So, what do Trumpsters think of Trump attacking Cruz's wife?
Mar 24, 2016 08:57:40 #
Should the same finger that does his Twitter account be on the nuke button?
Mar 24, 2016 09:06:12 #
Super Dave wrote:
Should the same finger that does his Twitter account be on the nuke button?
What in this world are you talking about?
Mar 24, 2016 09:06:12 #
Super Dave wrote:
Should the same finger that does his Twitter account be on the nuke button?
Compairing apples and oranges ehh , like adding two negitives and expecting a positive outcome ! However this is a silly spat between two grown men , not worth media coverage .
Mar 24, 2016 09:11:50 #
reconreb wrote:
Compairing apples and oranges ehh , like adding two negitives and expecting a positive outcome ! However this is a silly spat between two grown men , not worth media coverage .
Apples and oranges???? If Trump quickly jumps to conclusions, without first checking the facts, reflects on his snap judgement and decision making sk**ls if you ask me. Trump is out of his league when going after Ted Cruz...way out of his league. Also, Trump better get a thicker skin about his wife, because if he is our nominee, God help us, the Democrats will have a picnic penetrating that thin skin...his wife will be fair game. Just sayin'.
Mar 24, 2016 09:20:38 #
And why not, it is right now.
Super Dave wrote:
Should the same finger that does his Twitter account be on the nuke button?
Mar 24, 2016 09:22:41 #
their competing for the nomination and probably think we have enough intelligence to separate low level jabs and pokes from serious decisions as commander in chief.
Mar 24, 2016 09:29:11 #
Super Dave wrote:
Should the same finger that does his Twitter account be on the nuke button?
you must be dreamin again :roll: :roll: :roll:
Mar 24, 2016 09:37:07 #
Just for questions sake, did he threaten to, or begin attacks on Cruz's wife?
Cruz has been running a bit of a dirty campaign to this point, it was only logical for Trump to make his statement.
Now it turns out it was an outside interest group( that supports Cruz), and maybe they'll be smart enough not to attack Trumps wife anymore less information about Cruz's wife and her ties w/ Goldman Sachs were to be leaked out.
Myself, after seeing her pics, would love to see her for the next four years, sure beats the pitbull we currently have.
Cruz has been running a bit of a dirty campaign to this point, it was only logical for Trump to make his statement.
Now it turns out it was an outside interest group( that supports Cruz), and maybe they'll be smart enough not to attack Trumps wife anymore less information about Cruz's wife and her ties w/ Goldman Sachs were to be leaked out.
Myself, after seeing her pics, would love to see her for the next four years, sure beats the pitbull we currently have.
Mar 24, 2016 09:50:22 #
Just what law did she break? Would I want my wife to do that, probably not but what gives me the right to slam him because she did it? And you quite correct in 'she looks better than what we're seeing these days.
the waker wrote:
Just for questions sake, did he threaten to, or b... (show quote)
Mar 24, 2016 09:53:29 #
Super Dave wrote:
Should the same finger that does his Twitter account be on the nuke button?
What's goes around comes around,ALWAYS.Even for Cruz and Trump
Mar 24, 2016 09:59:21 #
the waker wrote:
Just for questions sake, did he threaten to, or b... (show quote)
Are you serious??? Cruz has been running a bit of a dirty campaign to this point???? I beg to differ!!!! It is Trump who is running the dirty campaign, calling Cruz "Lyin' Ted Cruz" which is a bunch of bunk, and then attacks him for what Super Pacs say, which he has no control over? No, Trump is the one who is campaigning dirty.
BTW, when did it become illegal to work for Goldman Sachs? If one wants to attack Cruz's wife just because she worked at a financial firm, all of the investors that Trump has stiffed should be fair game? Right? And, there were many.
Mar 24, 2016 09:59:59 #
the waker wrote:
Just for questions sake, did he threaten to, or b... (show quote)
"Myself, after seeing her pics, would love to see her for the next four years, sure beats the pitbull we currently have."
Yep!lolololol
Ties with Goldman Sachs you say?
Mar 24, 2016 10:02:54 #
Oh boy...thanks "The Waker", now you have awakened the uber conspiracy theorist nut bag eagleye13...yawn.
Now, we can expect his usual litany of conspiracy bulls**t...yawn...ho hum....
Now, we can expect his usual litany of conspiracy bulls**t...yawn...ho hum....
Mar 24, 2016 10:06:38 #
The NeoCON troll (hasbarat?) has arrived.
He takes a lickin; but keeps on tickin:-)
He takes a lickin; but keeps on tickin:-)
JMHO wrote:
Oh boy...thanks "The Waker", now you have awakened the uber conspiracy theorist nut bag eagleye13...yawn.
Now, we can expect his usual litany of conspiracy bulls**t...yawn...ho hum....
Now, we can expect his usual litany of conspiracy bulls**t...yawn...ho hum....
Mar 24, 2016 10:15:15 #
JMHO wrote:
Are you serious??? Cruz has been running a bit of... (show quote)
I still remember what the Cruz campaign did to Carson, so yeah dirty.
As far as Trump stiffing investor, so what, its a gamble, some have made alot of money, some haven't.
If they couldn't afford to loose they money, then don't gamble it, pal. :)
If Cruz's wife was completely legit at Goldman -Sachs, then I guess they have nothing to worry about.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.