One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Actual scientists demand NOAA come clean with its doctored g****l w*****g data
Jan 28, 2016 18:50:26   #
Pulfnick Loc: Knoxville, TN
 
300 eminent scientists, not corrupt political hack scientists, are demanding NOAA fess up about how they doctor and falsify data to "show g****l w*****g"

Of the 300 letter signers, 150 had doctorates in a related field. Signers also included: 25 climate or atmospheric scientists, 23 geologists, 18 meteorologists, 51 engineers, 74 physicists, 20 chemists and 12 economists. Additionally, one signer was a Nobel Prize winning physicist and two were astronauts.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/28/300-scientists-want-noaa-to-stop-hiding-its-global-warming-data/

But of course these and other honest scientists were not included in the phony study that is the source of the false, unsupported claim that 97% of scientists support the anthropogenic g****l w*****g h**x.

Reply
Jan 28, 2016 19:14:21   #
CowboyMilt
 
Of course the globe warms & cools & does it alternately throughout the year...they are called seasons...& the work on a cyclical basis...ALLS WELL!

Reply
Jan 28, 2016 20:39:36   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Pulfnick wrote:
300 eminent scientists, not corrupt political hack scientists, are demanding NOAA fess up about how they doctor and falsify data to "show g****l w*****g"

Of the 300 letter signers, 150 had doctorates in a related field. Signers also included: 25 climate or atmospheric scientists, 23 geologists, 18 meteorologists, 51 engineers, 74 physicists, 20 chemists and 12 economists. Additionally, one signer was a Nobel Prize winning physicist and two were astronauts.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/28/300-scientists-want-noaa-to-stop-hiding-its-global-warming-data/

But of course these and other honest scientists were not included in the phony study that is the source of the false, unsupported claim that 97% of scientists support the anthropogenic g****l w*****g h**x.
300 eminent scientists, not corrupt political hack... (show quote)
I guess these deniers felt awful stupid when the world ended yesterday just like Al Gore said it would.

Oh... It didn't end?........



Nevermind.

Reply
Jan 28, 2016 21:33:56   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Super Dave wrote:
I guess these deniers felt awful stupid when the world ended yesterday just like Al Gore said it would.

Oh... It didn't end?........



Nevermind.




Gee, when I thought the world was going to end, I spent the day eating ice cream, and not worrying if I would get fat. Noe I will have to diet!!! Damn it anyhow.

Reply
Jan 28, 2016 23:55:47   #
trucksterbud
 
Pulfnick wrote:
300 eminent scientists, not corrupt political hack scientists, are demanding NOAA fess up about how they doctor and falsify data to "show g****l w*****g"

Of the 300 letter signers, 150 had doctorates in a related field. Signers also included: 25 climate or atmospheric scientists, 23 geologists, 18 meteorologists, 51 engineers, 74 physicists, 20 chemists and 12 economists. Additionally, one signer was a Nobel Prize winning physicist and two were astronauts.

Don't know if you followed all this from the beginning. But, this is from the SCIENTISTS themselves. They all stated that the data is from COMPUTER models, and CANNOT ACCURATELY predict what may or may not happen. Remember, this came from the SCIENTISTS THEMSELVES...

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/28/300-scientists-want-noaa-to-stop-hiding-its-global-warming-data/

But of course these and other honest scientists were not included in the phony study that is the source of the false, unsupported claim that 97% of scientists support the anthropogenic g****l w*****g h**x.
300 eminent scientists, not corrupt political hack... (show quote)


If you followed this from the beginning, the scientists themselves stated that ALL their data was from computer models and it was IMPOSSIBLE to accurately predict any w*****r p*****ns, especially in the ten year time frame that the g****l w*****g h**x crowd insists is true.

Now, if you add in the HAARP project in Alaska (which my niece is aware of and has worked on computer programs for it) there is a good chance that some extreme computer models MAY INDEED be correct, since the gov is studying how to use the weather as a weapon........

Reply
Jan 29, 2016 22:07:15   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
I don't know why all of the denier are calling for open-science.

Just believe what the gubmit tells you about the secret science you and shut up.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.