One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
V****g
Jan 14, 2016 23:40:46   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
When you cast your v**e, is it because you believe in the message, and record of the person you are v****g for? Or do you just v**e against the other side?
Just curious.

Reply
Jan 14, 2016 23:56:57   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
archie bunker wrote:
When you cast your v**e, is it because you believe in the message, and record of the person you are v****g for? Or do you just v**e against the other side?
Just curious.
Sometimes 1, 2, or all 3. But there are more options.

Yes, I'd v**e for a potted plant against Hillary.

Yes, I'd v**e for a person that promises to do better than he's done, assuming that he wasn't too bad.

Yes, I can v**e wholeheartedly for someone based on their record of accomplishments. But along with this has to be their character. Not perfect character, but they need to be about as honest as a politician can be.


They say there are 100's of honest politicians running for office that don't take money for favors. That's why you never heard of them.

Reply
Jan 15, 2016 02:04:21   #
dwallace2015
 
Archie, usually the only option we have as v**ers is v****g "for the lesser of two evils".


archie bunker wrote:
When you cast your v**e, is it because you believe in the message, and record of the person you are v****g for? Or do you just v**e against the other side?
Just curious.

Reply
 
 
Jan 15, 2016 02:16:22   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
dwallace2015 wrote:
Archie, usually the only option we have as v**ers is v****g "for the lesser of two evils".


This has been the case many times. However this next e******n (if we make it to that date) should not be the case.

We as a Nation will v**e in a C*******t or an American. The only C*******t running are Dip Stick Democrats. That leaves me to v**e for an American. It also allows us to v**e for a person that does not have a stained background from a record of being a paid off politician. That means TRUMP. He will get my v**e without hesitation.

Reply
Jan 15, 2016 09:53:58   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
dwallace2015 wrote:
Archie, usually the only option we have as v**ers is v****g "for the lesser of two evils".
I disagree, and I never v**e for evil.

I agree that we have to pick the less of 2 imperfects, but that doesn't make them evil.

McCain was the last on my GOP list of nominees, I v**ed for him expecting he'd probably lose, and if he won he'd likely suck at the job. But he wasn't and isn't evil.

Romney was way down my list, too. He was as far from evil as any candidate in some time. I didn't think he'd be a good candidate and I was right. But he wasn't evil.

Both Bushs, Dole, Dukakis, Reagan, Carter, JFK were not by any means evil.

The Clintons and Obama, I classify as extremely corrupt, dishonest, and devious. Evil is not a bad description. Al Gore isn't far behind.

But I never - never v**e for evil. I don't v**e pro-a******n. I don't v**e pro-surrender. I don't v**e anti-freedom. While the GOP might not be the strongest supporters of life, liberty, and freedom, they're not evil..

At least not yet.. They are moving in that direction...

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.