One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Former CIA chief in B******i says 13 hours movie is a lie
Page 1 of 15 next> last>>
Jan 16, 2016 06:39:17   #
DJRich Loc: Western Pa
 
So the guy who was in charge says the events portrayed in the movie did not happen.

Wonder if gowdy has even taken the time to interview this guy named "Bob"?

Certainly news like this will never be reported on fox or other rightwing media.

And when did the CIA become part of the State Department? If anyone screwed up, it was the director of the CIA, petraeus, and panetta.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-cia-chief-in-b******i-challenges-film-version-of-2012-attack/2016/01/15/9cf2defc-baf7-11e5-b682-4bb4dd403c7d_story.html

Reply
Jan 16, 2016 07:36:25   #
Liberty Tree
 
DJRich wrote:
So the guy who was in charge says the events portrayed in the movie did not happen.

Wonder if gowdy has even taken the time to interview this guy named "Bob"?

Certainly news like this will never be reported on fox or other rightwing media.

And when did the CIA become part of the State Department? If anyone screwed up, it was the director of the CIA, petraeus, and panetta.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-cia-chief-in-b******i-challenges-film-version-of-2012-attack/2016/01/15/9cf2defc-baf7-11e5-b682-4bb4dd403c7d_story.html
So the guy who was in charge says the events portr... (show quote)


What do you expect him to say? You really expect those who were in charge to admit what really happened. Get real.

Reply
Jan 16, 2016 07:36:31   #
green apples Loc: Scottsdale, Az
 
So you are saying that that attack didn't happen. That those who are dead aren't dead and were not murdered? That it was just all a staged lie created entirely by Fox News? Why those clever bastards! Those Islamic terrorists have been dealt a real injustice and we should give obamma and hellery a high five for blowing off that Fox News h**x.
You are an i***t!

Reply
 
 
Jan 16, 2016 07:41:50   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
DJRich wrote:
So the guy who was in charge says the events portrayed in the movie did not happen.

Wonder if gowdy has even taken the time to interview this guy named "Bob"?

Certainly news like this will never be reported on fox or other rightwing media.

And when did the CIA become part of the State Department? If anyone screwed up, it was the director of the CIA, petraeus, and panetta.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-cia-chief-in-b******i-challenges-film-version-of-2012-attack/2016/01/15/9cf2defc-baf7-11e5-b682-4bb4dd403c7d_story.html
So the guy who was in charge says the events portr... (show quote)


Do you believe everything you read?? How about the theory of running guns and protecting that?? How about all the begging and pleading done directly to Hillary prior to this atrocious reality of government gone wrong!! Tell Stephens and the rest it didn't happen..!!!.

What about the lies you must now know about?? Or I guess "they didn't happen either???"

Reply
Jan 16, 2016 07:51:57   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
DJRich wrote:
So the guy who was in charge says the events portrayed in the movie did not happen.

Wonder if gowdy has even taken the time to interview this guy named "Bob"?

Certainly news like this will never be reported on fox or other rightwing media.

And when did the CIA become part of the State Department? If anyone screwed up, it was the director of the CIA, petraeus, and panetta.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-cia-chief-in-b******i-challenges-film-version-of-2012-attack/2016/01/15/9cf2defc-baf7-11e5-b682-4bb4dd403c7d_story.html
So the guy who was in charge says the events portr... (show quote)


I've wondered who "Bob" is for quite a while. He's the one who gave the stand down order.

But don't count on Gowdy to dig into ANYTHING that doesn't fit the republican narrative. Gowdy is instructed to d**g this out till the general e******n, then use it to smear Hilary. I kind of hope it works, sadly.

But what a pathetic statement about the American political system. No honor in America.

Reply
Jan 16, 2016 08:11:52   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I've wondered who "Bob" is for quite a while. He's the one who gave the stand down order.

But don't count on Gowdy to dig into ANYTHING that doesn't fit the republican narrative. Gowdy is instructed to d**g this out till the general e******n, then use it to smear Hilary. I kind of hope it works, sadly.

But what a pathetic statement about the American political system. No honor in America.


There is honor, its just being trampled on right now~~

But for the obstruction and lies being fed Gowdy and the stonewalling he's gotten on every request this could have been over long ago...Takes two to tango so to speak and the Hilary knows how to obstruct justice..She may not know anything but you can bet she knows that very well!!

Reply
Jan 16, 2016 08:23:31   #
Oakisland4U
 
H Clinton lied to the four families that got k**led in the raid !

Reply
 
 
Jan 16, 2016 08:23:53   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
DJRich wrote:
So the guy who was in charge says the events portrayed in the movie did not happen.

Wonder if gowdy has even taken the time to interview this guy named "Bob"?

Certainly news like this will never be reported on fox or other rightwing media.

And when did the CIA become part of the State Department? If anyone screwed up, it was the director of the CIA, petraeus, and panetta.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-cia-chief-in-b******i-challenges-film-version-of-2012-attack/2016/01/15/9cf2defc-baf7-11e5-b682-4bb4dd403c7d_story.html
So the guy who was in charge says the events portr... (show quote)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don't know the T***H any more than any other American knows it, but I personally believe that "site eyes on" is more reliable than some dude sitting in an office only listening and talking, NOT doing a damned thing. The author listened to the hired hands that were there to protect others........and I believe that will get us closer to the t***h than some elected or appointed slob's report. Like everything else that happens within our government, we will probably never know the t***h, but since our politicians choose to hide their activities, it is INCUMBENT on us to question EVERY COMMENT THEY MAKE TO TRY TO DETERMINE HOW MUCH IS TRUE AND HOW MUCH IS LIES.....and I maintain that from our government more lies survive than do t***hs. D********g bunch of thieves and liars.

Reply
Jan 16, 2016 08:26:07   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
Oakisland4U wrote:
H Clinton lied to the four families that got k**led in the raid !

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If H. Clinton opens her mouth, either lies or cursing flies out. She's easy to read. She is incapable of speaking the t***h.

Reply
Jan 16, 2016 09:28:52   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
DaJerkSpook wrote:
So the guy who was in charge says the events portrayed in the movie did not happen.

Wonder if gowdy has even taken the time to interview this guy named "Bob"?

Certainly news like this will never be reported on fox or other rightwing media.

And when did the CIA become part of the State Department? If anyone screwed up, it was the director of the CIA, petraeus, and panetta.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-cia-chief-in-b******i-challenges-film-version-of-2012-attack/2016/01/15/9cf2defc-baf7-11e5-b682-4bb4dd403c7d_story.html
So the guy who was in charge says the events portr... (show quote)


Yeah, OK JerkSpook.

In the future, you might consider that ALL movies contain elements of embellisment.

And no matter what the t***h may be, it's crystal clear that MISS PIGGY CLINTON is incapable of articulating it..................

.....................................................PUNK !!!

Reply
Jan 16, 2016 09:48:56   #
Ve'hoe
 
I know the t***h,,,, and I know it doesnt exist in our govt,,, it is all lies,,,,, only the libs,,,, and i***ts like bjbich,,, beleive it,,,,

Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don't know the T***H any more than any other American knows it, but I personally believe that "site eyes on" is more reliable than some dude sitting in an office only listening and talking, NOT doing a damned thing. The author listened to the hired hands that were there to protect others........and I believe that will get us closer to the t***h than some elected or appointed slob's report. Like everything else that happens within our government, we will probably never know the t***h, but since our politicians choose to hide their activities, it is INCUMBENT on us to question EVERY COMMENT THEY MAKE TO TRY TO DETERMINE HOW MUCH IS TRUE AND HOW MUCH IS LIES.....and I maintain that from our government more lies survive than do t***hs. D********g bunch of thieves and liars.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br I don't ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 16, 2016 10:28:54   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
I know the t***h,,,, and I know it doesnt exist in our govt,,, it is all lies,,,,, only the libs,,,, and i***ts like bjbich,,, beleive it,,,,


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thank you. I believe most of us know the real t***h, but cannot prove it thanks to all the stealth our government uses against us.

If you haven't seen this clip, PLEASE view NOW.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhuhHK2LAYg

Reply
Jan 16, 2016 11:31:47   #
Pulfnick Loc: Knoxville, TN
 
DJRich wrote:
So the guy who was in charge says the events portrayed in the movie did not happen.

Wonder if gowdy has even taken the time to interview this guy named "Bob"?

Certainly news like this will never be reported on fox or other rightwing media.

And when did the CIA become part of the State Department? If anyone screwed up, it was the director of the CIA, petraeus, and panetta.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-cia-chief-in-b******i-challenges-film-version-of-2012-attack/2016/01/15/9cf2defc-baf7-11e5-b682-4bb4dd403c7d_story.html
So the guy who was in charge says the events portr... (show quote)



The radical progressive Washington Times propaganda piece you cite is careful to avoid stating that there was not a stand down order. All this propaganda piece does is say an unidentified source said there was no stand down order. Shortly after the attack, several people who were actually present in B******i, and who were identified (unlike "Bob" ) confirmed they were told to stand down - no less than three times. They had no reason to lie. Of course, multiple reports and one email confirming the US military, not just the people in the CIA building, was told to stand down have been made. And a general immediately relieved of his command because he was ignoring the command to stand down.

Exactly like Hillary telling the families of the four victims (when the bodies landed in the US) that "We would get the people who made that video". And not Hillary denies saying that and calls the four families liars for having reported what she had said.

This article is radical progressive propaganda at its worst - or finest, depending on your view.

Reply
Jan 16, 2016 11:32:44   #
vernon
 
DJRich wrote:
So the guy who was in charge says the events portrayed in the movie did not happen.

Wonder if gowdy has even taken the time to interview this guy named "Bob"?

Certainly news like this will never be reported on fox or other rightwing media.

And when did the CIA become part of the State Department? If anyone screwed up, it was the director of the CIA, petraeus, and panetta.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-cia-chief-in-b******i-challenges-film-version-of-2012-attack/2016/01/15/9cf2defc-baf7-11e5-b682-4bb4dd403c7d_story.html
So the guy who was in charge says the events portr... (show quote)


i just heard that a guy named bill said that bob was a liar but he wouldent let me use his last name.how stupid do you think the people are,i mean we all arnt liberal

Reply
Jan 16, 2016 11:50:22   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
vernon wrote:
i just heard that a guy named bill said that bob was a liar but he wouldent let me use his last name.how stupid do you think the people are,i mean we all arnt liberal


A couple of guys who were there, I don't know their names off the top of my head, came out with a book about the incident/attack about two years after it happened with the Bob character named in it. Of course their intentions were honorable, to make a book to sell for money rather than offer the info to the investigation committees. After two years it would be just as reliable, yes? What a crock.

Also, I heard an interview with Tonto, Oz and Tig, the guys who the movie was about, and they said they were given a stand down order but really didn't know who it came from; their immediate superior of some higher up. They were later allowed to proceed and it cost them about 20 min of response time.

The whole thing is so convoluted because so many have attempted to present their version of the narrative which best fits their position.

Its a lot of BS.

Reply
Page 1 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.