One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Is the tea party anti-government?
Oct 15, 2013 19:45:23   #
Nuclearian Loc: I live in a Fascist, Liberal State
 
We hear the interminable torrent of lies from Democrats about the government shutdown, but the one that claims the tea-party is anti-government must be answered. When tea-party House members refuse to sign off on the biggest tax increase in American history, and the Obamacare mandate was declared to be a tax by Chief Justice John Roberts, those House members are protecting working people from a new agency that will suck the money right out of their bank accounts. This opposition to this onerous tax and the thousands of new regulations in Obamacare is not anti-government; it is anti-bad government.

The most egregious example of this type of liberal lie, the one that holds that the tea party is anti-government, comes from Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren. A corrupt corporate hack, Elizabeth Warren called tea-party House Republicans “the anarchy gang” in her most recent email.

In the email, Warren, the hypocrite who was paid over $200,000 by Travelers Insurance Corporation, which hired her to screw factory workers who were suffering from asbestos poisoning, workers who were trying to collect on their insurance policies, has the gall to falsely accuse Republicans of calling for “regulators to go easier on companies that put lead in children’s toys.” 

Conspiratorially claiming that the tea party is (hush, hush) sending out “thinly veiled calls for anarchy in Washington,” Warren, who was paid six figures by Dow Chemical, a multi-National Chemical Corporation to stop women from getting money for toxic shock breast syndrome, falsely accuses Republicans of stopping inspectors from “checking whether the meat in our grocery stores is crawling with deadly bacteria.” Warren, who supports partial-birth a******ns, championing children, accuses Republicans of calling for “the FDA to ignore whether morning-sickness drugs will cause horrible deformities in our babies.”

I am not making this up – honestly, I’m not.

In her email, Warren intoned her usual tired bumper-sticker slogan against Republicans:

“I’ve got mine, the rest of you are on your own.”

Yes, she certainly did get hers when she lied about her ethnic status to get tenure at Harvard. She got hers each year Harvard gave her around $350,000 to teach one class. She and her husband, who also got around $350,000 from Harvard for teaching one class, also shared a free house thanks to Harvard.

And we wonder why the cost of higher education is so high for “the rest of us” who are “on our own.”

Oh, and by the way, the Consumer Protection Bureau she set up at $600 per hour, money paid to her by taxpayers, “the rest of us,” is financed by the Federal Reserve, which is a private institution that is owned by the “millionaire and billionaire” big banks and corporations.

Opposing big tax increases is not anti-government. Supporting the Constitution is not anti-government. Standing up for working people, for an honest dollar and for elected politicians who are telling the t***h and who have the courage to stomach the torrent of lies as they do their job of representing the interests of working people is not anti-government.

Reply
Oct 15, 2013 22:06:08   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
She and many democrats are afraid of the Tea Party. The Tea Party is for lower taxes, American exceptionalism, smaller government, less government in American's lives and many other ideas. Problem is they need one platform.


Nuclearian wrote:
We hear the interminable torrent of lies from Democrats about the government shutdown, but the one that claims the tea-party is anti-government must be answered. When tea-party House members refuse to sign off on the biggest tax increase in American history, and the Obamacare mandate was declared to be a tax by Chief Justice John Roberts, those House members are protecting working people from a new agency that will suck the money right out of their bank accounts. This opposition to this onerous tax and the thousands of new regulations in Obamacare is not anti-government; it is anti-bad government.

The most egregious example of this type of liberal lie, the one that holds that the tea party is anti-government, comes from Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren. A corrupt corporate hack, Elizabeth Warren called tea-party House Republicans “the anarchy gang” in her most recent email.

In the email, Warren, the hypocrite who was paid over $200,000 by Travelers Insurance Corporation, which hired her to screw factory workers who were suffering from asbestos poisoning, workers who were trying to collect on their insurance policies, has the gall to falsely accuse Republicans of calling for “regulators to go easier on companies that put lead in children’s toys.” 

Conspiratorially claiming that the tea party is (hush, hush) sending out “thinly veiled calls for anarchy in Washington,” Warren, who was paid six figures by Dow Chemical, a multi-National Chemical Corporation to stop women from getting money for toxic shock breast syndrome, falsely accuses Republicans of stopping inspectors from “checking whether the meat in our grocery stores is crawling with deadly bacteria.” Warren, who supports partial-birth a******ns, championing children, accuses Republicans of calling for “the FDA to ignore whether morning-sickness drugs will cause horrible deformities in our babies.”

I am not making this up – honestly, I’m not.

In her email, Warren intoned her usual tired bumper-sticker slogan against Republicans:

“I’ve got mine, the rest of you are on your own.”

Yes, she certainly did get hers when she lied about her ethnic status to get tenure at Harvard. She got hers each year Harvard gave her around $350,000 to teach one class. She and her husband, who also got around $350,000 from Harvard for teaching one class, also shared a free house thanks to Harvard.

And we wonder why the cost of higher education is so high for “the rest of us” who are “on our own.”

Oh, and by the way, the Consumer Protection Bureau she set up at $600 per hour, money paid to her by taxpayers, “the rest of us,” is financed by the Federal Reserve, which is a private institution that is owned by the “millionaire and billionaire” big banks and corporations.

Opposing big tax increases is not anti-government. Supporting the Constitution is not anti-government. Standing up for working people, for an honest dollar and for elected politicians who are telling the t***h and who have the courage to stomach the torrent of lies as they do their job of representing the interests of working people is not anti-government.
We hear the interminable torrent of lies from Demo... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 16, 2013 10:38:01   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
bmac32 wrote:
She and many democrats are afraid of the Tea Party. The Tea Party is for lower taxes, American exceptionalism, smaller government, less government in American's lives and many other ideas. Problem is they need one platform.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree, but actually I THINK they have it, just don't verbalize it. Their platform is 'Freedom from oppression'. Or 'Liberty or death'. Or 'Don't tread on me'. Like me, I don't h**e GOVERNMENT so much as I h**e THIS GOVERNMENT THAT IS OVERBEARING AND STUPID AND OPPRESSIVE AND UNAMERICAN, THAT IS EXCEEDINGLY WASTEFUL AS WELL.

Reply
 
 
Oct 16, 2013 10:52:16   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Too many different Tea Party groups and they really need to get together and form a solid core. Both party's are spenders with programs that waste a lot of money. To me we have one party, demos who spend spend spend and demo lights who just spend less.



Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree, but actually I THINK they have it, just don't verbalize it. Their platform is 'Freedom from oppression'. Or 'Liberty or death'. Or 'Don't tread on me'. Like me, I don't h**e GOVERNMENT so much as I h**e THIS GOVERNMENT THAT IS OVERBEARING AND STUPID AND OPPRESSIVE AND UNAMERICAN, THAT IS EXCEEDINGLY WASTEFUL AS WELL.

Reply
Oct 16, 2013 11:07:21   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
bmac32 wrote:
Too many different Tea Party groups and they really need to get together and form a solid core. Both party's are spenders with programs that waste a lot of money. To me we have one party, demos who spend spend spend and demo lights who just spend less.

~~~~~~~~~~~~
In that respect, yes they need more organization for effectiveness.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.