Let's be fair.
Let's be fair; Just because Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice , in the Bush administration, had private email servers in which they revealed top secret government information does not mean that excuses Hillary from doing it. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Glaucon wrote:
Let's be fair; Just because Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice , in the Bush administration, had private email servers in which they revealed top secret government information does not mean that excuses Hillary from doing it. Two wrongs don't make a right.
They DID NOT have private email servers. They did not send any top secret emails. Hillary did both.
JMHO wrote:
They DID NOT have private email servers. They did not send any top secret emails. Hillary did both.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: yup
JMHO wrote:
They DID NOT have private email servers. They did not send any top secret emails. Hillary did both.
You mean they used AOL, or was it Yahoo.
moldyoldy wrote:
You mean they used AOL, or was it Yahoo.
Come on, moron! They used government servers...jerk.
moldyoldy wrote:
For private e mail?
Go back to school, will you? You're babbling like an i***t. YES, for private email...just because the term "private" is used doesn't mean "private server"...moron.
JMHO wrote:
They DID NOT have private email servers. They did not send any top secret emails. Hillary did both.
RESPONSE:
I agree we shouldn't take the word of the FBI and CIA on this matter. Two wrongs obviously can make a right. it is totally unfair that Condi and Colin are guilty and Hillary is found innocent.
JMHO wrote:
Go back to school, will you? You're babbling like an i***t. YES, for private email...just because the term "private" is used doesn't mean "private server"...moron.
I seem to remember that all the bush people avoided the law by using the RNC servers for anything other than the most mundane e mails.
JMHO wrote:
Go back to school, will you? You're babbling like an i***t. YES, for private email...just because the term "private" is used doesn't mean "private server"...moron.
I am trying to agree with you. I agree it is unfair to find Colin and Condi guilty and find Hillary not guilty for doing the same thing. They are obviously both guilty or both not guilty. I agree that private means private and email means email and babbling means babbling.
DamnYANKEE wrote:
BULLS**T .
I think you are trying to say you disagree with someone about something for some reason, but it isn't clear from your response.
Glaucon wrote:
Let's be fair; Just because Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice , in the Bush administration, had private email servers in which they revealed top secret government information does not mean that excuses Hillary from doing it. Two wrongs don't make a right.
as usual, Glaucon, is "mistaken", re: the "other" Sec's, of State.....people.....{ as usual}.......Your facts are "skewed! {Powell, & Rice......Didn't have the same circumstances!}....re-read, & try to get it straight, this time, before posting lies!
"K**lery" has "earned the right".....to a special jail cell, & put her in the same cell as "Bubba the Love Sponge".......Sexual maniac's, are her "specialty".....{just axe "Slick Perverted Willie"!}
Ahhhh.....Yes.....America......"Kilery" holds the record for "insideous scandals"......"Nefarious deeds..............dozens of them.......& her "Hubby".....is complicit!
Glaucon wrote:
I think you are trying to say you disagree with someone about something for some reason, but it isn't clear from your response.
It was pretty clear...you espouse bulls**t, and he just called you on it...as clear as the blue sky, except maybe to a warped l*****t who speaks in psychobabble like you.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.