Little Ball of H**e wrote:
I would recommenced a .40 cal over a 357. Same stopping power. Smaller package.
I'm looking at one right now~~the Glock 23 GEN4 in .40..Excellent design, compact and very light, even tho its a large mag capacity...dual recoil spring with a reversible mag catch, which my friend says is changeable in seconds...I like it very much....BUTT, I've got my Rugar 9mm that is also sawwweeetttt, and much in common to the .40, although I do think there is some difference in the recoil, or at least I felt there was??
Isn't the round capacity of the .40 less than the 9mm and certainly the .357 too, or am I mistaken???
lindajoy wrote:
I'm looking at one right now~~the Glock 23 GEN4 in .40..Excellent design, compact and very light, even tho its a large mag capacity...dual recoil spring with a reversible mag catch, which my friend says is changeable in seconds...I like it very much....BUTT, I've got my Rugar 9mm that is also sawwweeetttt, and much in common to the .40, although I do think there is some difference in the recoil, or at least I felt there was??
Isn't the round capacity of the .40 less than the 9mm and certainly the .357 too, or am I mistaken???
I'm looking at one right now~~the Glock 23 GEN4 in... (
show quote)
Does it matter? If you require more than two or three rounds, then you in trouble.
Little Ball of H**e wrote:
Does it matter? If you require more than two or three rounds, then you in trouble.
That would be a correct statement Mr. smart as*, but if more than one involved it may come in handy, right??? brat~~
I was just pointing out the little fact that if you need THAT many rounds, then you're probably in a situation where you are gonna die. In which case, it doesn't matter how many rounds you have. But, the more ammo you have, the more of the bastards you can send to hell.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.