Scientists Turn Carbon Dioxide Emissions to Stone: http://www.seeker.com/scientists-turn-carbon-dioxide-emissions-to-stone-1851588611.html?sf28432175=1...

Little Ball of Hate

http://www.seeker.com/scientists-turn-carbon-dioxide-emissions-to-stone-1851588611.html?sf28432175=1

bahmer

Little Ball of H**e wrote:

http://www.seeker.com/scientists-turn-carbon-dioxide-emissions-to-stone-1851588611.html?sf28432175=1

The coal miners should be happy now.

Little Ball of Hate

bahmer wrote:

The coal miners should be happy now.

Why is that? Do you really think the powers that be will ever use this technology? There is nothing in it for them. It won't allow them to oppress coal miners, or control the population with burdensome regulations.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Little Ball of H**e wrote:

http://www.seeker.com/scientists-turn-carbon-dioxide-emissions-to-stone-1851588611.html?sf28432175=1

Ball,

Darn good article, interesting post....

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

permafrost wrote:

Ball,

Darn good article, interesting post....

Gosh, After reading your next entry, I wonder why you bothered to post it... No, save the environment is not a power grab or an attempt to suppress the masses..

Little Ball of Hate

permafrost wrote:

Gosh, After reading your next entry, I wonder why you bothered to post it... No, save the environment is not a power grab or an attempt to suppress the masses..

That's your opinion. I am not so trusting of our government. There is too much history for that.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Little Ball of H**e wrote:

That's your opinion. I am not so trusting of our government. There is too much history for that.

I'm with ya! Which science do we deny? The science that says it's hot, and we're all going to die; or the science that says there is no warming, and the polar ice caps are growing??
Doesn't matter what you say. You deny science!!
Unless, of course, you are talking about chicks with dicks...

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

archie bunker wrote:

I'm with ya! Which science do we deny? The science that says it's hot, and we're all going to die; or the science that says there is no warming, and the polar ice caps are growing??
Doesn't matter what you say. You deny science!!
Unless, of course, you are talking about chicks with dicks...

He, he, he,......Yea, you go big fella

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

archie bunker wrote:

I'm with ya! Which science do we deny? The science that says it's hot, and we're all going to die; or the science that says there is no warming, and the polar ice caps are growing??
Doesn't matter what you say. You deny science!!
Unless, of course, you are talking about chicks with dicks...

You make a lot of sense out of the t***h of it all..The Earth is going to do what the Earth does and has some 5 billion years now...

This idea is very good in helping to purify our air as we should do to preserve and protect..It will not however, stop the natural course of what the earth does, period..

I'm with little on what government will or will not do..This capturing of CO2, in this format could be a money maker for sure or it "could expose the t***h of what CO2 really does and does not do"...Think forestry, ocean, land mass to people percentage etc...

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

lindajoy wrote:

You make a lot of sense out of the t***h of it all... (show quote)

Another concept I wish the warmers would grasp is that if America would cut it's carbon footprint to zero, the world impact would be negligible. If they need to point the finger, China and India would be a great start, but of course Gotebana Energy Inc. doesn't sell product to them.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

lindajoy wrote:

You make a lot of sense out of the t***h of it all... (show quote)

I apologize for shifting gears but what do you think about the State Dept. saying Hillary is a liar b cause her emails were clearly coded as to level of secrecy, some paragraph by paragraph. Game changer?

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Docadhoc wrote:

Another concept I wish the warmers would grasp is that if America would cut it's carbon footprint to zero, the world impact would be negligible. If they need to point the finger, China and India would be a great start, but of course Gotebana Energy Inc. doesn't sell product to them.

China and India need to think "protect our Earth, its all we have", but even in them doing so, as you point out, percentage wise it would not change what the Earth does..I look at the warming cycles as the Earths way of ridden itself of heat, so it doesn't "explode" and the cooling to bring it back where it is most functional..Elementary I know, but when you read all or a bunch of the literature on this, is that not exactly what it is doing, without all the big words???????

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Docadhoc wrote:

I apologize for shifting gears but what do you think about the State Dept. saying Hillary is a liar b cause her emails were clearly coded as to level of secrecy, some paragraph by paragraph. Game changer?

Dangitttttttttttt, Doc, I had not heard of it??? I am going to see what's out there on it tho...BO must be fuming or said let it rip!!!!

Holy smokes~~Don't want to take away from the posters thread so I'll just post these and go find another thread to shove down someones throat~~lolol
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/06/01/even-lefty-politifact-calls-hillary-a-liar-over-email-s**m/

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-goldberg-clinton-email-20160528-story.html

bahmer

lindajoy wrote:

Dangitttttttttttt, Doc, I had not heard of it??? I am going to see what's out there on it tho...BO must be fuming or said let it rip!!!!

Holy smokes~~Don't want to take away from the posters thread so I'll just post these and go find another thread to shove down someones throat~~lolol
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/06/01/even-lefty-politifact-calls-hillary-a-liar-over-email-s**m/

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-goldberg-clinton-email-20160528-story.html

If it was you or I instead of Hillary we would already be wearing an orange jumpsuit and looking between bars.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

lindajoy wrote:

China and India need to think "protect our Earth, its all we have", but even in them doing so, as you point out, percentage wise it would not change what the Earth does..I look at the warming cycles as the Earths way of ridden itself of heat, so it doesn't "explode" and the cooling to bring it back where it is most functional..Elementary I know, but when you read all or a bunch of the literature on this, is that not exactly what it is doing, without all the big words???????

You are correct. What I'm saying is that if the warmers in charge were really concerned they would be taking a hard line with the biggest offenders, but the reason they don't is that they aren't concerned and thete is no money in it for Barry and Al, whom I call Gorebama Energy Inc.

The earth is still.young and will survive. Eventually man may not, but earth will continue to cycle as it always has and no one can change that.

I was involved in a 12 year long research project exploring alternate energy sources. It was amazing to say the least. Suffice it to say, the conclusion was to go to fusion reactors. Extremely safe, much cheaper to build and operate, and such little radiation threat that 6' of dirt is more than enough sheilding. The hurdle is achieving the temperature necessary to begin the reaction.

Argon Ntl. Lab in Batavia, IL has been working on it since the 1970s but still hasn't reached critical temp. In time they will.