One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
America needs a White Republican President
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 9, 2013 12:16:48   #
Nuclearian Loc: I live in a Fascist, Liberal State
 
Before you read this, understand that the AUTHOR of it was BLACK!!

Admit it. You want a white Republican president again.

Now before you start feeling like you’re a r****t, understand you are not.

Wanting a white Republican president doesn’t make you r****t, it just makes you American.

In the pre-black president era, criticizing the president was simply the American thing to do. An exercise of one’s First Amendment right. Criticism had nothing to do with color, because there had never been a black president, or at least one whom people recognized as black.

So to criticize the president meant that you didn’t like his policies.

The e******n of a recognized black president was not supposed to change anything. In fact, it was supposed to (1) ease any perceived racial tensions, and (2) allow the government to focus on legislating without race. So America would be more free than ever to discuss the issues.

Not the case. And that is why having a white Republican president is best for the country.

Consider that nobody is ever accused of being r****t for disagreeing with white presidents. Mexicans disagreed with most white Republican presidents over America’s immigration policy. Many deranged Mexicans believe we should open the country up to them, some saying that much of America belongs to Mexico anyway. They are not called r****ts.

Liberal b****s have disagreed with most Republican presidents since Eisenhower, yet these b****s are not considered r****ts. In fact, when b****s had sanity and disagreed with the policies of r****t white Democrat presidents, nobody accused black people of being r****ts.

Fighting for one’s civil rights was not r****t then, nor is it r****t now. B****s (and Republicans) were on the side of righteousness, when they disagreed with the r****t policies of Andrew Johnson, and adopted by every Democrat president since.

Never has a black person been called r****t, because they didn’t like one of the white presidents’ policies. B****s were just exercising their First Amendment rights to speak freely. B****s have disagreed with policy positions of about every Republican president in the modern era, including those who have helped them.

Take Reagan for example. Reagan ushered in a veritable Renaissance for b****s, as Fox News showcased.

And the Reagan record?

African-American columnist Joseph Perkins has studied the effects of Reaganomics on black America. He found that, after the Reagan tax cuts gained traction, African-American unemployment fell from 19.5 percent in 1983 to 11.4 percent in 1989. Black-owned businesses saw income rise from $12.4 billion in 1982 to $18.1 billion in 1987—an annual average growth rate of 7.9 percent. The black middle class expanded by one-third during the Reagan years, from 3.6 million to 4.8 million.

Real Politics reports Obama’s statistics as follows:


Median family income for b***k A******ns has declined a whopping 10.9 percent during the Obama administration…This decline does not include losses suffered during the financial crisis and the recession that followed, but it instead measures declines since June 2009, when the recession officially ended.

That’s not the only bad news for African-Americans. The poverty rate for b****s is now 25.8 percent. The black labor force participation rate, which rose throughout the 1980s and 1990s, has declined for the past decade and quite sharply under Obama to 61.4 percent. The black unemployment rate, according to Pew Research, stands at 13.4 percent. Among black, male, high school dropouts, PBS’ Paul Salmon reports, the unemployment rate is a staggering 95 percent.


That report was from 2011, and it’s gotten worse since then. Facts don’t lie. Yet b****s want to put Obama on Mt. Rushmore and hang Reagan in effigy.

The only way you can argue with those stats is if you are a r****t. T***h be told, most Liberal b****s are r****ts.

Nobody wants to discuss it, because r****m by black Liberals has been sanctioned by the Left, even encouraged. Black r****ts get a pass, as black race-baiters are unchallenged on the most i***tic ideas and statements.

MSNBC’s Touré said that using the word “angry” to describe Obama is r****t. Juan Williams of Fox News said that mentioning the Constitution is r****t, and the list goes on.

But it gets worse. These Lefty r****ts do a far bigger disservice to b****s and America in general, as they rationalize Obama’s (and the Left’s) inability to create opportunity. When their policies wreak havoc, they pose insane arguments. They say that Republicans are trying to starve people by reducing the welfare rolls that Liberals have happily increased by 16M Americans.

Race-baiting, poverty-pimp Al Sharpton argued recently to keep 3M known deadbeats on welfare.

Black r****ts don’t complain when black people are marginalized and insulted with policies that dumb down black America, like the lessening of academic standards. They are fine telling black youths that those youths are less smart than all other ethnic groups. Certainly no future ramifications from that policy, said nobody ever.

These same r****ts allow for black children to be c***ted in education and ultimately, opportunity, as their enablers—guilty white Liberal r****ts—turn a blind eye.

I long for the days of a white president, because under white presidents, at least black people had p***e. Liberals have stolen p***e from b****s, and they have no intention of giving it back.

At least if we had a white president, black people might have a shot of regaining a modicum of respect.

Reply
Nov 9, 2013 12:31:52   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Nuclearian wrote:
Before you read this, understand that the AUTHOR of it was BLACK!!

Admit it. You want a white Republican president again.

Now before you start feeling like you’re a r****t, understand you are not.

Wanting a white Republican president doesn’t make you r****t, it just makes you American.

In the pre-black president era, criticizing the president was simply the American thing to do. An exercise of one’s First Amendment right. Criticism had nothing to do with color, because there had never been a black president, or at least one whom people recognized as black.

So to criticize the president meant that you didn’t like his policies.

The e******n of a recognized black president was not supposed to change anything. In fact, it was supposed to (1) ease any perceived racial tensions, and (2) allow the government to focus on legislating without race. So America would be more free than ever to discuss the issues.

Not the case. And that is why having a white Republican president is best for the country.

Consider that nobody is ever accused of being r****t for disagreeing with white presidents. Mexicans disagreed with most white Republican presidents over America’s immigration policy. Many deranged Mexicans believe we should open the country up to them, some saying that much of America belongs to Mexico anyway. They are not called r****ts.

Liberal b****s have disagreed with most Republican presidents since Eisenhower, yet these b****s are not considered r****ts. In fact, when b****s had sanity and disagreed with the policies of r****t white Democrat presidents, nobody accused black people of being r****ts.

Fighting for one’s civil rights was not r****t then, nor is it r****t now. B****s (and Republicans) were on the side of righteousness, when they disagreed with the r****t policies of Andrew Johnson, and adopted by every Democrat president since.

Never has a black person been called r****t, because they didn’t like one of the white presidents’ policies. B****s were just exercising their First Amendment rights to speak freely. B****s have disagreed with policy positions of about every Republican president in the modern era, including those who have helped them.

Take Reagan for example. Reagan ushered in a veritable Renaissance for b****s, as Fox News showcased.

And the Reagan record?

African-American columnist Joseph Perkins has studied the effects of Reaganomics on black America. He found that, after the Reagan tax cuts gained traction, African-American unemployment fell from 19.5 percent in 1983 to 11.4 percent in 1989. Black-owned businesses saw income rise from $12.4 billion in 1982 to $18.1 billion in 1987—an annual average growth rate of 7.9 percent. The black middle class expanded by one-third during the Reagan years, from 3.6 million to 4.8 million.

Real Politics reports Obama’s statistics as follows:


Median family income for b***k A******ns has declined a whopping 10.9 percent during the Obama administration…This decline does not include losses suffered during the financial crisis and the recession that followed, but it instead measures declines since June 2009, when the recession officially ended.

That’s not the only bad news for African-Americans. The poverty rate for b****s is now 25.8 percent. The black labor force participation rate, which rose throughout the 1980s and 1990s, has declined for the past decade and quite sharply under Obama to 61.4 percent. The black unemployment rate, according to Pew Research, stands at 13.4 percent. Among black, male, high school dropouts, PBS’ Paul Salmon reports, the unemployment rate is a staggering 95 percent.


That report was from 2011, and it’s gotten worse since then. Facts don’t lie. Yet b****s want to put Obama on Mt. Rushmore and hang Reagan in effigy.

The only way you can argue with those stats is if you are a r****t. T***h be told, most Liberal b****s are r****ts.

Nobody wants to discuss it, because r****m by black Liberals has been sanctioned by the Left, even encouraged. Black r****ts get a pass, as black race-baiters are unchallenged on the most i***tic ideas and statements.

MSNBC’s Touré said that using the word “angry” to describe Obama is r****t. Juan Williams of Fox News said that mentioning the Constitution is r****t, and the list goes on.

But it gets worse. These Lefty r****ts do a far bigger disservice to b****s and America in general, as they rationalize Obama’s (and the Left’s) inability to create opportunity. When their policies wreak havoc, they pose insane arguments. They say that Republicans are trying to starve people by reducing the welfare rolls that Liberals have happily increased by 16M Americans.

Race-baiting, poverty-pimp Al Sharpton argued recently to keep 3M known deadbeats on welfare.

Black r****ts don’t complain when black people are marginalized and insulted with policies that dumb down black America, like the lessening of academic standards. They are fine telling black youths that those youths are less smart than all other ethnic groups. Certainly no future ramifications from that policy, said nobody ever.

These same r****ts allow for black children to be c***ted in education and ultimately, opportunity, as their enablers—guilty white Liberal r****ts—turn a blind eye.

I long for the days of a white president, because under white presidents, at least black people had p***e. Liberals have stolen p***e from b****s, and they have no intention of giving it back.

At least if we had a white president, black people might have a shot of regaining a modicum of respect.
Before you read this, understand that the AUTHOR o... (show quote)


I am not a bigot but have often thought many black people were more r****t than w****s. I can see this guys point and have to admit that he is right.

Reply
Nov 9, 2013 13:07:56   #
Comment Loc: California
 
lpnmajor wrote:
I am not a bigot but have often thought many black people were more r****t than w****s. I can see this guys point and have to admit that he is right.


Hard Love! Do you give an starving addict money or food? Receiving handouts just enables them to continue on their journey. Welfare enables.

Reply
Nov 9, 2013 15:14:14   #
iwanttoknow
 
I agree with your assertion that Democratic policies have "dumbed down" the African-American population. We need to wake up and become more informed if we want to be accepted as true Americans. Let's stop begging with our hats in our hands. STAND UP !!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Nov 9, 2013 18:31:09   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
iwanttoknow wrote:
I agree with your assertion that Democratic policies have "dumbed down" the African-American population. We need to wake up and become more informed if we want to be accepted as true Americans. Let's stop begging with our hats in our hands. STAND UP !!!!!!!!!!!


the first step would be to stop using "African American". To be a true American - just be an American.

Reply
Nov 10, 2013 06:27:26   #
DEVILDOG9
 
I READ EVERY DAY ABOUT ALL THE LIES AND UNAMERICAN THINGS YOUR PRESIDENT IS DOING TO THIS COUNTRY. PLEASE TELL ME WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO ABOUT GETTING HIM OUT OF OFFICE. IT'S TIME WE ACT INSTEAD OF COMPLAINING ABOUT ALL THE THINGS HE IS DOING TO RUIN OUR GREAT COUNTRY. I BELIEVE OUR GREAT DOCUMENT SAY "WE THE PEOPLE" NOT I THE PRESIDENT. WE PUT HIS BLACK ASS IN OFFICE WHY CAN'T WE TAKE HIS BLACK ASS OUT? IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SCARED OF ONE BLACK MAN THAT IS TAKING AWAY THE VERY ROOTS OF OUR BEING.

SEMPER FI

Reply
Nov 10, 2013 08:17:10   #
cougar
 
Well said both of you. The problem is not that "O" is Black, it IS that he is a Commnist Narcassit with an agenda. I am one of those 'white' dudes who supported Martin L. Because he was RIGHT, not because he was Black. I did not support "O" because he was a lier and c*******t from childhood to college to Chicago to D.C. His agenda WILL be stopped either by the B****t or by other means. But not because he is Black or because his supporters for the most part are;but, because he is WRONG! Wrong for America! Wrong for the World! Race has nothing to do with Dictators or those who want to be! I am on old military fella too. I back my politics WITH a gun as well as INVOLVEMENT!

Reply
Nov 10, 2013 08:24:18   #
Nuclearian Loc: I live in a Fascist, Liberal State
 
cougar wrote:
Well said both of you. The problem is not that "O" is Black, it IS that he is a Commnist Narcassit with an agenda. I am one of those 'white' dudes who supported Martin L. Because he was RIGHT, not because he was Black. I did not support "O" because he was a lier and c*******t from childhood to college to Chicago to D.C. His agenda WILL be stopped either by the B****t or by other means. But not because he is Black or because his supporters for the most part are;but, because he is WRONG! Wrong for America! Wrong for the World! Race has nothing to do with Dictators or those who want to be! I am on old military fella too. I back my politics WITH a gun as well as INVOLVEMENT!
Well said both of you. The problem is not that &qu... (show quote)


Not quite right. He will not get kicked out because the Congressman are afraid of that BAD WORD them, being called....r****t.
And if there were no term limits on Presidents, he would continuously get re-elected because the i******s v**e for him, b****s v**e for him, public tit suckers v**e for him, and the NBPP (new Black Panther Party) who stand at the key v****g locations and intimidate w****s from v****g.
Nah, this country is going down. Because of this fear of being called r****t, even when what was done is NOT r****t.
You might as well get ready to "use your gun" in defense of this country. You will eventually need to.

Reply
Nov 10, 2013 08:48:27   #
cougar
 
Oh we are more then ready to do that if it comes to it! The true warrior is a Reluctant Warrior. We seek Peace first and foremost, but.... oh well... just do not expect civilized warfare Mr. O. I took an Oath, the Oath IS binding! But then Mr. O has no clue as to what HONOR is or T***H either for that matter.

Reply
Nov 11, 2013 02:00:03   #
CJakobsson
 
What we need is a president and a Congress that will tell the t***h to the people, and we as a people need to be able to recognize the t***h when we hear it.
If we analyze the economic policies of the Obama Administration, we can agree that when Obama took office, it was necessary to use newly created money to stimulate the economy. The mistake of Obama and the Congress was to inject that stimulus money into the part of the economy close to the top of the economic ladder. When newly created money is being used to prop up a sluggish economy, the newly created money should go to expand the capacity of activities that feed the hungry and house the homeless, and to state and local governments to keep police officers, fire fighters, and teachers on the job that would otherwise get laid off. Some of the Obama stimulus money went for those purposes, and that was fine. Too much of the Obama stimulus money went to an attempt to generate general economic growth by means of a governmental spendathon. That was not fine.
The USA does not necessarily need a white president, or a president of any particular color. We need a president of wh**ever color who will tell the t***h, and we need to be able to recognize the t***h when we hear it.
Over the last 5 years we could have done better, but when you look at what the situation was when Obama took office, the last 5 years could have also been a whole lot worse.

Reply
Nov 11, 2013 02:06:03   #
CJakobsson
 
When you say you back up your politics with a gun as well as involvement, does that mean you plan to shoot any public officials whose policies you disagree with? That is what it sounds like.

Reply
Nov 11, 2013 08:54:19   #
cougar
 
One does tend to interpret things by their own values it seems. No I do not plan such insanity. That is what the Political System is all about. Influencing puplic officials via rounding up a lot of friends and getting them to V**E. However Public Officials need to remember that the Public does have other options when they forget whom they SERVE. Public Officials are NOT Immune to JUSTICE!! Bad, corrupt and dishonorable people DO get into offices. It IS the responsibility OF The People to clean them out and replace them. Occatonally that does require force, and then a gun does come in handy. Mexico is a good example friend. But it happens right here in the good old USofA also.

Reply
Nov 11, 2013 16:58:46   #
CJakobsson
 
That is why we have police officers and prosecutors. Corrupt public officials get prosecuted for their crimes on a regular basis in the USA when they get caught. And when they get convicted, they do time in the big lock-up.
One of the great things about the USA is the fact that the system has a way of holding public officials accountable legally for their misdoings, without any need for vigilante action on the part of anybody.

Reply
Nov 11, 2013 19:50:04   #
cougar
 
Fella you have to be living in a dreamland. Our entire county was RUN by its Chief Justice who was a pedifile and drug dealer and had most of the Law Enforcement, DA, Sheriff and Judges working for HIM. Took almost ten years for a bunch of solid citizens to gather enough information to move them all out of Office and out of the County. NONE of them went to jail! There are more real crooks in Public Office then we have IN our Prisons t***h be known. DC is merely a reflection of the REST of the country. But... ALL Politics are LOCAL. You START at HOME! If you can't clean up your own Yard you haven't a chance in hell of cleaning up DC. or your State Capital. It takes time and effort and no small amount of risk. But in the end it IS worth the effort. Long story, here is not the place to tell it all. But you get the jest I hope! And Yes I carry a gun most of the time and NO I am not a cop! But it IS My County and My Kids! I'm a Cop OF Cops!! They work for me as they do you also. I just make sure they DO their JOBS!

Reply
Nov 11, 2013 23:20:39   #
iwanttoknow
 
Cougar you are right. The real crooks are in DC on our dime.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.