One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Comey did two things when he decided not too prosecute Clinton.
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Jul 8, 2016 17:46:01   #
Carol Kelly
 
America Only wrote:
I agree with all that is being stated here. It was 100% BS the entire ordeal. "She was grossly negligent but that does not show intent"...BS! The codes she violated clearly do NOT state any language using the word, INTENT!

Comey was told to clear her. Lynch was paid by Billy Clinton, (the airplane meeting) and no one has the balls to just stand up and call it the way it really is.

I can't say online what my overall plans are, but I damned sure am sick and tired of MY COUNTRY being screwed over by the high levels that get away with anything. Liberals in general are frigging cowards and t*****rs. Trump wants to make American great again. I can see right now, the liberal corruption machine is running full steam ahead. If my v**e or your v**e and the majority v**e is wiped away due to the tyranny of the Democraptic party, it is then time for all patriots to move against those tyrants. It is NOT to over throw the Government, but to REMOVE the tyrants from their power. The Constitution gives all of us that power. It is just about the time to use that power. In fact, THAT is past due!
I agree with all that is being stated here. It wa... (show quote)


Carelessness is the same as negligence. Negligence in this case is criminal.

Reply
Jul 8, 2016 22:18:32   #
UncleJesse Loc: Hazzard Co, GA
 
Hemiman wrote:
First he showed there is no longer any law in America except what Obama says is law.Second,by letting the obviously guilty Clinton off he immediately went from asset to liability,the second his speech ended.Mr.Comey turned himself into a loose end and I think everyone knows what happens to loose ends in the Clinton world.Now Comey can spend the rest of his life wondering when someone in government will feel threatened because he may talk about what pressures were used to get him too forgive her criminal actions.The fool painted a target on his back that will never wash off.lt's only a matter of time before Comey's name and natural causes appear in the same sentence.
First he showed there is no longer any law in Amer... (show quote)


http://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/766f812/2147483647/resize/1200x%3E/format/png/quality/85/?url=%2Fcmsmedia%2F40%2F20%2Ffe7d2ba6492b9f5994eefb6e968f%2F20160707edhoc-a.tif

Reply
Jul 9, 2016 12:46:42   #
CarolSeer2016
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
Carelessness is the same as negligence. Negligence in this case is criminal.


I really believe, after reading about his excuses, that Comey thought to try to distinguish between guilt, responsibility and cause. [I wrote an email on that very subject to a friend of mine, to wit:

"Professor Binkley's ability to distinguish "guilt" (criminal intent) from "responsibility" (as a former underwriter I see this as a failure to take prudent precautions to prevent certain events), and both from "cause" (an easy or superficial attempt to identify the antecedents that precede catastrophe) is one reason I consider Professor Binkley an exceptional thinker.

Simply stating a cause as "Imperialism" or "Militarism" or "the European State System" or "sectarianism" obscures the real, and underlying reasons for conflict. For instance, if we designate a cause as, say, Militarism (or Nationalism), then two things can occur:

1. There will be as many definitions of Militarism as there are historians; and

2. There will be attempts to outlaw any and all forms of "Militarianism" (or "Nationalism"), (the disarmament of Germany, for instance; or "open borders", in the case of Nationalism); however it may be defined.

Even so, assigning either guilt, responsibility or cause after the fact can typically be assigned to the vagaries of human nature: Somebody has to pay. I have my own thoughts on the genesis and furtherance of that "War to End All Wars" but they are not limited to any one nation, event or interest."]

(AND all you OPP posters know that government gets into our emails!!)

Comey, I have this to say to you: Those who are not able to make distinctions can get themselves in a hell of a lot of trouble.

Reply
Jul 9, 2016 14:05:26   #
Mikeyavelli
 
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
I really believe, after reading about his excuses, that Comey thought to try to distinguish between guilt, responsibility and cause. [I wrote an email on that very subject to a friend of mine, to wit:

"Professor Binkley's ability to distinguish "guilt" (criminal intent) from "responsibility" (as a former underwriter I see this as a failure to take prudent precautions to prevent certain events), and both from "cause" (an easy or superficial attempt to identify the antecedents that precede catastrophe) is one reason I consider Professor Binkley an exceptional thinker.

Simply stating a cause as "Imperialism" or "Militarism" or "the European State System" or "sectarianism" obscures the real, and underlying reasons for conflict. For instance, if we designate a cause as, say, Militarism (or Nationalism), then two things can occur:

1. There will be as many definitions of Militarism as there are historians; and

2. There will be attempts to outlaw any and all forms of "Militarianism" (or "Nationalism"), (the disarmament of Germany, for instance; or "open borders", in the case of Nationalism); however it may be defined.

Even so, assigning either guilt, responsibility or cause after the fact can typically be assigned to the vagaries of human nature: Somebody has to pay. I have my own thoughts on the genesis and furtherance of that "War to End All Wars" but they are not limited to any one nation, event or interest."]

(AND all you OPP posters know that government gets into our emails!!)

Comey, I have this to say to you: Those who are not able to make distinctions can get themselves in a hell of a lot of trouble.
I really believe, after reading about his excuses,... (show quote)


In other words, the Fix is in. Another Clintonian attempt to define the meaning of "is".

Reply
Jul 9, 2016 15:06:33   #
CarolSeer2016
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
In other words, the Fix is in. Another Clintonian attempt to define the meaning of "is".


It may very well have something to do with the "IsOught Gap" (see John Barnes "One For The Morning Glory."

Reply
Jul 9, 2016 15:51:39   #
Carol Kelly
 
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
I really believe, after reading about his excuses, that Comey thought to try to distinguish between guilt, responsibility and cause. [I wrote an email on that very subject to a friend of mine, to wit:

"Professor Binkley's ability to distinguish "guilt" (criminal intent) from "responsibility" (as a former underwriter I see this as a failure to take prudent precautions to prevent certain events), and both from "cause" (an easy or superficial attempt to identify the antecedents that precede catastrophe) is one reason I consider Professor Binkley an exceptional thinker.

Simply stating a cause as "Imperialism" or "Militarism" or "the European State System" or "sectarianism" obscures the real, and underlying reasons for conflict. For instance, if we designate a cause as, say, Militarism (or Nationalism), then two things can occur:

1. There will be as many definitions of Militarism as there are historians; and

2. There will be attempts to outlaw any and all forms of "Militarianism" (or "Nationalism"), (the disarmament of Germany, for instance; or "open borders", in the case of Nationalism); however it may be defined.

Even so, assigning either guilt, responsibility or cause after the fact can typically be assigned to the vagaries of human nature: Somebody has to pay. I have my own thoughts on the genesis and furtherance of that "War to End All Wars" but they are not limited to any one nation, event or interest."]

(AND all you OPP posters know that government gets into our emails!!)

Comey, I have this to say to you: Those who are not able to make distinctions can get themselves in a hell of a lot of trouble.
I really believe, after reading about his excuses,... (show quote)

He now has a target on his back. If he's not careful, the Clintons will get him.

Reply
Jul 10, 2016 00:41:39   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
UncleJesse wrote:
http://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/766f812/2147483647/resize/1200x%3E/format/png/quality/85/?url=%2Fcmsmedia%2F40%2F20%2Ffe7d2ba6492b9f5994eefb6e968f%2F20160707edhoc-a.tif


The Scarlet Letter? No! Ah ha, it's another Crooked E.
Let's look at FBI Director James Comey's full statement to the press on Hillary's undocumented testimony.

FBI Director Comey’s full remarks on Clinton email probe
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/07/05/fbi-director-comeys-full-remarks-on-clinton-email-probe/

"FBI Director James B. Comey said Tuesday that while Hillary Clinton and her staff were “extremely careless” in how they handled emails while she was secretary of state, the bureau would not recommend criminal charges. Here is a transcript of Comey’s prepared remarks released by the FBI:

The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails, as we did for those available to us; instead, they relied on the header information and used search terms to try to find all work-related e-mails among the reportedly more than 60,000 total e-mails remaining on Secretary Clinton's personal system in 2014. It is highly likely their search terms missed some work-related e-mails, and that we later found them, for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.

It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery."

If this scrubbing their devices in such a way as to "preclude complete forensic recovery" is not proof of "intent", what is?
But "intent" need not be proven, if Hillary were charged for "gross negligence," on the job; instead, FBI director James Comey referred to Hillary Clinton's actions (after studying a book on how to erase emails) as only "extremely careless" so that she would emerge unscathed.

This is simply unbelievable and unacceptable. This is summertime, with 59% of Black youth out of work, nothing to do but make mischief with George Soros's OSI foundation cults, such as Black L***s M****r. Why isn't George Soros arrested for inciting to r**t?

Trump speaks of jobs, jobs, jobs, and Hillary tells Old Whitey to be more understanding of the plight of the Black minorities that the Democrat Party is responsible for keeping unemployed and homeless.

I am hoping Right Side Broadcasting will take the political foreground and expose Hillary's hypocrisy.

Reply
Jul 10, 2016 08:29:20   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Comey speaks as if he were hilliar's lawyer.
The fix has been in since hilliar threw her head back and cackled "my goodness no, I won't be indicted "
Tarmacgate was just to put the finishing touches on it.

Reply
Jul 11, 2016 13:41:04   #
CarolSeer2016
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
He now has a target on his back. If he's not careful, the Clintons will get him.


He is certainly in a world of trouble. And mostly because he used words whose meaning he doesn't clearly understand.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.