One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Another stupid republican idea that didn't work
Page <<first <prev 12 of 12
Nov 13, 2013 20:26:14   #
VladimirPee
 
What did Hillary accomplish? Name her success as Secretary of State? Name one major diplomatic success? N Korea? Iran? Middle East?

GOP does not bean count. We have brilliant females in our party not the Bull D**es the Dems have. Debbie Wasserman Schultz must be the dumbest female in America. Maxine Waters is not far behind.


Poco624 wrote:
Oh, I just love it. Just keep on believing what you do. I know that only 23% of the House GOPer's want more women in Congress and in the 113th Congress they only have 19, and only 4 in the Senate. However, the Democrats have 62 women in Congress and 16 in the Senate.

I know that the rightwing Christians do not believe women need to know anything about government, in fact they are known to carry their wives around the house just to show them who is boss. Yep, in the 21st Century, there men who still think that women belong in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant.

Hillary Clinton was excellent in all areas, as a matter of fact, those New Jersey Democrats who v**ed for Chris Christie will v**e for Hillary Clinton.
Oh, I just love it. Just keep on believing what yo... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 17, 2013 13:04:11   #
Will I am Loc: Tucson, Arizona
 
Jussick,
You obviously have a problem with handouts, and an even bigger problem with the Feds handing out your tax money, which is also making your dollars worth less and less. As it seems like you read in my previous writing, I agree.
BUT--
When are the v**ers going to realize the establishment, who made the economy bad, the dollar worth less, and are taking away our liberties/freedom, are not in anyway going to fix anything, but are going to keep on digging us into a deeper hole?

Reply
Nov 17, 2013 13:23:15   #
TroubleshooterTim Loc: People's Republic of Oregon
 
Poco624 wrote:
Like Hillary Clinton said, the right can't handle facts. And since Hillary Clinton is a very intelligent lady she also says that went presented with facts they still run with their original lie. You just proved that. No one pays me, and that was a very stupid thing to ask.


Hillary has a real problem with the t***h.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/hillarys_list_of_lies.html

Reply
 
 
Dec 20, 2013 12:16:49   #
Will I am Loc: Tucson, Arizona
 
BoJester wrote:
So many of the teabag geniuses that routinely post their vile h**e and stupidity about a variety of subjects they nothing about, probably will complain about the source, a very rightwingnut rag.

All of the major players mentioned, reagan, ginrich, thompson and bush, were instrumental in screwing the taxpayer and benefitting big business like Walmart and McDonald's.
Only the very stupid fail to realize low wages require more social programs.
Yet these same i***ts will cry and whine and handwring and soil their depends, whenever the debt and deficit is mentioned as being driven by so-called entitlements.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/3/welfare-to-work-law-encourages-low-wages-increases/?page=all#pagebreak
So many of the teabag geniuses that routinely post... (show quote)


No, only those who think the government should take care of people who can not take care of themselves actually think there should be "social programs".
Churches, charity organizations, and even family members or friends should be taking care of those in need. There is nothing written about "social programs" in the Constitution.
In this capitalist trade market, the companies would deal with less employees if they could not pay the "low wages". The capitalistic machine will make everything more expensive when production becomes more expensive (through higher wages). When things are more expensive, those who are at the bottom of the ladder, have to survive with less. It is a circle, that giving anyone more effects everyone round and round, and when the government is involved, the Federal debt becomes part of the circle and grows.
Just because you have good intentions and good hearts, does not make it ok for those with fixed incomes. In fact, you could say that fixed incomes become broken incomes. I am not crying or whining, but trying to show you some logic, but I am already aware that Democratic or liberal minds operate on emotions rather than logic.

Reply
Dec 20, 2013 14:26:21   #
joe1941
 
Will I am wrote:
No, only those who think the government should take care of people who can not take care of themselves actually think there should be "social programs".
Churches, charity organizations, and even family members or friends should be taking care of those in need. There is nothing written about "social programs" in the Constitution.
In this capitalist trade market, the companies would deal with less employees if they could not pay the "low wages". The capitalistic machine will make everything more expensive when production becomes more expensive (through higher wages). When things are more expensive, those who are at the bottom of the ladder, have to survive with less. It is a circle, that giving anyone more effects everyone round and round, and when the government is involved, the Federal debt becomes part of the circle and grows.
Just because you have good intentions and good hearts, does not make it ok for those with fixed incomes. In fact, you could say that fixed incomes become broken incomes. I am not crying or whining, but trying to show you some logic, but I am already aware that Democratic or liberal minds operate on emotions rather than logic.
No, only those who think the government should tak... (show quote)


I love your response! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Page <<first <prev 12 of 12
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.