ACLU - as always (Page 2): How is the ACLU wasting tax payers money.

Cool Breeze

CowboyMilt wrote:

ACLU is another acronym that we could do away with & never miss them they are useless & spend far too much of our taxpayer money...

How is the ACLU wasting tax payers money.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

Cool Breeze wrote:

How is the ACLU wasting tax payers money.

One way is by bringing their contrived lawsuits.

Cool Breeze

crazylibertarian wrote:

One way is by bringing their contrived lawsuits.

Is bringing contrived lawsuits illegal?

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

Cool Breeze wrote:

Is bringing contrived lawsuits illegal?

.

No, but it does waste the money of both the government and private people who are their target and, incase you hadn't noticed, government's money is that of the taxpayers.

Just how much of what ACLU does do you defend there, Cool Breeze?

Cool Breeze

crazylibertarian wrote:

.

No, but it does waste the money of both the government and private people who are their target and, incase you hadn't noticed, government's money is that of the taxpayers.

Just how much of what ACLU does do you defend there, Cool Breeze?

The majority of it. Anymore questions.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

Cool Breeze wrote:

The majority of it. Anymore questions.

Just for a base line. Name something they do with their army of lawyers you disagree with.

Cool Breeze

Super Dave wrote:

Just for a base line. Name something they do with their army of lawyers you disagree with.

That's easy Prayer In School!

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

Cool Breeze wrote:

That's easy Prayer In School!

I agree that's easy. It's ironic that the right to 'religious expression' is at the beginning of the Bill of Rights and somehow is overlooked by constitutional geniuses on the left.

I also support some of the ACLU's actions. At least I have in the past. I can't think of one right now, but I'm sure I did.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

Cool Breeze wrote:

The majority of it. Anymore questions.

.

Oh yes, I have a huge question with a little bit of history thrown in.

Are you aware that ACLU's original intent was to replace the American government with c*******t one? Most of the founding members were c*******ts and they wanted to protect themselves from prosecution by AG Palmer during the Wilson administration.

Roger Baldwin, the original director, never renounced his goal of establishing a c*******t dictatorship here.

CarolSeer2016

crazylibertarian wrote:

If there is any remaining doubt that The American ... (show quote)

I believe the ACLU is C*******t. They didn't think I had the right to tell Obama to leave me alone.

What do you people think of that?

CarolSeer2016

crazylibertarian wrote:

.

Oh yes, I have a huge question with a littel bit of history thrown in.

Are you aware that ACLU's original intent was to replace the American government with c*******t one? Most of the founding members were c*******ts and they wanted to protect themselves from prosecution by AG Palmer during the Wilson administration.

Roger Baldwin, the original director, never renounced his goal of establishing a c*******t dictatorship here.

Just read this comment by you, CL. It's just what I thought. And they do all this in the name of "liberty". Which even Lincoln would have called "tyranny".

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

CarolSeer2016 wrote:

I believe the ACLU is C*******t. They didn't think I had the right to tell Obama to leave me alone.

What do you people think of that?

.

You are correct.

ACLU takes a very expansive view of the anti-establishment clause and a very narrow view of the Second Amendment. You either have to interpet both narrowly or both broadly.

Every so often, it will show its evenhandedness by defending Pope John Paul II's celebrating a mass in Central Park, New York and the right of The American N**is to march in Skokie but they are otherwise reliably in sync with c*******m.

Property rights are central to our freedoms but I know of just one case where it defended a property owner in a case in Poland, Michigan. I believe it was a case of eminent domain. I don't know where they were
during the Kelo case but they weren't on the side of the home owners. Zoning & land use controls are part & parcel of Marx's agenda to communize a society.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

CarolSeer2016 wrote:

Just read this comment by you, CL. It's just what I thought. And they do all this in the name of "liberty". Which even Lincoln would have called "tyranny".

.

I will try to ferret out an article I wrote about ACLU several years ago and distribute it here. I forgotten many of the facts I ofund out about it at the time but it might be nice to reread them.

I will challenge any progressive or ACLUer to refute them.

CarolSeer2016

crazylibertarian wrote:

. br br You are correct. br br ACLU takes a ve... (show quote)

So you're saying ACLU's i***tology is to despotize power---by not taking my side against Obama. Do I not have the right to tell him no? (I think what I told Obama is: "I don't care if you're the president of the world, I'm Carol Binkley, Carol A. Binkley, and I said NO.")

That's sooooo Marxist/C*******t/Bolshevik.

CarolSeer2016

crazylibertarian wrote:

.

I will try to ferret out an article I wrote about ACLU several years ago and distribute it here. I forgotten many of the facts I ofund out about it at the time but it might be nice to reread them.

I will challenge any progressive or ACLUer to refute them.

My own case reminded me of "Youngstown Sheet and Tubing v. United States" (1952, I believe). Just a different outcome.