One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Donald Trump Suggests ‘Second Amendment People’ Could Act Against Hillary Clinton
Page <prev 2 of 23 next> last>>
Aug 10, 2016 07:19:46   #
Harpooner1
 
PeterS wrote:
Oh, I've been threatened more times than I can count. One thing I've discovered with gun nuts is that most of you are a bunch of chickens**ts. I don't know if the FBI cares if you are chickens**ts though--they seem to take threats fairly seriously...


Peter, you had best get on your meds.....You are not a danger to us on the net,But, I think the people around you, if you have any, are in harms way.....Get help...seriously....

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 07:32:38   #
mcmlx
 
Super Dave wrote:
Democrats need to keep the focus off of Hillary's faults.

At any cost.


Absolutely. That's the game plan.

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 07:38:44   #
mcmlx
 
lindajoy wrote:
Their fear is far reaching...He said no such thing but leave it to the left to try and twist it for cause...



Twisting t***h has become an Olympic sized sport.

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 07:42:10   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
PeterS wrote:
"A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

So where in that does it say the second is to allow people to rise up and o*******w government. Aren't you conservatives suppose to be constitutionalists? So why are you reading into the constitution that which isn't there...


You have obviously never read The Federalist Papers. You can easily Google Comments of the founders on the Second Amendment as you are obviously ignorant of their intentions.

That statement is nearly as stupid as "The Founders meant single shot muskets." If they had meant that, they would have SAID that. They said "ARMS." That means anything that is used as an offensive or defensive weapon.

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 07:46:41   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
mcmlx wrote:
Twisting t***h has become an Olympic sized sport.


If that were true, our politicians would be bringing home plenty of gold medals

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 07:47:04   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
The Second Amendment was passed to allow the people to rise up & o*******w thier government.


No, it is people like you who think they are better than the rest of us. It is your tolerance for this harridan who is your nominee that is the evidence for how far down the hole progressives have fallen. She is truly dangerous.









AMEN, cl. You worded exactly how far these "progressives have fallen," and "how she is truly dangerous," with language that attributes well to your conservative ideology. I can imagine how the secular liberal/radical/c*******t progressives (D), may have summed-up the situation had the shoe been on the other foot; so to speak. As usual, the "libturds" in the MSM and administration are spinning what Mr. Trump said about the NRA to continue their slanderous attitude and agenda towards patriots, Christians, and Constitutionalist Americans, in general, while they support the likes of anything and anybody who is pursuing the "fundamental t***sformation" of America. Burning Mr. Trump's sign on a patriot's front lawn, supporting B*M and OWS {SDS & Weather Underground Jr.}, and "dissing" and k*****g the "PIGS," is where this "Marx/Alinsky" crowd have fallen, and Mr. Trump is the very LAST thing they can allow get into the WH in order to maintain their mob-like credentials and the continued destruction {"t***sformation"} of our 21st century free market Western culture and civilization. Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP!!!

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 07:48:07   #
funguy1949
 
PeterS wrote:
"A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

So where in that does it say the second is to allow people to rise up and o*******w government. Aren't you conservatives suppose to be constitutionalists? So why are you reading into the constitution that which isn't there...




Hey dips**t Can YOU read It gives we the people the right to bear arms against the government/why the fuck do you think the ass hole liberals want to do away with our rights to gaurd our freedoms that the constitution gives us/No more guns for privete citizens then comes no more constution/dictatorship comes to power,and if your willing to go along with such then your nothing but a coward an no US citizen

WARNING if you v**e for that b***h then you all are nothing but brainwashed dips**ts. I may be a old fart but I'd like to keep my freedoms till I'm 6' under I sure as hell didn't go to VN to die as a s***e.
YAAA GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 07:48:20   #
Liberty Tree
 
PeterS wrote:
This is probably the first time that a p**********l candidate has suggested that his followers assassinate the opposing candidate. And while I am not surprised that Trump said what he said what I would be surprised about if conservatives cared at all about what he said. It just goes to show how far they have slid down the hole. And they once thought they were morally superior. What a joke...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/10/us/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton.html


Was Trump talking about the Second Amendment people using their v****g rights, NO. Was he talking about actually k*****g Hillary, NO. Was it another irresponsible attempt at humor from one who wants to be President, YES

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 07:48:43   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
lindajoy wrote:
Their fear is far reaching...He said no such thing but leave it to the left to try and twist it for cause...
Clearly it was a joke. And clearly the left will run with anything, but in the end it was rhetorical immaturity that gave them the ammo.

The MSM is OK with making stuff up. They don't need any help.

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 07:49:52   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Was Trump talking about the Second Amendment people using their v****g rights, NO. Was he talking about actually k*****g Hillary, NO. Was it another irresponsible attempt at humor from one who wants to be President, YES
I thought it was a joke about k*****g the USSC justices. After all, k*****g Hillary wouldn't accomplish anything except bring her VP into power with a bigger mandate to confiscate guns than before.

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 07:50:54   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Super Dave wrote:
Clearly it was a joke. And clearly the left will run with anything, but in the end it was rhetorical immaturity that gave them the ammo.

The MSM is OK with making stuff up. They don't need any help.


Excellent point, Dave. "Rhetorical immaturity," indeed.

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 08:24:30   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
funguy1949 wrote:
Hey dips**t Can YOU read It gives we the people the right to bear arms against the government/why the fuck do you think the ass hole liberals want to do away with our rights to gaurd our freedoms that the constitution gives us/No more guns for privete citizens then comes no more constution/dictatorship comes to power,and if your willing to go along with such then your nothing but a coward an no US citizen

WARNING if you v**e for that b***h then you all are nothing but brainwashed dips**ts. I may be a old fart but I'd like to keep my freedoms till I'm 6' under I sure as hell didn't go to VN to die as a s***e.
YAAA GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP
Hey dips**t Can YOU read It gives we the people th... (show quote)










It was this exact secular/radical/c*******t government that our Founding Fathers saw coming a few centuries ago, 1949, and insisted on our 2nd Amendment rights to give "US," {as in "WE THE PEOPLE"} protection from the same European, African, Asian, etc. governments that were disarming and massacring the citizen people the planet over. It was made an "OBLIGATION," for the "New World," America, to never allow that to EVER happen in our "Shining Light on the Hill," and to allow the disarmament of American citizens by the very force that our Founders KNEW would eventually show its ugly head as a government in America; that would certainly, [like ALL governments], get bigger and bigger, and try to control every function of every citizen; to our current "obamanation" of "fundamental t***sformation." Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP!!!

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 08:24:37   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
slatten49 wrote:
Excellent point, Dave. "Rhetorical immaturity," indeed.


Normal people don't make jokes about k*****g candidates or Justices or armed i**********ns when speaking publicly, but then, nothing about either of these two candidates is "normal". The whole saying shocking things and lying shtick has been part of the everyday conversation for so long now, it's actually boring, so excitement has to be generated somehow.

The media and political operatives have perfected "reading between the lines" to the point that these mysterious unspoken words take center stage. I mean, how do you defend against something you never said?

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 08:28:08   #
rjoeholl
 
PeterS wrote:
This is probably the first time that a p**********l candidate has suggested that his followers assassinate the opposing candidate. And while I am not surprised that Trump said what he said what I would be surprised about if conservatives cared at all about what he said. It just goes to show how far they have slid down the hole. And they once thought they were morally superior. What a joke...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/10/us/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton.html


Hey, dumbass, guess what. Every American is a second amendment person; it's part of the constitution. Also, here's a little American history for you. Ready? Every asshole who ever shot an American President was a DEMOCRAT! So I think the Hildabeast is safe.

Reply
Aug 10, 2016 08:31:10   #
katgiles
 
PeterS wrote:
This is probably the first time that a p**********l candidate has suggested that his followers assassinate the opposing candidate. And while I am not surprised that Trump said what he said what I would be surprised about if conservatives cared at all about what he said. It just goes to show how far they have slid down the hole. And they once thought they were morally superior. What a joke...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/10/us/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton.html



If you believe Trump was calling for Hilliary's assination, you are as stupid as all the rest of the liberals. He was calling for his supporters to v**e, and mentioned that the NRA has a lot of money, a lot of supporters, and that their influence could make sure the second amendment stays. Get real. Trump would not call for anyone's assination. He is not stupid.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 23 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.