One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
America Has Been Duped on C*****e C****e!
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Jan 7, 2016 16:19:16   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
Future generations will look back at our tepid response to global climate disruption and wonder why we did not act sooner and more aggressively. C*****e c****e will adversely impact present and future generations, as well as all species on earth. Our moral obligation to protect life demands us to act!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/01/06/america-has-been-lied-to-about-c*****e-c****e/



Reply
Jan 7, 2016 16:38:51   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Except that what you're saying has been proven to be wrong.

Here's a short video of some g****l w*****g alarmists and their Chicken-Little studies being shown to be as foolish as informed people have known for decades.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KVTmo2Vxnk

Reply
Jan 7, 2016 17:01:50   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
Only a complete r****d would attempt to use youtube as a credible source!


Exxon Mobil has known about c*****e c****e for twenty years!

http://graphics.latimes.com/exxon-arctic/


Super Dave wrote:
Except that what you're saying has been proven to be wrong.

Here's a short video of some g****l w*****g alarmists and their Chicken-Little studies being shown to be as foolish as informed people have known for decades.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KVTmo2Vxnk

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2016 17:22:05   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Only a complete r****d would attempt to use youtube as a credible source!


Exxon Mobil has known about c*****e c****e for twenty years!

http://graphics.latimes.com/exxon-arctic/
LOL It's a Youtube video of climate alarmists having their hats handed to them by having non-i***ts asking them questions.

If you learned about what you're speaking about before vomiting h**e you'd understand more and look silly less.

And Mobile Oil is right. The climate has been changing for billions of years, and that would include the last 20. (Newsflash, the Ice Age is over)

Reply
Jan 7, 2016 17:29:44   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Future generations will look back at our tepid response to global climate disruption and wonder why we did not act sooner and more aggressively. C*****e c****e will adversely impact present and future generations, as well as all species on earth. Our moral obligation to protect life demands us to act!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/01/06/america-has-been-lied-to-about-c*****e-c****e/




You say i inspired you, and to check this out.....Just more lies, and this topic has been beaten to death many times. I say try something new, how many times have you alone posted a thread on this topic?

Reply
Jan 7, 2016 18:18:50   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
Fact: George HW Bush in 1992 signed a signed a treaty acknowledging the risks and need for action on c*****e c****e aka g****l w*****g!

http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/items/6036.php



Super Dave wrote:
LOL It's a Youtube video of climate alarmists having their hats handed to them by having non-i***ts asking them questions.

If you learned about what you're speaking about before vomiting h**e you'd understand more and look silly less.

And Mobile Oil is right. The climate has been changing for billions of years, and that would include the last 20. (Newsflash, the Ice Age is over)

Reply
Jan 7, 2016 18:31:58   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Fact: George HW Bush in 1992 signed a signed a treaty acknowledging the risks and need for action on c*****e c****e aka g****l w*****g!

http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/items/6036.php
Woopty Do.

Does that disprove the fact that the Antarctic ice cap has grown? No

Does that mean that the globe warmed significantly despite the NOAA/NASA proof to the contrary? No

Does that mean that the famous Hockey Stick Graph was accurate? No

Does that mean that the globe is doomed in 23 days as AlGore said? No

Does that mean that the models that have been used for the last 20 years suddenly became accurate? No

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2016 18:43:29   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Super Dave wrote:
Woopty Do.

Does that disprove the fact that the Antarctic ice cap has grown? No

Does that mean that the globe warmed significantly despite the NOAA/NASA proof to the contrary? No

Does that mean that the famous Hockey Stick Graph was accurate? No

Does that mean that the globe is doomed in 23 days as AlGore said? No

Does that mean that the models that have been used for the last 20 years suddenly became accurate? No



dave,

You do no better then the other dip sticks on OPP.

Keep repeating BS which has been shown untrue again and again. You never accept any facts, only cling to a disproved opinion..

I have rocks in my garden which are brighter then all of you put together..

Reply
Jan 7, 2016 19:16:27   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
???????

NASA C*****e C****e and its danger is a Fact!

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/



Super Dave wrote:
Woopty Do.

Does that disprove the fact that the Antarctic ice cap has grown? No

Does that mean that the globe warmed significantly despite the NOAA/NASA proof to the contrary? No

Does that mean that the famous Hockey Stick Graph was accurate? No

Does that mean that the globe is doomed in 23 days as AlGore said? No

Does that mean that the models that have been used for the last 20 years suddenly became accurate? No

NASA Chart!
NASA Chart!...

Reply
Jan 7, 2016 19:24:09   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
???????

NASA C*****e C****e and its danger is a Fact!

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/



Repeat of the same garbage, i beleive you never provided me with the calibration data the last time you threw up this usesless ass graph...provide the calibration certs and dates of equipment used, and what was used as a control to arrive at this conclusion.........or like everything else you do...it's just a big ol' LIE !!

Reply
Jan 7, 2016 19:43:12   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
Repeat of the same garbage, i beleive you never provided me with the calibration data the last time you threw up this usesless ass graph...provide the calibration certs and dates of equipment used, and what was used as a control to arrive at this conclusion.........or like everything else you do...it's just a big ol' LIE !!


Fact that only fools ignore!



Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2016 19:53:44   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Fact that only fools ignore!




Really, in 350,000 yrs we have gone up 100 ppm, after many natural occuring ups and downs that is ..per your graph (not proven to be accurate) 350 tp 400 ppm is acceptable amounts per a ASHRAE and OSHA.....guess who they work for? Adverse effects are not even an issue till 2500 to 5000 ppm on a xonstant and allowable of 5000 ppm for 8 hrs without adverse effects??? Again, who do those agencies work for? Left hand meet the right hand.

How did we measure levels in the 50s? Not the same as we do now, so what are we using as a control...then and now? And how are we measuring these levels claimed 350,000 yrs ago till 1950? Rockomometers maybe, fred flintstone on the gov payroll. We are well within acceptable limits, and will be for another 120,000 yrs using your lame ass graph as a timeline.

Only fools believe everything they are fed by frauds and liberal green gaspers.

Reply
Jan 7, 2016 20:18:53   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
permafrost wrote:
dave,

You do no better then the other dip sticks on OPP.

Keep repeating BS which has been shown untrue again and again. You never accept any facts, only cling to a disproved opinion..

I have rocks in my garden which are brighter then all of you put together..
How much time do you spend conversing with your rock garden?

Reply
Jan 7, 2016 20:23:53   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Fact that only fools ignore!
Yes.. only fools.

The top 10 (out of many) Facts that Prove G****l W*****g Alarmists are Frauds.

1. Record Ice
In 2014 there was record sea ice in Antarctica in fact a g****l w*****g expedition got stuck in it. Arctic sea ice has also made a nice comeback in 2014. The Great lakes had record ice Lake Superior only had 3 ice free months in 2014. You’d think that in the hottest year ever that ice would be melting like Al Gore said.

2. Record Snow
2014 saw record snowfall in many areas, remember when they said that g****l w*****g would cause snow to disappear and children won’t know what snow is.

3. Record Cold
In 2014 we saw all kinds of cold records remember the Polar Vortex? You’d think that we’d be breaking all kinds of heat records in “the hottest year ever”

4. Oceans Are Rising Much Less Than Predicted
Al Gore predicted that oceans would rise 20 feet by 2100, it looks like were on track for about a foot. 80% of the tide gauges show less rise than the official “global average”. Many tide gauges show no rise in sea level, and almost none show any acceleration over the past 20 years.

5. Polar Bears Are Thriving
You’d think that Polar Bears would really be in trouble in 2014 “the hottest year ever” but they are thriving.

6. Moose Are Making A Comeback
A few years ago the moose population in Minnesota dropped rapidly and they immediately blamed g****l w*****g, then they did a study and found out it was actually wolves that were k*****g the moose. Wolves have been taken off the endangered species list and are now endangering other species so they opened a wolf hunting season in Minnesota and the moose are coming back. It turns out it had nothing to do with g****l w*****g in fact the years when the moose population declined were some very cold ones.

7. 99% of Scientists don’t believe in Catastrophic Man-Made G****l W*****g
You’ve probably heard over and over that 99% of scientist believe in g****l w*****g well the opposite is true. That talking point came from a study where only 75 scientists said they believe in g****l w*****g on the other hand over 31,000 scientists have signed a petition saying they don’t believe in Catastrophic Man-Made G****l W*****g.

8. Nature produces much more CO2 than man
In 2014 NASA finally launched a satellite that measures CO2 levels around the globe. They assumed that most of the CO2 would be coming from the industrialized northern hemisphere but much to their surprise it was coming from the rainforests in South America, Africa and China.

9. It Isn’t Actually the Warmest Year.
If you look at the satellite data 2014 was not the warmest year ever in fact there has been no g****l w*****g for over 18 years. The Reason they can say it’s the warmest year is because they are using the ground weather station data which is heavily influenced by the Urban Heat Island effect, many of which are near pavement. Even still they had to cherry pick that data to get at the warmest year ever and it is only the warmest by only two-100ths of a degree within a dataset that has a variability of a half of a degree. The fact they they had to ignore accurate data and fudge sketchy data to push their agenda proves (IMHO) that c*****e c****e is a h**x.

10. The Hypocrisy of the Main Players
One of the main reasons you can tell that g****l w*****g is a h**x is that the main purveyors of g****l w*****g live lifestyles opposite of what they preach, they all own multiple large homes and yachts and they fly around the world in private jets pushing their propaganda. Not to mention some people such as Al Gore actually profit from Carbon Taxes and other g***n e****y laws. If they actually believed what they preached they would be leading quite different lives.

http://www.globalclimates**m.com/opinion/top-ten-reasons-c*****e-c****e-is-a-h**x/

Reply
Jan 7, 2016 20:27:48   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
Really, in 350,000 yrs we have gone up 100 ppm, after many natural occuring ups and downs that is ..per your graph (not proven to be accurate) 350 tp 400 ppm is acceptable amounts per a ASHRAE and OSHA.....guess who they work for? Adverse effects are not even an issue till 2500 to 5000 ppm on a xonstant and allowable of 5000 ppm for 8 hrs without adverse effects??? Again, who do those agencies work for? Left hand meet the right hand.

How did we measure levels in the 50s? Not the same as we do now, so what are we using as a control...then and now? And how are we measuring these levels claimed 350,000 yrs ago till 1950? Rockomometers maybe, fred flintstone on the gov payroll. We are well within acceptable limits, and will be for another 120,000 yrs using your lame ass graph as a timeline.

Only fools believe everything they are fed by frauds and liberal green gaspers.
Really, in 350,000 yrs we have gone up 100 ppm, af... (show quote)


NASA and NOAA are not frauds!



Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.