One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Hillary: Halt all f****l f**l extraction on federal lands
Feb 7, 2016 09:33:44   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
If you enjoyed paying $1.59 a gallon for gas this past weekend, understand a few things. To the extent domestic production affects this, the oil industry is mostly gettings its resources on private lands. That’s because Obama, while he’s happy to take credit for the increased productivity and lower prices, is fighting new leases on federal lands wherever he can. That’s how he can reassure his left-wing base he’s an enemy of the oil industry while also taking credit for the low prices.

But there is some oil being extracted on federal lands, and if that stopped all at once, it would definitely have a significant and negative impact on prices. And according to Hillary Clinton, that’ exactly what she would do if she became president:

blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”>

BREAKING: @HillaryClinton would impose a moratorium on f****l f**l extraction on federal lands #fitn pic.twitter.com/Tk3pCrnNeI

— 350 Action (@350action) February 5, 2016


Have you noticed that Hillary’s answers to questions are becoming even more saturated with B.S. than we’ve come to expect from her historically? It’s sort of like when she was asked if she would release the transcripts of her speeches to Wall Street financial firms, which she’s obviously not going to do, but she doesn’t want to just flat-out say no - so instead she said, “I’ll look into it. I don’t know the status.”

What the hell is that supposed to mean? I don’t know the status? What? You can’t even argue with that statement because it means nothing. It’s just something she pulled out of her # to say. And it’s the same thing with her response to this guy who’s asking about the moratorium. “There are legal issues we have to work through.” What legal issues? That doesn’t even make any sense. Even Obama isn’t so bogged down with “legal issues” that he’s found it necessary to impose a complete moratorium. He just stands in the way wherever he can out of ideological vanity.

If she actually means this, she’s talking about setting back the progress of domestic energy production in a pretty serious way - and all because of some nebulous “legal issues”?

Now, my guess is that there are no “legal issues” here that couldn’t be solved by the oil developers writing a nice fat check to the Clinton Foundation, or to the Hillary campaign. Or, even better . . . nothing she said to this guy meant anything, and she just figured she’d tell the guy what he wanted to hear and spew some nonsense about “legal issues” as a way of making it sound like she was actually giving him a serious response.

But aren’t you getting a little tired of a person running for president - and being taken seriously doing so - whose words are not taken seriously because everyone knows from the second they come out of her mouth that they’re complete Bolshevik?

Dan Calabrese

Reply
Feb 7, 2016 11:01:44   #
JimMe
 
JMHO wrote:
If you enjoyed paying $1.59 a gallon for gas this past weekend, understand a few things. To the extent domestic production affects this, the oil industry is mostly gettings its resources on private lands. That’s because Obama, while he’s happy to take credit for the increased productivity and lower prices, is fighting new leases on federal lands wherever he can. That’s how he can reassure his left-wing base he’s an enemy of the oil industry while also taking credit for the low prices.

But there is some oil being extracted on federal lands, and if that stopped all at once, it would definitely have a significant and negative impact on prices. And according to Hillary Clinton, that’ exactly what she would do if she became president:

blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”>

BREAKING: @HillaryClinton would impose a moratorium on f****l f**l extraction on federal lands #fitn pic.twitter.com/Tk3pCrnNeI

— 350 Action (@350action) February 5, 2016


Have you noticed that Hillary’s answers to questions are becoming even more saturated with B.S. than we’ve come to expect from her historically? It’s sort of like when she was asked if she would release the transcripts of her speeches to Wall Street financial firms, which she’s obviously not going to do, but she doesn’t want to just flat-out say no - so instead she said, “I’ll look into it. I don’t know the status.”

What the hell is that supposed to mean? I don’t know the status? What? You can’t even argue with that statement because it means nothing. It’s just something she pulled out of her # to say. And it’s the same thing with her response to this guy who’s asking about the moratorium. “There are legal issues we have to work through.” What legal issues? That doesn’t even make any sense. Even Obama isn’t so bogged down with “legal issues” that he’s found it necessary to impose a complete moratorium. He just stands in the way wherever he can out of ideological vanity.

If she actually means this, she’s talking about setting back the progress of domestic energy production in a pretty serious way - and all because of some nebulous “legal issues”?

Now, my guess is that there are no “legal issues” here that couldn’t be solved by the oil developers writing a nice fat check to the Clinton Foundation, or to the Hillary campaign. Or, even better . . . nothing she said to this guy meant anything, and she just figured she’d tell the guy what he wanted to hear and spew some nonsense about “legal issues” as a way of making it sound like she was actually giving him a serious response.

But aren’t you getting a little tired of a person running for president - and being taken seriously doing so - whose words are not taken seriously because everyone knows from the second they come out of her mouth that they’re complete Bolshevik?

Dan Calabrese
If you enjoyed paying $1.59 a gallon for gas this ... (show quote)



I'm not TIRED of Hillary Clinton... I'm SCARED of Hillary Clinton... And ANY DemLib-Socialist President... We ALL should be...

Reply
Feb 7, 2016 14:48:27   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
If They Want Her Records, Issue A 'John Doe' Warrant And Seize Everything She Has At 3:00am
That's What They Do To The 'Little People' With Our Homes And Businesses
AND These Warrants Include A GAG ORDER, So The Victims Can't Talk To The Press Or Anyone Else About ANY Of It

Back To The OP:
80% Of American Land West Of The Kansas-Colorado Border Falls Under State/Federal Jurisdiction Of Some Type

Reply
 
 
Feb 8, 2016 22:58:40   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
JMHO wrote:
If you enjoyed paying $1.59 a gallon for gas this past weekend, understand a few things. To the extent domestic production affects this, the oil industry is mostly gettings its resources on private lands. That’s because Obama, while he’s happy to take credit for the increased productivity and lower prices, is fighting new leases on federal lands wherever he can. That’s how he can reassure his left-wing base he’s an enemy of the oil industry while also taking credit for the low prices.

But there is some oil being extracted on federal lands, and if that stopped all at once, it would definitely have a significant and negative impact on prices. And according to Hillary Clinton, that’ exactly what she would do if she became president:

blockquote class=“twitter-tweet”>

BREAKING: @HillaryClinton would impose a moratorium on f****l f**l extraction on federal lands #fitn pic.twitter.com/Tk3pCrnNeI

— 350 Action (@350action) February 5, 2016


Have you noticed that Hillary’s answers to questions are becoming even more saturated with B.S. than we’ve come to expect from her historically? It’s sort of like when she was asked if she would release the transcripts of her speeches to Wall Street financial firms, which she’s obviously not going to do, but she doesn’t want to just flat-out say no - so instead she said, “I’ll look into it. I don’t know the status.”

What the hell is that supposed to mean? I don’t know the status? What? You can’t even argue with that statement because it means nothing. It’s just something she pulled out of her # to say. And it’s the same thing with her response to this guy who’s asking about the moratorium. “There are legal issues we have to work through.” What legal issues? That doesn’t even make any sense. Even Obama isn’t so bogged down with “legal issues” that he’s found it necessary to impose a complete moratorium. He just stands in the way wherever he can out of ideological vanity.

If she actually means this, she’s talking about setting back the progress of domestic energy production in a pretty serious way - and all because of some nebulous “legal issues”?

Now, my guess is that there are no “legal issues” here that couldn’t be solved by the oil developers writing a nice fat check to the Clinton Foundation, or to the Hillary campaign. Or, even better . . . nothing she said to this guy meant anything, and she just figured she’d tell the guy what he wanted to hear and spew some nonsense about “legal issues” as a way of making it sound like she was actually giving him a serious response.

But aren’t you getting a little tired of a person running for president - and being taken seriously doing so - whose words are not taken seriously because everyone knows from the second they come out of her mouth that they’re complete Bolshevik?

Dan Calabrese
If you enjoyed paying $1.59 a gallon for gas this ... (show quote)


Maybe we could begin the process by putting her fossilized ass back where she came from...well, Eagle Mountain might be more appropriate! :lol:

Reply
Feb 9, 2016 08:43:44   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
BigMike wrote:
Maybe we could begin the process by putting her fossilized ass back where she came from...well, Eagle Mountain might be more appropriate! :lol:


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 9, 2016 11:39:17   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
JMHO wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


Just imagine how much the rest of the nation would have to pay Nevada to keep her there!



Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.