Not to cause confusion to the issue, but, she actually asked the FBI to look into the possibility of if the DOJ "Could" find a a way to take legal action against climate deniers. There is a difference. First of all, to ask the FBI about potential prosecution of any individual or group would have to infer a crime has been committed. Their focus, the Obama administration, is to groups that not only deny that man made carbon emissions are the cause of g****l w*****g, c*****e c****e, etc...But, also the business that they are in in terms of energy production. So, if you are in the "f****l F**l" industry, and you deny your manner of energy production is cause for GW, CC, then they are looking at a way to prosecute you. It's not "Should They?"...It's "Could They?"
This is very scary!

You forgot to include DEAF from t***h/DUMB from t***h/BLIND from all t***h they are so brain washed to the point of being brain dead,but then again this just might be ploy to throw FBI off track & focal from the k**lery case.
They don't have any reasonable standard to prosecute anyone for disagreeing with the vague notion of man made c*****e c****e, so, they are on a search and destroy footing.
This insidious, disingenuous attack should not be a surprise from this administration.
I mean, Hillary, whether she knew what she was saying or not, vowed to put coal companies out of business. But, she did say she would somehow find the displaced workers jobs in "clean" energy. What about the companies themselves?
My take is these people want to destroy major portions of the US economy with no replacement plan......Just fantasy.
But, that is the liberal left.....Take apart what works, have the answer that DOESN"T work, wonder why it didn't work, blame those who disagreed in the first place that WH**EVER was a bad idea, propose a solution for a problem they caused, and demand more money from the people who have already suffered from their previous bad policies.
Sound familiar? It should...That is the left....YOUR Democrat party.

Not to cause confusion to the issue, but, she actually asked the FBI to look into the possibility of if the DOJ "Could" find a a way to take legal action against climate deniers. There is a difference. First of all, to ask the FBI about potential prosecution of any individual or group would have to infer a crime has been committed. Their focus, the Obama administration, is to groups that not only deny that man made carbon emissions are the cause of g****l w*****g, c*****e c****e, etc...But, also the business that they are in in terms of energy production. So, if you are in the "f****l F**l" industry, and you deny your manner of energy production is cause for GW, CC, then they are looking at a way to prosecute you. It's not "Should They?"...It's "Could They?"
This is very scary!
They don't have any reasonable standard to prosecute anyone for disagreeing with the vague notion of man made c*****e c****e, so, they are on a search and destroy footing.
This insidious, disingenuous attack should not be a surprise from this administration.
I mean, Hillary, whether she knew what she was saying or not, vowed to put coal companies out of business. But, she did say she would somehow find the displaced workers jobs in "clean" energy. What about the companies themselves?
My take is these people want to destroy major portions of the US economy with no replacement plan......Just fantasy.
But, that is the liberal left.....Take apart what works, have the answer that DOESN"T work, wonder why it didn't work, blame those who disagreed in the first place that WH**EVER was a bad idea, propose a solution for a problem they caused, and demand more money from the people who have already suffered from their previous bad policies.
Sound familiar? It should...That is the left....YOUR Democrat party.