One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Cruz’s Cuban Mistress Crisis EXPLODES:
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 27, 2016 10:54:15   #
moldyoldy
 
Cruz’s Cuban Mistress Crisis EXPLODES: Video Surfaced Long Ago, Right-Wing Media Buried It

Posted by Christian Drake on 26 Mar 2016

Ever since Anonymous issued a threat against Ted Cruz to reveal his extra-marital affairs, there has been nothing short of a growing sh*tstorm coming at him from all directions.

The latest scoop is huge. Not only have two new sources of information about the multiple affairs surfaced, but there is a darker story about a conspiracy to keep it hidden, which you will see below.

The first new detail is that a source within Breitbart reported they received a video from an operative allied with Marco Rubio, but who was not an “official” part of his now defunct campaign, that shows Cruz coming out of the Capitol Grille Restaurant and Hotel on Tuesdays and Thursdays with a woman who was not his wife.



But wait, there’s more. As if the video revelation was not enough, there are also more of Cruz’s alleged mistresses being identified.

Known so far:

Katrina Pierson: Trump campaign national spokeswoman

Amanda Carpenter: Conservative activist, CNN contributor and writer for Mark Levin

Sarah Isgur Flores: Former campaign manager for Carly Fiorina and well known Conservative political operative.

Another oddity – Ted Cruz’s Super-PAC “Keep The Promise” sent $500,000 dollars to Carly Fiorina’s Super-PAC “Carly For America”

fiorina 1

What would Cruz have sent Carly Fiorina 500k for, back when she was still as viable a candidate as Cruz himself was, and a threat to his campaign? That is VERY strange, to say the least.

Now that you know the new details, here comes the truly dark part of it all.

This whole thing is NOT ACTUALLY A “NEW” STORY. This has been a known thing since approximately mid to late February. A Breitbart reporter obtained the information and the video at that time, but never released it because Breitbart management ordered it buried. Their excuse at the time was that it was “not in alignment with their political affiliations.” – T***slation: We don’t want to smear Cruz QUITE yet because it will risk our press access with him on the off chance he wins the primary e******n. They clearly admitted having the full story and video at that time.

Breitbart is owned by a pro-Cruz Super-Pac funder named Robert Mercer who wanted the story buried. The editor of Breitbart, Ben Shapiro, is also being named as one of the people who blocked this story from being released. Shapiro is also the editor of The Daily Wire, which is owned by another pro-Cruz Super-PAC team, the Wilks brothers.

I don’t need to tell you how badly this looks for both Cruz and Breitbart. Breitbart tried to say there was no real proof of anything going on, and that’s why they chose not to run the story or use the tape. Now it’s revealed that Breitbart is a wholly owned propaganda arm of a Ted Cruz Super-PAC controller. There’s every reason to believe that the reason they didn’t want to run this story is because they actually knew that there was something to all this and they didn’t want to ruin their investment in buying the next Republican president.

Let’s think about it. Multiple women, all being identified with Cruz, some working for him in the past and some who worked at competing places into which Cruz Super-PACs funneled money for literally no good reason – where does the plausible deniability end? How many mistresses need to be associated with Cruz before the media starts believing that he was up to no good and/or that these women were taken advantage of?

Washington Times reporter Drew Johnson has also gone on record confirming 2 of the women in the list are accurate to his knowledge:



Anti-Trump political hatchet man Rick Wilson is even pressing them to release the tape, and he is not even against Ted Cruz.


For all his staunch denial and f**e bluster trying to attack Trump recently, calling him a sniveling coward, it seems that Ted is – as they say in his home state of Texas – all hat and no cattle. He will be spending the rest of the primary season trying to explain away or deny this and it’s going to cost him – dearly. It should be an interesting couple of weeks coming up, to say the least.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 10:56:06   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Cruz’s Cuban Mistress Crisis EXPLODES: Video Surfaced Long Ago, Right-Wing Media Buried It

Posted by Christian Drake on 26 Mar 2016

Ever since Anonymous issued a threat against Ted Cruz to reveal his extra-marital affairs, there has been nothing short of a growing sh*tstorm coming at him from all directions.

The latest scoop is huge. Not only have two new sources of information about the multiple affairs surfaced, but there is a darker story about a conspiracy to keep it hidden, which you will see below.

The first new detail is that a source within Breitbart reported they received a video from an operative allied with Marco Rubio, but who was not an “official” part of his now defunct campaign, that shows Cruz coming out of the Capitol Grille Restaurant and Hotel on Tuesdays and Thursdays with a woman who was not his wife.



But wait, there’s more. As if the video revelation was not enough, there are also more of Cruz’s alleged mistresses being identified.

Known so far:

Katrina Pierson: Trump campaign national spokeswoman

Amanda Carpenter: Conservative activist, CNN contributor and writer for Mark Levin

Sarah Isgur Flores: Former campaign manager for Carly Fiorina and well known Conservative political operative.

Another oddity – Ted Cruz’s Super-PAC “Keep The Promise” sent $500,000 dollars to Carly Fiorina’s Super-PAC “Carly For America”

fiorina 1

What would Cruz have sent Carly Fiorina 500k for, back when she was still as viable a candidate as Cruz himself was, and a threat to his campaign? That is VERY strange, to say the least.

Now that you know the new details, here comes the truly dark part of it all.

This whole thing is NOT ACTUALLY A “NEW” STORY. This has been a known thing since approximately mid to late February. A Breitbart reporter obtained the information and the video at that time, but never released it because Breitbart management ordered it buried. Their excuse at the time was that it was “not in alignment with their political affiliations.” – T***slation: We don’t want to smear Cruz QUITE yet because it will risk our press access with him on the off chance he wins the primary e******n. They clearly admitted having the full story and video at that time.

Breitbart is owned by a pro-Cruz Super-Pac funder named Robert Mercer who wanted the story buried. The editor of Breitbart, Ben Shapiro, is also being named as one of the people who blocked this story from being released. Shapiro is also the editor of The Daily Wire, which is owned by another pro-Cruz Super-PAC team, the Wilks brothers.

I don’t need to tell you how badly this looks for both Cruz and Breitbart. Breitbart tried to say there was no real proof of anything going on, and that’s why they chose not to run the story or use the tape. Now it’s revealed that Breitbart is a wholly owned propaganda arm of a Ted Cruz Super-PAC controller. There’s every reason to believe that the reason they didn’t want to run this story is because they actually knew that there was something to all this and they didn’t want to ruin their investment in buying the next Republican president.

Let’s think about it. Multiple women, all being identified with Cruz, some working for him in the past and some who worked at competing places into which Cruz Super-PACs funneled money for literally no good reason – where does the plausible deniability end? How many mistresses need to be associated with Cruz before the media starts believing that he was up to no good and/or that these women were taken advantage of?

Washington Times reporter Drew Johnson has also gone on record confirming 2 of the women in the list are accurate to his knowledge:



Anti-Trump political hatchet man Rick Wilson is even pressing them to release the tape, and he is not even against Ted Cruz.


For all his staunch denial and f**e bluster trying to attack Trump recently, calling him a sniveling coward, it seems that Ted is – as they say in his home state of Texas – all hat and no cattle. He will be spending the rest of the primary season trying to explain away or deny this and it’s going to cost him – dearly. It should be an interesting couple of weeks coming up, to say the least.
Cruz’s Cuban Mistress Crisis EXPLODES: Video Surfa... (show quote)


You lefties will believe anything...anything other than the t***h, that is. It seems a sucker is born every minute...sigh.

Besides, if Cruz was a Democrat, that would be a resume enhancement, if it was true, and it isn't.

Read this, moron: http://www.inquisitr.com/2931412/ted-cruz-sex-scandal-questioned-serious-doubts-arise-over-claims-cruz-had-mistresses/

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 11:11:15   #
crackerjack
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Cruz’s Cuban Mistress Crisis EXPLODES: Video Surfaced Long Ago, Right-Wing Media Buried It

Posted by Christian Drake on 26 Mar 2016

Ever since Anonymous issued a threat against Ted Cruz to reveal his extra-marital affairs, there has been nothing short of a growing sh*tstorm coming at him from all directions.

The latest scoop is huge. Not only have two new sources of information about the multiple affairs surfaced, but there is a darker story about a conspiracy to keep it hidden, which you will see below.

The first new detail is that a source within Breitbart reported they received a video from an operative allied with Marco Rubio, but who was not an “official” part of his now defunct campaign, that shows Cruz coming out of the Capitol Grille Restaurant and Hotel on Tuesdays and Thursdays with a woman who was not his wife.



But wait, there’s more. As if the video revelation was not enough, there are also more of Cruz’s alleged mistresses being identified.

Known so far:

Katrina Pierson: Trump campaign national spokeswoman

Amanda Carpenter: Conservative activist, CNN contributor and writer for Mark Levin

Sarah Isgur Flores: Former campaign manager for Carly Fiorina and well known Conservative political operative.

Another oddity – Ted Cruz’s Super-PAC “Keep The Promise” sent $500,000 dollars to Carly Fiorina’s Super-PAC “Carly For America”

fiorina 1

What would Cruz have sent Carly Fiorina 500k for, back when she was still as viable a candidate as Cruz himself was, and a threat to his campaign? That is VERY strange, to say the least.

Now that you know the new details, here comes the truly dark part of it all.

This whole thing is NOT ACTUALLY A “NEW” STORY. This has been a known thing since approximately mid to late February. A Breitbart reporter obtained the information and the video at that time, but never released it because Breitbart management ordered it buried. Their excuse at the time was that it was “not in alignment with their political affiliations.” – T***slation: We don’t want to smear Cruz QUITE yet because it will risk our press access with him on the off chance he wins the primary e******n. They clearly admitted having the full story and video at that time.

Breitbart is owned by a pro-Cruz Super-Pac funder named Robert Mercer who wanted the story buried. The editor of Breitbart, Ben Shapiro, is also being named as one of the people who blocked this story from being released. Shapiro is also the editor of The Daily Wire, which is owned by another pro-Cruz Super-PAC team, the Wilks brothers.

I don’t need to tell you how badly this looks for both Cruz and Breitbart. Breitbart tried to say there was no real proof of anything going on, and that’s why they chose not to run the story or use the tape. Now it’s revealed that Breitbart is a wholly owned propaganda arm of a Ted Cruz Super-PAC controller. There’s every reason to believe that the reason they didn’t want to run this story is because they actually knew that there was something to all this and they didn’t want to ruin their investment in buying the next Republican president.

Let’s think about it. Multiple women, all being identified with Cruz, some working for him in the past and some who worked at competing places into which Cruz Super-PACs funneled money for literally no good reason – where does the plausible deniability end? How many mistresses need to be associated with Cruz before the media starts believing that he was up to no good and/or that these women were taken advantage of?

Washington Times reporter Drew Johnson has also gone on record confirming 2 of the women in the list are accurate to his knowledge:



Anti-Trump political hatchet man Rick Wilson is even pressing them to release the tape, and he is not even against Ted Cruz.


For all his staunch denial and f**e bluster trying to attack Trump recently, calling him a sniveling coward, it seems that Ted is – as they say in his home state of Texas – all hat and no cattle. He will be spending the rest of the primary season trying to explain away or deny this and it’s going to cost him – dearly. It should be an interesting couple of weeks coming up, to say the least.
Cruz’s Cuban Mistress Crisis EXPLODES: Video Surfa... (show quote)


You are just giddy over this aren't you? At last you feel happy.!! How long have you been waiting for something this juicy? You are a real gossip.

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2016 12:06:36   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
The only thing that exploded was in your pants. That's because you thought you had some dirt on somebody besides Hillary.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 12:38:49   #
3jack
 
JMHO wrote:
You lefties will believe anything...anything other than the t***h, that is. It seems a sucker is born every minute...sigh.

Besides, if Cruz was a Democrat, that would be a resume enhancement, if it was true, and it isn't.

Read this, moron: http://www.inquisitr.com/2931412/ted-cruz-sex-scandal-questioned-serious-doubts-arise-over-claims-cruz-had-mistresses/


1. It is true
2. Cruz is not a Democrat
3. If it's not true, I expect a law suit
4. How many times have National Enquirer been wrong?
5. Stop grasping for straws in support of your loser Cruz

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 12:43:14   #
3jack
 
Super Dave wrote:
The only thing that exploded was in your pants. That's because you thought you had some dirt on somebody besides Hillary.


With Hillary all you have is innuendo, and the t***h about the self righteous, evangelical Cruz and his wayward weeny is not dirt. There will be no legal action against National Enquirer about the article.....mark my word.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 14:53:41   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
3jack wrote:
1. It is true
2. Cruz is not a Democrat
3. If it's not true, I expect a law suit
4. How many times have National Enquirer been wrong?
5. Stop grasping for straws in support of your loser Cruz


Aaaaah, one-jack-from-a-full-deck crawled out from his rock to espouse some more libtard nonsense...his specialty. Prove it's true, asshole. Who are the sources (National Enquirer doesn't name any sources)...actual proof now, not your usual lying libtard bulls**t.

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2016 14:55:15   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
3jack wrote:
With Hillary all you have is innuendo, and the t***h about the self righteous, evangelical Cruz and his wayward weeny is not dirt. There will be no legal action against National Enquirer about the article.....mark my word.


Innuendo????!!!!! GD, you're funny and damn stupid! Go crawl back under that rock, and stay in the dark, you freakin' moron.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 15:15:12   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
JMHO wrote:
Aaaaah, one-jack-from-a-full-deck crawled out from his rock to espouse some more libtard nonsense...his specialty. Prove it's true, asshole. Who are the sources (National Enquirer doesn't name any sources)...actual proof now, not your usual lying libtard bulls**t.
Donald Trump and David Pecker, the CEO of National Enquirer, have been friends for many years. NE has endorsed Trump. The story about Cruz' "affairs" was offered to a number of major l*****t media newspapers, such as the NYT and the Boston Globe. They checked it out, found absolutely nothing to support or verify it, and so summarily rejected it. (If the NYT couldn't uncover anything with which to trash a Republican, no one could.)

So, Pecker picked his peck of pickled peppers and published the story. It is a full-blown fabricated slander attack on Cruz in response to the FB postings by an anti-Trump super PAC that is not affiliated with the Cruz campaign. Cruz had nothing to do with the posting of a photo of Trump's wife, he never saw it coming, and there is nothing he could have done to stop it had he known.

Whether Trump conspired with Pecker to get that slander attack published, no one knows. But it is absolutely bogus and is another symptom of just how far down in the s**thole our politics have fallen.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 15:18:28   #
3jack
 
JMHO wrote:
Aaaaah, one-jack-from-a-full-deck crawled out from his rock to espouse some more libtard nonsense...his specialty. Prove it's true, asshole. Who are the sources (National Enquirer doesn't name any sources)...actual proof now, not your usual lying libtard bulls**t.


I could care less about what you think of me, but it's funny how the Cruz camp has mentioned nothing about libel, eh? If most Americans felt that they had been maligned, they would immediately file suit. Also, it's up to Cruz to disprove the article......I could care less. The only way to get to the real t***h, as you see it, is for Cruz to file libel charges against the NE.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 15:18:39   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Donald Trump and David Pecker, the CEO of National Enquirer, have been friends for many years. NE has endorsed Trump. The story about Cruz' "affairs" was offered to a number of major l*****t media newspapers, such as the NYT and the Boston Globe. They checked it out, found absolutely nothing to support or verify it, and so summarily rejected it. (If the NYT couldn't uncover anything with which to trash a Republican, no one could.)

So, Pecker picked his peck of pickled peppers and published the story. It is a full-blown fabricated slander attack on Cruz in response to the FB postings by an anti-Trump super PAC that is not affiliated with the Cruz campaign. Cruz had nothing to do with the posting of a photo of Trump's wife, he never saw it coming, and there is nothing he could have done to stop it had he known.

Whether Trump conspired with Pecker to get that slander attack published, no one knows. But it is absolutely bogus and is another symptom of just how far down in the s**thole our politics have fallen.
Donald Trump and David Pecker, the CEO of National... (show quote)


Thanks blade Runner. Anyone with an ounce of grey matter between the ears knows that it is not true and just a smear by the Trump campaign. Of course, we all know that collectively, all the l*****t Democrats can't come up with an ounce of grey matter...inclusively.

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2016 15:23:45   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
3jack wrote:
I could care less about what you think of me, but it's funny how the Cruz camp has mentioned nothing about libel, eh? If most Americans felt that they had been maligned, they would immediately file suit. Also, it's up to Cruz to disprove the article......I could care less. The only way to get to the real t***h, as you see it, is for Cruz to file libel charges against the NE.


More of your absolute ignorance...it never ends, and once again you make a complete ass out of yourself...your norm. How do you know what is going on behind the scenes in Cruz's campaign? Eh? Oh, and you throw in the typical LEFT-WING "Harry Reid" comment, "it's up to Cruz to disprove the article"!!!! You're f**king amazing!!!!!! One hell of a lot more stupid than I ever pegged you for, pal. You libtards are f**king unbelievable!

Like I said asshole, prove it is true. You can't, you can only sling mud like the rest of your ilk.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 15:24:44   #
3jack
 
JMHO wrote:
Innuendo????!!!!! GD, you're funny and damn stupid! Go crawl back under that rock, and stay in the dark, you freakin' moron.


How's that B******i thing working out for you? Heard anything from Trey Gowdy lately? Have they reviewed all of the e:mails yet? What about that inevitable indictment? How soon will it be forthcoming? What about that Whitewater thing and the murders of Vince Foster, Webb Hubble and others? Just to keep you in a h**e filled rage, I offer this.........

Bill Clinton right after receiving his third hummer of the week
Bill Clinton right after receiving his third humme...

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 15:28:15   #
3jack
 
JMHO wrote:
More of your absolute ignorance...it never ends, and once again you make a complete ass out of yourself...your norm. How do you know what is going on behind the scenes in Cruz's campaign? Eh? Oh, and you throw in the typical LEFT-WING "Harry Reid" comment, "it's up to Cruz to disprove the article"!!!! You're f**king amazing!!!!!! One hell of a lot more stupid than I ever pegged you for, pal. You libtards are f**king unbelievable!

Like I said asshole, prove it is true. You can't, you can only sling mud like the rest of your ilk.
More of your absolute ignorance...it never ends, a... (show quote)


Your rants change nothing. The evangelical boy wonder with the wandering weenie is toast.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 15:30:03   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
3jack wrote:
How's that B******i thing working out for you? Heard anything from Trey Gowdy lately? Have they reviewed all of the e:mails yet? What about that inevitable indictment? How soon will it be forthcoming? What about that Whitewater thing and the murders of Vince Foster, Webb Hubble and others? Just to keep you in a h**e filled rage, I offer this.........


More of your stupid? Have some patience libtard, the investigation has not concluded as yet. As for the rest of your stupid comment, what will be the body count be under a Hillary presidency? Will she top Bill's? A lot of the Clinton's associates, friends, and staff personnel become room temperature under the Clinton Crime Family. Just sayin'

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.