Written by Thomas Holmes on April 29, 2016

DEAR AMERICA: Does Being White and Attractive OPPRESS Minorities?

And you thought you might actually make it to the weekend without yet another dose of social justice lunacy. In this case, the University of Washington quickly retracted their athletic department’s infographic that accompanied their cheerleader recruitment campaign.

According to The Seattle Times, on Tuesday, the University did a complete 180 on the picture they released across the campus which was intended to provide dress and makeup pointers to potential cheerleader candidates:

Now let’s be clear here, no one is fainting away in stunned horror with claims of sexism, which would at least be consistent with the feminist narrative towards things like cheerleaders. Nope. This is now overtly r****t because the graphic depicted an attractive blonde.

“I can’t believe this is real,” Jazmine Perez, a U of W student, told The Seattle Times. ““One of the first things that comes mind is objectification and idealization of Western beauty, which are values I would like to believe the University doesn’t want to perpetuate. As a student of color who looks nothing like the student in the poster, this feels very exclusive.”

Well, Jazmine, if that’s how you feel than it must be true. That’s how the world works, right? I h**e to remind Jazmine, that, in the midst of her suffering at the hands of “western beauty”, that the University of Washington is one of the most western –located colleges in the most western society in the world. Also, unless she’s here on some scholarship from India or China, she is a member of said western society.

So tell me, what’s a more accurate depiction of western beauty? Oh right, progressivism is supposed to be about celebrating diversity. Except when society is asking you to celebrate diversity that you don’t like, then you’re the victim and everyone else is the r****t. Sorry, I forgot my place.

Remember when racial justice was about getting people to effectively not see skin color at all? Those were the days. Then the libs recognized the tremendous profit in convincing minorities to only see skin color and to only interpret things through a victim lens. Of course a simple poster that guides cheerleaders into appropriate clothing and makeup choices prior to tryouts is meant to be exclusive to Jazmine and anyone else who isn’t blonde, white and under 115lbs.

Just because the tryouts were open to everyone and things like hair styles are oppressively restricted to “straight or curled” doesn’t mean that Jazmine might be, I dunno, projecting just a tad. How do we get Jazmine to understand that there will be plenty of brunets and perfectly unoffended Asians trying out?

Oh who am I kidding that’ll never happen. Let’s just not risk offending anybody and reissue the infographic with an amorphous blob instead of a cheerleader. Hell, since g****r is just a f**e social construct anyway why not just use a picture of a hairy, 300lb, shirtless truck driver and that will clear things right up.

Written by Thomas Holmes on April 29, 2016

DEAR AMERICA: Does Being White and Attractive OPPRESS Minorities?

And you thought you might actually make it to the weekend without yet another dose of social justice lunacy. In this case, the University of Washington quickly retracted their athletic department’s infographic that accompanied their cheerleader recruitment campaign.

According to The Seattle Times, on Tuesday, the University did a complete 180 on the picture they released across the campus which was intended to provide dress and makeup pointers to potential cheerleader candidates:

Now let’s be clear here, no one is fainting away in stunned horror with claims of sexism, which would at least be consistent with the feminist narrative towards things like cheerleaders. Nope. This is now overtly r****t because the graphic depicted an attractive blonde.

“I can’t believe this is real,” Jazmine Perez, a U of W student, told The Seattle Times. ““One of the first things that comes mind is objectification and idealization of Western beauty, which are values I would like to believe the University doesn’t want to perpetuate. As a student of color who looks nothing like the student in the poster, this feels very exclusive.”

Well, Jazmine, if that’s how you feel than it must be true. That’s how the world works, right? I h**e to remind Jazmine, that, in the midst of her suffering at the hands of “western beauty”, that the University of Washington is one of the most western –located colleges in the most western society in the world. Also, unless she’s here on some scholarship from India or China, she is a member of said western society.

So tell me, what’s a more accurate depiction of western beauty? Oh right, progressivism is supposed to be about celebrating diversity. Except when society is asking you to celebrate diversity that you don’t like, then you’re the victim and everyone else is the r****t. Sorry, I forgot my place.

Remember when racial justice was about getting people to effectively not see skin color at all? Those were the days. Then the libs recognized the tremendous profit in convincing minorities to only see skin color and to only interpret things through a victim lens. Of course a simple poster that guides cheerleaders into appropriate clothing and makeup choices prior to tryouts is meant to be exclusive to Jazmine and anyone else who isn’t blonde, white and under 115lbs.

Just because the tryouts were open to everyone and things like hair styles are oppressively restricted to “straight or curled” doesn’t mean that Jazmine might be, I dunno, projecting just a tad. How do we get Jazmine to understand that there will be plenty of brunets and perfectly unoffended Asians trying out?

Oh who am I kidding that’ll never happen. Let’s just not risk offending anybody and reissue the infographic with an amorphous blob instead of a cheerleader. Hell, since g****r is just a f**e social construct anyway why not just use a picture of a hairy, 300lb, shirtless truck driver and that will clear things right up.

I know a lot of this stuff I put out there is hard for a sane person to believe until they learn a lot of the different aspects of it, especially those lacking in spiritual discernment. If it was so easily debunked surely would have done so. Instead you just say stupid stuff and insults. And I don't believe for a second that Thomas Jefferson would have said anything that antagonistic to Christianity. He wasn't that religious but he wasn't an atheist Christian h**er like whoever put out that picture with that quotation. The 2nd picture is what Jesus is thought to have looked like. Somatic like his own people with dark hair like wool is the only. He looks amazingly like Rabbi Cahn who wrote the book the harbinger which proves in no uncertain terms that America is soon to be destroyed. Remember that, it's coming sooner than you think the information in that book is so profound it drew me out of a 65 year agnosticism and made me a true believing Christian, although I have a long way to go in self-improvement.