One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
VA/Republicans
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 26, 2016 23:47:32   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
US Senate Republicans Block Landmark Veterans Health Bill!

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-veterans-congress-idUSBREA1Q26O20140227

Reply
May 27, 2016 00:07:21   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
US Senate Republicans Block Landmark Veterans Health Bill!

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-veterans-congress-idUSBREA1Q26O20140227


I don't waste my time on biased commentary such as blogs. I will read a nationally accredited publication.

Reply
May 27, 2016 00:29:16   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
Veterans Groups Blast Republicans For K*****g a Bill to Support Veterans!

http://www.businessinsider.com/veterans-groups-gop-2014-2


bill horn wrote:
I don't waste my time on biased commentary such as blogs. I will read a nationally accredited publication.


http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-veterans-congress-idUSBREA1Q26O20140227

You must really enjoy making a complete fool of yourself, the url above says "article" not 'blog' r****d! And Reuters is accredited, more than than the right wing propaganda sites that you frequent!

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2016 00:44:25   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Veterans Groups Blast Republicans For K*****g a Bill to Support Veterans!

http://www.businessinsider.com/veterans-groups-gop-2014-2




http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-veterans-congress-idUSBREA1Q26O20140227

You must really enjoy making a complete fool of yourself, the url above says "article" not 'blog' r****d! And Reuters is accredited, more than than the right wing propaganda sites that you frequent!



Breaking news! New symbols for the dems and repbs!

A condom and a chastity belt!

Reply
May 27, 2016 00:45:19   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
bill horn wrote:
Breaking news! New symbols for the dems and repbs!

A condom and a chastity belt!


You'll need two!

Reply
May 27, 2016 02:13:43   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
I don't waste my time on biased commentary. I will read a nationally accredited publication.

Pronounced, ray lin
Popularity of the Name Raylan
Raylan is brand-spanking-new to the American male naming charts. He only first appeared in 2011 so we can hardly ascertain his staying-power just yet. The name entered the charts at position #701 which is an impressive first-time debut. American parents are most famous for outright name inventions, so this is just the latest example of a now long list. There’s no meaning behind the name Raylan which makes it a little ho-hum lackluster. But we get the attraction to its sound.

Reply
May 27, 2016 03:38:48   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
bill horn wrote:
I don't waste my time on biased commentary. I will read a nationally accredited publication.

Pronounced, ray lin
Popularity of the Name Raylan
Raylan is brand-spanking-new to the American male naming charts. He only first appeared in 2011 so we can hardly ascertain his staying-power just yet. The name entered the charts at position #701 which is an impressive first-time debut. American parents are most famous for outright name inventions, so this is just the latest example of a now long list. There’s no meaning behind the name Raylan which makes it a little ho-hum lackluster. But we get the attraction to its sound.
I don't waste my time on biased commentary. I will... (show quote)


His mammy and pappy named him Ray.

But he turned f*ggot when he grew up so he changed his name to Raylan.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2016 03:55:04   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
Your obsession with my moniker is quite childish, a pathetic attempt to upset myself, which only proves how juvenile you actually are! By the way, I am beyond reproach, especially from a person, as despicable as yourself.



bill horn wrote:
I don't waste my time on biased commentary. I will read a nationally accredited publication.

Pronounced, ray lin
Popularity of the Name Raylan
Raylan is brand-spanking-new to the American male naming charts. He only first appeared in 2011 so we can hardly ascertain his staying-power just yet. The name entered the charts at position #701 which is an impressive first-time debut. American parents are most famous for outright name inventions, so this is just the latest example of a now long list. There’s no meaning behind the name Raylan which makes it a little ho-hum lackluster. But we get the attraction to its sound.
I don't waste my time on biased commentary. I will... (show quote)

Reply
May 27, 2016 07:44:51   #
Cool Breeze
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
His mammy and pappy named him Ray.

But he turned f*ggot when he grew up so he changed his name to Raylan.


Why in your world anyone who display a degree of intelligence is probably a F*ggot although you fail to mention your mistress!



Reply
May 27, 2016 08:34:50   #
Mom8052 Loc: Lost in the mountains of New Mexico
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
US Senate Republicans Block Landmark Veterans Health Bill!

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-veterans-congress-idUSBREA1Q26O20140227


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Let's consider who put the bill on the Senate Floor, good ole' Bernie Sanders. Then MCconnell decided to add pork to the measure. This bill is needed, they have served their country, they should be given better healthcare than is given to the i******s coming into our country.

Reply
May 27, 2016 21:44:06   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Mom8052 wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Let's consider who put the bill on the Senate Floor, good ole' Bernie Sanders. Then MCconnell decided to add pork to the measure. This bill is needed, they have served their country, they should be given better healthcare than is given to the i******s coming into our country.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br Let's c... (show quote)


If I remember correctly, republican leadership concurred that vets need the help, but stated that this is no time to be adding to our debt load by passing bills loaded with unnecessary expenditures not aimed at providing for the target population.. namely our veterans.

I do not believe the caring left bothered to remove the pork or in any other way rewrite the bill to ensure its passage for our vets. Apparently the scope of their loving care terminates abruptly if there is nothing in it for them.

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2016 02:01:39   #
Cool Breeze
 
Docadhoc wrote:
If I remember correctly, republican leadership concurred that vets need the help, but stated that this is no time to be adding to our debt load by passing bills loaded with unnecessary expenditures not aimed at providing for the target population.. namely our veterans.

I do not believe the caring left bothered to remove the pork or in any other way rewrite the bill to ensure its passage for our vets. Apparently the scope of their loving care terminates abruptly if there is nothing in it for them.
If I remember correctly, republican leadership con... (show quote)


If you remember? The onset of Alzheimer's eh?


On a 56-41 v**e, Democrats failed to muster the 60 v**es needed to waive the procedural v**e necessary to move the legislation to the full Senate for a v**e. Two Republicans, Dean Heller of Nevada and Jerry Moran of Kansas, v**ed with the Democrats.

"We're not going to be intimidated on this," GOP Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama said before the v**e. "We're going to do the right things for the veterans of America."

Under the bill, more veterans would have become eligible for in-state college tuition, even improved dental care — and some wounded troops left unable to have children would have received fertility or adoption services.

In addition, the Veteran's Administration would have received more resources to ease its backlog of cases, and the bill would have bolstered programs for veterans who suffered sexual abuse. According to our GOP friends this is 'Pork'.
How patriotic of them!

Reply
May 28, 2016 05:32:46   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Cool Breeze wrote:
If you remember? The onset of Alzheimer's eh?


On a 56-41 v**e, Democrats failed to muster the 60 v**es needed to waive the procedural v**e necessary to move the legislation to the full Senate for a v**e. Two Republicans, Dean Heller of Nevada and Jerry Moran of Kansas, v**ed with the Democrats.

"We're not going to be intimidated on this," GOP Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama said before the v**e. "We're going to do the right things for the veterans of America."

Under the bill, more veterans would have become eligible for in-state college tuition, even improved dental care — and some wounded troops left unable to have children would have received fertility or adoption services.

In addition, the Veteran's Administration would have received more resources to ease its backlog of cases, and the bill would have bolstered programs for veterans who suffered sexual abuse. According to our GOP friends this is 'Pork'.
How patriotic of them!
If you remember? The onset of Alzheimer's eh? br ... (show quote)


You did well discussing the good points of the bill.

Now discuss the negative portions including ALL the pork.

I can't. I have Alzheimer's. Right?

Reply
May 28, 2016 06:37:43   #
Mom8052 Loc: Lost in the mountains of New Mexico
 
Docadhoc wrote:
If I remember correctly, republican leadership concurred that vets need the help, but stated that this is no time to be adding to our debt load by passing bills loaded with unnecessary expenditures not aimed at providing for the target population.. namely our veterans.

I do not believe the caring left bothered to remove the pork or in any other way rewrite the bill to ensure its passage for our vets. Apparently the scope of their loving care terminates abruptly if there is nothing in it for them.
If I remember correctly, republican leadership con... (show quote)


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yeah, but is it not their jobs to to change a bill to get rid of the pork, even if there is nothing in it for them. Some of these folks served in the Military. I guess it was soooo loooong ago, they have forgotten.

Reply
May 28, 2016 08:44:42   #
Cool Breeze
 
Docadhoc wrote:
You did well discussing the good points of the bill.

Now discuss the negative portions including ALL the pork.

I can't. I have Alzheimer's. Right?


That shouldn't stop you from trying. It hasn't before has it? Personally I like pork! Those who don't are probably C****es!



Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.