One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Next Dictator...
Jan 19, 2016 14:38:40   #
Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
 
THE NEXT DICTATOR?!?

Well it seems by the public's noninterest in 13 Hours on B******i this weekend, shows Hitlary was correct, the public doesn't care!!! "With all due respect, the fact is we have four dead Americans. Whether it was because of a protest or because guys outside for a walk one night decided to go k**l some Americans. What difference at this point does it make?" -- Hillary Clinton

Now I'm Betting She Thinks The Same Will Be True About Her Emails!!!

How Hitlary Sees The Public!!!

Inspector General: Clinton Emails Had 'Intel' From Most Secretive, Classified Programs

Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne - Jan 19, 2016 - Fox News


EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton's emails on her unsecured, homebrew server contained intelligence from the U.S. government's most secretive and highly classified programs, according to an unclassified letter from a top inspector general to senior lawmakers.

Fox News exclusively obtained the text of the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP).

That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,” the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings even more scrutiny to the p**********l candidate’s handling of the government’s closely held secrets.

“To date, I have received two sworn declarations from one [intelligence community] element. These declarations cover several dozen emails containing classified information determined by the IC element to be at the confidential, secret, and top secret/sap levels,” said the IG letter to lawmakers with oversight of the intelligence community and State Department. “According to the declarant, these documents contain information derived from classified IC element sources.”

Intelligence from a "special access program,” or SAP, is even more sensitive than that designated as "top secret" – as were two emails identified last summer in a random sample pulled from Clinton's private server she used as secretary of state. Access to a SAP is restricted to those with a "need-to-know" because exposure of the intelligence would likely reveal the source, putting a method of intelligence collection -- or a human asset -- at risk. Currently, some 1,340 emails designated “classified” have been found on Clinton’s server, though the Democratic p**********l candidate insists the information was not classified at the time.

“There is absolutely no way that one could not recognize SAP material,” a former senior law enforcement with decades of experience investigating violations of SAP procedures told Fox News. “It is the most sensitive of the sensitive.”

Executive Order 13526 -- called "Classified National Security Information" and signed Dec. 29, 2009 -- sets out the legal framework for establishing special access programs. The order says the programs can only be authorized by the president, "the Secretaries of State, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence, or the principal deputy of each."

The programs are created when "the vulnerability of, or threat to, specific information is exceptional,” and “the number of persons who ordinarily will have access will be reasonably small and commensurate with the objective of providing enhanced protection for the information involved," it states.

According to court documents, former CIA Director David Petraeus was prosecuted for sharing intelligence from special access programs with his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell. At the heart of his prosecution was a non-disclosure agreement where Petraeus agreed to protect these closely held government programs, with the understanding “unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention or negligent handling … could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation.” Clinton signed an identical non-disclosure agreement Jan. 22, 2009.

Fox News is told that the recent IG letter was sent to the leadership of the House and Senate intelligence committees and leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as well as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and State Department inspector general.

Fox News has asked the committees to make the letter public because its findings are unclassified.

Representatives for the ODNI and intelligence community inspector general had no comment, but did not dispute the findings.

The intelligence community IG was responding in his message to a November letter from the Republican chairmen of the Senate intelligence and foreign relations committees that questioned the State Department email review process after it was wrongly reported the intelligence community was retreating from the “top secret” designation.

As Fox News first reported, those two emails were “top secret” when they hit the server, and it is now considered a settled matter.

The intelligence agencies now have their own reviewers embedded at the State Department as part of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) process. The reviewers are identifying intelligence of a potentially classified nature, and referring it to the relevant intelligence agency for further review.

There is no formal appeals process for classification, and the agency that generates the intelligence has final say. The State Department only has control over the fraction of emails that pertain to their own intelligence.

While the State Department and Clinton campaign have said the emails in questions were “retroactively classified” or “upgraded” – to justify the more than 1,300 classified emails on her server – those terms are meaningless under federal law.

The former federal law enforcement official said the finding in the January IG letter represents a potential violation of USC 18 Section 793, “gross negligence” in the handling of secure information under the Espionage Act.

~~~~~

Emails Reveal Clinton Aides Pushed Back Against Using Government Email Account

(Huma Abedin Clinton Aid)

Fox News - Jan 18, 2016


A new set of e-mails released Monday shows a State Department official's suggestion to Hillary Clinton’s aide Huma Abedin in August 2011 that the then-secretary of state begin using a government email account was met with pushback.

The official, Stephen D. Mull, then the executive secretary of the State Department, mentioned Clinton’s use of the personal e-mail server in an Aug. 30, 2011 message while proposing that Clinton be provided with a new Blackberry equipped with a state.gov e-mail account.

“We are working to provide the Secretary per her request a Department issued Blackberry to replace her personal unit which is malfunctioning,” wrote Mull. He noted that Clinton’s device was malfunctioning at the time “possibly because of her personal email server is down.”

The e-mail was addressed to Cheryl Mills, with Patrick Kennedy, the undersecretary for management at the State Department, Clinton aide Monica Hanley, and Abedin copied on the message.

Mull offered to prepare two Blackberries, one of which would include “an operating State Department email account.”

His offer was met with resistance from Abedin in a later email.

“Let’s discuss the state blackberry, doesn’t make a whole lot of sense,” she wrote.

She added “even the white house attested” the outages affecting Clinton’s server were “a pretty widespread problem, not just affecting us.”

The emails were obtained by The Daily Caller through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the government watchdog group Cause of Action.

Clinton has been under criticism since news broke last spring that she had as secretary of state used a private server and email accounts for official business.

She has said she never knowingly sent or received classified information. However, the State Department, which under a Freedom of Information Act request is in the process of releasing roughly 55,000 pages of Clinton emails, is also retroactively classifying about 1,000 of her emails.

Reply
Jan 19, 2016 14:53:07   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
This Is The Kind Of Concern, Competence And Decisive Leadership America Needs NOW !!

Reply
Jan 19, 2016 15:09:06   #
jimahrens Loc: California
 
It is my opinion that she just night have been selling Gov Secrets to the highest bidder. I pray I am wrong.
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
THE NEXT DICTATOR?!?

Well it seems by the public's noninterest in 13 Hours on B******i this weekend, shows Hitlary was correct, the public doesn't care!!! "With all due respect, the fact is we have four dead Americans. Whether it was because of a protest or because guys outside for a walk one night decided to go k**l some Americans. What difference at this point does it make?" -- Hillary Clinton

Now I'm Betting She Thinks The Same Will Be True About Her Emails!!!

How Hitlary Sees The Public!!!

Inspector General: Clinton Emails Had 'Intel' From Most Secretive, Classified Programs

Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne - Jan 19, 2016 - Fox News


EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton's emails on her unsecured, homebrew server contained intelligence from the U.S. government's most secretive and highly classified programs, according to an unclassified letter from a top inspector general to senior lawmakers.

Fox News exclusively obtained the text of the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP).

That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,” the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings even more scrutiny to the p**********l candidate’s handling of the government’s closely held secrets.

“To date, I have received two sworn declarations from one [intelligence community] element. These declarations cover several dozen emails containing classified information determined by the IC element to be at the confidential, secret, and top secret/sap levels,” said the IG letter to lawmakers with oversight of the intelligence community and State Department. “According to the declarant, these documents contain information derived from classified IC element sources.”

Intelligence from a "special access program,” or SAP, is even more sensitive than that designated as "top secret" – as were two emails identified last summer in a random sample pulled from Clinton's private server she used as secretary of state. Access to a SAP is restricted to those with a "need-to-know" because exposure of the intelligence would likely reveal the source, putting a method of intelligence collection -- or a human asset -- at risk. Currently, some 1,340 emails designated “classified” have been found on Clinton’s server, though the Democratic p**********l candidate insists the information was not classified at the time.

“There is absolutely no way that one could not recognize SAP material,” a former senior law enforcement with decades of experience investigating violations of SAP procedures told Fox News. “It is the most sensitive of the sensitive.”

Executive Order 13526 -- called "Classified National Security Information" and signed Dec. 29, 2009 -- sets out the legal framework for establishing special access programs. The order says the programs can only be authorized by the president, "the Secretaries of State, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence, or the principal deputy of each."

The programs are created when "the vulnerability of, or threat to, specific information is exceptional,” and “the number of persons who ordinarily will have access will be reasonably small and commensurate with the objective of providing enhanced protection for the information involved," it states.

According to court documents, former CIA Director David Petraeus was prosecuted for sharing intelligence from special access programs with his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell. At the heart of his prosecution was a non-disclosure agreement where Petraeus agreed to protect these closely held government programs, with the understanding “unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention or negligent handling … could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation.” Clinton signed an identical non-disclosure agreement Jan. 22, 2009.

Fox News is told that the recent IG letter was sent to the leadership of the House and Senate intelligence committees and leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as well as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and State Department inspector general.

Fox News has asked the committees to make the letter public because its findings are unclassified.

Representatives for the ODNI and intelligence community inspector general had no comment, but did not dispute the findings.

The intelligence community IG was responding in his message to a November letter from the Republican chairmen of the Senate intelligence and foreign relations committees that questioned the State Department email review process after it was wrongly reported the intelligence community was retreating from the “top secret” designation.

As Fox News first reported, those two emails were “top secret” when they hit the server, and it is now considered a settled matter.

The intelligence agencies now have their own reviewers embedded at the State Department as part of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) process. The reviewers are identifying intelligence of a potentially classified nature, and referring it to the relevant intelligence agency for further review.

There is no formal appeals process for classification, and the agency that generates the intelligence has final say. The State Department only has control over the fraction of emails that pertain to their own intelligence.

While the State Department and Clinton campaign have said the emails in questions were “retroactively classified” or “upgraded” – to justify the more than 1,300 classified emails on her server – those terms are meaningless under federal law.

The former federal law enforcement official said the finding in the January IG letter represents a potential violation of USC 18 Section 793, “gross negligence” in the handling of secure information under the Espionage Act.

~~~~~

Emails Reveal Clinton Aides Pushed Back Against Using Government Email Account

(Huma Abedin Clinton Aid)

Fox News - Jan 18, 2016


A new set of e-mails released Monday shows a State Department official's suggestion to Hillary Clinton’s aide Huma Abedin in August 2011 that the then-secretary of state begin using a government email account was met with pushback.

The official, Stephen D. Mull, then the executive secretary of the State Department, mentioned Clinton’s use of the personal e-mail server in an Aug. 30, 2011 message while proposing that Clinton be provided with a new Blackberry equipped with a state.gov e-mail account.

“We are working to provide the Secretary per her request a Department issued Blackberry to replace her personal unit which is malfunctioning,” wrote Mull. He noted that Clinton’s device was malfunctioning at the time “possibly because of her personal email server is down.”

The e-mail was addressed to Cheryl Mills, with Patrick Kennedy, the undersecretary for management at the State Department, Clinton aide Monica Hanley, and Abedin copied on the message.

Mull offered to prepare two Blackberries, one of which would include “an operating State Department email account.”

His offer was met with resistance from Abedin in a later email.

“Let’s discuss the state blackberry, doesn’t make a whole lot of sense,” she wrote.

She added “even the white house attested” the outages affecting Clinton’s server were “a pretty widespread problem, not just affecting us.”

The emails were obtained by The Daily Caller through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the government watchdog group Cause of Action.

Clinton has been under criticism since news broke last spring that she had as secretary of state used a private server and email accounts for official business.

She has said she never knowingly sent or received classified information. However, the State Department, which under a Freedom of Information Act request is in the process of releasing roughly 55,000 pages of Clinton emails, is also retroactively classifying about 1,000 of her emails.
THE NEXT DICTATOR?!? br br Well it seems by the p... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2016 17:34:08   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
jimahrens wrote:
It is my opinion that she just night have been selling Gov Secrets to the highest bidder. I pray I am wrong.


Just because people don't go to a movie doesn't mean they aren't interested in a despicable act committed buy a candidate for president.She was obviously covering up some criminal act for which she would sacrifice the lives of Americans too protect her own worthless ass.

Reply
Jan 19, 2016 17:39:10   #
jimahrens Loc: California
 
No one in there right mind could possibly explain why they would v**e for Hillery.
Hemiman wrote:
Just because people don't go to a movie doesn't mean they aren't interested in a despicable act committed buy a candidate for president.She was obviously covering up some criminal act for which she would sacrifice the lives of Americans too protect her own worthless ass.

Reply
Jan 19, 2016 17:42:45   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
jimahrens wrote:
No one in there right mind could possibly explain why they would v**e for Hillery.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.