One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Who are you v****g against?
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
May 12, 2016 19:27:57   #
Glaucon
 
The coming p**********l e******n is going to be one of a kind: In previous e******ns, we have ended up with two choices and asked each other who we are v****g for. This time, it seems we are asking, “Who are you v****g against?”

With the almost certain nomination of Donald Trump by the Republicans and the almost certain nomination of Hillary Clinton by the Democrats, I have made up my mind.

I saw this on Rolling Stone and thought you’d be interested in it.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/hillary-clinton-for-president-20160323

If you are able to read this brief article and understand it, in my mind, you are not closed minded and you are not an authoritarian follower. I would be interested in your comments about the content of this article, but only if you have read it.

Reply
May 12, 2016 19:58:15   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
Glaucon wrote:
The coming p**********l e******n is going to be one of a kind: In previous e******ns, we have ended up with two choices and asked each other who we are v****g for. This time, it seems we are asking, “Who are you v****g against?”

With the almost certain nomination of Donald Trump by the Republicans and the almost certain nomination of Hillary Clinton by the Democrats, I have made up my mind.

I saw this on Rolling Stone and thought you’d be interested in it.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/hillary-clinton-for-president-20160323

If you are able to read this brief article and understand it, in my mind, you are not closed minded and you are not an authoritarian follower. I would be interested in your comments about the content of this article, but only if you have read it.
The coming p**********l e******n is going to be on... (show quote)

That article has got to be the biggest piece of crap I've read in my lifetime. Not that I'm for Trump either but regardless of who is elected, God is going to give us EXACTLY what we deserve right along with His righteous judgment.

Reply
May 12, 2016 20:02:18   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Pretty left wing in their statement of 'Hillary Clinton is one of the most qualified candidates for the presidency in modern times'. They fail to point out those Qualifications just like her followers.

Glaucon wrote:
The coming p**********l e******n is going to be one of a kind: In previous e******ns, we have ended up with two choices and asked each other who we are v****g for. This time, it seems we are asking, “Who are you v****g against?”

With the almost certain nomination of Donald Trump by the Republicans and the almost certain nomination of Hillary Clinton by the Democrats, I have made up my mind.

I saw this on Rolling Stone and thought you’d be interested in it.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/hillary-clinton-for-president-20160323

If you are able to read this brief article and understand it, in my mind, you are not closed minded and you are not an authoritarian follower. I would be interested in your comments about the content of this article, but only if you have read it.
The coming p**********l e******n is going to be on... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
May 12, 2016 20:07:15   #
Glaucon
 
bmac32 wrote:
Pretty left wing in their statement of 'Hillary Clinton is one of the most qualified candidates for the presidency in modern times'. They fail to point out those Qualifications just like her followers.


It is obviously possible to ignore her qualifications if your political emotions dictate that you do do. If I were to list some of her qualifications , you would have to dispute or ignore them in order to be right, so I won't waste our time. If you don't want to see them, you have every right not to see them.

Reply
May 12, 2016 20:08:58   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
mwdegutis wrote:
That article has got to be the biggest piece of crap I've read in my lifetime. Not that I'm for Trump either but regardless of who is elected, God is going to give us EXACTLY what we deserve right along with His righteous judgment.
Agreed.

Stupid is as stupid does.

Reply
May 12, 2016 20:32:05   #
mcmlx
 
Super Dave wrote:
Agreed.

Stupid is as stupid does.


Could not get halfway through it.
Not right after dinner.
Couple of Dramamine and maybe I can finish.

Reply
May 12, 2016 20:40:46   #
CowboyMilt
 
Glaucon wrote:
The coming p**********l e******n is going to be one of a kind: In previous e******ns, we have ended up with two choices and asked each other who we are v****g for. This time, it seems we are asking, “Who are you v****g against?”

With the almost certain nomination of Donald Trump by the Republicans and the almost certain nomination of Hillary Clinton by the Democrats, I have made up my mind.

I saw this on Rolling Stone and thought you’d be interested in it.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/hillary-clinton-for-president-20160323

If you are able to read this brief article and understand it, in my mind, you are not closed minded and you are not an authoritarian follower. I would be interested in your comments about the content of this article, but only if you have read it.
The coming p**********l e******n is going to be on... (show quote)


I just couldn't make it half way through...writer is living on a different planet then I am...

Reply
 
 
May 12, 2016 20:55:22   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
What qualifications being elected in NY or appointed doesn't make one qualified. And as usual you point to nothing that points to those qualifications but your feelings.



Glaucon wrote:
It is obviously possible to ignore her qualifications if your political emotions dictate that you do do. If I were to list some of her qualifications , you would have to dispute or ignore them in order to be right, so I won't waste our time. If you don't want to see them, you have every right not to see them.

Reply
May 12, 2016 20:55:44   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
The Rolling Stone. The Rolling Stone , are you joking ?

Get this man a bigger Hammer.
Get this man a bigger Hammer....

Reply
May 12, 2016 20:57:45   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
This is the way the left seeing things, threw rose colored glasses, they still thing Gore was wonderful.



CowboyMilt wrote:
I just couldn't make it half way through...writer is living on a different planet then I am...

Reply
May 12, 2016 21:22:34   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
CowboyMilt wrote:
I just couldn't make it half way through...writer is living on a different planet then I am...


Having seen who posted it I didn't waste my time reading it. Instead, I read what others have had to say about it, which affirmed my decision to forego the effort of reading what is evidently a pos, but then, check the name of the poster.

Reply
 
 
May 12, 2016 22:08:49   #
Glaucon
 
mwdegutis wrote:
That article has got to be the biggest piece of crap I've read in my lifetime. Not that I'm for Trump either but regardless of who is elected, God is going to give us EXACTLY what we deserve right along with His righteous judgment.



I AM SORRY YOU WERE NOT STONG ENOUGH TO READ THE ARTICLE.

Reply
May 12, 2016 22:10:32   #
Glaucon
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
Having seen who posted it I didn't waste my time reading it. Instead, I read what others have had to say about it, which affirmed my decision to forego the effort of reading what is evidently a pos, but then, check the name of the poster.
IT HADN'T EVEN OCCURRED TO ME THAT YOU MIGHT BE STONG AND OPEN MINDED ENOUGHT TO HAVE EVEN ATTEMPTED READING IT.

Reply
May 12, 2016 22:13:18   #
Glaucon
 
bmac32 wrote:
This is the way the left seeing things, threw rose colored glasses, they still thing Gore was wonderful.


I IKNEW THERE WERE SOME OF YOU WHO WOULD NOT HAVE WHAT IT WOULD TO HAVE READ IT. NO HARD FEELINGS COURAGE IS AT LEAST PARTIALLY HERITALBE.

Reply
May 12, 2016 23:10:25   #
Artemis
 
bmac32 wrote:
This is the way the left seeing things, threw rose colored glasses, they still thing Gore was wonderful.


It's hard to argue that Secretary Clinton is not qualified. Serving as First Lady of the United States offers a unique perspective, but even without her experience inside the White House, she has a wealth of experience. Having said all of that, lets see some of her other qualifications


* Graduated from Yale Law School
* Worked as staff of a U.S. Senate subcommittee
* Staff of the P**********l Impeachment Inquiry Commitee,
advising the U.S. House Judiciary Committee during the Nixon impeachment proceedings.
* Faculty, University of Arkansas Law School
* Part-time chairman of the Legal Services Corporation, appointed by President Carter.
* Member of the Rose Law Firm
* National Law Journal named her twice one of the 100 most powerful lawyers in America
* Co-founded Arkansas Advocates for Children and Family
* Chaired the Arkansas Educational Standards Committee
* First Lady of Arkansas for 12 years
* First Lady of the United States of America for 8 years
* Chaired President Clinton's National Task Force on Health Care Reform
* Elected United States Senator from New York; served for eight years
* Served for five years as President Obama's Secretary of State, fourth in line of succession of the Presidency

Yeah she just doesn't have the qualifications,it must be those rose colored glasses.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.