Hemiman Loc: Communist California

The FBI has offered immunity to the person that set up her in home system,could this be part of the fix?If The person refuses the offer from the FBI would they say well we tried and then they would be off the hook.Hillery says no evidence so she is off the hook and everyone just goes home.
It will be very interesting if Hillery does get convicted and can't run for pres.what does the GOP do about Trump,they claim the reason they want him out is because he can't beat Hillery,they would be exposed if she doesn't run,as we all know the real reason they want Trump out is because he will expose all these corrupt politicians.

Doc110 Loc: York PA

Thank's for the post, I heard this on the news, i'll try and post the news article.
8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) :roll: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

I'm sure he's been given career counseling by the libs already.

Doc110 Loc: York PA

Looks like Hillary's invisibility and her State Department IT staffer bubble has finally popped. He has given up his 5th Amendment rights and took the FBI Immunity plea bargain.

Sorry SuperD, Liberals can learn from their mistakes, but most don't . . . As far as political counseling, I will you that job. tell me how it works out . . .

Could this be the the road to the big house, and that their is a secretive grand jury working behind the scenes.

Another nail in the coffin with the slippery b***h.

Hope so.

Doc110 Loc: York PA

Here is the crack in the Clinton persona, her hubris infallibility . . .


03/02/2016 Justice Dept. grants immunity to staffer who set up Clinton email server

Adam Goldman
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-clinton-email-investigation-justice-department-grants-immunity-to-former-state-department-staffer/2016/03/02/e421e39e-e0a0-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html?

The Justice Department has granted immunity to the former State Department staffer who worked on Hillary Clinton’s private email server as part of a criminal investigation into the possible mishandling of classified information, according to a senior law enforcement official.

The official said the FBI had secured the cooperation of Bryan Pagliano, who worked on Clinton’s 2008 p**********l campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009.

As the FBI looks to wrap up its investigation in the coming months, agents will likely want to interview Clinton and her senior aides about the decision to use a private server, how it was set up, and whether any of the participants knew they were sending classified information in emails, current and former officials said.

The inquiry comes against a sensitive political backdrop in which Clinton is the favorite to secure the Democratic nomination for the presidency.

So far, there is no indication that prosecutors have convened a grand jury in the email investigation to subpoena testimony or documents, which would require the participation of a U.S. attorney’s office.

Clinton personally paid State Department staffer to maintain server
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clintons-personally-paid-state-department-staffer-to-maintain-server/2015/09/04/b13ab23e-530c-11e5-9812-92d5948a40f8_story.html?


Spokesmen at the FBI and Justice Department would not discuss the investigation. Pagliano’s lawyer also declined to comment.

In a statement, Brian Fallon, a spokesman for the Clinton campaign, said:

“As we have said since last summer, Secretary Clinton has been cooperating with the Department of Justice’s security inquiry, including offering in August to meet with them to assist their efforts if needed.”


He also said that the campaign is “pleased” that Pagliano, who invoked his Fifth Amendment rights before Congress, is now cooperating with prosecutors.

The campaign had encouraged Pagliano to testify before Congress.


As part of the inquiry, law enforcement officials will look at the potential damage had the classified information in the emails been exposed.

The Clinton campaign has described the probe as a security review.

But current and former officials in the FBI and at the Justice Department have said investigators are trying to determine whether a crime was committed.

“There was wrongdoing,” said a former senior law enforcement official.

“But was it criminal wrongdoing?”

Clinton has since apologized for what had happened: “Yes, I should have used two email addresses, one for personal matters and one for my work at the State Department.

Not doing so was a mistake.

I’m sorry about it, and I take full responsibility.”


Any decision to charge someone would involve Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch, who told Congress when asked earlier this month about the email inquiry: “That matter is being handled by career independent law enforcement agents, FBI agents, as well as the career independent attorneys in the Department of Justice.

They follow the evidence, they look at the law and they’ll make a recommendation to me when the time is appropriate.

“We will review all the facts and all the evidence and come to an independent conclusion as how to best handle it,” she added.

Current and former officials said the conviction of retired four-star general and CIA director David H. Petraeus for mishandling classified information is casting a shadow over the email investigation.

The officials said they think that Petraeus’s actions were more egregious than those of Clinton and her aides since he lied to the FBI, and classified information he shared with his biographer contained top secret code words, identities of covert officers, war strategy and intelligence capabilities.

Prosecutors initially threatened to charge him with three felonies, including conspiracy, violating the Espionage Act and lying to the FBI. But after negotiations, Petraeus pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified information.

He was fined $100,000 and sentenced to two years of probation. FBI officials were angered by the deal and predicted it would affect the outcome of other cases involving classified information.


Petraeus “was handled so lightly for his offense there isn’t a whole lot you can do,” said a former U.S. law enforcement official who oversaw counterintelligence investigations and described the email controversy as “a lesser set of circumstances.”

The State Department has been analyzing the contents of Clinton’s correspondence, as it has prepared 52,000 pages of Clinton’s emails for public release in batches, a process that began in May and concluded Monday.

The State Department has said 2,093 of Clinton’s released emails were redacted in all or part because they contained classified material, the vast majority of them rated “confidential,” the lowest level of sensitivity in the classification system.

Clinton and the State Department have said that none of the material was marked classified at the time it was sent. However, it is the responsibility of individual government officials to properly handle sensitive material.

The email investigation is being conducted by FBI counterintelligence agents and supervised by the Justice Department’s National Security Division.


In a letter filed earlier this month in federal court as part of ongoing civil litigation over Clinton’s emails, the FBI confirmed that it was “working on matters related to former Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server.”

The agency declined to publicly detail the investigation’s “specific focus, scope or potential targets.”

On Tuesday, FBI Director James B. Comey said he was “very close” to the investigation.

Former federal prosecutor Glen Kopp said it is not surprising that agents want to interview Clinton and her aides.

“They are within the zone of interest of the investigation,” he said.
A request to interview her would have to be reviewed by top level officials at both the FBI and the Justice Department, a former official said.

As part of those interviews, the FBI would also seek to establish that Clinton and her aides understood the policies and protocols for handling classified information, former officials said.

Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall, declined to comment.

Kendall, who also has represented President Bill Clinton and Petraeus, has navigated similar issues in other cases. During the investigation of President Clinton by independent counsel Ken Starr, for instance, Kendall rebuffed several requests for interviews.


The president was then subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury. In a deal brokered by Kendall, the subpoena was withdrawn and Clinton testified voluntarily in 1998.

Former prosecutors said investigators were probably feeling the pressure of time because of the e******n.

Take action before the e******n, they said, and you risk being perceived as trying to influence the result.

Take action after and face criticism for not letting v**ers know there was an issue with their preferred candidate.


“The timing is terrible whether you do it before or after,” Kopp said.

The issue of Clinton’s use of a private email server was referred to the FBI in July after the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community officials determined that some of the emails that traversed Clinton’s server contained classified material.

Emails that contain material now deemed classified were authored by Clinton but also by many of her top aides, including Jacob Sullivan, who was her director of policy planning and her deputy chief of staff. He is now advising Clinton’s campaign on foreign policy and is thought to be a likely candidate for national security adviser if she is elected.

The State Department has said that, at the request of intelligence agencies, it has classified 22 Clinton emails as “top secret” and will not release those emails, even in redacted form.

“Top secret” is the highest level of classification, reserved for material whose release could cause “exceptionally grave damage to the national security.”


I. Charles McCullough III, the inspector general of the intelligence community, has indicated that some of the material intelligence officials have reviewed contained information that was classified at the time it was sent; the State Department has indicated it has not analyzed whether the material should have been marked classified when it was sent, only whether it requires classification before being released now.

77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States

Hillary Clinton is getting what she deserves for 40 plus years the Clintons have gotten away with murder,embezzlement,money laundering and much more but those charges are against Bill not Hillary she just covered it up.This what has gone on with the server and everything is Hillary's fault because she thought she was above the law now the person who held her personal server has been given immunity by the DOJ not the F.B.I.That means a grand jury is hearing his testimony and if he lies he goes to prison.This means he's going to spill the beans and Hillary Clinton is not going to be protected.Don't think like everybody else that Obama won't prosecute Hillary I got another thing for you.Hillary is going to be the fall person so the investigation doesn't come to the Whitehouse.If she's indicted that leaves room for Obama to make his case why he can't have another term.He's that sociopathic and don't think for a moment he won't try and do it.Say what you will about Hillary Clinton i've got no skin in the game on this one but,watch the Usurper in Chief.If she's indicted I think President Obama will issue a police state and try a run around the Congress and we'll be stuck with Obama indefinitely.For those who will laugh.Just look what he's done with all these executive orders.Giving the federal government powers it never had.This is a very calculated and dangerous man.For one we don't know what he's doing behind the countries back.If Hillary is not indicted.Say good bye to America forever there is no coming back.The America we all know and will be gone forever. If she's not put in handcuffs and taken to prison. The American people will know the game is r****d.It will destroy America. The Libs will finally have there wish.Whether you're a Republican or Democrat who support the rule of Law this will solidify people's ideas that there is a set of rules for most people not politicians.America is at stake.Hopefully justice prevails.Jury's still out.But there's hope and light at the end of the tunnel.Lets hope the DOJ and the F.B.I send a resounding statement that nobody is above the law.

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States

Hillary Clinton is getting what she deserves for 40 plus years the Clintons have gotten away with murder,embezzlement,money laundering and much more but those charges are against Bill not Hillary she just covered it up.This what has gone on with the server and everything is Hillary's fault because she thought she was above the law now the person who held her personal server has been given immunity by the DOJ not the F.B.I.That means a grand jury is hearing his testimony and if he lies he goes to prison.This means he's going to spill the beans and Hillary Clinton is not going to be protected.Don't think like everybody else that Obama won't prosecute Hillary I got another thing for you.Hillary is going to be the fall person so the investigation doesn't come to the Whitehouse.If she's indicted that leaves room for Obama to make his case why he can't have another term.He's that sociopathic and don't think for a moment he won't try and do it.Say what you will about Hillary Clinton i've got no skin in the game on this one but,watch the Usurper in Chief.If she's indicted I think President Obama will issue a police state and try a run around the Congress and we'll be stuck with Obama indefinitely.For those who will laugh.Just look what he's done with all these executive orders.Giving the federal government powers it never had.This is a very calculated and dangerous man.For one we don't know what he's doing behind the countries back.If Hillary is not indicted.Say good bye to America forever there is no coming back.The America we all know and will be gone forever. If she's not put in handcuffs and taken to prison. The American people will know the game is r****d.It will destroy America. The Libs will finally have there wish.Whether you're a Republican or Democrat who support the rule of Law this will solidify people's ideas that there is a set of rules for most people not politicians.America is at stake.Hopefully justice prevails.Jury's still out.But there's hope and light at the end of the tunnel.Lets hope the DOJ and the F.B.I send a resounding statement that nobody is above the law.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

So far all she's 'getting' is $millions and the adoration by the MSM and the welfare crowd.

There is a chance that she could be indicted, but it's a very small chance. For Obama to allow this would be for him to have to admit what a pathetic job he did between golf swings and taking selfies.

77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States

Say what you will but Obama will not block an indictment if he does he should be impeached right on the spot because he swore to uphold the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic.Believe me he doesn't want the F.B..I. Snooping around the Whitehouse.He won't block it because he h**es Hilliary. He's for only himself. This will only solidify that statement.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

Obama doesn't have to block the indictment. If Lynch refuses to indict (as she did with Lois Learner) Obama will have hands off.

And... BTW... Obama could murder a bisexual refugee child and rape his cat on national TV and he wouldn't get impeached.

Obama has deserved impeachment for years. But like I kept saying here over and over "It ain't happenin".

Obama loves Obama more than he h**es Hillary. Her indictment for 1000's of crimes under his nose would make him look as incompetent as he is. He can't allow that to happen.

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States

All I can say for the person who held the server is not to mention Obama's name at all or he'll be sent to the same ranch that justice Scalia was sent to.Anybody have and ideas why nobody is do an investigation of Scalia's death is beyond me that's for another topic and another day.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

The reason for the lack of investigation over Scalia's death probably that his family didn't want one and there was no evidence of wrongdoing. Sometimes things are that simple.

As for Hillary's geek.... If I was him, I'd stay away from Ft. Marcy Park.

77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States

If there's a block it would have to come from Obama he's already tried to invoke his wisdom on the topic and what did we see.The F.B.I. All but told him through leaks to the press that if he tries to intervene he's next so Obama has been silent for some time on the matter.