradigm; the false left versus the false right. I also understand that if I can see it, so can the numerous think tanks funded by the elites. The elites do not always try to obstruct changes in public awareness; this would be an unrealistic and fruitless effort. Instead, they often work to co-opt these changes and exploit them to the benefit of the establishment.
Consider, for instance, the aggressive takeover of the Tea Party movement by the neoconservative guard. I joined activist efforts in 2007 when the Tea Party was small but growing and organized primarily around the goal of auditing and/or shutting down the Federal Reserve. Many people are not even aware that the Tea Party was launched by Ron Paul among other libertarian voices.
As the movement began to grow exponentially, there were some attempts to stifle it. Accusations of “homegrown terrorism” were thrown around, not necessarily by Democrats, but by the Republican Party. When the strategy of demonization failed, the same Fox News supported neocons that called for our heads suddenly began hijacking our bandwagon. I’ll never forget the day I saw a supposed Tea Party event featuring main speakers like Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee; it was then that I knew there was no more Tea Party.
Of course, the elites were able to pirate the name (or the “brand”) and pirate some of the events, but they were never able to steal away the idea and the principles behind the movement. This seemed to confound the establishment. No matter what tactics they used, the movement, which I and many others have always called the “Liberty Movement,” just simply would not go away.
What the elites did not seem to grasp at that time was that the movement was not rooted in a single organization, or a single candidate, or even a group of “leaders.” Instead, the liberty movement was and still is rooted in a set of principles. Normal co-option tactics could not possibly work. They could take over the Tea Party, but true liberty activists could simply walk away and start another group or groups. We are adaptable, and because we do not have a traditional centralized leadership, we are difficult to pin down and control.
No matter what the elites have tried, they have not been able to lure liberty activists back to the neocon reservation. However, the establishment is not averse to trying new methods and new avenues of attack.
The first and most common strategy of co-option is to fool the target movement into adopting a leader or leaders that they think are friendly but who are actually working against them. As mentioned earlier, this was attempted with the Tea Party, but it failed. Liberty activists left the Tea Party and continued their efforts elsewhere. When simpler methods elude the establishment, they tend to add complexities.
For example, I have written extensively on a concerted effort by the Russian government controlled RT network and others to paint Eastern governments as “victims” of g*******t aggression. As I have outlined and thoroughly evidenced, nations like Russia and China work hand-in-hand with g*******t institutions like the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, the Bank of International Settlements and the United Nations. It is undeniable that the East is a part of the so-called “New World Order.” They are not opposed to it.
Despite the considerable evidence to the contrary, there is still a percentage of the liberty movement that clings to the notion that globalism is a construct of the West alone, and that the East is “fighting against it.” One purpose of this propaganda is, I believe, to continue the effort to co-opt the liberty movement. If the movement can be convinced to develop adoration for g*******t puppets like Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping, then we can eventually be lured into negative actions under false pretenses. Fortunately, the false East/West paradigm is losing its edge and liberty activists mesmerized by it are coming to their senses once again.
Many people will not understand why such measures on the part of the establishment would be necessary. The fact is, the liberty movement is the single-most vital activist movement in modern history. It is the core of a great awakening that is accelerating but still fragile.
This awakening, if left to grow, will result in the erasure of all false paradigms and the elites behind them. A problem that has plagued humanity for centuries, the problem of centralization and collectivism (community by force rather than by consent), could finally be dismantled.
Some will claim such statements amount to “delusions of grandeur,” but if that were true, the elites would not need to spend vast amounts of energy and capital trying to co-opt or demonize us. If we were not a threat, or if our claims were nonsensical “conspiracies” with no validity, then they would let us operate without harassment. Instead, we have well-funded organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center dedicated to endlessly misrepresenting who we are and what we believe in.
With the false East/West paradigm not achieving the desired effect, and the hack and slash tactics of the SPLC and the mainstream media doing little to deter the expansion of the movement, the elites have become more sophisticated.
Whenever you have a r*******n focused on the inherent ideals of freedom, totalitarian institutions struggle to intervene. The issue is, freedom is not only moral, but practical. Wherever true freedom exists, people are not only happier, but more productive and prosperous. It’s hard for a tyrant to fight a r*******n based on freedom because the idea is more powerful than any weapon or any form of treachery. No matter how advanced the tyranny is, and no matter how many rebels they imprison or k**l, the idea of freedom endures.
The only way to destroy a r*******n like this, a r*******n like the liberty movement, is to make it about something other than freedom. The powers that be have to convince that movement to support policies that are destructive to their own ideals. If this can be done, then that r*******n has lost the advantage of principle – the only advantage that really matters.
So what does any of this have to do with the 2016 e******n?
As I have pointed out for many months, the e******n of 2016 is an obvious dividing point for our nation. This is how I was able to predict back in March that the final e******n would be Donald Trump versus Hillary Clinton – the match-up made too much sense.
Clinton was always a given. No other Democratic candidate could possibly encompass the pure evil of the establishment guard more than her. And, the only candidate conservatives could revile more than Barack Obama is Hillary Clinton. Clinton is even despised by many on the political Left. This is a perfect scenario for the elites.
I have been trying to recall any e******n in the past century in which more negative and potentially damning information was released about a candidate. Clinton’s numerous lies on the B******i attacks are still fresh in the public consciousness. No one can deny, at the very least, that she had real-time confirmation as head of the State Department that the diplomatic station in B******i was under direct attack, and that under her watch no aid was ever sent though it was readily available. Despite her dismissals in congressional hearings, her own emails confirm that she was aware of the terrorist event, but told the American people a fabricated story about “protests” rather than a violent assault.
The motives behind Clinton allowing Ambassador Chris Stevens among others to be murdered in Banghazi have yet to be revealed. I suspect that the then-secret arms flow from Libya into Syria and the covert U.S. support of ISIS may have had something to do with it.
Through constant email hacks and leaks, Clinton has been proven over and over again to be either a liar or completely incompetent. Her misappropriation of taxpayer funds for her husband’s foundation, her mishandling of classified materials and the misuse of her position within government to dole out favors to her financial patrons is so egregious that if government actually followed the rule of law she would be imprisoned for the rest of her life.
In fact, Clinton’s only defense so far for her misdeeds has been to argue essentially that because of her health condition she is too incompetent to be blamed for her behavior.
Add to this her open pandering to insane cultural Marxist groups like third-wave feminists and Black L***s M****r and it would be hard to find a more cartoonish or cinematic monster. So, people will have to forgive me when I say that anyone who thinks the establishment is stupid enough to place all their eggs in the basket of the Clinton campaign is living in a fantasy world. Clearly, a Clinton presidency is not the end game for the elites.
Trump’s public persona is the exact antithesis to Clinton’s. Readers know that for months I have been predicting a Trump presidency. Those not familiar with my position can read my article “2016 Will End With Economic Instability And A Trump Presidency.”
To summarize, the elites need a patsy for the breakdown of the financial system they have engineered. That patsy will not be Trump per se, but conservatives in general. Whether Donald Trump is aware of this program or not, I do not know. I have no hard evidence indicating that Trump is anti-constitution; then again, I don’t have much evidence indicating he is pro-constitution. All I have at present to go by is his rhetoric, and rhetoric counts for nothing.
What I do know is that triggering a fiscal crisis under the watch of Trump and blaming conservatives is far more useful to the elites than triggering a crisis under Clinton and risk blame falling on international banking syndicates.
I can say with a high level of certainty that millions of conservatives in the U.S. will not tolerate a Clinton presidency. It’s just not going to happen. I give it a year or less before she begins implementing draconian measures above and beyond Obama’s efforts and Americans respond with physical r*******n. In this event, the U.S. will be torn apart by outright civil war.
Those who think this is an exaggeration should consider the fact that we have already been on the edge of conflict with the federal government during the Bundy Ranch incident, and that was over property rights and government abuse of protesters. Imagine the reaction to a Clinton gun grab.
I do not think this is the plan, though.
Rather, the plan may be in part to lure the liberty movement, which is now more influential than ever before, back under the purview of the Republican umbrella. With Trump at the helm, there is an assumption among many liberty activists that the establishment has “stumbled” and lost control. Keep in mind that without Clinton as the opposing super-villain, this narrative does not work.
Only Clinton could frighten liberty activists enough to forgo their understanding of the false left/right paradigm and rejoin the Republican Party. Only Trump, with his brand of rhetoric, could convince them that perhaps the party has been shaken up and the neocon rats scattered. I’m just not buying it.
I believe Clinton is meant to lose. If this is the case and Trump is inaugurated in January of next year, the liberty movement needs to ask itself if Trump is truly an obstacle for the elites, or if he is an ally to the elites.
The greatest threat to our movement will be if we centralize and fall in line behind one man or one mainstream organization. In our fervor to defeat Hillary Clinton, who is admittedly a truly despicable person, will we find ourselves willingly blind to any trespasses by Trump? Imagine for a moment that the elites do indeed crash our financial system with Trump in office; will we still hold Trump to the same constitutional standards as we would a president under non-crisis conditions?
If Trump responds to the crisis with martial law or other constitutional abuses, will we make excuses for him because we want to believe he is anti-establishment, or will we stand against him as we would Hillary Clinton?
Perhaps these are presumptuous questions. Perhaps there will be no Trump presidency. Perhaps he does take office but there is no financial crash (though simple mathematics dictate otherwise). Perhaps Trump will magically invigorate our economic structure, the elites will walk away in solemn defeat and America will return to a golden age of prosperity. Yeah, we can all dream.
The bottom line is, far more important than the U.S. e******ns, far more important than a Clinton defeat or a Trump win, far more important even than economic crisis is the continued independence and vitality of the liberty movement. The temptation to sacrifice that independence for some activists will be overwhelming. It will seem far easier to hand over responsibility for the future of this nation to a more “official” entity. But in this sacrifice of responsibility lies the death of freedom. Again, the liberty movement is the most important movement in modern human history, and the only way it can be k**led is if we help k**l it. The only way it can be co-opted is if we allow it. The risk going into November and 2017 is greater than it has ever been.
Even if you disagree with the potential for every scenario I present here, all I ask is that you increase your vigilance at this time and wh**ever happens, don’t forgo your principles for the sake of what you think is a lesser evil.
— Brandon Smith
Sep 7, 2016 08:55:06 #
lpnmajor
Loc: Arkansas
The MSM gleefully announce that Americans are being asked to choose between two horrible candidates, that they desperately seek change and that they are desperate for other choices - then just as gleefully neglect to inform the public of any other choices EXCEPT for Trump and Clinton. There are other choices - but you'll have to look for them yourself. Even NPR and PBS have fallen in line with this paradigm. So much for journalistic integrity huh.
Essentially, we're being told that we WILL eat s**t and like it, but being as we're a democratic type nation - we're given the choice between cow or chicken s**t.
Essentially, we're being told that we WILL eat s**t and like it, but being as we're a democratic type nation - we're given the choice between cow or chicken s**t.
Sep 7, 2016 09:14:46 #
lpnmajor wrote:
The MSM gleefully announce that Americans are bein... (show quote)
>>>>>>>>>>>
This has been going on for 100 years major... Nothing new.
I'm just the messenger yet again and Brandon puts it into a delivery I can't always give you guys.
V****g will fail
V****g is a sham
V****g is for show
V****g is fixed
Your V**e doesn't count and never has.
The E*****rate is cooked and we will Occupy Washington soon.
Then and only then will the rest of you all realize what's happened and what we've come to.
Sep 7, 2016 10:03:56 #
America, your ancestors rejected GOD hundreds of years ago- read about it in 1 Samuel chapter 8. You , of course, don't believe it because virtually everything you learned in your public schools, outside of basic math, reading and writing, was a lie. These verses in 1 Samuel could have been written this morning they so accurately describe the mess you're in today. Sadly you haven't learned a thing. A few devil worshipping freemasons wrote your constitution and made sure that your laws would supersede the law of GOD. That sound you hear is your country going down the toilet.
Sep 7, 2016 10:11:34 #
GRB777 wrote:
America, your ancestors rejected GOD hundreds of y... (show quote)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Noted and please click on Quote Reply under the box so we know who you're addressing.
Also remember that the Religious aspect of our society and your point only applies to those who have the faith.
So when and if fighting this / these entities you mention you have to use a completely different strategy.
I.E.
Fighting and reasoning with the RKM and other Jews with Christianity and your ploy is completely futile.
Same applies when dealing with the Sub Human Scum of Islam.
I can go on and on and on but I'm sure you get my point.
Sep 7, 2016 11:29:12 #
Ricko
Loc: Florida
lpnmajor wrote:
The MSM gleefully announce that Americans are bein... (show quote)
ipnmajor-lets not go off the deep end just yet. Believe, if elected, Trump will do a great job for the country. He does not have an axe to grind nor is he beholden to anyone. His ego is such that he will not fail us. I would bet that he would be the hardest working president ever. Conversely, Hillary would be a disaster. Her tax plan alone will k**l any potential recovery. Additionally, we can not trust her to do what is best for America as she has already proven that she is willing to sell access for money. Trump is the only option if we are to succeed economically and safeguard our citizens. Ironically, those who advocate open borders are the very ones who are protected by Secret Service 24/7 (Obama/Clinton). To any clear thinking person, Hillary should be a non-starter. Good Luck America !!!
Sep 7, 2016 11:31:44 #
lpnmajor wrote:
The MSM gleefully announce that Americans are bein... (show quote)
I guess we get our news from different sources....
Sep 7, 2016 11:32:26 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> br b... (show quote)
If that's how you feel there isn't much reason to v**e is there...
Sep 7, 2016 11:34:37 #
Ricko wrote:
ipnmajor-lets not go off the deep end just yet. B... (show quote)
>>>>>>>>>>
Hillary also answers to the Rockefellers' TriLateral Commission Dead or Alive - ha !
Sep 7, 2016 11:36:41 #
PeterS wrote:
If that's how you feel there isn't much reason to v**e is there...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I don't v**e anymore as it doesn't count, never has... Fools like you continue to v**e !
Since I'm bound by a different covenant of t***h and actions it would be a waste of personal time for someone like me to v**e.
You still don't get it do you Peter?
Sep 7, 2016 11:36:48 #
ST,
I have been thinking about a new rant on my blog, which I usually post on Facebook also. Your initial post on this thread, (Brandon Smith), hit most of the points that I had in my head right on the nose. As you say further down in the thread, v****g is a sham and has been since gerrymandering was introduced. Now however, the powers that be can simply hack the v****g machines and get any result they want! I wish I was young enough to get in the street and take the action to the perpetrators!
Stated simply, once v****g is taken out of our hands we can simply kiss the American system goodbye, or does anyone believe that Congress has a 9% approval rating, yet 96% of the incumbents will be re-elected?
At any rate I would like to obtain permission from Brandon Smith to post his treatise on Facebook, maybe helping to wake up some of the snoozing e*****rate.
I have been thinking about a new rant on my blog, which I usually post on Facebook also. Your initial post on this thread, (Brandon Smith), hit most of the points that I had in my head right on the nose. As you say further down in the thread, v****g is a sham and has been since gerrymandering was introduced. Now however, the powers that be can simply hack the v****g machines and get any result they want! I wish I was young enough to get in the street and take the action to the perpetrators!
Stated simply, once v****g is taken out of our hands we can simply kiss the American system goodbye, or does anyone believe that Congress has a 9% approval rating, yet 96% of the incumbents will be re-elected?
At any rate I would like to obtain permission from Brandon Smith to post his treatise on Facebook, maybe helping to wake up some of the snoozing e*****rate.
Sep 7, 2016 11:39:05 #
Terry Hamblin wrote:
ST, br br I have been thinking about a new rant o... (show quote)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
By all means proceed... You have my blessings... Just make sure you quote his name.
As for the rest of your concerns, well, Occupy Washington approaches no matter who gets in office.
Sep 7, 2016 11:44:31 #
Sep 7, 2016 11:46:51 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I don't v**e anymore as it doesn't count, never has... Fools like you continue to v**e !
Since I'm bound by a different covenant of t***h and actions it would be a waste of personal time for someone like me to v**e.
You still don't get it do you Peter?
I don't v**e anymore as it doesn't count, never has... Fools like you continue to v**e !
Since I'm bound by a different covenant of t***h and actions it would be a waste of personal time for someone like me to v**e.
You still don't get it do you Peter?
Sounds like a wise decision for you Sici. Hope more Trump supporters think like you...
Sep 7, 2016 11:58:35 #
PeterS wrote:
Sounds like a wise decision for you Sici. Hope more Trump supporters think like you...
>>>>
I'm not sure you'll ever wake up and I really don't care if you do, there is no reversing whats been set in motion. I just by chance happen to be the messenger on this particular site.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.