Should people too dangerous to buy guns or fly to be allowed to visit a school, church, hospital, or football stadium?
Jun 19, 2016 23:05:36 #
That's the problem with solutions that are political and not practical. They don't work because they're not intended to work. They're intended to cover a politician's ass.
If a guy is too dangerous to fly or purchase a gun, he shouldn't be around my kids....
If a guy is too dangerous to fly or purchase a gun, he shouldn't be around my kids....
Jun 19, 2016 23:57:38 #
Super Dave wrote:
That's the problem with solutions that are political and not practical. They don't work because they're not intended to work. They're intended to cover a politician's ass.
If a guy is too dangerous to fly or purchase a gun, he shouldn't be around my kids....
If a guy is too dangerous to fly or purchase a gun, he shouldn't be around my kids....
Amen!
Politicians are the most slime ball of them all!
Jun 20, 2016 00:14:04 #
Super Dave wrote:
That's the problem with solutions that are political and not practical. They don't work because they're not intended to work. They're intended to cover a politician's ass.
If a guy is too dangerous to fly or purchase a gun, he shouldn't be around my kids....
If a guy is too dangerous to fly or purchase a gun, he shouldn't be around my kids....
Oh, they can't get a big victory so are looking to get it anywhere they can. Doesn't look like it's going to pass so irrelevant anyway...
Jun 20, 2016 05:10:02 #
PeterS wrote:
The no-fly list is still here.Oh, they can't get a big victory so are looking to get it anywhere they can. Doesn't look like it's going to pass so irrelevant anyway...
I'm fine with keeping dangerous people off of airplanes. But not so fine with them h*****g out at my kid's football game.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.