Onelostdog Loc: Restless Oregon

From the internet comes this bit of information.

Black Lives Do Matter



Is this r****t? You decide.





WHAT IF ALL B****S SUDDENLY LEFT AMERICA

(THEY ARE 13% OF THE TOTAL POPULATION):



The prison population would go down by 37%



There would be 50% less gang members



Obesity percentage would drop 10%



Average IQ would go up 7 points putting us

3rd in the world tied with Japan



Average Sat scores would go up almost 100 pts



Average ACT scores would go up 5.5 pts



AIDS and HIV would go down by 2/3rds



Chlamydia cases would go down 50%



Gonorrhea would go down 69%



Syphilis would go down 58%



The average income for Americans would go up over 20,000 dollars a year



Amount of people in poverty would drop 30%



Homelessness would go down 57%



Welfare recipients would go down by 40%



DEMOCRATS WOULD LOSE 70% OF THEIR V****G BASE



.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States (anyone can provide info to WIKI)



And many criminal defense attorneys would have to find another line of work!

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

Nope, cannot be r****t.

You are not a r****t,
R****m is a crime, and everyone knows crime is for black people

:shock:

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

markinny

can,t get rid of this blight on the free ride.

Boneyfingers

Then the question is: What is it that causes b****s to have so much trouble living under the same rules as w****s ? Those that do recognize there is only one set of rules appear to be doing fine and are not discriminated against.

As for the part about them being s***es..Have you ever met anyone
who has ever been a s***e ? I have not !!
The argument might have been valid 100 years ago, but it is not
today. It makes no difference what your grandfather was, it is
what you are today. My grandfather was a coal miner, I have never been in a coal mine, so should I moan and groan about the hard live of a coal miner even though I have never been ? If the
coal producers own anything, they owe it to him, not to me.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Citing facts is not a r****t act. Numbers can not lie. If the source is correct in their reporting, then how can they be argued?

I have said for many years, the worst mistake we have made, and this includes exploding the bomb on Japan, was to import Africans. From the start, they were unsuited for a developing nation and of course s***ery was wrong. It was true that many of the Founders considered s***ery a terrible injustice and hoped to abolish it, but they meant to expel the freed s***es from the United States, not to live with them in e******y. Thomas Jefferson’s views were typical. Despite what he wrote in the Declaration, he did not think B****s were equal to W****s, noting that “in general, their existence appears to participate more of sensation than reflection.” He hoped s***ery would be abolished some day, but “when freed, he (the Negro) is to be removed beyond the reach of mixture.”

James Madison agreed with Jefferson that the only solution to the race problem was to free the s***es and expel them: “To be consistent with existing and probably unalterable prejudices in the U.S. freed b****s ought to be permanently removed beyond the region occupied by or allotted to a White population.” He proposed that the federal government buy up the entire s***e population and t***sport it overseas. After two terms in office, he served as chief executive of the American Colonization Society, which was established to repatriate B****s.

Benjamin Franklin asked a very sincere question, "Why increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America?"

Even John Jay voiced his opinion, “Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people, a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs."

Now keep in mind, in 1770, 40 percent of White households in Manhattan owned Black s***es, and there were more s***es in the colony of New York than in Georgia. And although I think that New Yorkers are fine individuals, they are for the most part liberals. But, even those claiming to be supporters of the Abolition Movement, there was an issue. For they resisted the idea of complete e******y, specifically interracial marriages. There were no fewer than 165 anti-abolition r**ts in the North during the 1820s alone... and at the core was the issue of marriage. So, even they wanted a better solution. And that solution was colonize them.

Henry Ward Beecher, brother of Harriet Beecher Stowe who wrote Uncle Tom’s Cabin, expressed the majority view: “Do your duty first to the colored people here; educate them, Christianize them, and then colonize them.”

Henry Clay, when asked the purpose for his group the American Colonization Society responded with “rid our country of a useless and pernicious, if not dangerous portion of the population.” The following prominent Americans were not just members but served as officers of the society: James Madison, Andrew Jackson, Daniel Webster, Stephen Douglas, William Seward, Francis Scott Key, Winfield Scott, John Marshall, and Roger Taney. James Monroe, another President who owned s***es, worked so tirelessly in the cause of “colonization” that the capital of Liberia is named Monrovia in recognition of his efforts.

Our founders were smart and correct on so many issues, so what happened? Liberals happened, and with most things they control, they made a big stinking mess. What they elected to do was make generation after generations of b****s not only very unhappy, but have kept the vast majority of b****s in poverty. Currently , 27.4 percent of b****s live well below poverty levels, with the majority of single black women being at the bottom level. 45.8 percent of young black children (under age 6) live in poverty. Would things have been different for them in their own country of Africa? Probably not but they would be right at home. During 2014, along with the horrific outbreak of Ebola in West Africa, the continent as a whole experienced one of the more turbulent years in its recent history with widespread protests, unrest, civil wars, and insurgencies. Sound like what happened in Ferguson and Philadelphia?

RWNJ

The murder rate would also drop by 50%

RWNJ

We should have picked our own cotton.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Most s***e owners did not own cotton plantations and after the invention of the cotton gin, b****s were seldom used. However, they were used on sugar and rice plantations. B****s were used for one reason, rice and sugar was grown in some areas of Africa and there was evidence that s***es taken from the Gold Coast by Islamic, Portuguese, and Dutch traders were familiar with the methods of cultivation practiced in their native country.

It is a myth that all white settlers owned s***es and farms could not exist without their labor. In fact, the first documented s***e owner was a black. Another issue with the newly taught history they conveniently leave out facts, such as less than 5 percent of w****s in the south owned black s***es. Did you know, prior to 1654, all Africans in the thirteen colonies were held in indentured servitude and were released after a contracted period with many of the indentured receiving land and equipment after their contracts for work expired? Probably not.

The first official s***e owner in America was an Angolan who adopted the European name of Anthony Johnson. He was sold to s***e traders in 1621 by an enemy tribe in his native Africa, and was registered as “Antonio, a Negro” in the official records of the Colony of Virginia. He went to work for a white farmer as an indentured servant. By July 1651 Johnson had five indentured servants of his own. In 1664, he brought a case before Virginia courts in which he contested a suit launched by one of his indentured servants, a Negro who adopted the name of John Casor. Johnson won the suit and retained Casor as his servant for life, who thus became the first official and true s***e in America.

In 1830, a fourth of the free Negro s***e masters in South Carolina owned 10 or more s***es; eight owning 30 or more.

Of the b****s residing in the South, 261,988 were not s***es. Of this number, 10,689 lived in New Orleans. Black Duke University professor John Hope Franklin recorded that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned s***es, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city.

In 1860 there were at least six Negroes in Louisiana who owned 65 or more s***es. The largest number, 152 s***es, were owned by the widow C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards, who owned a large sugar cane plantation.

Another Negro s***e magnate in Louisiana, with over 100 s***es, was Antoine Dubuclet, a sugar planter whose estate was valued at (in 1860 dollars) $264,000.

In Charleston, South Carolina in 1860, 125 free Negroes owned s***es; six of them owning 10 or more. Of the $1.5 million in taxable property owned by free Negroes in Charleston, more than $300,000 represented s***e holdings. In North Carolina 69 free Negroes were s***e owners.

If you love history and digging through old records, you may know this, but in 1860 only a small minority of w****s owned s***es. According to the US census report for that last year before the Civil War, there were nearly 27 million w****s in the country. Some eight million of them lived in the s***eholding states. The same records has an eye-opening set of records. There were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned s***es. Even if all s***eholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of w****s in the country.

The figures show conclusively that, when free, b****s disproportionately became s***e masters in pre-Civil War America. The statistics outlined above show that about 28 percent of free b****s owned s***es—as opposed to less than 4.8 percent of southern w****s, and dramatically more than the 1.4 percent of all w***e A******ns who owned s***es.

And Georgia, often thought of as a large s***e state, actually placed a ban on s***e ownership. James Oglethorpe (1696–1785) was a British general who founded the colony of Georgia in 1732. From the very beginning, Oglethorpe ensured that s***ery was banned in the colony, and that Africans were barred from entering the territory.

So.... who picked cotton? Better question, who owned those farms? Another thing that is often overlooked, the white settlers had no prior experience with s***e ownership. However, s***ery in Africa was practiced from the time they began raid neighboring tribes.

The t***satlantic s***e trade was dwarfed by the Arab or Muslim s***e trade, which lasted from 650 AD to 1900 AD. It is estimated that a minimum of 18 million Africans were ens***ed by Arab s***e traders, and that over one million Europeans were ens***ed by the Muslim world during the same period. But, that is for a future discussion.

73STNGLKABEE

Lack of fathers being around. Look at the stats. Gotta have that back up plan if kids stop listening to mom.

RWNJ

That was sarcasm. If we'd picked our own cotton, B****s would be the curse on our country that they are today.

Onelostdog Loc: Restless Oregon

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Thanks Willy I can put my peace down now, guess no b*****e will be coming through my front door. Good news I must admit but it does let my hopes down just a little. :XD: :twisted:

Onelostdog Loc: Restless Oregon

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: Sometimes the t***h really sucks. Well it does if your ignorant, black and a Demonrat.

Onelostdog Loc: Restless Oregon

Very true and to me it goes along with this African American crap. How many American b****s have ever been to Africa, hell a large percentage don't even know where Africa is located on a map. So how can they be an African American and black. Is that not saying that white people can't be African American if they were born on African soil? Your either an African or your an American can't it both ways.

Onelostdog Loc: Restless Oregon

Well written and intelligent piece sir. This in a way sounds like somewhat of a great idea for the inclusion or exclusion of Islamic peoples also as we do not have any need for Islam and it's Satanic beliefs on our soil.