missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Go Ice Fishing…

How do you settle a p**********l e******n when the v**e is too close to call?
With an ice fishing contest, of course!

After the first round of v**es were counted, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were deadlocked.

Instead of going through a recount, the two agreed to a week-long ice fishing contest to settle the e******n. Whoever caught the most fish at the end of the week would be the President.

The candidates decided a remote frozen lake in northern Wisconsin would be the ideal place. No observers on the fishing grounds, but both candidates would need to have their catches verified and counted each night at 5pm.

After Day 1, Trump returned with a total of 10 fish, Hillary came back with nothing.

Day 2 finished, and Trump caught another 20 fish, but Hillary once again came back with nothing!

That night, Hillary and her cronies got together and accused Trump of being a “low-life, c***tin’ son-of-a-gun.” Instead of fishing on Day 3, they were just going to follow Trump to spy on him and figure out how he was c***ting.

Day 3 finished up and Trump had an incredible day, adding 50 fish to his total!

That night, Hillary and her buddies got together for the full report on how Donald was c***ting. Hillary stood up to give her report and said, “You are not going to believe this, he’s cutting holes in the ice!”

Robert Wilson Loc: Texas

Robert Wilson Loc: Texas

[quote=missinglink]Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Go Ice Fishing…

How do you settle a p**********l e******n when the v**e is too close to call?
With an ice fishing contest, of course!

After the first round of v**es were counted, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were deadlocked.

Instead of going through a recount, the two agreed to a week-long ice fishing contest to settle the e******n. Whoever caught the most fish at the end of the week would be the President.

The candidates decided a remote frozen lake in northern Wisconsin would be the ideal place. No observers on the fishing grounds, but both candidates would need to have their catches verified and counted each night at 5pm. Hillary was fishing for SUCKERS.

After Day 1, Trump returned with a total of 10 fish, Hillary came back with nothing.

Day 2 finished, and Trump caught another 20 fish, but Hillary once again came back with nothing!

That night, Hillary and her cronies got together and accused Trump of being a “low-life, c***tin’ son-of-a-gun.” Instead of fishing on Day 3, they were just going to follow Trump to spy on him and figure out how he was c***ting.

Day 3 finished up and Trump had an incredible day, adding 50 fish to his total!

That night, Hillary and her buddies got together for the full report on how Donald was c***ting. Hillary stood up to give her report and said, “You are not going to believe this, he’s cutting holes in the ice!”[/qu HILLARY WAS FISHING FOR SUCKERS.

donald41 Loc: puyallup Wa

It is so funny, the best part to me is it could be true, If the contest would happen that is.

MarvinSussman

I have a better one:

The US gummint wants a lot of stuff for the next year so it gives the public sector a LOT of money to make the stuff. By the end of the year, all the stuff is delivered. The public sector uses the money to make the stuff and used its income to satisfy its needs and also to start new enterprises and do some commerce.

After the stuff is all delivered, the gummint says to the public sector:

"You remember all that money I gave you to make that stuff? Well, I see that you put about 5% of it into your savings accounts. That was a good idea! Tell you what l will do, I will auction off some risk-free, interest-bearing bonds that you can use for trade collateral, bank reserves, pension funds, etc. That will be a store of wealth that you will need. That’s the only way you can accumulate wealth for the future.

“And you sent another 7% of the money to China so I will make the same offer to them so they will have trade collateral. That will help maintain the status of the US dollar as a reserve currency, which simplifies trade and reduces import prices.

That 12% is money I could have taxed with the other 88% but you need that money more than I do. I can print all I need.

"Now about that 88% of the budget that you still have, I want it back because if I let you keep it, you will go hog-wild and overspend and cause inflation. So send that 88% back. Now! Or else -"

The liberal hears that and says: "Ouch! But I guess it's a reasonable request. I will pay my taxes and enjoy the savings."

The conservative hears that and says: "Gummint, you need the money more than we do. Take all of it back! We don’t need savings. Just reduce our taxes so we won’t have savings. And cut back on the spending. We can do without the infrastructure."

LIBERAL: Wait! We need that infrastructure for our grandchildren! And the unemployed need those construction jobs. And the economy needs their spending. And we do need the savings.

CONSERVATIVE: Those lazy unemployed people ought to look for other jobs. If the gummint does all that spending, it will get too big. I want a small gummint. And if the gummint sells all those bonds, it will have too much debt.

LIBERAL: That debt is our wealth! How can we have too much wealth? The gummint can’t possibly have a debt problem. When a bond matures, the Treasury just sends a check that never bounces. The only cost to the gummint is the interest.

CONSERVATIVE: But if the debt gets real big and the interest rate goes up, the budget will explode.

LIBERAL: The interest rate won't go up if we have a lot of wealth and everybody bids for bonds, raises the bid price, and lowers the interest rate. The gummint just has to make its deficit spending as big as what we save and what we send to China. There is no problem as long as the GDP growth rate is greater than the debt interest rate which will stay low as long as we grow wealthy and spend and keep the GDP growth rate high.

CONSERVATIVE: Well, I have to live within my means and so does the gummint. I can't spend more than my income and neither can the gummint. We need a Constitutional amendment to enforce a balanced budget.


LIBERAL: But the gummint does not depend on income. The Constitution lets the gummint spend without limit. We get taxed only to prevent inflation. And if the gummint takes all the money back, the money supply will lose the amount we save and send to China every year. Eventually, that will cause deflation and recessions.

Wouldn't it be better to use the deficit for infrastructure for our grandchildren and fix the bridges before they fall into the river and get full employment and prosperity and put an end to poverty and empty the prisons and increase our wealth for retirement?

CONSERVATIVE: But with full employment and empty prisons and prosperity forever, Those People will become middle class and get uppity. No way! Gummint! Please don't leave money on the table! Wh**ever you spend, take it all back! We need that amendment for a balanced budget.

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

It appears the resident i***t never sleeps. It is always around proving the old adage of; 'An i***t's name is like an i***t's face, it can be found in any old place'.

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

I just tread this.
That saying is hilarious .
I'm stealing it.

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

I just read this.
That saying is hilarious .
I'm stealing it.

Robert Wilson Loc: Texas

A-h-h-h-h, such intelligence! I happened to be the CEO, of GRITS INC, and am in dire need of an economics professor to help count grits--INTERESTED? Send your reesimaye to; TRUE GRITS, PO BOX 007, CALCUTTA INDIA.( Must be available to relocate.)

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

He is laughable isn't he? Also a pathetic Marxist. They never learn that Marxism has always failed and will always fail.

MarvinSussman

You must be lost. This is an echo chamber for right wing and/or religion nuts.

I use it to test arguments. If I can convince a moron, it's a good argument.

Morons make up half our population. Most of them have kindergarten brains. They answer facts and logic with invective and think they are brilliant.

I will be 93 next August and only have engineering and math degrees.

Probably could not count grits. Sorry

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Got to send this one out to my friends...

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Well then, considering you are here utilizing the "ego chamber" talking about your degrees etc, you must be talking to yourself as well, or for yourself, yes??

93, congratulations, very nice.... (no sarcasm meant)

MarvinSussman

Just turning down an offer for which I lacked the specified doc. I Never soliloquize because its more fun confounding morons.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Dang, Marvin, I do and even answer myself..Still argue with me too...