Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

You must know these sheep, of the Democratic party, only listen to their falsehoods and out right lies.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

You must be one of the sheep that believe anything that you see on the internet instead of checking out the information for yourself. All of you progressives are just so gullible it just shows, the intelligent ones of us, how your are driven by your compassion and not common sense and intellect.
Then there you go, like all progressives, blaming Bush again. It was the intelligence agencies that claimed that the Iraq government had chemical weapons not Bush. Get your head out from under a rock and try to be intelligent.

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

I guess that you do not know that the President has discretion to spend on things that he believes in and not what the people believe. In many agencies of the government the President can direct that agency to spend on what he wants.

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

What an ignorant comment. "Obama is solely too blame?" If you actually believe that, then you know nothing. The US' mideast agenda(keep the Russians out, keep the Arabs divided, keep control of those pipelines) has been in play for decades, and Obama has merely picked up where previous administrations have left off. In case you don't read to well, the poster rightfully acknowledges this and did not "grant absolution" to Obama...maybe you should try getting your info from somewhere other than right-wing h**e-Obama sites, maybe you'll learn something.

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

You try taking your own advice. The fact is, every president of the last 25 years are culpable to some degree for the quagmire that is the MiddleEast.

peter11937 Loc: NYS

Camel urine!

peter11937 Loc: NYS

[quote=J Anthony]What an ignorant comment. "Obama is solely too blame?" If you actually believe that, then you know nothing. The US's Mideast agenda(keep the Russians out, keep the Arabs divided, keep control of those pipelines) has been in play for decades, and Obama has merely picked up where previous administrations have left off. In case you don't read to well, the poster rightfully acknowledges this and did not "grant absolution" to Obama...maybe you should try getting your info from somewhere other than right-wing h**e-Obama sites, maybe you'll learn something.[/quote

Obama has had the "football" for seven years, and fumbled on every play. There is no where on this earth that the political situation is better, where armed conflict is less severe o where totalitarianism is in retreat. Our economy is suffering from Obama's pen and telephone......He would have been replaced as quarterback on any other team in the league.....

Ricko Loc: Florida

son of witless-I agree !! In retrospect, , some could argue that if we had not been there in the first place Obama would not have had the opportunity to make that bad decision. However, we had a victory and all that was needed is more time to train the Iraquis to enable them to maintain stability in their country. Yes, we will have to go back in at some point if ISIS is to be wiped out. We need to be part of a coalition strong enough to leave no doubt as to the outcome. All prisoners should be turned over to the host country to be dealt with Muslim style. Obliteration in lieu of Incarceration might be the only way to rid ourselves of these pests. Good Luck America !!!

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

[quote=peter11937][quote=J Anthony]What an ignorant comment. "Obama is solely too blame?" If you actually believe that, then you know nothing. The US's Mideast agenda(keep the Russians out, keep the Arabs divided, keep control of those pipelines) has been in play for decades, and Obama has merely picked up where previous administrations have left off. In case you don't read to well, the poster rightfully acknowledges this and did not "grant absolution" to Obama...maybe you should try getting your info from somewhere other than right-wing h**e-Obama sites, maybe you'll learn something.[/quote

Obama has had the "football" for seven years, and fumbled on every play. There is no where on this earth that the political situation is better, where armed conflict is less severe o where totalitarianism is in retreat. Our economy is suffering from Obama's pen and telephone......He would have been replaced as quarterback on any other team in the league.....[/quote]

I don't disagree, but those who profit from endless war continue to do so, and continue to call for escalations, regardless of who is president. No one in positions of power have clearly defined what a "victory" in this situation would look like, nor have they given the public any substantial answers on how to "win" a conflict specifically designed to go on indefinitely. So this is not a political issue, it is a systemic one, a fact that few people seem willing or able to grasp

peter11937 Loc: NYS

The way to a victory over modern mohamadism is to utterly destroy their ability to wage war or organize.. Remember that they have declared war with us. They have been dispatching fifth columnist terrorists all over the world and in the USA , worst attack, 9-11-2001 . There have been more that 27,500 FATAL islamic attacks since then worldwide, and thousands of non fatal attacks. Should we remain passive, well that did not work out on 9-11 nor has i worked out well at any time in recorded history when facing an enemy with no grounding in western civilization's norms. In fact, pacifism failed miserably in Germany where they shed heir civilized behavior at the behest of a madman who gave nationalistic speeches....
We must do wh**ever it takes to defeat an enemy who prefers death to anything else. Your solution might be what?

roy

[/quote]

Amen should never have been there you can do nothing for these people they will fight with each other till the end of time, get the hell out leave them people to fight its cost our country way to much to our young people being mangled how the people that put them there in the first could even sleep at night is beyound me.

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

I agree with some of your statement. But the middle east uprising problem was started by Hillary and the Obama administration. Hillary started the Lebanon problem with the taking down of the Dictator that had control of the country up till that time and then getting the Muslim Brotherhood leader in as President. How did those situations work out?

Ve'hoe

The military budget is down,, significantly,,,,

Ve'hoe

The first president to have to deal with muslim terror was George Washington,,,, dealing with the barbary Corsairs,,,,,,


Same crap,, kidnappings and murder,,,,,, nothing has changed,, and the Saudis are the ones who divide the other arabs,,,,, not us,,,,,,,

thats why ISIS h**es us,,, and why bin laden,,,, a saudi prince turned on them,,,,