One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
'Uninsured Are Disengaged' and Disinterested; 31% Plan to Remain Without Health Insurance, say's Poll
Feb 2, 2016 09:15:59   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
Poll: 'Uninsured Are Disengaged' and Disinterested; 31% Plan to Remain Without Health Insurance

Craig Bannister
http://www.mrctv.org/blog/poll-uninsured-are-disengaged-and-disinterested-31-plan-remain-without-health-insurance

“As the Affordable Care Act’s third open enrollment period comes to a close at the end of this month, most of the uninsured are disengaged from the ongoing enrollment process,” a new Kaiser study of Americans aged 18-64 shows.

And, despite Obamacare’s penalties and PR, roughly a third have no intention of getting coverage, the study conducted Jan. 13-19, 2016 shows:

“Do you plan to get health insurance in the next few months, or do you think you will remain uninsured?” (ages 18-64):

31% Will Remain Uninsured
65% Will Get Health Insurance
4% Don’t Know/Refused to answer

And, these aren’t just people who recently left their jobs.

Nearly half (46%) of the uninsured say they have been without coverage for two years or more.

The uninsured are also uninformed:

Only 15% know the enrollment deadline,
16% THINK they do, but don’t
12% think it has already passed (Jan. 13-19, 2016 survey)

Additionally, only 1% know that the 2016 fine amount is $695 per person or 2.5% of household income.

Half (47%) of the uninsured do not even think they will have to pay a fine for not having health insurance in 2015, while the other half (47%) believe they will.

“Some uninsured may in fact be exempt from the fine because of hardship exemptions available under the law,” Kaiser notes.

What’s more, they’re not particularly interested in finding out how to get coverage:

57% have not even tried to get more information on their own.

More than 7 in 10 saying they have not tried to figure out if they qualify for Medicaid (72 percent) or for financial assistance to purchase health insurance (79 percent) in the past 6 months.

And, if they’re waiting for the government to come and save them, they’re largely out of luck, since 67% say no one has contacted them to get them to sign up for coverage.

Reply
Feb 2, 2016 09:57:06   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Doc110 wrote:
Poll: 'Uninsured Are Disengaged' and Disinterested; 31% Plan to Remain Without Health Insurance

Craig Bannister
http://www.mrctv.org/blog/poll-uninsured-are-disengaged-and-disinterested-31-plan-remain-without-health-insurance

“As the Affordable Care Act’s third open enrollment period comes to a close at the end of this month, most of the uninsured are disengaged from the ongoing enrollment process,” a new Kaiser study of Americans aged 18-64 shows.

And, despite Obamacare’s penalties and PR, roughly a third have no intention of getting coverage, the study conducted Jan. 13-19, 2016 shows:

“Do you plan to get health insurance in the next few months, or do you think you will remain uninsured?” (ages 18-64):

31% Will Remain Uninsured
65% Will Get Health Insurance
4% Don’t Know/Refused to answer

And, these aren’t just people who recently left their jobs.

Nearly half (46%) of the uninsured say they have been without coverage for two years or more.

The uninsured are also uninformed:

Only 15% know the enrollment deadline,
16% THINK they do, but don’t
12% think it has already passed (Jan. 13-19, 2016 survey)

Additionally, only 1% know that the 2016 fine amount is $695 per person or 2.5% of household income.

Half (47%) of the uninsured do not even think they will have to pay a fine for not having health insurance in 2015, while the other half (47%) believe they will.

“Some uninsured may in fact be exempt from the fine because of hardship exemptions available under the law,” Kaiser notes.

What’s more, they’re not particularly interested in finding out how to get coverage:

57% have not even tried to get more information on their own.

More than 7 in 10 saying they have not tried to figure out if they qualify for Medicaid (72 percent) or for financial assistance to purchase health insurance (79 percent) in the past 6 months.

And, if they’re waiting for the government to come and save them, they’re largely out of luck, since 67% say no one has contacted them to get them to sign up for coverage.
Poll: 'Uninsured Are Disengaged' and Disinterested... (show quote)




I only know about part of the problem and that's in my State. As part of the original rollout, there were funds allocated for "education and advertisement" for each State. In my State, as a protest against "Obamacare", the legislature refused to release those funds to our Dept. of Human Services - so the ONLY information available on local media was done by BC/BS ( smart business move on their part ). AR citizens needing information, had to rely on "healthcare.Gov" - which we all know was an unmitigated disaster.

Most just gave up.

Reply
Feb 2, 2016 10:29:06   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Doc110 wrote:
Poll: 'Uninsured Are Disengaged' and Disinterested; 31% Plan to Remain Without Health Insurance

Craig Bannister
http://www.mrctv.org/blog/poll-uninsured-are-disengaged-and-disinterested-31-plan-remain-without-health-insurance

“As the Affordable Care Act’s third open enrollment period comes to a close at the end of this month, most of the uninsured are disengaged from the ongoing enrollment process,” a new Kaiser study of Americans aged 18-64 shows.

And, despite Obamacare’s penalties and PR, roughly a third have no intention of getting coverage, the study conducted Jan. 13-19, 2016 shows:

“Do you plan to get health insurance in the next few months, or do you think you will remain uninsured?” (ages 18-64):

31% Will Remain Uninsured
65% Will Get Health Insurance
4% Don’t Know/Refused to answer

And, these aren’t just people who recently left their jobs.

Nearly half (46%) of the uninsured say they have been without coverage for two years or more.

The uninsured are also uninformed:

Only 15% know the enrollment deadline,
16% THINK they do, but don’t
12% think it has already passed (Jan. 13-19, 2016 survey)

Additionally, only 1% know that the 2016 fine amount is $695 per person or 2.5% of household income.

Half (47%) of the uninsured do not even think they will have to pay a fine for not having health insurance in 2015, while the other half (47%) believe they will.

“Some uninsured may in fact be exempt from the fine because of hardship exemptions available under the law,” Kaiser notes.

What’s more, they’re not particularly interested in finding out how to get coverage:

57% have not even tried to get more information on their own.

More than 7 in 10 saying they have not tried to figure out if they qualify for Medicaid (72 percent) or for financial assistance to purchase health insurance (79 percent) in the past 6 months.

And, if they’re waiting for the government to come and save them, they’re largely out of luck, since 67% say no one has contacted them to get them to sign up for coverage.
Poll: 'Uninsured Are Disengaged' and Disinterested... (show quote)


So what's your point? People are refusing to sign on to government's gift to big, for profit, claim denying, private health insurance corporations that profit over $500 BILLION from the system.

I live in Texas. Do not qualify for medicaid and damn sure can't afford the only plan available to me, the BCBS bronze plan. As a single man 378.98/month premium, $6000.00 annual deductible and then covers only 60%. How is that affordable?

STOP believing the lies and myths about single payer put out by the health insurance corporation, big pharma and their bought and paid for politicians.

Medicare for All is the answer.

The Simple Answer to America’s Health Care Crisis: Medicare for All
By Dave Lindorff

When it comes to reforming America’s disastrous health care “system,” there are two issues that need to be considered: access and cost.

The so-called reform proposals being offered by the Obama White House, the House and the Senate, are failing on both counts, and deserve to die.

No progressives should allow themselves to be suckered into promoting one or the other.

Here’s the problem. As long as the health insurance industry is permitted to be the primary paymaster, the cost of medical care will continue to soar, not least because the insurance industry is so concerned about minimizing its own outlays that it is forcing the system to dev**e nearly 30% of every health care dollar spent to administrative costs (compared to 3-4 percent for Medicare, and even less for single-payer systems like Canada’s). That’s true whether there is a so-called “public option” government-run health insurance plan or not. Note that 30 percent of America’s $2.5-trillion health care bill per year is $750 billion a year, a sum which does absolutely nothing to make a single person more healthy or less ill. Even if one were to assume that the lion’s share of those administrative expenses were only for the private funded portion of America’s health care system, and for Medicare, the state-run but partly federally-funded portion that is famous for its paperwork mess, and the uninsured, who also consume a lot of paperwork when they do get treated at hospitals under mandated free-care provisions of at the expense of local governments, we’d be talking about 30% of $1.5 trillion, or about $450 billion going to administrative costs every year—still a staggering sum.

Medicare, the health program for the elderly and the disabled, and Medicaid, the federally and state-funded program that funds medical care for the poor, together cost some $850 billion a year. Add to that the $150 billion that hospitals and local governments spend annually to cover the uninsured poor who don’t qualify for Medicaid, and the $50 billion the federal government spends for veterans’ care. That’s just over $1 trillion in government spending to cover the health care of roughly half the population of the United States.

The rest of us—working people and our families—rely on private insurance, some of it paid for by employers, some by us, either as our share of the cost of company plans (growing every year), or as the deductible and co-pay portions of our medical bills. That privately funded medical care costs us about $1.5 trillion a year—50% more than the government spends on the medical care for a roughly equal number of people. If you do the math, it turns out that we who rely on the private sector are spending about $10,000 per person per year on health care, either directly out of our own pockets, or in the form of money our employers are paying into insurance plans for us—money that could otherwise be coming to us in the form of higher wages or lower-priced goods.

What this means is that right off the bat, if the politicians in Washington were to simply thumb their noses at the insurance industry, and at the greedy docs and drug companies who are paying millions in legal bribes to protect their stake in the lucrative medical game, and if they were to extended Medicare to all of us, we could immediately eliminate $500 billion from the nation’s collective medical bill, because that’s how much more cheaply Medicare, Medicaid and the VA are able to treat patients than the private sector. But the savings would be far more than that. The cost of treating the uninsured--$150 billion a year—would be dramatically reduced, because it is currently almost entirely for emergency care at hospitals, the most expensive possible way to deliver medical care. My guess is that at least $100 billion would be saved simply by switching all those people over to Medicare, so they could walk into a doctor’s office for treatment instead of into an ER. The VA, with its separate government-owned hospital system, would become largely redundant if all veterans were simply treatable under Medicare, which would probably save a considerable portion of that $50 billion-per-year expense. Furthermore, by switching private-pay patients over to Medicare, most of the $450 billion a year currently wasted on administrative costs would be eliminated—a savings of perhaps $3-400 billion a year. While some of that would be reflected in the cost differential between privately financed and Medicare financed care, most is not. The main reason Medicare’s per-patient cost for care is much lower than for private pay patients (who, remember, are younger and healthier on average than Medicare patients, and so should be cheaper to treat, not more expensive), is that Medicare sets out payment schedules for doctors and hospitals, and negotiates payments for medicines—all at much lower levels than do private insurers, who often just set reimbursement rates, and let their insured patients cover the difference out of pocket.

Taking all these savings together, it’s a good guess, I would say, that by simply expanding Medicare to cover all Americans without exception, the nation as a whole could save upwards of $900 billion on its current $2.5 trillion annual medical bill.

Now that’s not to say such a change wouldn’t involve a tax increase. The current publicly funded share of that $2.5 trillion bill is about $1 trillion, when you add together federal, state and local outlays, all funded by the taxpayer. An expanded Medicare that covered everyone would, by my reckoning, cost about $1.4 trillion, once all the costs were added, and the savings implemented, including lowered payments to doctors, hospitals and drug companies. So we’d have to cover an extra $400 billion a year through tax increases.

But remember, there would be no more local revenues going to pay for uninsured care at local hospitals, no more state taxes going to pay for Medicaid for medical care for the poor, no more out-of-pocket payments by families for co-pays and deductibles, or for employee share of insurance premiums. And companies would no longer be paying anything for employee health insurance. The net gain to the average person would be enormous.

That’s the point that the medical industry lobby conveniently ignores. It’s a point also conveniently ignored by the politicians they’ve bought in Washington and the White House, who only talk about the increased taxes that a single-payer government takeover of health care finance would entail.

And, to get back to the beginning of this article, there would no longer be an issue of Americans going without access to medical care. Everyone would be on Medicare. And not one of the costly “reform” proposals being pushed through Congress today can say that. Every proposed “reform” plan leaves millions uninsured.

Note too that, under basic Medicare (as long as you don’t get suckered into one of those HMO rip-offs like Humana and other insurance firms advertise), everyone gets to choose his or her own doctor and hospital. There is no gatekeeper system—another bugaboo raised by the health industry lobbyists.

With a universalization of Medicare, at one fell swoop, America would have a single-payer system—one that its elderly citizens already have, and by all accounts are very satisfied with—and one that would be substantially cheaper than what we have now.

For everyone.

Socialized medicine? Maybe, but it’s a socialism we already know. Call it “socialism with American characteristics,” if you like. Or to crib from a comment President Obama made to the fat cat docs at the American Medical Assn. convention recently, it’s a socialism that is “part of the American tradition.”

So, want to have some fun? Tell your congressional delegation to demand that the Congressional Budget Office, which just came up with an estimate that the Senate’s health “reform” bill would add $1.6 trillion in costs over 10 years, do a study of what expanding Medicare to all would cost, after netting out the savings to individuals and employers of having their insurance payments and out-of-pocket health expenses eliminated.

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2016 10:31:09   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Another fact:

60% of all personal bankruptcy filings are due to excessive medical bills and 75% of those filing for medical bankruptcy HAD private insurance!

Reply
Feb 2, 2016 10:39:31   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
I Agree with every thing you say, that is the point. . . Obamacare sucks . . .

buffalo wrote:
So what's your point? People are refusing to sign on to government's gift to big, for profit, claim denying, private health insurance corporations that profit over $500 BILLION from the system.

I live in Texas. Do not qualify for medicaid and damn sure can't afford the only plan available to me, the BCBS bronze plan. As a single man 378.98/month premium, $6000.00 annual deductible and then covers only 60%. How is that affordable?

STOP believing the lies and myths about single payer put out by the health insurance corporation, big pharma and their bought and paid for politicians.

Medicare for All is the answer.

The Simple Answer to America’s Health Care Crisis: Medicare for All
By Dave Lindorff

When it comes to reforming America’s disastrous health care “system,” there are two issues that need to be considered: access and cost.

The so-called reform proposals being offered by the Obama White House, the House and the Senate, are failing on both counts, and deserve to die.

No progressives should allow themselves to be suckered into promoting one or the other.

Here’s the problem. As long as the health insurance industry is permitted to be the primary paymaster, the cost of medical care will continue to soar, not least because the insurance industry is so concerned about minimizing its own outlays that it is forcing the system to dev**e nearly 30% of every health care dollar spent to administrative costs (compared to 3-4 percent for Medicare, and even less for single-payer systems like Canada’s). That’s true whether there is a so-called “public option” government-run health insurance plan or not. Note that 30 percent of America’s $2.5-trillion health care bill per year is $750 billion a year, a sum which does absolutely nothing to make a single person more healthy or less ill. Even if one were to assume that the lion’s share of those administrative expenses were only for the private funded portion of America’s health care system, and for Medicare, the state-run but partly federally-funded portion that is famous for its paperwork mess, and the uninsured, who also consume a lot of paperwork when they do get treated at hospitals under mandated free-care provisions of at the expense of local governments, we’d be talking about 30% of $1.5 trillion, or about $450 billion going to administrative costs every year—still a staggering sum.

Medicare, the health program for the elderly and the disabled, and Medicaid, the federally and state-funded program that funds medical care for the poor, together cost some $850 billion a year. Add to that the $150 billion that hospitals and local governments spend annually to cover the uninsured poor who don’t qualify for Medicaid, and the $50 billion the federal government spends for veterans’ care. That’s just over $1 trillion in government spending to cover the health care of roughly half the population of the United States.

The rest of us—working people and our families—rely on private insurance, some of it paid for by employers, some by us, either as our share of the cost of company plans (growing every year), or as the deductible and co-pay portions of our medical bills. That privately funded medical care costs us about $1.5 trillion a year—50% more than the government spends on the medical care for a roughly equal number of people. If you do the math, it turns out that we who rely on the private sector are spending about $10,000 per person per year on health care, either directly out of our own pockets, or in the form of money our employers are paying into insurance plans for us—money that could otherwise be coming to us in the form of higher wages or lower-priced goods.

What this means is that right off the bat, if the politicians in Washington were to simply thumb their noses at the insurance industry, and at the greedy docs and drug companies who are paying millions in legal bribes to protect their stake in the lucrative medical game, and if they were to extended Medicare to all of us, we could immediately eliminate $500 billion from the nation’s collective medical bill, because that’s how much more cheaply Medicare, Medicaid and the VA are able to treat patients than the private sector. But the savings would be far more than that. The cost of treating the uninsured--$150 billion a year—would be dramatically reduced, because it is currently almost entirely for emergency care at hospitals, the most expensive possible way to deliver medical care. My guess is that at least $100 billion would be saved simply by switching all those people over to Medicare, so they could walk into a doctor’s office for treatment instead of into an ER. The VA, with its separate government-owned hospital system, would become largely redundant if all veterans were simply treatable under Medicare, which would probably save a considerable portion of that $50 billion-per-year expense. Furthermore, by switching private-pay patients over to Medicare, most of the $450 billion a year currently wasted on administrative costs would be eliminated—a savings of perhaps $3-400 billion a year. While some of that would be reflected in the cost differential between privately financed and Medicare financed care, most is not. The main reason Medicare’s per-patient cost for care is much lower than for private pay patients (who, remember, are younger and healthier on average than Medicare patients, and so should be cheaper to treat, not more expensive), is that Medicare sets out payment schedules for doctors and hospitals, and negotiates payments for medicines—all at much lower levels than do private insurers, who often just set reimbursement rates, and let their insured patients cover the difference out of pocket.

Taking all these savings together, it’s a good guess, I would say, that by simply expanding Medicare to cover all Americans without exception, the nation as a whole could save upwards of $900 billion on its current $2.5 trillion annual medical bill.

Now that’s not to say such a change wouldn’t involve a tax increase. The current publicly funded share of that $2.5 trillion bill is about $1 trillion, when you add together federal, state and local outlays, all funded by the taxpayer. An expanded Medicare that covered everyone would, by my reckoning, cost about $1.4 trillion, once all the costs were added, and the savings implemented, including lowered payments to doctors, hospitals and drug companies. So we’d have to cover an extra $400 billion a year through tax increases.

But remember, there would be no more local revenues going to pay for uninsured care at local hospitals, no more state taxes going to pay for Medicaid for medical care for the poor, no more out-of-pocket payments by families for co-pays and deductibles, or for employee share of insurance premiums. And companies would no longer be paying anything for employee health insurance. The net gain to the average person would be enormous.

That’s the point that the medical industry lobby conveniently ignores. It’s a point also conveniently ignored by the politicians they’ve bought in Washington and the White House, who only talk about the increased taxes that a single-payer government takeover of health care finance would entail.

And, to get back to the beginning of this article, there would no longer be an issue of Americans going without access to medical care. Everyone would be on Medicare. And not one of the costly “reform” proposals being pushed through Congress today can say that. Every proposed “reform” plan leaves millions uninsured.

Note too that, under basic Medicare (as long as you don’t get suckered into one of those HMO rip-offs like Humana and other insurance firms advertise), everyone gets to choose his or her own doctor and hospital. There is no gatekeeper system—another bugaboo raised by the health industry lobbyists.

With a universalization of Medicare, at one fell swoop, America would have a single-payer system—one that its elderly citizens already have, and by all accounts are very satisfied with—and one that would be substantially cheaper than what we have now.

For everyone.

Socialized medicine? Maybe, but it’s a socialism we already know. Call it “socialism with American characteristics,” if you like. Or to crib from a comment President Obama made to the fat cat docs at the American Medical Assn. convention recently, it’s a socialism that is “part of the American tradition.”

So, want to have some fun? Tell your congressional delegation to demand that the Congressional Budget Office, which just came up with an estimate that the Senate’s health “reform” bill would add $1.6 trillion in costs over 10 years, do a study of what expanding Medicare to all would cost, after netting out the savings to individuals and employers of having their insurance payments and out-of-pocket health expenses eliminated.
So what's your point? People are refusing to sign ... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 2, 2016 10:57:50   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Doc110 wrote:
I Agree with every thing you say, that is the point. . . Obamacare sucks . . .


Are you a medical doctor? My brother has been an ER doctor for nearly 30 years and he agrees that Medicare for All is the answer. That is why he is an ER doctor. He doesn't have to deal with the insurance industry. But he says that the ACA has ushered in the era of the corporatizing of medical care in hospitals. Patients are referred to as customers. Medical billing by hospitals and doctors is purposely inflated. That way they get to write the amount they are not paid off as losses on their taxes. Neat trick, eh?

Reply
Feb 3, 2016 09:48:55   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
buffalo wrote:


Are you a medical doctor?

My brother has been an ER doctor for nearly 30 years and he agrees that Medicare for All is the answer.

That is why he is an ER doctor. He doesn't have to deal with the insurance industry. But he says that the ACA has ushered in the era of the corporatizing of medical care in hospitals.

Patients are referred to as customers. Medical billing by hospitals and doctors is purposely inflated.

That way they get to write the amount they are not paid off as losses on their taxes.

Neat trick, eh?
br br Are you a medical doctor? br br My broth... (show quote)


18 years in the medical field in various position's at one the largest medical facility in the world.

No I'm not a Doctor. That is not an impediment for me to understand the healthcare debacle currently happening in this country and the failure of the ACA, i.e. Obamacare.

If they wanted true healthcare in this country, a centralizes industry for costs, medical supplies and medical treatment was possible.

Healthcare costs would have dropped immediately and would be affordable.
For profit and Not for profit hospitalization, which is a misnomer.

Because It's always been about profits that's why they are publicly traded medical stocks companies and industries which are to make a profit. Thats how capitalism works . . .

And the impending unsustainable ponzi scheme called Healthcare and in all actuality it is only health insurance at a cost and a insurance policy.

It's all about the money accounting process, affordable, far from it.

It was all a lie, perpetrated by the democrats, starting with Hillary care, aka ACA Obamacare by government bureaucrats, the Insurance companies, the State social insurance exchanges and the tie-over mandates from medicare subsidies and lets not forget about the mandates and taxes involved to implement and pay for the health cost's.

All it was was a shell game, follow the health care ball under the three shells, can you find the healthcare ball as they are moved ?

Wasteful government spending, corruption and a growing bureaucracy that has total aspects over your minion American lives . . .

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2016 16:30:55   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Doc110 wrote:
18 years in the medical field in various position's at one the largest medical facility in the world.

No I'm not a Doctor. That is not an impediment for me to understand the healthcare debacle currently happening in this country and the failure of the ACA, i.e. Obamacare.

If they wanted true healthcare in this country, a centralizes industry for costs, medical supplies and medical treatment was possible.

Healthcare costs would have dropped immediately and would be affordable.
For profit and Not for profit hospitalization, which is a misnomer.

Because It's always been about profits that's why they are publicly traded medical stocks companies and industries which are to make a profit. Thats how capitalism works . . .

And the impending unsustainable ponzi scheme called Healthcare and in all actuality it is only health insurance at a cost and a insurance policy.

It's all about the money accounting process, affordable, far from it.

It was all a lie, perpetrated by the democrats, starting with Hillary care, aka ACA Obamacare by government bureaucrats, the Insurance companies, the State social insurance exchanges and the tie-over mandates from medicare subsidies and lets not forget about the mandates and taxes involved to implement and pay for the health cost's.

All it was was a shell game, follow the health care ball under the three shells, can you find the healthcare ball as they are moved ?

Wasteful government spending, corruption and a growing bureaucracy that has total aspects over your minion American lives . . .
18 years in the medical field in various position'... (show quote)


I am with you Doc110. My brother has said for years (that's where I get the phrase) that health care and health insurance are not the same thing. He, as well as I, thinks health care should be considered a right in the US like it is in nearly all industrialized countries. Some get to treat it as a right while others have to treat medical care like a bankrupting privilege. 60% of personal bankruptcies in the US are because of excessive medical bills and 75% of those bankruptcies have health insurance!

A Medicare for All system with a small means tested tax would save 95% of taxpayers money over paying ridiculous insurance premiums to private, for profit health insurance corporations whose executives are some of the highest paid in the US. How does and insurance corporation increase profits? By raising premiums or denying claims. Of course, if people want to continue to purchase private health insurance they would be free to do so.

The current medicare system could be run more efficiently than it is, but it still works well for our seniors. The main problem I see with a medicare for all system is that our i***t greedy politicians in DC would have to be made (forced) to keep their grubby hands off the funds and delegate them solely for the purpose of paying for people's medical care. That is the problem with Social Security.

I know from experience with my 86 year old father that doctors and hospitals purposely inflate their fees and charges by huge percentages, accept what medicare pays and uses the rest as a tax write-off.

Most of the horror stories we hear about single payer is just myths and lies put out by the insurance industry. Canadians are very satisfied with their Medicare for All system and Canadians are NOT flocking to the US for medical care.

Reply
Feb 3, 2016 19:10:45   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
buffalo wrote:

I am with you Doc110. My brother has said for years (that's where I get the phrase) that health care and health insurance are not the same thing. He, as well as I, thinks health care should be considered a right in the US like it is in nearly all industrialized countries. Some get to treat it as a right while others have to treat medical care like a bankrupting privilege. 60% of personal bankruptcies in the US are because of excessive medical bills and 75% of those bankruptcies have health insurance!

A Medicare for All system with a small means tested tax would save 95% of taxpayers money over paying ridiculous insurance premiums to private, for profit health insurance corporations whose executives are some of the highest paid in the US. How does and insurance corporation increase profits? By raising premiums or denying claims. Of course, if people want to continue to purchase private health insurance they would be free to do so.

The current medicare system could be run more efficiently than it is, but it still works well for our seniors. The main problem I see with a medicare for all system is that our i***t greedy politicians in DC would have to be made (forced) to keep their grubby hands off the funds and delegate them solely for the purpose of paying for people's medical care. That is the problem with Social Security.

I know from experience with my 86 year old father that doctors and hospitals purposely inflate their fees and charges by huge percentages, accept what medicare pays and uses the rest as a tax write-off.

Most of the horror stories we hear about single payer is just myths and lies put out by the insurance industry. Canadians are very satisfied with their Medicare for All system and Canadians are NOT flocking to the US for medical care.
br I am with you Doc110. My brother has said for ... (show quote)


Here is the biggest problem which is innovation and government subsidies' and the drug companies and approval of gunny-pig drug trials.

It's a r****d medical health care system.

Reply
Feb 3, 2016 20:40:35   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Doc110 wrote:
Here is the biggest problem which is innovation and government subsidies' and the drug companies and approval of gunny-pig drug trials.

It's a r****d medical health care system.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 06:42:23   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
buffalo wrote:


I am with you Doc110. My brother has said for years (that's where I get the phrase) that health care and health insurance are not the same thing. He, as well as I, thinks health care should be considered a right in the US like it is in nearly all industrialized countries. Some get to treat it as a right while others have to treat medical care like a bankrupting privilege. 60% of personal bankruptcies in the US are because of excessive medical bills and 75% of those bankruptcies have health insurance!

A Medicare for All system with a small means tested tax would save 95% of taxpayers money over paying ridiculous insurance premiums to private, for profit health insurance corporations whose executives are some of the highest paid in the US. How does and insurance corporation increase profits? By raising premiums or denying claims. Of course, if people want to continue to purchase private health insurance they would be free to do so.

The current medicare system could be run more efficiently than it is, but it still works well for our seniors. The main problem I see with a medicare for all system is that our i***t greedy politicians in DC would have to be made (forced) to keep their grubby hands off the funds and delegate them solely for the purpose of paying for people's medical care. That is the problem with Social Security.

I know from experience with my 86 year old father that doctors and hospitals purposely inflate their fees and charges by huge percentages, accept what medicare pays and uses the rest as a tax write-off.

Most of the horror stories we hear about single payer is just myths and lies put out by the insurance industry. Canadians are very satisfied with their Medicare for All system and Canadians are NOT flocking to the US for medical care.
br br I am with you Doc110. My brother has said ... (show quote)



Came across this news article, thought you would reflect on the t***h as to the real medical and political aspects "The Impending Collapse of American Medicine" and where American citizens are "Headed" in this fabricated utopian society that we live in.

I quote this pragmatic note and please ponder on this insightful message.

Any thinking American knows that there is something terribly wrong with the health care system in this country.

Instead, we are witnessing the imposition of a system that will further ens***e and impoverish the peasants here in Gulag Amerika.

How poetic that a self-identifying “black man” is the front for resurrecting a 21st century version of chattel s***ery in the twilight years of Empire.


Doc110


The History Of Health Care T***sition: The Impending Collapse of American Medicine. Reflections on a Medical Career by Robert S. Dotson, M.D.

The Impending Collapse of American Medicine
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/08/02/reflections-medical-career-robert-s-dotson-m-d/

Just as is every issue in the US, Obamacare and the wider question of the state of American health care are obscured by propaganda and disinformation.

In the article below, Dr. Robert S. Dobson looks back on a lifetime of medical practice and provides facts and insights that might help us to understand our situation.



The US medical system is the most expensive on earth without being the best and without providing full coverage.

One-sixth of the American population has no medical coverage.

There are two main reasons that US medicine is so expensive.

One is that profits are piled upon profits.

In addition to wages and salaries for doctors, nurses, and medical personnel, the American health care system has to provide profits for private hospitals, diagnostic centers, insurance companies, and for the accountants, attorneys and management consultants made necessary by the enormous litigation and regulatory compliance cost.

American medicine is the most regulated in the world and the most criminalized.

What “Obamacare” does is to divert Medicare and Medicaid monies to the profits of private insurance companies.

Instead of providing medical care to those in need, the taxpayers’ money will provide bonuses for insurance executives and profits for their shareholders.

It is the height of folly for Obama worshipers to defend a law written by the private insurance companies that uses public revenues to provide insurers with 50 million more customers and to add yet another layer of profits to the cost of American medicine.


Reflections on a Medical Career
Robert S. Dotson, M.D.

All lovely things will have an ending, All lovely things will fade and die; And youth, that’s now so bravely spending, Will beg a penny by and by.
-Conrad Aiken (“Disenchantment IV”- 1916)

Thirty years have passed since a much younger physician opened his ophthalmology practice in East Tennessee. A lifetime of hopes and expectations, intermingled with the usual collection of fears and uncertainties, has sped past at blinding speed.

Children came, grew up, and moved on to their own lives. Parents and grandparents, aunts and uncles, many friends and colleagues have returned to dust in advance of their fading photos.

Patients and their parents and children and grandchildren have moved in and out of this world, too, inextricably woven into the fabric of my life. Sadly, a few may have been hurt by lapses in judgment or the arrogance of youthful physician p***e and overconfidence.

But, at the end of the day, most were helped. I was fortunate to be recognized as a “doctor’s doctor” early on and, though there was no attendant reward other than the respect of peers, that was a sufficiently gratifying laurel to carry.

As in any human story, joy and pain, love and sorrow, have marked these same years. The Millstone of Time has also worn away foolish aspirations and vainglorious pretensions.

There is no one left to impress, no accolades to seek, no rank to which to aspire. Consequently, I feel freed to offer some end-of-life reflections on my profession and career.



Any thinking American knows that there is something terribly wrong with the health care system in this country.

Throughout my career, the political ruling elite has been enacting piecemeal a version of “universal” healthcare coverage to satisfy the demands of an increasingly vocal, but also increasingly disenfranchised citizenry.

Our overlords, of course, have been more motivated by enhancing corporate bottom lines and enriching themselves, than in genuinely helping the peasantry.



Every U.S. President since Kennedy in 1962 has dealt with the issue in one way or another – by policy statement or passage of legislation.


1. LBJ oversaw the creation of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965. Nixon oversaw the passage of the HMO Act (Health Maintenance Organization) in 1973 and ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) in 1974.


Amazingly, he also introduced CHIA (Comprehensive Health Insurance Act) in 1974. Even more incredible was the spectacle of Ted Kennedy working to ensure its defeat. Doubtless, Kennedy regretted that in future years.


2. Following the untimely departure of the 37th President, Gerald Ford signed ERISA into law in 1974 on his behalf, thereby introducing some minimal regulations to ensure that separated employees could maintain benefits, such as health insurance, for a limited time.


3. Carter campaigned in favor of National Health Insurance, but failed to pass anything similar during his time in office. He cited Kennedy’s opposition to CHIA and to his own proposals as the main reason for failure.


4. Reagan’s era witnessed the passage of EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act) and COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) in 1986 that, among other things, provided for emergency medical treatment coverage for anyone who could d**g themselves into an emergency room (of course, such a visit might bankrupt them unless they were lucky enough to be an i*****l a***n).

Medical labs and imaging centers (and, the providers staffing them) were given “special attention” under CLIA (1988).


5. The first President Bush had little time for national health care issues, as he was primarily focused on launching the NWO. Poppy’s “Thousand Points of Light” degenerated into in-coming tracers from the illuminated Angel of Death – simply more “peace, freedom and liberty” being delivered to millions of innocents across Battlefield Earth.

It seems so trivial now, but Bush was unseated after reneging on his pledge of “no new taxes,” not for offshoring the US economy or taking the first step toward turning US foreign policy into the pursuit of world hegemony.


6. The Clinton administration tried to force through “Hillarycare” in 1993, but met with stiff opposition from their Republican opponents (of course, the opposition was due to perceived threats to corporate profit margins).

Nonetheless, Team Clinton was able to push through HIPAA (1996) (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) and SCHIP (1997) (State Children’s Health Insurance Program) which, contrary to the titles of the acts, neither improved health insurance portability or accountability nor improved the health of children.

The Clinton White House had more important fish to fry: war in the Balkans; the liberal distribution of depleted uranium and cruise missiles across the globe; test wars on Americans at places like Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma City (OKC); the appearance of numerous “Arkan-cide” victims whose mortal remains seemed to be discovered at the most inconvenient times; and, a semen-stained blue dress.

The first versions of the Patriot Act were trotted out in response to the false f**g event of OKC, but Congress and even the Imperial Senate balked at moving so precipitously toward the New Amerikan Security State.


7. The ascension of son Bush and his neoconservative cabal turned the government to the drive toward world hegemony.

The serendipitous events of 9/11 opened the door for passage of the neocon’s PATRIOT Act and for the still on-going implementation of their Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

New alphabet agencies like DHS and TSA were created to augment existing departments and agencies (FDA, DHHS, IRS, FTC, FCC, EPA, FEMA, DEA, BATF, FBI, NSA, CIA, and DOD) charged with dominating the nation and the planet beyond. Orwell’s dystopia, 1984, became reality: “War is Peace. Freedom is S***ery, Ignorance is Strength.”

President Bush modeled Big Brother’s third slogan for an admiring populace more concerned with Harry Potter and Janet Jackson’s nipple than with the deadly machinations of the psychopath in charge.

It seems likely that steps toward the Third World War were taken during Bush II’s reign with “war, war, WAR” being unconstitutionally declared against the nebulous (some might say, non-existent) terrorists lurking under every bed and in every closet, cave, and country on the planet.

In spite of a premature proclamation of “Mission Accomplished” from a f**g-festooned carrier in 2003 by the Decider-In-Chief, the k*****gs have continued with little pause up to this day.

The Great Decider used the opportunity of “victory” abroad, however, to turn his attention to the healthcare needs of his subjects.

What could be a better bone to throw to the peasants than the expansion of pharmaceutical coverage for those under Medicare?

And, what could be a better pay-off for corporate buddies than massive new government wealth t***sfers of taxpayers’ dollars to Big Pharma via such a plan?

It was a perfect “win-win” for the oligarchs at the top of the pyramid and a “lose-lose” for the peons at the bottom.

To the great joy of Big Pharma, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act (Medicare, Part D) was launched in 2003 to insure unimaginable profits for its corporate members and more expense for the common people it was alleged to help.

As in any casino, our healthcare croupiers are well trained to leave no dollar on the table.


8. President Obama, a corporate stooge par excellence, was able to ram through “universal healthcare” with the help of a Howdy Doody smile, his corporate sponsors, and the slavish devotion of an ever-delusional, pseudo-Left.

It mattered not that the legislation was written by the insurance companies who had been profiting from the misery of patients for decades.

It is no accident – and would be comical, if it were not so serious – that there will be no true, equitable national health care system under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (aka, “Romneycare II” or “Obamacare” or, lately, “Robertscare” in homage to a Supreme Court judge) and its accompanying legislation, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act.



No Single Payer.

No mutual insurance system that provides a basic level of healthcare for the proles of this collapsing Security State.

Instead, we are witnessing the imposition of a system that will further ens***e and impoverish the peasants here in Gulag Amerika.

How poetic that a self-identifying “black man” is the front for resurrecting a 21st century version of chattel s***ery in the twilight years of Empire.

Obama was positively beaming in his many photo-ops with the sponsoring corporatist representatives of Corporate Medicine, Big Insurance, Big Pharma, and Big Government who enabled the Prince of Change to achieve this milestone deception of America.

The very fact that this “wonderful” new system – lauded by supporters as “revolutionary” – is to be enforced by a projected army of 16,500 new IRS agents should give us pause.

Notwithstanding passage of the legislation, decades of bad healthcare policy and corporatist plunder are finally taking their toll.

The collapse of the ill-conceived US health care system might be near.

Ever more intrusive regulations are driving up the cost of medical care, and the practice of medicine is being criminalized.

Even with all of their flaws, Medicare and Medicaid have provided a safety net for the elderly and disadvantaged since their inception.

Those systems’ days are numbered, however, as they are being gutted to turn health care into profits not for doctors and hospitals but for insurance companies and Big Pharma.

For starters, large sums have been ear-marked to be taken from Medicare and Medicaid to help fund PPACA (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act).

Is l**ting Social Security and Medicare “change one can believe in”?

If this system is bad for patients, what does it mean for doctors?

It means falling reimbursement rates and rising overhead costs for providers, onerous government mandates and regulations, and institutionalized, legalized larceny by Big Pharma, Big Insurance and Corporate Medicine.

As an example of how time and circumstance have affected my own profession of ophthalmology, one need only look at Medicare approved reimbursement rates for cataract surgery.

In reflecting back over my many years in the field of ophthalmology (as of this writing, I am 63 years old and feeling pretty shop-worn), I am staggered by the changes that have occurred.

When I opened my practice in 1982, Medicare approved surgical fees for cataract and implant surgery were near $1200.

By 2012, that approved charge had dropped to about $570 in Tennessee.

(There is some variance within states based on rural versus metro areas and between states where some are declared to have higher costs of doing business.)

Additionally, the US dollar has declined in value an average of almost 2.5% per year over the past 30 year period.

Needless to say, overhead operating costs – salary, rent, insurance, personnel costs, taxes, and normal business expenses – have exploded during this same 30 year period. My office rent was raised 20% in the Fall of 2011, for instance.

To further illustrate the absurdity of the situation, it is worth recounting an anecdote.

Several years ago, a patient excitedly told me of the vision restoring cataract surgery that her poodle had received at the local veterinary college. It “only cost $2600 for both eyes!”

At the time, Medicare was paying about $1400 for two eyes in a human – including work up, surgical fee, post-op care for 90 days, and the very real liability associated with being a physician in a litigious society.

I do not begrudge my animal doctor friends their success, but surely the worth of human care should at least approximate that for a poodle.

Although I know veterinarians who are struggling in their own practices due to the economic recession, at least they do not have to deal with government fee-setting and the liability and costs associated with treating humans.

They are able to price their services sufficiently to keep their practices open and to provide for their own health care and retirement.



In my own practice, the amount of “write off” on charges for legitimate services rendered began to climb as we entered the 21st Century.

For years, the “disallowed” charges by Medicare and private insurers resulted in “discounts” of 20-25%.

As the economic upheaval of 2008 rolled around, those fee adjustments (actually theft of labor from providers) began to climb – 30%, 32%, 35%, and in my last year of practice over 60%!

For years, I had been able to subsidize my Medicare (cataract) side of the practice by offering elective refractive surgery procedures (LASIK, PRK, etc.) to my patients. As these were private pay cases, they offset the draconian cuts in Medicare and insurance fee “adjustments.”

The economic collapse of 2008, however, reduced that income stream for many ophthalmologists and, subsequently, led to the closing of many practices throughout the country.

Most general ophthalmologists are, by definition, primarily cataract surgeons. Many people – including Medicare recipients – do not realize that the fees paid to their physician are fixed by the U.S. Government after consultation with its many corporate sponsors within Big Insurance, Big Pharma, and Corporate Medicine.

Patients also do not realize that those reimbursement levels are set by central planners at below-cost levels.

Medicare issues cut across all specialties, and ophthalmology has not been alone in experiencing cutbacks.

Primary care physicians have increasingly become “piece good workers” – managed by corporate pencil pushers to see a patient every 6-8 minutes while being forced to carry all the liability and manage all the data and coding previously done by insurers.

Who can diagnose, much less treat a patient in 6-8 minutes?



My own solo cardiologist was forced to close his practice last Fall and seek employment with an area hospital, due to declining reimbursement levels.

More than 51% of cardiologists in the U.S. are now hospital employees.

One of my medical school classmates, a successful internal medicine specialist, has recently given up the fight and has plans to enter some other line of work.

Several friends in Radiology have seen their incomes decline as more and more work is “outsourced” to tele-docs in Asia.

Still other long-time friends who are general surgeons are struggling to survive (a surgical fee for incisional cholecystectomy, for instance, is now under $400).

Several have retired prematurely and others are looking for other work to do. As a final example, another of my friends is one of five physicians in a busy urology practice (2 offices and 26 employees) and they are now borrowing from the bank to make payroll.

A recent article from CNN, “Doctors Going Broke,” confirms the growing problem. http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/05/smallbusiness/doctors_broke/index.htm

As income reductions are being imposed on private practice, costs are being driven up by exploding regulations. In addition, the plethora of new mandates and laws have increasingly criminalized every aspect of the practice of medicine and created vast new armies of armed bureaucrats whose sole aim is to impose civil and criminal penalties on any provider unlucky enough to be singled out for attention.

The old Soviet dictum attributed to Lavrenti Beria (Stalin’s NKVD chief), “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime,” is in full force in Amerika.



The present puppet in the White House has completed the work begun by his predecessors in moving the nation into a police state.

The NDAA passed in the Fall of 2011 was the final nail in the coffin of personal freedoms guaranteed by the US Constitution.

By suspending habeas corpus and even trial by judge or jury, the Act has made certain that no person is safe from being violated by a power-mad Security State.

At the mere movement of the Unitary Executive’s pen, it is now permissible to “disappear” or even execute anyone on the planet – all on the whim of the unaccountable psychopath in charge.

Judge Andrew P. Napolitano, has reported that our present Unitary Exec spends every Tuesday morning reviewing and signing off on a k**l list supplied by his loyal minions.

Nobel Peace Prize worthy stuff, indeed!

One is presumed guilty now in Amerika until proven otherwise and nowhere has this been more demonstrated than in the policing of medicine.

Heaven help the poor provider who is targeted by the Medicare Police – or now, one supposes, by the new IRS Medical Special Branch. If targeted, his or her practice will be shut down without due process.

His or her assets will be seized without due process (assuring the inability to even defend oneself).



Finally, the unlucky guilty-until-proved-innocent physician will be permanently discredited (libeled) in his or her community with the ready help of the Government’s countless propaganda organs – press, radio, and TV – all before any day in court is seen.

New restrictions, rules, and regulations on healthcare – on providers and patients alike – have imposed legal constraints with which full compliance is impossible.

Medicare rules and regs alone fill tens of thousands of pages, and ignorance of any of them is no defense for the unlucky.

The original HIPAA legislation has been amplified with many additions since its inception in 1996: FERPA, HITECH, ARRA (2009). Each additional act or regulation has further criminalized the practice of medicine.



Finally, the entire health care system is being forced to switch to electronic health records (EHRs) and, soon, to a completely new coding system (from ICD-9 to ICD-10).

Failure to comply with these mandates will result in further reductions in provider payments with every year that they remain unimplemented.

For a solo physician practice, it is estimated that each mandate will cost as much as $80,000 to implement initially and, then, $10-15,000 annually to maintain.

For multi-physician practices, costs run as high as three times (or more) that of a single provider practice.

Of course, the purpose behind all of this is to make each person’s most private and personal information available to government bureaucrats and regulators while also ensuring its accessibility to the Security State’s many law enforcement tentacles and to all the corporate members of the Medical-Industrial complex.

Unfettered access to this information will ensure that the Corporate State can maximize its profits, largely avoid all risk and liability, and eliminate any potential competition (such as, often cheaper and more effective alternative medicine providers and therapies, non-GMO whole foods, and nutritional supplements).

It will also ensure that medicine is practiced/delivered within strict cookbook guidelines that are carefully written by non-physician bureaucrats to maintain corporate profits and government power.



All of this is well along in implementation.

A recent article, “Efforts to implement Obamacare law raise concerns of massive government expansion” from Fox News, 5 July 2012, (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/03/efforts-to-implement-obamacare-law-raise-conce... informs us that lawyers have already “drafted more than 13,000 pages of Obamacare regulations and that this number will increase further over coming months.

In addition, we are told that DHHS (Department of Health and Human Services) has been given more than one billion dollars to date in order to begin oversight of this mess and that more than 180 “commissions, boards, and bureaus” within the Agency are already hard at work implementing the final destruction of American medicine.

Widespread v******tion of the population with untested “stabs” will be mandated and enforced.

As long predicted by Tin Hatters around the planet, this will permit biometric “nano-chipping” of the citizenry without the unpleasant need to ask their permission.

Vast sums will be committed to “preventive” medicine which will prevent nothing and will only expand the reach of the Medical-Industrial complex into every nook and cranny of a person’s life – and, into every wallet.

Certain corporate profit-driven diets and treatment regimens will be mandated and enforced; access to nutritional supplements and alternative medicine practices will be limited or banned altogether.

Behavior patterns of all types will be monitored and carefully scripted and controlled (what we see, hear, read, do, eat, drink, and breathe – where and how we work, play, and live) under the guise of State Security concerns and its new companion, Public Health or Public Good.

And, finally, the Corporate State will deploy “death panels” to decide when a person has outlived his or her economic usefulness to the State.

In spite of Obama’s denials that such bodies exist and Palin’s diversionary, hysterical rantings at Tea Party rallies, there is clear provision in the Act for bureaucratic decision-making bodies which will make end-of-life decisions for us all.

These entities are already being formed and deployed across the land. Our Anglo cousins in the UK are showing us the way by withholding food and fluids from as many as 29% of their hospital patients now who are judged to be living beyond their government-dictated “use-by” dates (pragmatically justified “to free up beds” – oh, those Brits and their refined sense of humor).



What can be done about the failing American health care system and the wider collapse of the economy and civil liberty?

Frankly, very little.

The system is r****d against the people as it has always been, only now one can be “black-bagged” and disappeared at any time.

Protest too loudly and one is liable to literally see a grim Reaper overhead with one’s personal biometrics programmed into its fire control system.

Like every other institution within the United States, the medical system is totally and completely broken.

It can no longer be fixed by “v****g” for the lesser of evils, by printing bales of fiat currency, or even by deploying fleets of obsolete aircraft carriers across the planet.



If as it seems we are arriving at the end of an age, if we can survive the end, something better might arise from the ashes.

The prospect of collapse turns one’s thoughts to escape and survival. Can you do either?

Volumes have been written about preparedness in a time of chaos, so I will spare readers a rehash.

But, a few comments about healthcare, in particular, might be in order.



In a perfect world, it is my opinion that we should have some form of single payer healthcare system and divorce ourselves from corporate medicine.

In my opinion, this will not happen without the complete collapse of the present system.

Since that is unlikely to occur before more seasons of national e******n f***d are imposed on us, a few “in-the-meantime” suggestions follow:



Avoid contact with the existing health care system as far as possible. Yes, emergencies arise that require the help of physicians, but by and large one can learn to care for one’s own minor issues.

Though it is flawed, the internet has been an information leveler for the masses and permits each person to be his or her own physician to a large degree.

Take advantage of it!

Educate yourself about your own body and learn to fuel and maintain it as you would an expensive auto or a pet poodle.

One does not need a medical degree to:

1. avoid excessive use of tobacco or alcohol or, for that matter, caffeine;
2. avoid poisons like fluoride, aspartame, high fructose corn syrup, and addictive drugs (legal or illicit);
3. avoid unnecessary and potentially lethal imaging studies (TSA’s radiation pornbooths, excessive mammography, repetitive CT scans – exposure to all significantly increases cancer risk);
4. avoid excessive cell phone use and exposure to other forms of EMR pollution where possible (the NSA is recording everything you say and text anyway);
5. avoid daily fast food use and abuse (remember: pink slime and silicone) ;
6. avoid untested GM foods (do you really want to become “Roundup Ready?”):
7. avoid most v******tions and pharmaceutical agents promoted by the establishment;
8. avoid risky behaviors (and, we do not need a bunch of Nanny State bureaucrats to define and police these);
9. exercise moderately;
10. get plenty of sleep;
11. drink plenty of good quality water (buy a decent water filter to remove fluoride, chloride, and heavy metals);
12. wear protective gear at work and play where appropriate (helmets, eye-shields, knee and elbow pads, etc.):
13. seek out locally-grown, whole, organic foods and support your local food producers;
14. take appropriate nutritional supplements (multi-vitamins, Vitamin C, Vitamin D3);
15. switch off the TV and the mainstream media it represents;
16. educate yourself while you can;

And, lastly…



17. QUESTION AUTHORITY!

Doing these simple, common-sense things will add healthy years to a person’s life and help one avoid most medical encounters during his or her allotted time on earth.

Finally, we have a responsibility to our neighbors and our families. We need to reach out to those around us – talk to them, listen to them – sympathize and empathize.

Take time especially to listen to those who are in pain and are suffering and to help them by being humane.

If you do this, you will discover that we have more in common with each other than the ruling elite wants us to believe.

Governments obtain power and control by taking advantage of divisions along religious, ethnic, class, economic, ideological, and nationalistic lines.

We must awaken to this fact if the 99% are to prevail against the 1%.

As for me, I was finally forced to close my practice earlier this year.

Nearly two years of consulting with multiple attorneys, accountants, practice management consultants, and bankers, and expending most of my resources in a vain effort to keep operating, were simply not enough.

It seemed only poetic that April Fool’s Day 2012 should be chosen for turning out the lights and ringing down the curtain.

Patients and employees and suppliers were notified of the end. Many had been with me for my entire career and leaving them was and remains painful. More than nine thousand active charts were t***sferred to the care of a younger ophthalmologist still trying to stay afloat.

I share the heartache of many physicians forced out of medicine by the high cost of practicing it.

As the health system is stripped of medical care in behalf of corporate profits, its exploitative character will become clear to all. In the meantime, don’t give in or give up.

Plan for something better on the other side of chaos.

I wanted a perfect ending.

Now I’ve learned, the hard way, that some poems don’t rhyme, and some stories don’t have a clear beginning, middle and end. -Gilda Radner

Reply
 
 
Feb 4, 2016 07:47:00   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Doc110 wrote:
Came across this news article, thought you would reflect on the t***h as to the real medical and political aspects "The Impending Collapse of American Medicine" and where American citizens are "Headed" in this fabricated utopian society that we live in.

I quote this pragmatic note and please ponder on this insightful message.

Any thinking American knows that there is something terribly wrong with the health care system in this country.

Instead, we are witnessing the imposition of a system that will further ens***e and impoverish the peasants here in Gulag Amerika.

How poetic that a self-identifying “black man” is the front for resurrecting a 21st century version of chattel s***ery in the twilight years of Empire.


Doc110


The History Of Health Care T***sition: The Impending Collapse of American Medicine. Reflections on a Medical Career by Robert S. Dotson, M.D.

The Impending Collapse of American Medicine
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/08/02/reflections-medical-career-robert-s-dotson-m-d/

Just as is every issue in the US, Obamacare and the wider question of the state of American health care are obscured by propaganda and disinformation.

In the article below, Dr. Robert S. Dobson looks back on a lifetime of medical practice and provides facts and insights that might help us to understand our situation.



The US medical system is the most expensive on earth without being the best and without providing full coverage.

One-sixth of the American population has no medical coverage.

There are two main reasons that US medicine is so expensive.

One is that profits are piled upon profits.

In addition to wages and salaries for doctors, nurses, and medical personnel, the American health care system has to provide profits for private hospitals, diagnostic centers, insurance companies, and for the accountants, attorneys and management consultants made necessary by the enormous litigation and regulatory compliance cost.

American medicine is the most regulated in the world and the most criminalized.

What “Obamacare” does is to divert Medicare and Medicaid monies to the profits of private insurance companies.

Instead of providing medical care to those in need, the taxpayers’ money will provide bonuses for insurance executives and profits for their shareholders.

It is the height of folly for Obama worshipers to defend a law written by the private insurance companies that uses public revenues to provide insurers with 50 million more customers and to add yet another layer of profits to the cost of American medicine.


Reflections on a Medical Career
Robert S. Dotson, M.D.

All lovely things will have an ending, All lovely things will fade and die; And youth, that’s now so bravely spending, Will beg a penny by and by.
-Conrad Aiken (“Disenchantment IV”- 1916)

Thirty years have passed since a much younger physician opened his ophthalmology practice in East Tennessee. A lifetime of hopes and expectations, intermingled with the usual collection of fears and uncertainties, has sped past at blinding speed.

Children came, grew up, and moved on to their own lives. Parents and grandparents, aunts and uncles, many friends and colleagues have returned to dust in advance of their fading photos.

Patients and their parents and children and grandchildren have moved in and out of this world, too, inextricably woven into the fabric of my life. Sadly, a few may have been hurt by lapses in judgment or the arrogance of youthful physician p***e and overconfidence.

But, at the end of the day, most were helped. I was fortunate to be recognized as a “doctor’s doctor” early on and, though there was no attendant reward other than the respect of peers, that was a sufficiently gratifying laurel to carry.

As in any human story, joy and pain, love and sorrow, have marked these same years. The Millstone of Time has also worn away foolish aspirations and vainglorious pretensions.

There is no one left to impress, no accolades to seek, no rank to which to aspire. Consequently, I feel freed to offer some end-of-life reflections on my profession and career.



Any thinking American knows that there is something terribly wrong with the health care system in this country.

Throughout my career, the political ruling elite has been enacting piecemeal a version of “universal” healthcare coverage to satisfy the demands of an increasingly vocal, but also increasingly disenfranchised citizenry.

Our overlords, of course, have been more motivated by enhancing corporate bottom lines and enriching themselves, than in genuinely helping the peasantry.



Every U.S. President since Kennedy in 1962 has dealt with the issue in one way or another – by policy statement or passage of legislation.


1. LBJ oversaw the creation of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965. Nixon oversaw the passage of the HMO Act (Health Maintenance Organization) in 1973 and ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) in 1974.


Amazingly, he also introduced CHIA (Comprehensive Health Insurance Act) in 1974. Even more incredible was the spectacle of Ted Kennedy working to ensure its defeat. Doubtless, Kennedy regretted that in future years.


2. Following the untimely departure of the 37th President, Gerald Ford signed ERISA into law in 1974 on his behalf, thereby introducing some minimal regulations to ensure that separated employees could maintain benefits, such as health insurance, for a limited time.


3. Carter campaigned in favor of National Health Insurance, but failed to pass anything similar during his time in office. He cited Kennedy’s opposition to CHIA and to his own proposals as the main reason for failure.


4. Reagan’s era witnessed the passage of EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act) and COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) in 1986 that, among other things, provided for emergency medical treatment coverage for anyone who could d**g themselves into an emergency room (of course, such a visit might bankrupt them unless they were lucky enough to be an i*****l a***n).

Medical labs and imaging centers (and, the providers staffing them) were given “special attention” under CLIA (1988).


5. The first President Bush had little time for national health care issues, as he was primarily focused on launching the NWO. Poppy’s “Thousand Points of Light” degenerated into in-coming tracers from the illuminated Angel of Death – simply more “peace, freedom and liberty” being delivered to millions of innocents across Battlefield Earth.

It seems so trivial now, but Bush was unseated after reneging on his pledge of “no new taxes,” not for offshoring the US economy or taking the first step toward turning US foreign policy into the pursuit of world hegemony.


6. The Clinton administration tried to force through “Hillarycare” in 1993, but met with stiff opposition from their Republican opponents (of course, the opposition was due to perceived threats to corporate profit margins).

Nonetheless, Team Clinton was able to push through HIPAA (1996) (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) and SCHIP (1997) (State Children’s Health Insurance Program) which, contrary to the titles of the acts, neither improved health insurance portability or accountability nor improved the health of children.

The Clinton White House had more important fish to fry: war in the Balkans; the liberal distribution of depleted uranium and cruise missiles across the globe; test wars on Americans at places like Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma City (OKC); the appearance of numerous “Arkan-cide” victims whose mortal remains seemed to be discovered at the most inconvenient times; and, a semen-stained blue dress.

The first versions of the Patriot Act were trotted out in response to the false f**g event of OKC, but Congress and even the Imperial Senate balked at moving so precipitously toward the New Amerikan Security State.


7. The ascension of son Bush and his neoconservative cabal turned the government to the drive toward world hegemony.

The serendipitous events of 9/11 opened the door for passage of the neocon’s PATRIOT Act and for the still on-going implementation of their Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

New alphabet agencies like DHS and TSA were created to augment existing departments and agencies (FDA, DHHS, IRS, FTC, FCC, EPA, FEMA, DEA, BATF, FBI, NSA, CIA, and DOD) charged with dominating the nation and the planet beyond. Orwell’s dystopia, 1984, became reality: “War is Peace. Freedom is S***ery, Ignorance is Strength.”

President Bush modeled Big Brother’s third slogan for an admiring populace more concerned with Harry Potter and Janet Jackson’s nipple than with the deadly machinations of the psychopath in charge.

It seems likely that steps toward the Third World War were taken during Bush II’s reign with “war, war, WAR” being unconstitutionally declared against the nebulous (some might say, non-existent) terrorists lurking under every bed and in every closet, cave, and country on the planet.

In spite of a premature proclamation of “Mission Accomplished” from a f**g-festooned carrier in 2003 by the Decider-In-Chief, the k*****gs have continued with little pause up to this day.

The Great Decider used the opportunity of “victory” abroad, however, to turn his attention to the healthcare needs of his subjects.

What could be a better bone to throw to the peasants than the expansion of pharmaceutical coverage for those under Medicare?

And, what could be a better pay-off for corporate buddies than massive new government wealth t***sfers of taxpayers’ dollars to Big Pharma via such a plan?

It was a perfect “win-win” for the oligarchs at the top of the pyramid and a “lose-lose” for the peons at the bottom.

To the great joy of Big Pharma, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act (Medicare, Part D) was launched in 2003 to insure unimaginable profits for its corporate members and more expense for the common people it was alleged to help.

As in any casino, our healthcare croupiers are well trained to leave no dollar on the table.


8. President Obama, a corporate stooge par excellence, was able to ram through “universal healthcare” with the help of a Howdy Doody smile, his corporate sponsors, and the slavish devotion of an ever-delusional, pseudo-Left.

It mattered not that the legislation was written by the insurance companies who had been profiting from the misery of patients for decades.

It is no accident – and would be comical, if it were not so serious – that there will be no true, equitable national health care system under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (aka, “Romneycare II” or “Obamacare” or, lately, “Robertscare” in homage to a Supreme Court judge) and its accompanying legislation, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act.



No Single Payer.

No mutual insurance system that provides a basic level of healthcare for the proles of this collapsing Security State.

Instead, we are witnessing the imposition of a system that will further ens***e and impoverish the peasants here in Gulag Amerika.

How poetic that a self-identifying “black man” is the front for resurrecting a 21st century version of chattel s***ery in the twilight years of Empire.

Obama was positively beaming in his many photo-ops with the sponsoring corporatist representatives of Corporate Medicine, Big Insurance, Big Pharma, and Big Government who enabled the Prince of Change to achieve this milestone deception of America.

The very fact that this “wonderful” new system – lauded by supporters as “revolutionary” – is to be enforced by a projected army of 16,500 new IRS agents should give us pause.

Notwithstanding passage of the legislation, decades of bad healthcare policy and corporatist plunder are finally taking their toll.

The collapse of the ill-conceived US health care system might be near.

Ever more intrusive regulations are driving up the cost of medical care, and the practice of medicine is being criminalized.

Even with all of their flaws, Medicare and Medicaid have provided a safety net for the elderly and disadvantaged since their inception.

Those systems’ days are numbered, however, as they are being gutted to turn health care into profits not for doctors and hospitals but for insurance companies and Big Pharma.

For starters, large sums have been ear-marked to be taken from Medicare and Medicaid to help fund PPACA (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act).

Is l**ting Social Security and Medicare “change one can believe in”?

If this system is bad for patients, what does it mean for doctors?

It means falling reimbursement rates and rising overhead costs for providers, onerous government mandates and regulations, and institutionalized, legalized larceny by Big Pharma, Big Insurance and Corporate Medicine.

As an example of how time and circumstance have affected my own profession of ophthalmology, one need only look at Medicare approved reimbursement rates for cataract surgery.

In reflecting back over my many years in the field of ophthalmology (as of this writing, I am 63 years old and feeling pretty shop-worn), I am staggered by the changes that have occurred.

When I opened my practice in 1982, Medicare approved surgical fees for cataract and implant surgery were near $1200.

By 2012, that approved charge had dropped to about $570 in Tennessee.

(There is some variance within states based on rural versus metro areas and between states where some are declared to have higher costs of doing business.)

Additionally, the US dollar has declined in value an average of almost 2.5% per year over the past 30 year period.

Needless to say, overhead operating costs – salary, rent, insurance, personnel costs, taxes, and normal business expenses – have exploded during this same 30 year period. My office rent was raised 20% in the Fall of 2011, for instance.

To further illustrate the absurdity of the situation, it is worth recounting an anecdote.

Several years ago, a patient excitedly told me of the vision restoring cataract surgery that her poodle had received at the local veterinary college. It “only cost $2600 for both eyes!”

At the time, Medicare was paying about $1400 for two eyes in a human – including work up, surgical fee, post-op care for 90 days, and the very real liability associated with being a physician in a litigious society.

I do not begrudge my animal doctor friends their success, but surely the worth of human care should at least approximate that for a poodle.

Although I know veterinarians who are struggling in their own practices due to the economic recession, at least they do not have to deal with government fee-setting and the liability and costs associated with treating humans.

They are able to price their services sufficiently to keep their practices open and to provide for their own health care and retirement.



In my own practice, the amount of “write off” on charges for legitimate services rendered began to climb as we entered the 21st Century.

For years, the “disallowed” charges by Medicare and private insurers resulted in “discounts” of 20-25%.

As the economic upheaval of 2008 rolled around, those fee adjustments (actually theft of labor from providers) began to climb – 30%, 32%, 35%, and in my last year of practice over 60%!

For years, I had been able to subsidize my Medicare (cataract) side of the practice by offering elective refractive surgery procedures (LASIK, PRK, etc.) to my patients. As these were private pay cases, they offset the draconian cuts in Medicare and insurance fee “adjustments.”

The economic collapse of 2008, however, reduced that income stream for many ophthalmologists and, subsequently, led to the closing of many practices throughout the country.

Most general ophthalmologists are, by definition, primarily cataract surgeons. Many people – including Medicare recipients – do not realize that the fees paid to their physician are fixed by the U.S. Government after consultation with its many corporate sponsors within Big Insurance, Big Pharma, and Corporate Medicine.

Patients also do not realize that those reimbursement levels are set by central planners at below-cost levels.

Medicare issues cut across all specialties, and ophthalmology has not been alone in experiencing cutbacks.

Primary care physicians have increasingly become “piece good workers” – managed by corporate pencil pushers to see a patient every 6-8 minutes while being forced to carry all the liability and manage all the data and coding previously done by insurers.

Who can diagnose, much less treat a patient in 6-8 minutes?



My own solo cardiologist was forced to close his practice last Fall and seek employment with an area hospital, due to declining reimbursement levels.

More than 51% of cardiologists in the U.S. are now hospital employees.

One of my medical school classmates, a successful internal medicine specialist, has recently given up the fight and has plans to enter some other line of work.

Several friends in Radiology have seen their incomes decline as more and more work is “outsourced” to tele-docs in Asia.

Still other long-time friends who are general surgeons are struggling to survive (a surgical fee for incisional cholecystectomy, for instance, is now under $400).

Several have retired prematurely and others are looking for other work to do. As a final example, another of my friends is one of five physicians in a busy urology practice (2 offices and 26 employees) and they are now borrowing from the bank to make payroll.

A recent article from CNN, “Doctors Going Broke,” confirms the growing problem. http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/05/smallbusiness/doctors_broke/index.htm

As income reductions are being imposed on private practice, costs are being driven up by exploding regulations. In addition, the plethora of new mandates and laws have increasingly criminalized every aspect of the practice of medicine and created vast new armies of armed bureaucrats whose sole aim is to impose civil and criminal penalties on any provider unlucky enough to be singled out for attention.

The old Soviet dictum attributed to Lavrenti Beria (Stalin’s NKVD chief), “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime,” is in full force in Amerika.



The present puppet in the White House has completed the work begun by his predecessors in moving the nation into a police state.

The NDAA passed in the Fall of 2011 was the final nail in the coffin of personal freedoms guaranteed by the US Constitution.

By suspending habeas corpus and even trial by judge or jury, the Act has made certain that no person is safe from being violated by a power-mad Security State.

At the mere movement of the Unitary Executive’s pen, it is now permissible to “disappear” or even execute anyone on the planet – all on the whim of the unaccountable psychopath in charge.

Judge Andrew P. Napolitano, has reported that our present Unitary Exec spends every Tuesday morning reviewing and signing off on a k**l list supplied by his loyal minions.

Nobel Peace Prize worthy stuff, indeed!

One is presumed guilty now in Amerika until proven otherwise and nowhere has this been more demonstrated than in the policing of medicine.

Heaven help the poor provider who is targeted by the Medicare Police – or now, one supposes, by the new IRS Medical Special Branch. If targeted, his or her practice will be shut down without due process.

His or her assets will be seized without due process (assuring the inability to even defend oneself).



Finally, the unlucky guilty-until-proved-innocent physician will be permanently discredited (libeled) in his or her community with the ready help of the Government’s countless propaganda organs – press, radio, and TV – all before any day in court is seen.

New restrictions, rules, and regulations on healthcare – on providers and patients alike – have imposed legal constraints with which full compliance is impossible.

Medicare rules and regs alone fill tens of thousands of pages, and ignorance of any of them is no defense for the unlucky.

The original HIPAA legislation has been amplified with many additions since its inception in 1996: FERPA, HITECH, ARRA (2009). Each additional act or regulation has further criminalized the practice of medicine.



Finally, the entire health care system is being forced to switch to electronic health records (EHRs) and, soon, to a completely new coding system (from ICD-9 to ICD-10).

Failure to comply with these mandates will result in further reductions in provider payments with every year that they remain unimplemented.

For a solo physician practice, it is estimated that each mandate will cost as much as $80,000 to implement initially and, then, $10-15,000 annually to maintain.

For multi-physician practices, costs run as high as three times (or more) that of a single provider practice.

Of course, the purpose behind all of this is to make each person’s most private and personal information available to government bureaucrats and regulators while also ensuring its accessibility to the Security State’s many law enforcement tentacles and to all the corporate members of the Medical-Industrial complex.

Unfettered access to this information will ensure that the Corporate State can maximize its profits, largely avoid all risk and liability, and eliminate any potential competition (such as, often cheaper and more effective alternative medicine providers and therapies, non-GMO whole foods, and nutritional supplements).

It will also ensure that medicine is practiced/delivered within strict cookbook guidelines that are carefully written by non-physician bureaucrats to maintain corporate profits and government power.



All of this is well along in implementation.

A recent article, “Efforts to implement Obamacare law raise concerns of massive government expansion” from Fox News, 5 July 2012, (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/03/efforts-to-implement-obamacare-law-raise-conce... informs us that lawyers have already “drafted more than 13,000 pages of Obamacare regulations and that this number will increase further over coming months.

In addition, we are told that DHHS (Department of Health and Human Services) has been given more than one billion dollars to date in order to begin oversight of this mess and that more than 180 “commissions, boards, and bureaus” within the Agency are already hard at work implementing the final destruction of American medicine.

Widespread v******tion of the population with untested “stabs” will be mandated and enforced.

As long predicted by Tin Hatters around the planet, this will permit biometric “nano-chipping” of the citizenry without the unpleasant need to ask their permission.

Vast sums will be committed to “preventive” medicine which will prevent nothing and will only expand the reach of the Medical-Industrial complex into every nook and cranny of a person’s life – and, into every wallet.

Certain corporate profit-driven diets and treatment regimens will be mandated and enforced; access to nutritional supplements and alternative medicine practices will be limited or banned altogether.

Behavior patterns of all types will be monitored and carefully scripted and controlled (what we see, hear, read, do, eat, drink, and breathe – where and how we work, play, and live) under the guise of State Security concerns and its new companion, Public Health or Public Good.

And, finally, the Corporate State will deploy “death panels” to decide when a person has outlived his or her economic usefulness to the State.

In spite of Obama’s denials that such bodies exist and Palin’s diversionary, hysterical rantings at Tea Party rallies, there is clear provision in the Act for bureaucratic decision-making bodies which will make end-of-life decisions for us all.

These entities are already being formed and deployed across the land. Our Anglo cousins in the UK are showing us the way by withholding food and fluids from as many as 29% of their hospital patients now who are judged to be living beyond their government-dictated “use-by” dates (pragmatically justified “to free up beds” – oh, those Brits and their refined sense of humor).



What can be done about the failing American health care system and the wider collapse of the economy and civil liberty?

Frankly, very little.

The system is r****d against the people as it has always been, only now one can be “black-bagged” and disappeared at any time.

Protest too loudly and one is liable to literally see a grim Reaper overhead with one’s personal biometrics programmed into its fire control system.

Like every other institution within the United States, the medical system is totally and completely broken.

It can no longer be fixed by “v****g” for the lesser of evils, by printing bales of fiat currency, or even by deploying fleets of obsolete aircraft carriers across the planet.



If as it seems we are arriving at the end of an age, if we can survive the end, something better might arise from the ashes.

The prospect of collapse turns one’s thoughts to escape and survival. Can you do either?

Volumes have been written about preparedness in a time of chaos, so I will spare readers a rehash.

But, a few comments about healthcare, in particular, might be in order.



In a perfect world, it is my opinion that we should have some form of single payer healthcare system and divorce ourselves from corporate medicine.

In my opinion, this will not happen without the complete collapse of the present system.

Since that is unlikely to occur before more seasons of national e******n f***d are imposed on us, a few “in-the-meantime” suggestions follow:



Avoid contact with the existing health care system as far as possible. Yes, emergencies arise that require the help of physicians, but by and large one can learn to care for one’s own minor issues.

Though it is flawed, the internet has been an information leveler for the masses and permits each person to be his or her own physician to a large degree.

Take advantage of it!

Educate yourself about your own body and learn to fuel and maintain it as you would an expensive auto or a pet poodle.

One does not need a medical degree to:

1. avoid excessive use of tobacco or alcohol or, for that matter, caffeine;
2. avoid poisons like fluoride, aspartame, high fructose corn syrup, and addictive drugs (legal or illicit);
3. avoid unnecessary and potentially lethal imaging studies (TSA’s radiation pornbooths, excessive mammography, repetitive CT scans – exposure to all significantly increases cancer risk);
4. avoid excessive cell phone use and exposure to other forms of EMR pollution where possible (the NSA is recording everything you say and text anyway);
5. avoid daily fast food use and abuse (remember: pink slime and silicone) ;
6. avoid untested GM foods (do you really want to become “Roundup Ready?”):
7. avoid most v******tions and pharmaceutical agents promoted by the establishment;
8. avoid risky behaviors (and, we do not need a bunch of Nanny State bureaucrats to define and police these);
9. exercise moderately;
10. get plenty of sleep;
11. drink plenty of good quality water (buy a decent water filter to remove fluoride, chloride, and heavy metals);
12. wear protective gear at work and play where appropriate (helmets, eye-shields, knee and elbow pads, etc.):
13. seek out locally-grown, whole, organic foods and support your local food producers;
14. take appropriate nutritional supplements (multi-vitamins, Vitamin C, Vitamin D3);
15. switch off the TV and the mainstream media it represents;
16. educate yourself while you can;

And, lastly…



17. QUESTION AUTHORITY!

Doing these simple, common-sense things will add healthy years to a person’s life and help one avoid most medical encounters during his or her allotted time on earth.

Finally, we have a responsibility to our neighbors and our families. We need to reach out to those around us – talk to them, listen to them – sympathize and empathize.

Take time especially to listen to those who are in pain and are suffering and to help them by being humane.

If you do this, you will discover that we have more in common with each other than the ruling elite wants us to believe.

Governments obtain power and control by taking advantage of divisions along religious, ethnic, class, economic, ideological, and nationalistic lines.

We must awaken to this fact if the 99% are to prevail against the 1%.

As for me, I was finally forced to close my practice earlier this year.

Nearly two years of consulting with multiple attorneys, accountants, practice management consultants, and bankers, and expending most of my resources in a vain effort to keep operating, were simply not enough.

It seemed only poetic that April Fool’s Day 2012 should be chosen for turning out the lights and ringing down the curtain.

Patients and employees and suppliers were notified of the end. Many had been with me for my entire career and leaving them was and remains painful. More than nine thousand active charts were t***sferred to the care of a younger ophthalmologist still trying to stay afloat.

I share the heartache of many physicians forced out of medicine by the high cost of practicing it.

As the health system is stripped of medical care in behalf of corporate profits, its exploitative character will become clear to all. In the meantime, don’t give in or give up.

Plan for something better on the other side of chaos.

I wanted a perfect ending.

Now I’ve learned, the hard way, that some poems don’t rhyme, and some stories don’t have a clear beginning, middle and end. -Gilda Radner
Came across this news article, thought you would r... (show quote)


GREAT POST!!! So true. Sadly, most sheople have no clue.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.