The reasons Hillary employs Polling deception: Everyday there is a new poll about the upcoming e******n. People are concerned when the polls are trending away from their candidates.

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

Everyday there is a new poll about the upcoming e******n. People are concerned when the polls are trending away from their candidates. But don't be alarmed. Polling is a science. The candidates themselves commission the best polls. They usually know the real story. To accurately reflect the situation, polls must be taken from a random sample; the questions must be asked in a way that do not bias the answer; and there can be no leading of the interviewee in any direction by the one asking the questions. The polls taken by the news organizations rarely follow these criteria. Their samplings are biased toward what they perceive as a larger Democratic base and the questions are slanted to lead the interviewee.

Last night, I was subjected to a candidate's poll. It didn't even try to mask its bias. The statements it was making about the candidates were incredible. This poll, I believe, was testing how people react to certain attack themes the campaign wanted to employ against its opponent. They were themes along the lines of r****m, bigotry, homophobia, putting guns in the hands of the mentally ill, denying a woman's right to an a******n, and so on. The questions started out like this: "Would you be more or less likely to v**e for Donald Trump if you knew he has supported r****m by..." or "Would you be more or less likely to v**e for Hillary Clinton if you knew she supported the unequivocal right of a women to have an a******n?"

Some of the themes that were tested were so outrageous that I couldn't help but comment that "while I don't believe that is the case, if it were true, I would be less likely to v**e for the candidate." Even the one asking the questions started laughing at some of my comments because, he, too, knew the test questions were extreme. The one thing that I saw from this poll that is interesting to note is that the test themes all had a common theme-anyone who would v**e for Trump will be labeled a r****t and a bigot. Clinton, from the direction of this poll, appears to be seriously considering cornering the v**ers and dividing them based on r****m and bigotry. If you don't want to be labeled a r****t, you better v**e Hillary.

This is a longstanding political tactic of the Hegelian Dialectic used by c*******ts to move people from what they think to what they want them to think. First, there is the thesis, which is your current way of thinking. Then there is the new thesis, the antithesis which, in this case would be "if you v**e for this person you are a r****t." Then there is the synthesis, where you think about this and know that you are not a r****t, but maybe people think you are, so you v**e in a way that you can say you are not a r****t. Thesis, antithesis and synthesis-that's what these polls are probing. Discernment is needed to counter these messages so there is no deception. 2 Timothy 1:7 says, "For God has not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind." Exercise your sound mind as led by the Holy Spirit.

reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.

thanks , good info !

PeterS

jack sequim wa wrote:

Everyday there is a new poll about the upcoming e******n. People are concerned when the polls are trending away from their candidates. But don't be alarmed. Polling is a science. The candidates themselves commission the best polls. They usually know the real story. To accurately reflect the situation, polls must be taken from a random sample; the questions must be asked in a way that do not bias the answer; and there can be no leading of the interviewee in any direction by the one asking the questions. The polls taken by the news organizations rarely follow these criteria. Their samplings are biased toward what they perceive as a larger Democratic base and the questions are slanted to lead the interviewee.

Last night, I was subjected to a candidate's poll. It didn't even try to mask its bias. The statements it was making about the candidates were incredible. This poll, I believe, was testing how people react to certain attack themes the campaign wanted to employ against its opponent. They were themes along the lines of r****m, bigotry, homophobia, putting guns in the hands of the mentally ill, denying a woman's right to an a******n, and so on. The questions started out like this: "Would you be more or less likely to v**e for Donald Trump if you knew he has supported r****m by..." or "Would you be more or less likely to v**e for Hillary Clinton if you knew she supported the unequivocal right of a women to have an a******n?"

Some of the themes that were tested were so outrageous that I couldn't help but comment that "while I don't believe that is the case, if it were true, I would be less likely to v**e for the candidate." Even the one asking the questions started laughing at some of my comments because, he, too, knew the test questions were extreme. The one thing that I saw from this poll that is interesting to note is that the test themes all had a common theme-anyone who would v**e for Trump will be labeled a r****t and a bigot. Clinton, from the direction of this poll, appears to be seriously considering cornering the v**ers and dividing them based on r****m and bigotry. If you don't want to be labeled a r****t, you better v**e Hillary.

This is a longstanding political tactic of the Hegelian Dialectic used by c*******ts to move people from what they think to what they want them to think. First, there is the thesis, which is your current way of thinking. Then there is the new thesis, the antithesis which, in this case would be "if you v**e for this person you are a r****t." Then there is the synthesis, where you think about this and know that you are not a r****t, but maybe people think you are, so you v**e in a way that you can say you are not a r****t. Thesis, antithesis and synthesis-that's what these polls are probing. Discernment is needed to counter these messages so there is no deception. 2 Timothy 1:7 says, "For God has not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind." Exercise your sound mind as led by the Holy Spirit.

Everyday there is a new poll about the upcoming e*... (show quote)

Well, nothing like an unbiased first hand experience to set the record straight! So what happened in the same set of polls that so Trump in the lead?

robmull Loc: florida

jack sequim wa wrote:

Everyday there is a new poll about the upcoming e******n. People are concerned when the polls are trending away from their candidates. But don't be alarmed. Polling is a science. The candidates themselves commission the best polls. They usually know the real story. To accurately reflect the situation, polls must be taken from a random sample; the questions must be asked in a way that do not bias the answer; and there can be no leading of the interviewee in any direction by the one asking the questions. The polls taken by the news organizations rarely follow these criteria. Their samplings are biased toward what they perceive as a larger Democratic base and the questions are slanted to lead the interviewee.

Last night, I was subjected to a candidate's poll. It didn't even try to mask its bias. The statements it was making about the candidates were incredible. This poll, I believe, was testing how people react to certain attack themes the campaign wanted to employ against its opponent. They were themes along the lines of r****m, bigotry, homophobia, putting guns in the hands of the mentally ill, denying a woman's right to an a******n, and so on. The questions started out like this: "Would you be more or less likely to v**e for Donald Trump if you knew he has supported r****m by..." or "Would you be more or less likely to v**e for Hillary Clinton if you knew she supported the unequivocal right of a women to have an a******n?"

Some of the themes that were tested were so outrageous that I couldn't help but comment that "while I don't believe that is the case, if it were true, I would be less likely to v**e for the candidate." Even the one asking the questions started laughing at some of my comments because, he, too, knew the test questions were extreme. The one thing that I saw from this poll that is interesting to note is that the test themes all had a common theme-anyone who would v**e for Trump will be labeled a r****t and a bigot. Clinton, from the direction of this poll, appears to be seriously considering cornering the v**ers and dividing them based on r****m and bigotry. If you don't want to be labeled a r****t, you better v**e Hillary.

This is a longstanding political tactic of the Hegelian Dialectic used by c*******ts to move people from what they think to what they want them to think. First, there is the thesis, which is your current way of thinking. Then there is the new thesis, the antithesis which, in this case would be "if you v**e for this person you are a r****t." Then there is the synthesis, where you think about this and know that you are not a r****t, but maybe people think you are, so you v**e in a way that you can say you are not a r****t. Thesis, antithesis and synthesis-that's what these polls are probing. Discernment is needed to counter these messages so there is no deception. 2 Timothy 1:7 says, "For God has not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind." Exercise your sound mind as led by the Holy Spirit.

Everyday there is a new poll about the upcoming e*... (show quote)

Yea, jack, true. The "state-run" polls are certainly in cahoots with all the "state-run, lap-dog, alphabet channel" media. All MSNBC {"M"ain "S"tream "N"etwork for "B"arack and "C"linton}, seem to only send the polls out to their faithful listeners, like ABC {"A"ll "B"arack "C"hannel} or NBC {"N"etwork for "B"arack and "C"linton} or CNN {"C"linton "N"etwork "N"ews}, and even BBC, {"B"arack "C"hannel "C"ondensed}, and I'll guarantee a good percentage of their listeners are (W) {Weiners}; the new (D). Much like the entire crowds at the Trump rally's are "white, conservative, stupid, dangerous, unhinged, crazy, radical, r****t, uneducated, Islamophobes, homophobes, bigots and xenophobes," because Mr. Trump most certainly is. THAT only stands to "progressive" reason. Just try to listen to any of the aforementioned "alphabet" channels, and you can even program each of them into your "hook," {remote}, and "surf," and NEVER miss the secular liberal progressive context of the "daily morning talking points," message of-the-day. Same words, same phraseology, ideology, agenda and sentence structure; in the strict order of daily "progressive" importance. Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP!!!

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

PeterS wrote:

Well, nothing like an unbiased first hand experience to set the record straight! So what happened in the same set of polls that so Trump in the lead?

This is about polling and the liberal conditioning utilized by Clinton, a marxist technique.
Nothing that you are unable to validate.
Unfortunately you won't find these underhanded methods used in conservative polling, not mind control.
Prove me wrong.

fullspinzoo

jack sequim wa wrote:

Everyday there is a new poll about the upcoming e******n. People are concerned when the polls are trending away from their candidates. But don't be alarmed. Polling is a science. The candidates themselves commission the best polls. They usually know the real story. To accurately reflect the situation, polls must be taken from a random sample; the questions must be asked in a way that do not bias the answer; and there can be no leading of the interviewee in any direction by the one asking the questions. The polls taken by the news organizations rarely follow these criteria. Their samplings are biased toward what they perceive as a larger Democratic base and the questions are slanted to lead the interviewee.

Last night, I was subjected to a candidate's poll. It didn't even try to mask its bias. The statements it was making about the candidates were incredible. This poll, I believe, was testing how people react to certain attack themes the campaign wanted to employ against its opponent. They were themes along the lines of r****m, bigotry, homophobia, putting guns in the hands of the mentally ill, denying a woman's right to an a******n, and so on. The questions started out like this: "Would you be more or less likely to v**e for Donald Trump if you knew he has supported r****m by..." or "Would you be more or less likely to v**e for Hillary Clinton if you knew she supported the unequivocal right of a women to have an a******n?"

Some of the themes that were tested were so outrageous that I couldn't help but comment that "while I don't believe that is the case, if it were true, I would be less likely to v**e for the candidate." Even the one asking the questions started laughing at some of my comments because, he, too, knew the test questions were extreme. The one thing that I saw from this poll that is interesting to note is that the test themes all had a common theme-anyone who would v**e for Trump will be labeled a r****t and a bigot. Clinton, from the direction of this poll, appears to be seriously considering cornering the v**ers and dividing them based on r****m and bigotry. If you don't want to be labeled a r****t, you better v**e Hillary.

This is a longstanding political tactic of the Hegelian Dialectic used by c*******ts to move people from what they think to what they want them to think. First, there is the thesis, which is your current way of thinking. Then there is the new thesis, the antithesis which, in this case would be "if you v**e for this person you are a r****t." Then there is the synthesis, where you think about this and know that you are not a r****t, but maybe people think you are, so you v**e in a way that you can say you are not a r****t. Thesis, antithesis and synthesis-that's what these polls are probing. Discernment is needed to counter these messages so there is no deception. 2 Timothy 1:7 says, "For God has not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind." Exercise your sound mind as led by the Holy Spirit.

Everyday there is a new poll about the upcoming e*... (show quote)

Great post, Jack. I find myself becoming a little discouraged when my choice starts to lose ground. Everybody should hang in there and not become discouraged, but it was interesting to see and understand how they try to create a bias when asking the question. Hope a lot of people read your post and not become discouraged.

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

fullspinzoo wrote:

Great post, Jack. I find myself becoming a little discouraged when my choice starts to lose ground. Everybody should hang in there and not become discouraged, but it was interesting to see and understand how they try to create a bias when asking the question. Hope a lot of people read your post and not become discouraged.

Once we become aware, it's plain a day and becomes very t***sparent just how vast the efforts are from so many, to manipulate this e******n. Their evil has no boundaries. .......

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

robmull wrote:

Yea, jack, true. The "state-run" polls ... (show quote)

Rob, great add on to my post.
Thanks for that, it's fitting and great thoughts that apply to reality.