The Bells Tolling For Hitlary...
Jan 17, 2016 17:14:58 #
Don G. Dinsdale
Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
THE BELLS TOLL FOR HILLARY
The FBI Is Closing In
By R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. - Jan 8, 2016 - The American Spectator
The Federal Bureau of Investigation will recommend that the Justice Department bring criminal charges against Hillary Clinton and various of her aides, and soon. The evidence consists of materials that the Bureau has gathered in the course of its months-long investigation of Mrs. Clintons personal server. The recommendations will come very soon.
The charges will consist of some of the following:
1. Improper disclosure or retention of classified information.
2. Destruction of government records.
3. Lying to federal agents.
4. Lying under oath.
5. Obstruction of justice.
All the counts are familiar to those of us who have followed the Clintons for a quarter of a century, but, as one source familiar with the FBIs investigation told me, the evidence has now reached a critical mass.
There are those who have told me that the FBI has been engaged in a ruse. And that the Bureau will report it has come across nothing criminal. Then the whole imbroglio is expected to blow over.
But such cynics are in the minority. Most sources have told me the investigation is genuine, serious, and all but completed. One told me that it was completed two months ago. The Bureau has put together a case that as one source put it is locked up. It is solid.
In the past, as FBI agent I.C. Smith wrote in his book Inside: A Top G-Man Exposes Spies, Lies, and Bureaucratic Bungling Inside the FBI, the Clintons have benefited from a few corrupt agents, usually in Arkansas. But that was years ago, and in Arkansas. This is the FBI in Washington, at the top where there are plenty of utterly professional law enforcement officials. They believe t***h matters and so does the pursuit of justice. They have been building a case that is unassailable, one source told me. It is beyond the case against Petraeus. It is about the violation of federal statutes.
The only question now is will the recommendations come this month or within sixty days. Politicians with the p**********l itch such as Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry hope the FBIs recommendations will come in a week or so to allow them to get into the race. Other observers say the decision will come later. The FBI, said one source, does not care about politics. Whether it comes tomorrow or in sixty days, Justice Department policies mandate making such decisions as far in advance of e******ns as possible. If there are conflicting winds blowing in the Bureau or DOJ, they must avoid the appearance of being motivated by partisan politics.
Yet such is the gravity of the charges and the consequences of neglecting them that they cannot be ignored. If they are ignored, people familiar with the investigation say, it will be impossible to prosecute future defendants being charged with the mishandling of classified information. Said Joseph DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, The intelligence community will not stand for that. They will fight for indictment and they are already in the process of gearing themselves to basically revolt if [the Attorney General] refuses to bring charges. FBI Director James Comey has reportedly said he will resign if the Bureaus recommendations for charges are ignored.
One source familiar with the case said the indictments will begin with the small fish starting with Bryan Pagliano, the keeper of Hillarys server, and move on to the Big Enchilada, Hillary. Wh**ever happens, seasoned political players have claimed Hillary will continue in the race for Democratic nomination. Joe Trippi, former campaign manager for 2004 p**********l candidate Howard Dean, was overheard in the Green Room at Fox saying Hillary will run to the end.
Avert your gaze.
Former U.S. Attorney says Hillary Clinton Could Face Criminal Charges in 60 Days
By Rachel Stockman - January 7th, 2016 - MEDIAITE
If former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova prediction is true, Hillary Clinton will most likely no longer be a contender for the 2016 p**********l race. He told Fox News Gretchen Carlson that he thinks Hillary Clinton and some of her staff may be indicted within the next 60 to 90 days.
They (the FBI) are going to make a recommendation that there is going to be charges against a series of people, DiGenova said on the program..
What I know is that the FBI has been building a compelling an unassailable case against Hillary and her surrounding group inside the State department, he said.
Mr. DiGenova must have some inside knowledge about the investigation because so far FBI director has refused to answer questions about the ongoing investigation into whether the private emails were mishandled.
Interestingly, this comes at the heels of the U.S. State Departments Inspector General Office findings that the department gave inaccurate and incomplete answers to those who were trying to seek then Secretary of State Hillary Clintons records. For example, the report says the State Department mistakenly told a group they had no information regarding Hillary Clintons personal email account.
Hillary Clintons Criminal Indictment Looms
Posted on J****** 6, 2016 by DC Whispers
Talk of a possible indictment against former Obama Secretary of State and current Democrat p**********l frontrunner, Hillary Clinton have swirled for months.
Whispers now indicate that over the last forty-eight hours that talk has turned very-very serious and it has the Clinton Machine scrambling to prevent what would be a historic political collapse not seen since the days of Nixon.
(Shes exhausted by it. Shes out of her mind with worry )
Judge: These Are All the Charges Hillary Faces Over Private Emails
BY JASON W. STEVENS - THE FEDERALIST PAPERS PROJECT
With Hillary Clinton's private email scandal taking off, the criticisms continue to pour in from the Right AND THE LEFT.
And now with everyone seemingly piling on, expect the narrative to switch quickly to sexism in order to protect Ms. Clintons p**********l ambitions for 2016.
But in the meantime, one judge has clearly explained the charges the former-Secretary of State faces for her serious breach of the law and responsibility.
From Fox News:
What are the potential consequences for Hillary Clinton for using a personal email account during her time as secretary of state?
On Wednesday, the House Select Committee on B******i issued her a subpoena for all communications related to the investigation.
Judge Andrew Napolitano sat down with Martha MacCallum to go over the two potential criminal investigations that the former First Lady could face.
1. The less serious possibility is an investigation similar to what was brought against Gen. David Petraeus, who pleaded guilty this week for keeping classified documents in an unsecured location. The judge explained that in Mrs. Clintons case, she kept classified secrets on a home server that was not secured by the government. Napolitano said theres no way Clinton did not have classified material on her home server, since she held the same security clearance as the president. That would only be a misdemeanor charge, however.
2. Napolitano said the far more serious charge would be a conspiracy to conceal documents from government computers, which carries a penalty of three years in jail per document. A conviction on that charge would disqualify her from holding public office again.
clinton
The situation seems extremely clear. It doesnt matter that Clinton has already ordered the State Department to make her emails public. Serious damage has already been done.
And there should be consequences.
BUT WAIT THERES MORE!
Not only is Clinton facing serious criminal charges, but it turns out that she personally disciplined a former-US ambassador for doing the exact same thing shes now accused of doing!
So much for sexism.
Via Young Conservatives:
In case you havent had your daily dose of liberal hypocrisy today, heres a fresh cup for you involving some new details about the Hillary Clinton email scandal.
Apparently, the State Departmentunder her watchforced a U.S. ambassador to resign from his post after it was discovered he was using a private email address back in 2012.
Hillarys State Department actually forced the 2012 resignation of the U.S. ambassador to Kenya in part for setting up an unsanctioned private e-mail system. According to a 2012 report from the State Departments inspector general, former U.S. ambassador to Kenya Scott Gration set up a private e-mail system for his office in 2011.
The inspector generals report offered a scathing assessment of Grations information security practices practices that are eerily similar to those undertaken by Clinton while she served as Secretary of State [ ]
The inspector generals report specifically noted that Gration violated State Department policy by using a private, unsanctioned e-mail service for official. In its executive summary listing its key judgments against the U.S. ambassador to Kenya who served under Hillary Clinton, the inspector general stated that Grations decision to willfully violate departmental information security policies highlighted Grations reluctance to accept clear-cut U.S. Government decisions. The report claimed that this reluctance to obey governmental security policies was the former ambassadors greatest weakness.
This will destroy her.
That is, if this news doesnt do it first.
What do you think of Ms. Clintons 2016 hopes NOW?
The FBI Is Closing In
By R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. - Jan 8, 2016 - The American Spectator
The Federal Bureau of Investigation will recommend that the Justice Department bring criminal charges against Hillary Clinton and various of her aides, and soon. The evidence consists of materials that the Bureau has gathered in the course of its months-long investigation of Mrs. Clintons personal server. The recommendations will come very soon.
The charges will consist of some of the following:
1. Improper disclosure or retention of classified information.
2. Destruction of government records.
3. Lying to federal agents.
4. Lying under oath.
5. Obstruction of justice.
All the counts are familiar to those of us who have followed the Clintons for a quarter of a century, but, as one source familiar with the FBIs investigation told me, the evidence has now reached a critical mass.
There are those who have told me that the FBI has been engaged in a ruse. And that the Bureau will report it has come across nothing criminal. Then the whole imbroglio is expected to blow over.
But such cynics are in the minority. Most sources have told me the investigation is genuine, serious, and all but completed. One told me that it was completed two months ago. The Bureau has put together a case that as one source put it is locked up. It is solid.
In the past, as FBI agent I.C. Smith wrote in his book Inside: A Top G-Man Exposes Spies, Lies, and Bureaucratic Bungling Inside the FBI, the Clintons have benefited from a few corrupt agents, usually in Arkansas. But that was years ago, and in Arkansas. This is the FBI in Washington, at the top where there are plenty of utterly professional law enforcement officials. They believe t***h matters and so does the pursuit of justice. They have been building a case that is unassailable, one source told me. It is beyond the case against Petraeus. It is about the violation of federal statutes.
The only question now is will the recommendations come this month or within sixty days. Politicians with the p**********l itch such as Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry hope the FBIs recommendations will come in a week or so to allow them to get into the race. Other observers say the decision will come later. The FBI, said one source, does not care about politics. Whether it comes tomorrow or in sixty days, Justice Department policies mandate making such decisions as far in advance of e******ns as possible. If there are conflicting winds blowing in the Bureau or DOJ, they must avoid the appearance of being motivated by partisan politics.
Yet such is the gravity of the charges and the consequences of neglecting them that they cannot be ignored. If they are ignored, people familiar with the investigation say, it will be impossible to prosecute future defendants being charged with the mishandling of classified information. Said Joseph DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, The intelligence community will not stand for that. They will fight for indictment and they are already in the process of gearing themselves to basically revolt if [the Attorney General] refuses to bring charges. FBI Director James Comey has reportedly said he will resign if the Bureaus recommendations for charges are ignored.
One source familiar with the case said the indictments will begin with the small fish starting with Bryan Pagliano, the keeper of Hillarys server, and move on to the Big Enchilada, Hillary. Wh**ever happens, seasoned political players have claimed Hillary will continue in the race for Democratic nomination. Joe Trippi, former campaign manager for 2004 p**********l candidate Howard Dean, was overheard in the Green Room at Fox saying Hillary will run to the end.
Avert your gaze.
Former U.S. Attorney says Hillary Clinton Could Face Criminal Charges in 60 Days
By Rachel Stockman - January 7th, 2016 - MEDIAITE
If former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova prediction is true, Hillary Clinton will most likely no longer be a contender for the 2016 p**********l race. He told Fox News Gretchen Carlson that he thinks Hillary Clinton and some of her staff may be indicted within the next 60 to 90 days.
They (the FBI) are going to make a recommendation that there is going to be charges against a series of people, DiGenova said on the program..
What I know is that the FBI has been building a compelling an unassailable case against Hillary and her surrounding group inside the State department, he said.
Mr. DiGenova must have some inside knowledge about the investigation because so far FBI director has refused to answer questions about the ongoing investigation into whether the private emails were mishandled.
Interestingly, this comes at the heels of the U.S. State Departments Inspector General Office findings that the department gave inaccurate and incomplete answers to those who were trying to seek then Secretary of State Hillary Clintons records. For example, the report says the State Department mistakenly told a group they had no information regarding Hillary Clintons personal email account.
Hillary Clintons Criminal Indictment Looms
Posted on J****** 6, 2016 by DC Whispers
Talk of a possible indictment against former Obama Secretary of State and current Democrat p**********l frontrunner, Hillary Clinton have swirled for months.
Whispers now indicate that over the last forty-eight hours that talk has turned very-very serious and it has the Clinton Machine scrambling to prevent what would be a historic political collapse not seen since the days of Nixon.
(Shes exhausted by it. Shes out of her mind with worry )
Judge: These Are All the Charges Hillary Faces Over Private Emails
BY JASON W. STEVENS - THE FEDERALIST PAPERS PROJECT
With Hillary Clinton's private email scandal taking off, the criticisms continue to pour in from the Right AND THE LEFT.
And now with everyone seemingly piling on, expect the narrative to switch quickly to sexism in order to protect Ms. Clintons p**********l ambitions for 2016.
But in the meantime, one judge has clearly explained the charges the former-Secretary of State faces for her serious breach of the law and responsibility.
From Fox News:
What are the potential consequences for Hillary Clinton for using a personal email account during her time as secretary of state?
On Wednesday, the House Select Committee on B******i issued her a subpoena for all communications related to the investigation.
Judge Andrew Napolitano sat down with Martha MacCallum to go over the two potential criminal investigations that the former First Lady could face.
1. The less serious possibility is an investigation similar to what was brought against Gen. David Petraeus, who pleaded guilty this week for keeping classified documents in an unsecured location. The judge explained that in Mrs. Clintons case, she kept classified secrets on a home server that was not secured by the government. Napolitano said theres no way Clinton did not have classified material on her home server, since she held the same security clearance as the president. That would only be a misdemeanor charge, however.
2. Napolitano said the far more serious charge would be a conspiracy to conceal documents from government computers, which carries a penalty of three years in jail per document. A conviction on that charge would disqualify her from holding public office again.
clinton
The situation seems extremely clear. It doesnt matter that Clinton has already ordered the State Department to make her emails public. Serious damage has already been done.
And there should be consequences.
BUT WAIT THERES MORE!
Not only is Clinton facing serious criminal charges, but it turns out that she personally disciplined a former-US ambassador for doing the exact same thing shes now accused of doing!
So much for sexism.
Via Young Conservatives:
In case you havent had your daily dose of liberal hypocrisy today, heres a fresh cup for you involving some new details about the Hillary Clinton email scandal.
Apparently, the State Departmentunder her watchforced a U.S. ambassador to resign from his post after it was discovered he was using a private email address back in 2012.
Hillarys State Department actually forced the 2012 resignation of the U.S. ambassador to Kenya in part for setting up an unsanctioned private e-mail system. According to a 2012 report from the State Departments inspector general, former U.S. ambassador to Kenya Scott Gration set up a private e-mail system for his office in 2011.
The inspector generals report offered a scathing assessment of Grations information security practices practices that are eerily similar to those undertaken by Clinton while she served as Secretary of State [ ]
The inspector generals report specifically noted that Gration violated State Department policy by using a private, unsanctioned e-mail service for official. In its executive summary listing its key judgments against the U.S. ambassador to Kenya who served under Hillary Clinton, the inspector general stated that Grations decision to willfully violate departmental information security policies highlighted Grations reluctance to accept clear-cut U.S. Government decisions. The report claimed that this reluctance to obey governmental security policies was the former ambassadors greatest weakness.
This will destroy her.
That is, if this news doesnt do it first.
What do you think of Ms. Clintons 2016 hopes NOW?
Jan 17, 2016 17:31:27 #
That beyotch would try to RULE America from her JAIL CELL.
She believes that she is OWED the PRESIDENCY.
She believes that she is OWED the PRESIDENCY.
Jan 17, 2016 17:42:05 #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
THE BELLS TOLL FOR HILLARY br br The FBI Is Closi... (show quote)
It's highly unlikely that anything will happen to her. She just took the lead again for the dimwit-a-crats over Bernie the socialist. They are going to protect her using wh**ever underhanded tactics they can muster. People have to wake up to what's really going on around them. I personally, am so pissed off at what is happening right in front of everyones eyes, and they still support her. Liberals, I can deal with. But progressive liberals, I just hope the cool-aid that they are drinking is left over from Jim Jones!
SEMPER FI
Jan 17, 2016 17:50:26 #
Don G. Dinsdale
Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
Kool-Aid With Jim or Pot With Hitlary??? Either Way American's Had It...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
mongo wrote:
It's highly unlikely that anything will happen to ... (show quote)
Jan 18, 2016 10:18:43 #
Jan 18, 2016 10:32:10 #
Jan 18, 2016 10:44:52 #
gynojunkie wrote:
Instead of 'beyotch' why not 'belch' is what she is and does.That beyotch would try to RULE America from her JAIL CELL.
She believes that she is OWED the PRESIDENCY.
She believes that she is OWED the PRESIDENCY.
Jan 18, 2016 12:27:29 #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
THE BELLS TOLL FOR HILLARY br br The FBI Is Closi... (show quote)
I HOPE its THIS WEEK , Not in 60 days
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.