Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)

To all on the Left or even sceptical Right please don't take anyone's word for any of this, get off your lazy backsides and do some research on the B******i questions & issues... Look into weapons t***sfers to Syria (Fast & Furious Islamic style) being shipped out of B******i, this happened in September was Obama and ultimately Hillary worried about November e******n??? Why was additional security denied when requested by Ambassador Stevens, and why the stand down order from CIA compound to Embassy Grounds??? Much to look into IF you want the t***h about Obama & Hillary's culpability??? Don D.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Highly plausible.. Something BIG was going on to let them die... "Okie Don"

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Dereliction of Duty

Robert Mullally Posted On Jun 1, 2016

Hi. I believe that the unsecured emails from Hillary's private server were being intercepted by the B******i terrorists, and [they] knew more what was going on at the B******i Compound, faster, than any of the American CIA.

I'm not sure if the head of the CIA, John Brennan, had converted to Islam yet, but it would be interesting to find-out the date he converted. And the only person who could give a legitimate "stand-down" order is the highest rated or ranked superior, "IN-THE-LOOP." "BHB" was "in-the-loop," and therefore the only person able to give the legitimate "stand-down" command.

No ifs ands or buts. When the commander in chief is directly infused into the action [by presence or audio and/or video], NO other officer is more senior, and NO other less-senior officer can override the commands of a more senior officer. Simple.

And you wonder why "BHB" "got the hell outta' Dodge," bright and early the next morning for a "fundraiser." Hummmmmmm.

And Ambassador Stevens most probably walked-in on an illegal [t*****rous] American weapons exchange to the al Qaeda and Taliban, the enemy; and his fate was sealed. NO other, [especially patriotic military] "prying-eyes" could be a living witness to the t*****rous American arms exchange to the enemy!!!

Not to worry, soon all the American troops would be removed from Iraq, and the weapons exchanges could be given directly to ISIS in Iraq, with NO "prying-eyes;" exactly where they would be used to take back Iraq from the damn American "Imperialists."

And the weapons could be on a much bigger scale; tanks, halftracks, troop-t***sporters, armored jeeps, Humvees; and of course the usual latest technologically advanced American weaponry, ammo and explosive; right from Sunni of Iraq to Sunni of ISIS; from "Sunni" POTUS.

And no more taking stupid chances in the exposed [stonewalled] B******i!!!

And now trillions - that's TRILLION$ of dollar$, with a "T," TRILLION$ of DOLLAR$ worth of the most advanced American military equipment in the world could be exchanged to ISIS with American patriotic eyes trying to sue, investigate and indict about 23 other "scandals" being perpetrated by the "enemy within."

GREAT BIG PLUS for Islamic Terrorists, Worldwide. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE???

****************************************************************

Dennis Fitzsimmons MD Posted On Tuesday, May 31, 2016

ARE THERE ANY HONEST POLITICIANS?

________________________________


Colonel Phil "Hands" Handley is credited with the highest-speed air-to-air gun k**l in the history of aerial combat. He flew operationally for all but 11 months of a 26-year career, in aircraft such as the F-86 Sabre, F-15 Eagle, and the C-130A Hercules.

Additionally, he flew 275 combat missions during two tours in Southeast Asia in the F- 4D and F-4E. His awards include 21 Air Medals, 3 Distinguished Flying Crosses, and the Silver Star.

Here is what Col. Handley wrote in response to Panetta and Dempsey claims there was no time to send help to B******i.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Betrayal in B******i by Phil "Hands" Handley Colonel, USAF (Ret.)

The combat code of the US Military is that we don't abandon our dead or wounded on the battlefield. In US Air Force lingo, fighter pilots don't run off and leave their wingmen. If one of our own is shot down, still alive and not yet in enemy captivity, we will either come to get him or die trying.

Among America’s fighting forces, the calm, sure knowledge that such an irrevocable bond exists is priceless. Along with individual faith and personal grit, it is a sacred trust that has often sustained hope in the face of terribly long odds.

The disgraceful abandonment of our Ambassador and those brave ex-SEALs who fought to their deaths to save others in that compound is nothing short of dereliction of duty.

Additionally, the patently absurd cover-up scenario that was fabricated in the aftermath was an outright lie in an attempt to shield the President and the Secretary of State from responsibility.

It has been over three years since the attack on our compound in B******i. The White House strategy, with the aid of a "lap dog" press has been to run out the clock before the t***h is forthcoming.

The testimonies of the three "whistleblowers" have reopened the subject and hopefully will lead to exposure and disgrace of those responsible for this embarrassing debacle. It would appear that the most recent firewall which the Administration is counting on is the contention "that there were simply no military assets that could be brought to bear in time to make a difference" mainly due to the unavailability of tanker support for fighter aircraft.

This is simply BS, regardless how many supposed "experts" the Administration trot out to make such an assertion.

The bottom line is that even if the closest asset capable of response was halfway around the world, you don't just sit on your penguin ass and do nothing.

The fact is that the closest asset was not halfway around the world, but as near as Aviano Air Base, Italy where two squadrons of F-16Cs are based.

Consider the following scenario (all times B******i local): When Hicks in Tripoli receives a call at 9:40 PM from Ambassador Stevens informing him ”Greg, we are under attack!" (his last words), Hicks immediately notifies all agencies and prepares for the immediate initiation of an existing ”Emergency Response Plan."

At AFRICON, General Carter Ham attempts to mount a rescue effort, but is told to "stand down". By 10:30 PM an unarmed drone is overhead the compound and streaming live feed to various "Command and Control Agencies" so everyone watching that feed knew damn well what was going on.

At 11:30 PM Doherty and five others leave Tripoli, arriving in B******i at 1:30 AM on Wednesday morning, where they hold off the attacking mob from the roof of the compound until they are k**led by a direct mortar hit at 4:00 AM.

So nothing could have been done, eh? Nonsense. If one assumes that tanker support really "was not available" what about this: When at 10:00 PMAFRICON alerts the 31st TFW Command Post in Aviano Air Base, Italy of the attack, the Wing Commander orders pr********n for the launch of two F-16s and advises the Command Post at NAS Sigonella to prepare for hot pit refueling and quick turn of the jets.

By 11:30 PM, two F-16Cs with drop tanks and each armed with five hundred 20 MM rounds are airborne. Flying at 0.92 mach they will cover the 522 nautical miles directly to NAS Sigonella in 1.08 hours. While en route, the flight lead is informed of the tactical situation, rules of engagement, and radio frequencies to use.

The jets depart Sigonella at 1:10 AM with full fuel load and cover the 377 nautical miles directly to B******i in 0.8 hours, arriving at 1:50 AM which would be 20 minutes after the arrival of Woods, Doherty and their team.

Provided that the two F-16s' initial pass over the mob, in full afterburner at 200 feet and 550 knots, did not stop the attack in its tracks, a few well-placed strafing runs on targets of opportunity would assuredly do the trick.

Were the F-16s fuel state insufficient to return to Sigonelli after jettisoning their external drop tanks, they could easily do so at Tripoli International Airport, only half an hour away.

As for those hand-wringing naysayers who would worry about IFR clearances, border crossing authority, collateral damage, landing rights, political correctness and dozens of other reasons not to act -- screw them. It is time our "leadership" get its priorities straight and put America's interests first.

The end result would be that Woods and Doherty would be alive. Dozens in the attacking rabble would be rendezvousing with "72 virgins" and a clear message would have been sent to the next worthless POS terrorist contemplating an attack on Americans that it is not really a good idea to "tug" on Superman's cape.

Of course, all this depends on a Commander In Chief more concerned with saving the lives of those he put in harm's way than getting his crew rested for a campaign fund raising event in Las Vegas the next day. It also depends on a Secretary of State who actually understood "What difference did it make?", and a Secretary of Defense who was watching the feed from the drone and understood what the attack consisted of instead of making an immediate response that "One of the military tenets is that you don't commit assets until you fully understand the tactical situation."

Ultimately it comes down to the question of who gave that order to stand down? Whoever that coward(s) turns out to be should be exposed, removed from office, and face criminal charges for dereliction of duty. The combat forces of the United States of America deserve leadership that really does "have their back" when the chips are down.

FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE ACTUALLY TAKEN THE TIME TO READ THIS, DO ONE THING FOR ME AND FORWARD IT!

TO AVOID HAVING THIS HAPPEN AGAIN, WHOEVER GAVE THE "STAND DOWN" ORDER NEEDS TO BE EXPOSED!