JMHO Loc: Utah

It’s well known how in 1965 Daniel Patrick Moynihan, assistant secretary of labor to Democrat President Johnson, warned that the black family was on the verge of a “complete breakdown” because of growing illegitimacy rates: in 1963 the out-of-wedlock birth rate for w****s was 3 percent, and for b****s it was 23.6 percent.

Moynihan was part of a generation of Democrats who cared about lifting b****s up into the ranks of equal opportunity with w****s, back in the days before the Democrat Party became completely morally corrupt.

In his 1965 “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action,” Moynihan observed that because more b****s were being born into unmarried homes, more b****s were becoming dependent on welfare to survive.

Then, as now, b****s represented only a small percentage of the U.S. population but a disproportionate percentage of people relying on public assistance. At the center of this “tangle of pathology,” as Moynihan called it, was “the weakness of the family structure” among b****s. “Once or twice removed, it will be found to be the principal source of most of the aberrant, inadequate, or antisocial behavior that did not establish, but now serves to perpetuate the cycle of poverty and deprivation.”

The majority of black babies are being born to single mothers—a prescription for a life of poverty and crime.

Ever since, the problem has only gotten worse.

…

The majority of black babies are being born to single mothers—a prescription for a life of poverty and crime. And despite the warnings that have sounded off loudly for over half a century, Democrats have done nothing to stop b****s, their most steadfast constituents, from having babies they can’t take care of. This problem has perpetuated itself for generations, producing generational poverty among b****s.

If black lives truly matter, as Democrats shout at the top of their lungs, why don’t they promulgate policies that encourage b****s to get married before they have kids?

B****s’ v****g overwhelmingly for Democrats over the past half century is the quintessential definition of political suicide.

But what’s bad for b****s t***slates into a high rate of return on investment for Democrats. Marketing the “no baby daddy” syndrome to b****s has t***slated into v**es, lots of v**es, approaching 100 percent from b****s over the past half century. And the black family has been dismembered in the process, like the fetuses Planned Parenthood chops up to sell for profit. Democrats don’t quit while they’re ahead. No, the donkey party doubles down on evil.

In his 1992 acceptance speech for the Democrat p**********l nomination, Bill Clinton declared, “Governments don’t raise children; parents do. And you should.”

Clinton meant to say, “If you’re white, I expect you to raise your kids”—because Democrats have made it their priority for society to normalize the idea that the federal government should be responsible for parenting b****s and their children. Neither Clinton nor any Democrat president since Johnson has done anything effective to ask b***k A******ns as a race to take responsibility for raising our kids.

No greater or more glaring example of liberals’ profiting politically off of black people’s misery can be seen than the Democrats’ refusal to address the illegitimate birthrate spiraling out of control among b****s.

More black babies are born out of wedlock today (72 percent) than into married homes. That’s dramatically worse than when Moynihan initially raised the issue (when it was 23 percent)—thanks to fifty years of encouragement by the Democrat Party.

In other words, in America today, it is rare for black babies to be born to married parents. Black fathers are simply not part of the black family equation. Think about that.

Black fathers are simply not part of the black family equation. Think about that.

A few years ago, my mother tutored a four-year-old black girl in pre-K at a Richmond, Va. public school. It was part of an after-school program organized by her church’s outreach ministry. One afternoon in February, my mother was explaining to the little girl the meaning of Valentine’s Day’s. Helping the child make a card for her mother, my mother told her that she was going to give Valentine’s Day cards to special people like her husband and her children.

The little girl looked up at my mother in disbelief, asking, “You can have a husband?” Slightly shocked and a little taken aback, my mother simply responded, “Yes.”

It’s a sad state of affairs when the word husband is a foreign word to a little black girl.

A few weeks later, around Easter, the little girl asked my mother again, “Mrs. Wright, you have a husband?”

“Yes,” my mother responded. “Husbands, friends, they’re all the same,” replied the little girl.

No, they certainly are not all the same. But the little girl probably had gone home and asked her single mother what a husband was, and her mother had told her that. It’s difficult to have a conversation with a four-year-old about the importance of marriage.

But the problem is that this little girl will grow up with her mother’s message that husbands are just the same as boyfriends. Based on the statistics, she will likely follow her mother’s bad example and have a baby out of wedlock.

Women having babies without fathers isn’t just a sign of the moral collapse of our culture, it’s hazardous to the child. When a child is born into a single-parent home, the chances of that child’s growing up in poverty are much greater.

According to a Brookings Institution study published in 2009, if a person graduates from high school, works a fulltime job, and waits until twenty-one to get married and have children, his or her chance of succeeding in life and becoming a member of the middle class rises to 76 percent. If a person doesn’t finish high school, doesn’t marry, and has a baby before the age of twenty-one, his or her chance of becoming poor soars to 74 percent.

One of the anti-poverty solutions the Brookings study recommended was for the federal government to advocate policies that strengthen families, such as programs “to reduce unplanned pregnancies for teens and twenty-somethings.”

The Brookings researchers seem to have understood that the breakdown of the black family has been the main driver of the chronic wealth gap between w****s and b****s over the past five decades. The lack of intact families among b****s leads to a lack of education and jobs, which t***slates into higher rates of crime and government dependency among b****s. Eureka!

You don’t have to be a neurosurgeon to see that a child born to an unmarried teenage mother isn’t going to have a rosy future in life. The conclusions of the Brookings research are obvious, but Democrats continue to ignore the plain t***h. Back in 1965, Moynihan was pelted with virulent criticism for telling the t***h about black America.

Things have only gotten worse since then.

http://dailysignal.com/2016/03/29/how-liberal-policies-destroyed-black-families/?utm_source=heritagefoundation&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=morningbell&mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRonu6vNeu%2FhmjTEU5z16uQoW6e1h4kz2EFye%2BLIHETpodcMTcRhPbHYDBceEJhqyQJxPr3NLtQN191pRhLiDA%3D%3D

Cool Breeze

Of course it is! No matter what Progressive Pundits say America is still r****t. The only thing that has changed is the sophistication of it.

http://www.allaboutpopularissues.org/the-history-of-r****m-faq.htm

America has had a long history of r****m. R****m has infiltrated every aspect of American society and shows no sign of decreasing. This fact is more easily understood if r****m is viewed for what it really is at its core: an institutional ideology. It is a misunderstanding to equate r****m with the evil-minded treatment of one individual to another. R****m is more than just personal hatred. No, r****m is allowed to subsist because it is fostered and maintained by institutions and government, however unwittingly. Even if individuals within groups or members of a corporate hierarchy determine that the practices of a particular institution are r****t, those individuals would be hard pressed to bring about change.

When seeking to understand the state of race relations in 21st Century America, one must gain a clear picture of the nature of r****m; it is the belief that one group of people with a particular biological make up is superior to other groups with a differing biological make up. Thus, these groups deemed superior are allowed to gain economic power and social dominance over the other groups considered inferior. This condition is all the more exasperating in America because of the many strides that have been made over the past decades to combat the situation. From the Montgomery Bus Boycott in December 1955, and the student sit-ins in the sixties, to the Selma March in 1965 headed by Martin Luther King and the V****g Rights Act signed by President Johnson in the same year, it had been assumed that relations were moving towards improvement. With every visible stride forward, the country has still lagged behind in genuine racial reconciliation.

In those earlier days in the 20th century, the face of r****m was largely black and white. Today, the face of r****m has become multi-colored and multicultural. With the high increase of diverse populations entering and maintaining communities all over the country, r****m has expanded to include antagonism between peoples of many cultures.

The 21st Century has brought about many attempted changes in society. There is legislation and memoranda against discrimination in its many forms. Affirmative action has been used as an attempt to ensure individuals are given equal opportunity for employment, housing, and other types of advancement. Television shows have changed format and characters to seek political correctness. Nevertheless, society cleverly and subtly maintains its separate views of the races. Ancient barriers, though invisible, still exist owing to the unhappy t***h that it is still impossible to legislate the hearts of men. There will always be those who will fight for change while others resist, seeking to maintain the status quo. These are issues of economy, power, and control not easily relinquished. Inasmuch as r****m is an institutional ideology, there can still be no improvement unless many individuals work towards it.

JMHO Loc: Utah

R****t only in your little, and I emphasize "LITTLE", r****t brain.

oz89 Loc: California

There is more involved in the problem than what is being told because it's not just the liberal policies, it a system that was never broken down and a us verse them mentality.

Cool Breeze

The problem is the "E******y Industry" It makes a good sound bite but privately there are those who don't believe a word of it. All Men are Created Equal! Although some are more equal than others.

Cool Breeze

You brought the subject up pal! Your lemming comrades are silent. They don't know any better. I do because of my small brain.

JMHO Loc: Utah

Yep, pea size...and r****t.

Cool Breeze

BS! Care to point out what I've said is racst?

JMHO Loc: Utah

Learn how to spell nitwit. R****t!

Cool Breeze

Blow me Bigot! LOL

77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States

The title of this article is how liberal policies have destroyed Black families. The title should be how liberal policies are still destroying the black families.Let's start by talking about the Assassination of JFK by LBJ.This calamity started in November of 1963.The dye was cast on that fateful November day while the Nation was mourning Johnson was plotting a way to fix the poverty situation and Start a war with C*******t North Vietnam. He ordered Isreali plane to fire on the warships in the gulf of Tonkin which started the Vietnam war on a lie.What was the lie that dingy shrimpingboats attacked and battle ship.That was also to throw people off Johnson's tail about the Kennedy Assassination.Now with his plan in place Jonhson hatched a scheme call the great society act which was the first of its kind it was nothing more than a big omnibus spending bill The country has ever seen. It's still growing let's not forget that the poverty level was at 15% just like today except we've spent 15trillion on the war on poverty.Then on April 4,1968 the Jonhson Assassination team got to work and k**led Martin Luther King Jr.That opened The door for scoundrels like Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton to take over the biggest money Heist the world has ever seen these two men have done nothing but undermine the great works started by Martin Luther King Jr .They really should be in prison for allowing Johnson to get away with murder not once but twice.This is when the corruption started in the African-American community. The local community government became corrupt because the money allocated to these communities was stolen country wide by the new "Civil Rights Leaders". The reason I have Civil Rights Leaders in quotations is because Civil rights died on April 4,1968. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton were never apart of Rev. Kings entourage. This new Civil Rights was now about redistribution of wealth. Going away from we can do it ourselves to within a decade to we need more government assistance.That when the liberal policies started destroying the African-American community.Also Margaret Sanger's planned parenthood orginazation was implemented by our government and introduced on an economical scale in the inner cities across America and in doing so has eradicated about 20,000,000 African-American lives before they even had a chance at life.But yet it's still blame whitey for everything .Even though it was their community leaders doing it to them.Affirmative action is nothing but reverse r****m.The EOE made Affirmative action obsolete.But yet they still rely on Gov' that doesn't give two s**ts about it's own citizens they're more concerned about the i*****l i*******ts and Muslims.The black person in America is forgotten the libers have already destroyed your communities now they're trying to destroy i*****l i*******ts and muslims communities and then they will have destroyed all of America which is what they wanted to do in the first place.So my question to ALL African-American People in America when are you going to start prosecuting the leaders in your communities it's time they go to prison face charges of conspiracy, corruption, theft,and murder on a genocidal level.

DamnYANKEE

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: DICKHEADED TROLL , COOLIO

Cool Breeze

Who said Civil Rights was about redistribution of wealth? What was Civil Rights about? Maintaing the Status Quo?

77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States

Your out of your league coolbreeze.Just look at the counties of Baltimore and Detroit.Let's take a look at Detroit way back in the Middle fifties when liberalism took hold .Look at Detroit now you see the devastation liberalism caused the the city.For sixty some odd years of Democratiic leadership the city look like a third world country.Even the homeless have moved to a different city. It's sad because the lifeblood of Detroit wad the car industry which the Unions decided to close up shop rather than try to Dave the lifeblood of the city.The government of The city of Detroiit was one of the most corrupt cities in America right behind the city of Chicago. They couldn't stop spending other people's money and spreading it around .The Mayor and his wife are now in prison for embezzlement and theft of people's money.Then let's take a long hard look at Baltimore we have the same thing going on here 60 years plus of liberal rule and last year the i***ts of Baltimore burnt the city down to the ground over bulls**t started by the Mayor and her Attorney General. These cops on Trl will never be charged with the crimes the Attorney General is seeking so when that happens The i***ts in Baltimore will burn the rest of Baltimore down to the ground .Let's go to Chicago the liberals have had since the Chicago fire of 1906 to now about 110 years of liberal policy the city is 120billion dollar budget deficit but yet you look at the streets of Chicago as a war zone there are more people dying in the streets of Chicago than in Fallujah Iraq.Then we can talk about California, New York,Washington state,Oregon, all of the Northeast. You still don't believe me about wealth redistribution. Every one of the cities or states is going bankrupt you can't blame it on republican anything. The states i've mentioned also cities are completely controlled by democratic precincts.In some states The house,Senate, and Governor are all Democratic.I know your going to find every liberal excuse out there but it won't fly.Because most people know that liberals have a penchant for lying and t***h telling.So nobody believe's them.

77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States

Your out of your league coolbreeze.Just look at the counties of Baltimore and Detroit.Let's take a look at Detroit way back in the Middle fifties when liberalism took hold .Look at Detroit now you see the devastation liberalism caused the the city.For sixty some odd years of Democratiic leadership the city look like a third world country.Even the homeless have moved to a different city. It's sad because the lifeblood of Detroit wad the car industry which the Unions decided to close up shop rather than try to Dave the lifeblood of the city.The government of The city of Detroiit was one of the most corrupt cities in America right behind the city of Chicago. They couldn't stop spending other people's money and spreading it around .The Mayor and his wife are now in prison for embezzlement and theft of people's money.Then let's take a long hard look at Baltimore we have the same thing going on here 60 years plus of liberal rule and last year the i***ts of Baltimore burnt the city down to the ground over bulls**t started by the Mayor and her Attorney General. These cops on Trl will never be charged with the crimes the Attorney General is seeking so when that happens The i***ts in Baltimore will burn the rest of Baltimore down to the ground .Let's go to Chicago the liberals have had since the Chicago fire of 1906 to now about 110 years of liberal policy the city is 120billion dollar budget deficit but yet you look at the streets of Chicago as a war zone there are more people dying in the streets of Chicago than in Fallujah Iraq.Then we can talk about California, New York,Washington state,Oregon, all of the Northeast. You still don't believe me about wealth redistribution. Every one of the cities or states is going bankrupt you can't blame it on republican anything. The states i've mentioned also cities are completely controlled by democratic precincts.In some states The house,Senate, and Governor are all Democratic.I know your going to find every liberal excuse out there but it won't fly.Because most people know that liberals have a penchant for lying and t***h telling.So nobody believe's them.