Friday, Nov.1, 2013 - CNN Exposed, by Amber Lyon - Why would CNN or CNNi refuse to air the "Nick Robertson Report" with Muhammed Al Zawahiri (brother of Ayman Al Zawahiri) that clearly shows the Egyptian uprising was 100% in response to his call for protests for release of the blind Sheik on 9-11? Why would "the most trusted name in news" hide the report showing the t***h and instead allow the false narratives to be sold, by them, to the American e*****rate?
Amber Lyon provided the answers when she reported that CNN never aired the Nick Robertson report in Egypt because it completely contradicted president Obama and Hillary Clinton's assertions. In short, the Robertson report, if aired, would have proved the Obama and Clinton were lying.
The Nick Robertson report was filmed on 9-11-12, the exact morning of the Cairo embassy protest, and, by coincidence, it would have aired at the exact moment Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama began attributing the Egyptian embassy protest to a "U-tube video," a U-tube video the U.S. Cairo embassy was unaware of until 9-9-12.
CNN's refusal to air the real reasoning for the Egyptian embassy protest turned assault was intentional protection of President Obama, specifically orchestrated by the CNN News group, at the behest of the White House. So this was specific, intentional lying that the CNN News has a history of doing.
carolyn wrote:
Friday, Nov.1, 2013 - CNN Exposed, by Amber Lyon - Why would CNN or CNNi refuse to air the "Nick Robertson Report" with Muhammed Al Zawahiri (brother of Ayman Al Zawahiri) that clearly shows the Egyptian uprising was 100% in response to his call for protests for release of the blind Sheik on 9-11? Why would "the most trusted name in news" hide the report showing the t***h and instead allow the false narratives to be sold, by them, to the American e*****rate?
Amber Lyon provided the answers when she reported that CNN never aired the Nick Robertson report in Egypt because it completely contradicted president Obama and Hillary Clinton's assertions. In short, the Robertson report, if aired, would have proved the Obama and Clinton were lying.
The Nick Robertson report was filmed on 9-11-12, the exact morning of the Cairo embassy protest, and, by coincidence, it would have aired at the exact moment Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama began attributing the Egyptian embassy protest to a "U-tube video," a U-tube video the U.S. Cairo embassy was unaware of until 9-9-12.
CNN's refusal to air the real reasoning for the Egyptian embassy protest turned assault was intentional protection of President Obama, specifically orchestrated by the CNN News group, at the behest of the White House. So this was specific, intentional lying that the CNN News has a history of doing.
Friday, Nov.1, 2013 - CNN Exposed, by Amber Lyon -... (
show quote)
and let's not forget that both hillary and obummer's involvement in bengazi
Like I have said before,,,, I spent 2011-2012 in Afghanistan and the Middle East,,,,
If like the liar in chief said yesterday that he has "created or saved" 7 Million jobs,,, by his magic manipulation of the economy with lowered deficits(!?!)
Then using the same skewed math we must consider the following:
1. We are still in Iraq
2. We are still in Afghanistan
3. We are in Egypt, Lybia, Africa
4. We sent troops into Syria in 2012, (cause I worked on the t***sportation docs called a TPFD 'tip-fid' that sent the first army infantry bn into Syria)
So,,, as far as we all know,,, that makes 6 wars saved or created,,,,and this guy got a nobel peace prize???
pixie wrote:
and let's not forget that both hillary and obummer's involvement in bengazi
pixie wrote:
and let's not forget that both hillary and obummer's involvement in bengazi
And for heaven's sake not forget that Hillary got on National TV and admitted her involvement. Then she was allowed to "step down" so as to not hurt her play for the presidency in 2016. AND WE ALLOWED HER TO DO THIS WITH VERY MINIMUM OUTCRY.
My working life was spent in Accounting. I continue to see confusion about
the difference between the words DEBT and DEFICIT.
Deficits relate to a proposed budget, i.e. this is what I plan to spend. This is how you decrease a deficit - I originally planned to spend $10, however, I have now decided to spend $5. Voila, an instant deficit reduction of $5.
A Debt never goes away until you pay REAL money to pay it back to whoever or wherever you borrowed it from. It is a loan with interest due.
And isn't a debt a compilation of all the deficits?
Realistic Rhoda wrote:
My working life was spent in Accounting. I continue to see confusion about
the difference between the words DEBT and DEFICIT.
Deficits relate to a proposed budget, i.e. this is what I plan to spend. This is how you decrease a deficit - I originally planned to spend $10, however, I have now decided to spend $5. Voila, an instant deficit reduction of $5.
A Debt never goes away until you pay REAL money to pay it back to whoever or wherever you borrowed it from. It is a loan with interest due.
My working life was spent in Accounting. I contin... (
show quote)
Not always. It depends on how accurate your budget process is and if
the budget was overloaded with unnecessary dollars. In Washington they have a tendency to do that so that they can then say....see we cut the
budget. You would never get away with that game in the business world.
Sorry for being ignorant about accounting stuff,,, but what happens and what is happening in your opinion when the Pres/Senate/House actually pass NO budget? And is that really what has happened? Or not?
Realistic Rhoda wrote:
Not always. It depends on how accurate your budget process is and if
the budget was overloaded with unnecessary dollars. In Washington they have a tendency to do that so that they can then say....see we cut the
budget. You would never get away with that game in the business world.
When they don't have a budget, they just spend, spend, and overspend
They remind me of people who live on credit by maxing out every one
of their cards. Then they wonder why they lose their credit and their
credit ratings drop down to below 200. Budgets are guidelines that are supposed to be good estimates of what income will be for a given year and the expenses that are budgeted for should equal the income that will be received. When living within a budget at the Federal level, the choices should be cut spending or find another source of income. Borrowing is not a good source of income because it has to be paid back. The Federal Reserve has been printing what I call Monopoly Money. Actually, it has caused the value of a dollar to decrease. Some manufacturers, particularly in the food industry, are decreasing the weight per package but charging the same price. Eventually, the house of cards will collapse.
Hey thanks for the great gouge,,,,much appreciated
Realistic Rhoda wrote:
When they don't have a budget, they just spend, spend, and overspend
They remind me of people who live on credit by maxing out every one
of their cards. Then they wonder why they lose their credit and their
credit ratings drop down to below 200. Budgets are guidelines that are supposed to be good estimates of what income will be for a given year and the expenses that are budgeted for should equal the income that will be received. When living within a budget at the Federal level, the choices should be cut spending or find another source of income. Borrowing is not a good source of income because it has to be paid back. The Federal Reserve has been printing what I call Monopoly Money. Actually, it has caused the value of a dollar to decrease. Some manufacturers, particularly in the food industry, are decreasing the weight per package but charging the same price. Eventually, the house of cards will collapse.
When they don't have a budget, they just spend, sp... (
show quote)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.