Chuck and Rachel lead a great debate
Feb 5, 2016 08:10:55 #
What a great debate, they let the two of them go, and go at it they did, while still keeping composer. They set an outstanding example of appropriate behavior in a debate. Hillary is strong there is no debating that, Bernie is the man for the true intention of wanting to get corporate out of government and out of the control. Excellent!
Feb 5, 2016 08:25:22 #
Artemis wrote:
What a great debate, they let the two of them go, and go at it they did, while still keeping composer. They set an outstanding example of appropriate behavior in a debate. Hillary is strong there is no debating that, Bernie is the man for the true intention of wanting to get corporate out of government and out of the control. Excellent!
i totally agree
Feb 5, 2016 09:15:05 #
GOP poison wrote:
i totally agree
Your opinion on who you felt won the debate? Wouldn't it be something to have a woman and a Jew in the white house...a new historical record! :wink: :XD: :thumbup:
Feb 5, 2016 10:12:49 #
Bernie, is correct nothing will change unless we are free from the grasp of big money in government. People from both sides of the fence should be for this, let's put the power back into the hands of the people. :thumbup:
Feb 5, 2016 10:45:46 #
Artemis wrote:
Bernie, is correct nothing will change unless we are free from the grasp of big money in government. People from both sides of the fence should be for this, let's put the power back into the hands of the people. :thumbup:
This was an interesting debate... The influence of big money is plain and clear... But just how far will we have go to turn this all around?... I fear that there is not one good solid candidate in the entire bunch on both sides... I'm getting tired of v****g for the lesser of two evils ... :evil:
Feb 5, 2016 10:54:16 #
Good debate huh,,,Hillary the ultimate corporate insider and Berny the raise , raise , raise , tax , tax , tax,,, yea right :thumbdown:
Feb 5, 2016 11:06:37 #
reconreb wrote:
Good debate huh,,,Hillary the ultimate corporate insider and Berny the raise , raise , raise , tax , tax , tax,,, yea right :thumbdown:
I thought you folks were all for capitalism,:thumbup: I thought the left were all socialists, :?: guess that just isn't true eh :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: People are all for Trump because he knows how the game is played, well so does Hillary, so why the hypocrisy?
Feb 5, 2016 11:14:27 #
emarine wrote:
This was an interesting debate... The influence of big money is plain and clear... But just how far will we have go to turn this all around?... I fear that there is not one good solid candidate in the entire bunch on both sides... I'm getting tired of v****g for the lesser of two evils ... :evil:
I understand that sentiment not wanting to v**e for the lesser of two evils, but sooner or later you'll have to decide and I hope not v****g is not one of your choices. :shock: I say v**e for who you think has the greatest intention for the betterment of the country whoever that may be for you, good luck.
Feb 5, 2016 11:31:56 #
Artemis wrote:
I understand that sentiment not wanting to v**e for the lesser of two evils, but sooner or later you'll have to decide and I hope not v****g is not one of your choices. :shock: I say v**e for who you think has the greatest intention for the betterment of the country whoever that may be for you, good luck.
Big money plays the divide and conquer game... Looks like they can play rough..the little guy still loses in the end... the planet is full of little guys everywhere... this e******n includes everyone... exceptional circumstances requires exceptional people ... I fear we are choosing from the B team... I hope I'm wrong
Feb 5, 2016 12:31:39 #
emarine wrote:
Big money plays the divide and conquer game... Looks like they can play rough..the little guy still loses in the end... the planet is full of little guys everywhere... this e******n includes everyone... exceptional circumstances requires exceptional people ... I fear we are choosing from the B team... I hope I'm wrong
It has so much to do with the se******n the party's back. I believe it is time for a stronger independent party, with more financial backing in order be able to back the best candidate, and not the one with enough of his own money to be able to run. We've created our own conundrum.
Feb 5, 2016 13:06:46 #
Artemis wrote:
It has so much to do with the se******n the party's back. I believe it is time for a stronger independent party, with more financial backing in order be able to back the best candidate, and not the one with enough of his own money to be able to run. We've created our own conundrum.
You and emarine make a lot of good points. It's times like last night I regret not having cable or satellite. I only caught snippets on the news. Honestly? I'm not sure a stronger independent party would fix the problem. Money corrupts and corruption has a way of creeping into even the most noble of ventures. We have indeed created our own conundrum.
Feb 5, 2016 18:18:35 #
Searching wrote:
You and emarine make a lot of good points. It's times like last night I regret not having cable or satellite. I only caught snippets on the news. Honestly? I'm not sure a stronger independent party would fix the problem. Money corrupts and corruption has a way of creeping into even the most noble of ventures. We have indeed created our own conundrum.
You are correct nothing is impenetrable and we have to be on constant vigilance. As I see it we stand a better chance as individuals standing together in a non party, than in party being manipulated within a dogma.
Feb 5, 2016 19:57:45 #
Artemis wrote:
You are correct nothing is impenetrable and we have to be on constant vigilance. As I see it we stand a better chance as individuals standing together in a non party, than in party being manipulated within a dogma.
The gleam in the eyes of zealots is disturbing and both sides of the aisle seem to have no scarcity. I am registered, long ago having voiced my allegiance to a party. However, since I v**e my conscience, I may change my affiliation to "none." I think it's time...
Feb 5, 2016 20:16:23 #
Searching wrote:
The gleam in the eyes of zealots is disturbing and both sides of the aisle seem to have no scarcity. I am registered, long ago having voiced my allegiance to a party. However, since I v**e my conscience, I may change my affiliation to "none." I think it's time...
:thumbup: I did about twelve years ago
Feb 6, 2016 06:44:12 #
Searching wrote:
You and emarine make a lot of good points. It's times like last night I regret not having cable or satellite. I only caught snippets on the news. Honestly? I'm not sure a stronger independent party would fix the problem. Money corrupts and corruption has a way of creeping into even the most noble of ventures. We have indeed created our own conundrum.
We have, indeed, created our own conundrum. I think you got that right.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.