eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Aborting the Working Class
Why the Oligarchs H**e the Working Class
http://lewrockwell.us7.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6ad24f4cd1574f1f7b8a0a03a&id=68df7cc091&e=ac767b1a94

It would be an ignominious defeat worthy of a Shakespearean tragedy if a******n ends up being the issue that derails Trump as the Tank Engine. By claiming that there would have to be “some form of punishment” levied against any woman who would dare get an a******n in Donald Trump’s Great-Again America, the poor bastard walked right into Chris Matthews’ well-crafted trap. In fact, he eagerly took the bait that those he considers his lessers have been wise enough to pass up for years. All Republican p**********l candidates in recent history—the “dummies,” the “failures,” the “disasters,” the ones who “got captured” in Vietnam—have at some point during their campaign been asked the “would you punish women who get a******ns ” question by members of the mainstream media, and every one of them understood that it was a “gotcha” question and answered accordingly.

The late Tim Russert made a cottage industry out of the “would you punish women” question. He asked Mitt Romney in December 2007:

Russert: If a woman had an a******n, would she be perceived a criminal? And what would be the legal consequences to people who participated in that procedure?

Romney: You wouldn’t—I don’t think anyone is calling for—maybe some of them, but no one I know of is calling for punishing the mother, punishing the woman.

He put the same question to Mike Huckabee just two weeks later:

Russert: And what would happen to doctors or women who participated in the a******n?

Huckabee: I think you don’t punish the woman, first of all, because it’s not about—I consider her a victim, not a, not a criminal.

Russert grilled John McCain on the “punishment” issue in 2000 and 2008, and he got the same response both times: “Prosecute a******n doctors, not women who get them.”

It never mattered how many times he failed; every p**********l e******n year, Russert would lob the question anew at every Republican running. Perhaps now that the hook he so lovingly baited over the course of so many years has finally landed “the big one,” his restive soul can be at peace.

Rest easy, Tim, your work is done. Walk toward the light.

Now, Trump’s alt-right fans would undoubtedly say that The Donald messed up on the “punish the woman” question because a******n isn’t what he’s all about. He hadn’t thought the issue through because he has bigger, more important mountains to climb. Which is why it would be ironic if this is the one he ends up dying on. Trump would find himself alongside Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock in the hall of fame of Republicans brought down by “gotcha” questions about a******n. As it is, Trump did the unthinkable (for him) by timidly walking back his answer. But as with Xerxes being sliced by Leonidas’ spear, sure, he’s still standing, but can his followers ever look at him the same way again? A simple question about a******n has shown that even a god-king can bleed.

There is a tendency among pundits to focus on political harm from the a******n issue only insofar as it affects Republicans.

Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an article, Taki's Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don't get paid for their work. Email editors@takimag.com to buy additional rights. http://takimag.com/article/aborting_the_working_class_david_cole/print#ixzz45EqwVDZL

sboy

Trump is a disaster and will change his position on any subject readily, to meet the goals he personally has set. In this case, he wants to be President, not because he wants to do what is best for America, but because it is good for Trump, himself. Trump is a FRAUD. He has no philosophy, except to do what is good for the Donald. Period!

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Wake up sboy. Figure it out.
Trump is going from businessman to Statesman.
All the others are politicians.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Obama takes his orders from those that put him in office.
R's and D's both need to figure this out. If neither does; America will get more of the same "leadership" running our politicians:

I post this because it covers the Council on foreign Relations (CFR) in detail. I hope others will copy and save for future reference.
Every one that cares, and wants to know what America is up against; should copy, save, and share with others:


URL for Roster ofCouncil on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission (TC) and Bilderberger Group (BB) Members is below.

Obama’s Executive Cabinet members:
In order of succession to the Presidency:

Vice President of the United States
Joseph R. Biden CFR/88
X Speaker of the House (Not in cabinet) Nancy Pelosi
Now JohnBoehner
Department of State
Secretary Hillary Rodham BB/CFR/RS/TC –
See Hillary’s speaches at CFR meeting on Youtube


Department of the Treasury
Secretary Timothy F. Geithner BB/CFR/TC/09
NOW: Jacob “Jack” Lew CFR

Department of Defense
Secretary Leon E. Panetta CFR


Chuck Hagel CFR

Department of Justice
Attorney General; Eric Holder CFR

Newbees:
Ashton Carter CFR/92
Jeh Charles Johnson CFR

Pentagon Senior Counsel CFR

Director, CIA/ DHS Secretary
Jeh Charles Johnson CFR

Sylvia Mathews Burwell CFR/11


More positions filled with CFR:


Department of Commerce
Secretary John E. Bryson CFR/TC/88

Department of Veterans Affairs
Secretary Eric K. Shinseki CFR


Department of Homeland Security
Secretary Janet A. Napolitano CFR
Florida Representative and DNC Chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz. CFR

United States Ambassador to the United Nations
Ambassador Susan Rice CFR
White House Chief of Staff
Bill Daley CFR
Department of Agriculture
Secretary Thomas J. Vilsack CFR
Source: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/cfrall1.htm#d
http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/roundtable/CFRA-Elist.html - Initial List of Council on Foreign Relations Members

Hillary Clinton Frankly Reveals the CFR Is Running the USA ...
Hillary Clinton spills the beans at the inauguration of the new office for Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in Washington, D.C. Some have said it was simply a slip of the tongue but wh**ever the perception is Clinton frankly revealed who's running the show in these United States:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2T-5Pd3oYY
Z*****t control of CFR: http://www.rense.com/general48/captiv.htm

Some Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Facts
The 3,000 seats of the CFR quickly filled with members of America's elite. Today, CFR members occupy key positions in government, the mass media, financial institutions, multinational corporations, the military, and the national security apparatus.
Since its inception, the CFR has served as an intermediary between high finance, big oil, corporate elitists and the U.S. government. The executive branch changes hands between Republican and Democratic administrations, but cabinet seats are always held by CFR members. It has been said by political commentators on the left and on the right that if you want to know what U.S. foreign policy will be next year, you should read Foreign Affairs this year.
The CFR's claim that "The Council has no affiliation with the U.S. government" is laughable. The justification for that statement is that funding comes from member dues, subscriptions to its Corporate Program, foundation grants, and so forth. All this really means is that the U.S. government does not exert any control over the CFR via the purse strings.
Since 1940, every U.S. secretary of state (except for Gov. James Byrnes of South Carolina, the sole exception) has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and/or its younger brother, the Trilateral Commission. Also since 1940, every secretary of war and every secretary of defense has been a CFR member. During most of its existence, the Central Intelligence Agency has been headed by CFR members, beginning with CFR founding member Allen Dulles. Virtually every key U.S. national security and foreign policy adviser has been a CFR member for the past seventy years.
Almost all White House cabinet positions are occupied by CFR members. President Clinton, himself a member of the CFR, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group, employs almost one hundred CFR members in his administration. Presidents come and go, but the CFR's power--and agenda--always remains.
The CFR's Shroud of Secrecy - On its web page, the CFR boasts that its magazine, Foreign Affairs, "is acclaimed for its analysis of recent international developments and for its forecasts of emerging trends." It's not much of a challenge to do so, though, when you play a part in determining what those emerging trends will be.
So are they predicting trends or creating them? The answer is fairly obvious to anyone who has earnestly reflected on the matter.
The CFR fancies itself to represent a diverse range cultural and political interests, but its members are predominantly wealthy males, and their policies reflect their elitist biases. The CFR attempts to maintain the charade of diversity via its Non-Attribution Rule, which allows members to engage in "a free, frank, and open exchange of ideas" without fear of having any of their statements attributed in public. The flip side of this, obviously, is a dark cloud of secrecy which envelopes the CFR's activities.
CFR meetings are usually held in secret and are restricted to members and very select guests. All members are free to express themselves at meetings unrestrained, because the Non-Attribution Rule guarantees that "others will not attribute or characterize their statements in public media forums or knowingly t***smit them to persons who will," according to the Council on Foreign Relations' 1992 Annual Report.
The report goes on to forbid any meeting participant "to publish a speaker's statement in attributed form in any newspaper; to repeat it on television or radio, or on a speaker's platform, or in a classroom; or to go beyond a memo of limited circulation."
The end result is that the only information the public has on the CFR is the information they release for public consumption, which should send up red f**gs for anyone who understands the immense effect that CFR directives have on America's foreign policy. The public knows what the CFR wants the public to know about the CFR, and nothing more. There is one hole in the fog of secrecy, however: a book entitled Tragedy and Hope, written by an "insider" named Dr. Carroll Quigley, mentor of Bill Clinton.
Google: “Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral, Commission, Bilderberg Group”________________________________________
A few more notables in Both Parties Serving Bilderberger’s CFR/TC/BB AGENDA:
Bush Sr. - CFR,B (R)
Bush Jr? Cabinet CFR (R)
Both Clintons - CFR,TC,B (D)
Jimmy Carter - CFR,TC (D)
Obama & Biden - CFR (D)
Dick Cheney - CFR,TC (R)
Newt Gingrich - CFR (R)
Mitch McConnell - CFR (R)
Rick Perry - BB,2007 (D&R)
John Kerry CFR (D)
John McCain - CFR (R)
Zbig Brzezinski - TC, BB (D)
Heny Kissinger BB,CFR,TC (R) Paul Volker- CFR,TC,BB (D) Alan Greenspan CFR,TC,BB
Ben Bernanke BB
Tim Geithner - CFR,TC BB
David Rockefeller CFR,TC,BB George Soros - CFR,BB (D)
Albert Gore, Jr. CFR,TC (D)
Donald Rumsfeld CFR ,BB(R)
Jacob “Jack” Lew CFR (D)
Robert Gates BB,CFR,TC (D
Leon Panetta CFR (D)
Lee Hamilton CFR,TC (R)
Robert Reich CFR (D)
Condoleezza Rice CFR (R)
Susan Rice CFR (D)
Ted Cruz CFR (R)
Donna Shalala CFR/TC (D)



THE MEDIA:
George Will - CFR,TC (R)
George Stephanopoulos
CFR, BB (D)
William Kristol BB (R) William Buckley Jr. CFR,BB (R)
Tom Brokaw CFR
FOX owner
Rupert Murdock – CFR, BB
FOX SPINNERS
John Bolton CFR (R)
Charles Krauthammer CFR(R)
Doug Schoen CFR
Washington Post owner
Katherine Graham CFR,TC,BB

David Richmond Gergen - CNN Spinner BB/CFR/TC/92 (D)
Robert B. Reich CFR (D)

Brian Williams - CFR

In the News:
Haley Barbour CFR (D)
Eric Holder CFR (D)
Larry Summers CFR, BB
Janet Yellen CFR (D)
Chuck Hagel CFR (D)
Sylvia Burwell CFR/11 (D)
Jeh Johnson CFR (D)
Ashton Carter CFR/92 (D)
Benjamin Netanyahu CFR’88

More Politicians:

Fred Thompson CFR (R)
Charles B. Rangel CFR (D)
Barney Frank CFR (D)

Richard Newton Gardner CFR/RS/TC/84
Ruth Bader Ginsburg (D) CFR/92
Sandra Day O'Connor (R) CFR/92
Robert S. Mcnamara CFR (D)
Warren Christopher CFR (D)
Madeleine Albright CFR (D)
Samuel Richard ("Sandy" Berger CFR/BB (R)


Military
General David Petraeus CFR,
CIA Director Chuck Hagel CFR

International Bankers - James Wolfensohn Paul Wolfowitz, Alan Greenspan, Tim Geithner CFR,TC,BB



Hillary Clinton Frankly Reveals the CFR Is Running the USA ...
Hillary Clinton spills the beans at the inauguration of the new office for Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in Washington, D.C. Some have said it was simply a slip of the tongue but wh**ever the perception is Clinton frankly revealed who's running the show in these United States:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2T-5Pd3oYY

Cheney on CFR, Council on Foreign Relations http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOAk-7F1EVU
US Foreign Policy, Putin, Ukraine & etc
http://tomatobubble.com/id550.html
Save as a Word Doc, copy and paste. A lot of people are waking up. A critical mass of awakened Americans can get reached when the t***h is shared

sboy

Trump will never be a statesman. His mouth is a loose cannon.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Trump will put his country ahead of the NWO.



Hillary Clinton Frankly Reveals the CFR Is Running the USA ...
Hillary Clinton spills the beans at the inauguration of the new office for Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in Washington, D.C. Some have said it was simply a slip of the tongue but wh**ever the perception is Clinton frankly revealed who's running the show in these United States:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2T-5Pd3oYY

Cheney on CFR, Council on Foreign Relations http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOAk-7F1EVU
US Foreign Policy, Putin, Ukraine & etc
http://tomatobubble.com/id550.html

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

I couldn't care less about Trump's faux pas. He's not overly rehearsed and since it was a dumb question anyway (I probably would have asked Matthews if he was nuts), I'm not overly critical. The Establishment, and Matthews is Establishment, has used semantics as a diversion for too fucking long. Enough! :thumbup: