Sassy Lass

As an Independent v**er, I have to admit that back in the day, I sometimes v**ed for the Democrat candidate for president, simply because I thought he was the best candidate for the country. After watching the radical machinations over the last eight years from the Democrat party (i.e., pro-a******n, gay marriage, political correctness run amuck, taking God out of the constitution, participating in a childish and outlandish anti-gun sit-in, and just generally being the kind of people I would avoid like the plague), I have decided that I am still an Independent, but an Independent who will NEVER -- and I mean NEVER -- v**e again for a Democrat! A Republican, YES; Libertarian, YES, Independent, YES, depending upon who has the best vision for the country and it's people, and a person who walks the talk.

I was absolutely blown away that we had 15 (not counting Bush and Trump) outstanding candidates on the Republican side vying for president of these United States, only to have Don-the-Con Trump win the primary. Couldn't understand why so many people would v**e for a blowhard who had been a NY Liberal all his life and had in the past been so opposite the Republican platform.

A recent article really opened my eyes, and made me sick to my stomach. Yep, it's true, Folks, the Democraps can't win unless they c***t, defraud, and mislead the American public!

Check out the link below:
http://www.redstate.com/diary/creinstein/2016/06/25/12-million-democrats-v**ed-republican-primaries/?utm_source=rsmorningbriefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

EL Loc: Massachusetts

I think we should drop "parties" and just have a number of people (not attached to any party) running for president. We should always have more than two because sometimes we just end up v****g for the better of the two, not anyone we would really want.
If we had 10 or even more, we'd have a better choice. These days they have to be rich to run for president. That too is wrong. There's probably someone out there that doesn't have enough money to run who would be the best president ever. You know, one who would be thinking of the United States instead of power and money.

PawneeCounty Loc: Oklahoma USA

Did you ever consider they changed because of Obama and Hillary's policies?

I was once registered Democrat until Obama and Hillary were running back in 2007 and I switched to Republican because I was 200% against either one of them.

This article is on the Red State Site that is Erick Erickson he is extremely anti Trump and bias as Hell. While he didn't write the article his staff goes along with him or they do not get published. Trump wasn't my favorite but if he can steer a v**er base away from Clinton that is a positive. I am neither Democrat or Republican but Oklahoma is a closed primary that will not let Independents or Libertarians v**e in the Primaries.

PawneeCounty Loc: Oklahoma USA

You sure got that right that would make it fair. The big money is who elects our officials at all levels federal, state, county, and city with the possible exception of small rural areas.

buffalo Loc: Texas

More DNC corruption:

Busted! DNC caught in $100 million v**er scheme
JUNE 27, 2016

A foreign billionaire and seven-figure donor to the Clinton Foundation has been caught funding a reportedly illegal v****g scheme that links straight to the Democratic National Committee and p**********l candidate Hillary Clinton.

A computer hacker who goes by the moniker Guccifer 2.0 recently leaked emails allegedly from the DNC outlining their 2016 general e******n strategies — and one of them details a coordinated effort with a foreign entity, funded entirely with $100 million from big-time Clinton donor and Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss, to influence the results of the 2016 e******n.

The group was allegedly targeting pro-Clinton demographics for v***r r**********n as well as “outreach, organizing, and legal and policy advocacy on v****g laws”, and according to Washington Beacon reporter Lachlan Markay, that’s illegal.

The group behind the $100 million v***r r**********n push, The Wyss Foundation, is registered as a 501(c)(3) charitable foundation. It is forbidden by law from financing direct political projects.

Critics say the document, titled “Wyss Foundation Democracy Strategy Discussion Memo,” provides clear evidence the group was violating this law, with the DNC’s participation and knowledge.

Markay writes, “The document details the scope of Democratic efforts to boost grassroots organizing, and sheds light on how some of the left’s deepest pockets are facilitating those efforts through nonprofit vehicles generally restricted to charitable activity.”

Wyss himself, as a foreign national, is also legally banned from any federal or state political donations — a rule he’d allegedly violated up to 30 times in a nine-year period, according to The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Wyss has also has ties to Clinton, and had previously given between $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation. Additionally, “Wyss’ now-defunct HJW Foundation previously employed Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, who received $87,083 from the group in 2013 for consulting services,” according to Markay.

— The Horn editorial team

Big Bass

I am not surprised.

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

How does that differ from the elected in office versus those trying to obtain an office?

Pokyjoe

A little fraud never hurt the Democratic party.when Kennedy won over Nixon a new record was set Chicago politics, as more dead people v**ed than ever before. Same thing happened in parts of Texas where Johnson had a lot of followers.
S0 LET THE GAMES BEGIN!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pokyjoe

I don't see where wealth should be a disqualify anybody after all George Washington was very very well-off. Kennedy never missed a meal.
Where would a poor man get 2-3billion to run a campaign, he'd be bought and paid for just Hillary. "it would be difficult for him to be quite as dishonest as she".

buffalo Loc: Texas

Proof that e******ns are not won, they are bought.