One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Here is one from Judicial Watch that leaners won't like at all. . . .
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
May 27, 2016 02:20:29   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
. . . . that is those who take the trouble to read it. Most really don't even know that JW is after those people in the courts. The bag of lawyers at DOJ are very liable to lie about anything to maybe help out the Obama crowd.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2016/05/fed-judge-blasts-doj-lawyers-lying-court-defend-obama-amnesty/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Judicial%20Watch%20Tipsheet%2005-25-16%20(1)&utm_content=

Reply
May 27, 2016 02:53:30   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
oldroy wrote:
. . . . that is those who take the trouble to read it. Most really don't even know that JW is after those people in the courts. The bag of lawyers at DOJ are very liable to lie about anything to maybe help out the Obama crowd.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2016/05/fed-judge-blasts-doj-lawyers-lying-court-defend-obama-amnesty/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Judicial%20Watch%20Tipsheet%2005-25-16%20(1)&utm_content=


I already read this one. Despite the fact that lawyers are supposed to be so t***hful, the reality is a little different.

Reply
May 27, 2016 03:19:21   #
Little Ball of Hate
 
oldroy wrote:
. . . . that is those who take the trouble to read it. Most really don't even know that JW is after those people in the courts. The bag of lawyers at DOJ are very liable to lie about anything to maybe help out the Obama crowd.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2016/05/fed-judge-blasts-doj-lawyers-lying-court-defend-obama-amnesty/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Judicial%20Watch%20Tipsheet%2005-25-16%20(1)&utm_content=


How does that song go? K**l all the lawyers...K**l 'em tonight. Something like that.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2016 05:46:56   #
sisboombaa
 
Having worked with or around attorneys over the years. I have had experience with about 150 (plus or minus). I can say there was only 4 that I had respect for both their morals and knowledge. What a sad comment. I am not an attorney if you're wondering.

Reply
May 27, 2016 05:47:52   #
okie don
 
Check History. I believe it was Amemdment 16 that prohibited any one of Nobility to England aka Esquires ( Attys or Lawyers) from being in a Govt position. 12 States had rarified it and THEY needed the 13th State. The War of 1812 broke out and the Amendment wasn't finalized and made part of our 'Gubment .
Had it been ratified no ' ambulance chaser' aka Atty or Esquire we be in DC.
FACT, got check it out !!!

GO TRUMP,
he's non'Ambulance chaser'.(:

Reply
May 27, 2016 05:49:39   #
okie don
 
Sorry I can't type or proofread but you get the 'drift' of what our founding forefathers wanted...

Reply
May 27, 2016 05:53:35   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
okie don wrote:
Sorry I can't type or proofread but you get the 'drift' of what our founding forefathers wanted...


It wasn't more than 60% of Congress who list their current or former profession as lawyer.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2016 06:34:07   #
snowbear37 Loc: MA.
 
The bane of this country: lawyers and politicians.

Reply
May 27, 2016 07:14:39   #
S. Maturin
 
oldroy wrote:
. . . . that is those who take the trouble to read it. Most really don't even know that JW is after those people in the courts. The bag of lawyers at DOJ are very liable to lie about anything to maybe help out the Obama crowd.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2016/05/fed-judge-blasts-doj-lawyers-lying-court-defend-obama-amnesty/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Judicial%20Watch%20Tipsheet%2005-25-16%20(1)&utm_content=


Judicial Watch... never mind how indebted we are to their efforts... think how grateful our children and grandchildren will be for them. No other organization is doing nearly so much good.

A completely priceless organization like that one comes along once in a lifetime--- if one's lucky.

Reply
May 27, 2016 07:50:26   #
Sons of Liberty Loc: look behind you!
 
Little Ball of H**e wrote:
How does that song go? K**l all the lawyers...K**l 'em tonight. Something like that.


...and a good one it is at that...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkg

Reply
May 27, 2016 08:00:33   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Loki wrote:
It wasn't more than 60% of Congress who list their current or former profession as lawyer.


I was thinking more like 80% or more.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2016 15:56:44   #
Little Ball of Hate
 
Sons of Liberty wrote:
...and a good one it is at that...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkg


He must have been thinking about liberals when he wrote those lyrics.

Reply
May 27, 2016 16:34:19   #
S. Maturin
 
Little Ball of H**e wrote:
He must have been thinking about liberals when he wrote those lyrics.


Yup, that would be something my liberal associates could benefit from hearing... naturally, they might hear, but they (typically) will not listen.

Self-determination & responsibility causes their beady little eyes to glaze.

Reply
May 27, 2016 17:14:27   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Loki wrote:
I already read this one. Despite the fact that lawyers are supposed to be so t***hful, the reality is a little different.


They did their lying on orders from the White House and the AG. Don't all lawyers lie when they get to court?

Reply
May 27, 2016 17:20:03   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
oldroy wrote:
They did their lying on orders from the White House and the AG. Don't all lawyers lie when they get to court?


There usually make ambiguous weaselly statements.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.