Obama Treated Worse Than A Child
Oct 16, 2013 18:28:11 #
My recent post titled America needs a white Republican president has brought out the raving L*****t lunatics.
Despite the fact that Im black, most L*****ts are calling me a r****t. And what is more pathetic is, they have called my friend Joe the Plumber a r****t for re-posting the article.
It should come as no surprise that most of the ignoramuses who commented about the article only read the title or had somebody read the title to them. And in the case of the HuffPo, which called Joe the Plumber a r****t, they didnt even bother to check the substance of the article.
The gist of the article is that, if America had a white Republican president, everybody would be free to criticize him without fear of being called a r****t.
I go on to make the point that disagreeing with Obama should have the same implications as disagreeing with a white, Republican president.
Apparently not. God forbid Obama should have to actually deal with life like a mature adult.
White Republican presidents need no such protection. B****s disagreed with Bush and many wanted him to fail. Were they deemed r****ts? Of course not. Even for the b****s who are r****ts, people just chalked their criticism up to a difference in ideologies.
I made the following comment recently to a panel of distinguished Democrats at a prestigious institution:
Black Conservatives are called behind scratching, black-anglo-saxon, boot-licking, buck-dancing, butt-kissing, co-caucasian, cocktail-sipping, foot shuffling, hi yaller, handkerchief-head, opporTOMist, Oreo cookie, rent-a-Tom, servant-of-the-right-wing, self-hating, self-loathing, shoeshine boy, speak-when-spoken-to, Stepin Fetchit, thank-ya-boss, uppity un-cola, Uncle Tom, race t*****r, Rush Limbaugh wannabes, to name a few.
I then asked,
Can you name me ONE thing that black Liberals are called by black conservatives?
Answer by one of the panelists:
Liberal.
Thats the best that fraud could do.
Meddling Progressives believe they need to protect a man who volunteered to be the Chief Executive of the United States. The people asking for answers are not some Democrat-sanctioned, neo-N**i fringe group like the KKK or the Tea Party-mimicking Coffee Party, with membership of less than 500.
Rather, the Tea Party is comprised of approximately 50 million+ responsible, taxpaying, patriotic America-loving, law-abiding citizens. The Tea Partystockholders in Americahave a right to ask questions of the Commander-In-Chief without being called r****ts.
Bob Johnson, the CEO of BET, could handle stockholder criticism without crying r****m, particularly if BET were failing as miserably as the American economy.
Oprah Winfreys corporation has white stockholders. Im sure some of them question her wisdom in leaving her daytime talk show gig, and promptly losing over $100M of their money. Are they r****ts?
If Obama were the CEO of a private-sector company, his actions would at the very least get him drug-tested. Kevin Jackson
As a former management consultant to some of the worlds largest corporations, I dont know a single former client who wouldnt have fired Obama in the second year of his tenure. In most of those organizations, Obama wouldnt have escaped year one scrutiny before he would have been tossed. Private corporations would have seen enough. Their stockholders would have seen enough.
At the Fiscal Responsibility Summit 2009 Obama said:
And thats why today Im pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office. This will not be easy. It will require us to make difficult decisions and face challenges weve long neglected. But I refuse to leave our children with a debt that they cannot repay and that means taking responsibility right now, in this administration, for getting our spending under control.
However, that man will have more than doubled the national debt before the end of his second term.
The man who called a white Republican president unpatriotic to run up a debt of $9T, will have amassed a debt of $20T+ by the end of his tenure, yet there were no calls of r****m when Obama said this of Bush.
Shouldnt Americas black chief executive be held to the same standards as others? Or is it ok to treat Obama worse than you would treat a child?
At least children are taught lessons and consequences. Liberals wont allow Obama to learn from mistakes.
In fact, the Left continue to encourage his mistakes, because they dont want to appear to be r****t. Its an elaborate system of cover-up. The irony being, the cover-up emphasizes their r****m: the r****m of low expectations, and their incessant need to coddle b****s for profit.
Obama represents Frankensteins monster of Liberalism, an experiment gone bad. The monster unfortunately has been unleashed on America.
© 2013 Kevin Jackson The Black Sphere, LLC All Rights Reserved
Read more at http://theb****sphere.net/2013/10/obama-treated-worse-child/#c0YRpIFEXes3sm5J.99
Despite the fact that Im black, most L*****ts are calling me a r****t. And what is more pathetic is, they have called my friend Joe the Plumber a r****t for re-posting the article.
It should come as no surprise that most of the ignoramuses who commented about the article only read the title or had somebody read the title to them. And in the case of the HuffPo, which called Joe the Plumber a r****t, they didnt even bother to check the substance of the article.
The gist of the article is that, if America had a white Republican president, everybody would be free to criticize him without fear of being called a r****t.
I go on to make the point that disagreeing with Obama should have the same implications as disagreeing with a white, Republican president.
Apparently not. God forbid Obama should have to actually deal with life like a mature adult.
White Republican presidents need no such protection. B****s disagreed with Bush and many wanted him to fail. Were they deemed r****ts? Of course not. Even for the b****s who are r****ts, people just chalked their criticism up to a difference in ideologies.
I made the following comment recently to a panel of distinguished Democrats at a prestigious institution:
Black Conservatives are called behind scratching, black-anglo-saxon, boot-licking, buck-dancing, butt-kissing, co-caucasian, cocktail-sipping, foot shuffling, hi yaller, handkerchief-head, opporTOMist, Oreo cookie, rent-a-Tom, servant-of-the-right-wing, self-hating, self-loathing, shoeshine boy, speak-when-spoken-to, Stepin Fetchit, thank-ya-boss, uppity un-cola, Uncle Tom, race t*****r, Rush Limbaugh wannabes, to name a few.
I then asked,
Can you name me ONE thing that black Liberals are called by black conservatives?
Answer by one of the panelists:
Liberal.
Thats the best that fraud could do.
Meddling Progressives believe they need to protect a man who volunteered to be the Chief Executive of the United States. The people asking for answers are not some Democrat-sanctioned, neo-N**i fringe group like the KKK or the Tea Party-mimicking Coffee Party, with membership of less than 500.
Rather, the Tea Party is comprised of approximately 50 million+ responsible, taxpaying, patriotic America-loving, law-abiding citizens. The Tea Partystockholders in Americahave a right to ask questions of the Commander-In-Chief without being called r****ts.
Bob Johnson, the CEO of BET, could handle stockholder criticism without crying r****m, particularly if BET were failing as miserably as the American economy.
Oprah Winfreys corporation has white stockholders. Im sure some of them question her wisdom in leaving her daytime talk show gig, and promptly losing over $100M of their money. Are they r****ts?
If Obama were the CEO of a private-sector company, his actions would at the very least get him drug-tested. Kevin Jackson
As a former management consultant to some of the worlds largest corporations, I dont know a single former client who wouldnt have fired Obama in the second year of his tenure. In most of those organizations, Obama wouldnt have escaped year one scrutiny before he would have been tossed. Private corporations would have seen enough. Their stockholders would have seen enough.
At the Fiscal Responsibility Summit 2009 Obama said:
And thats why today Im pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office. This will not be easy. It will require us to make difficult decisions and face challenges weve long neglected. But I refuse to leave our children with a debt that they cannot repay and that means taking responsibility right now, in this administration, for getting our spending under control.
However, that man will have more than doubled the national debt before the end of his second term.
The man who called a white Republican president unpatriotic to run up a debt of $9T, will have amassed a debt of $20T+ by the end of his tenure, yet there were no calls of r****m when Obama said this of Bush.
Shouldnt Americas black chief executive be held to the same standards as others? Or is it ok to treat Obama worse than you would treat a child?
At least children are taught lessons and consequences. Liberals wont allow Obama to learn from mistakes.
In fact, the Left continue to encourage his mistakes, because they dont want to appear to be r****t. Its an elaborate system of cover-up. The irony being, the cover-up emphasizes their r****m: the r****m of low expectations, and their incessant need to coddle b****s for profit.
Obama represents Frankensteins monster of Liberalism, an experiment gone bad. The monster unfortunately has been unleashed on America.
© 2013 Kevin Jackson The Black Sphere, LLC All Rights Reserved
Read more at http://theb****sphere.net/2013/10/obama-treated-worse-child/#c0YRpIFEXes3sm5J.99
Oct 16, 2013 18:55:35 #
Oct 16, 2013 18:58:59 #
Lily wrote:
I read this the other day. You know none of the progressives will pay any attention.
Even if they did they would poo-poo it as just another one of, or all the names he mentioned in his column.
Oct 16, 2013 22:31:05 #
Thanks for your comments. I respect your willingness to express what so many are thinking. I for one, have said I don't care if one is blue, black , Red, yellow or green. If they behave in unlawful or unconstitutional behavior, they need to be held accountable.
It's a sure bet the liberal faction and news will continue to protect the guilty.
It's a sure bet the liberal faction and news will continue to protect the guilty.
Oct 16, 2013 23:50:37 #
Damn shame the first Black President was not conservative like Herman Cain or Thomas Sowell even Ben Carson. Fact is Black Conservatives are c*******ts worst nightmare.
Conservatives got to get over the RACE CARD! Damned FAST! This bulls**t has outlived its use.
The focus must be on Conservative verses Darkness. Ignore all else or we are doomed to exist in s***ery!
Conservatives got to get over the RACE CARD! Damned FAST! This bulls**t has outlived its use.
The focus must be on Conservative verses Darkness. Ignore all else or we are doomed to exist in s***ery!
Oct 17, 2013 06:23:16 #
I worked for the government for 20 years, and we had to take drug test about two times a month, why don't they drug test Obama, and by the way I hear he likes it up the butt
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.