Pulfnick Loc: Knoxville, TN

Obama's successful strategy to create a global Muslim apocalypse can be summarized with a few key points:

1. Cut and run from Iraq, creating the power vacuum Bush warned about, thereby allowing Islamic terrorists (ISIS - the JV team)to take over, especially oil production to fund ISIS
2. Get rid of Gaddafi in Libya (who had renounced terrorism and eliminated his WMD program after Bush invaded Iraq) to create a power vacuum so Islamic terrorists could take over. Hillary probably was the primary player here.
3. Swamp the US (and Europe) with Muslims who had not been seriously vetted and include terrorists posing as refugees - per stated ISIS strategy
4. Support removal of Assad in Syria against strong US military opposition, and support Assad's enemies - who just happen to be Islamic terrorists. Fund and provide weapons to Assad's opposition who happily accepted Obama's gifts, then quit "fighting" Assad, and turned the goodies over to ISIS. http://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n01/seymour-m-hersh/military-to-military

"Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, director of the DIA between 2012 and 2014, confirmed that his agency had sent a constant stream of classified warnings to the civilian leadership about the dire consequences of toppling Assad. The jihadists, he said, were in control of the opposition. Turkey wasn’t doing enough to stop the smuggling of foreign fighters and weapons across the border. ‘If the American public saw the intelligence we were producing daily, at the most sensitive level, they would go ballistic,’ Flynn told me. ‘We understood Isis’s long-term strategy and its campaign plans, and we also discussed the fact that Turkey was looking the other way when it came to the growth of the Islamic State inside Syria.’ The DIA’s reporting, he said, ‘got enormous pushback’ from the Obama administration. ‘I felt that they did not want to hear the t***h.’"

EL Loc: Massachusetts

"T***H".....they don't even know the meaning of the word.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

Like I've said several times before about Obama.

It's impossible to be that wrong that often by accident. Even a blind blithering moron gets something right occasionally because of dumb luck.

kburns50

We should have left all those mid-east leaders in place; good or bad. They at least kept these radicals under their thumb.

bahmer

Barack Obama is not seeking "legacy"
Sylvia Thompson October 26, 2015

Sylvia Thompson
To the many gullible souls out there who truly think that Barack Obama is "legacy building" in his all-out assault on America, I implore you to bow out of the conversation because you are not seeing clearly.

The term legacy carries positive connotations of something bequeathed that is to the receiver's benefit. Everything that Barack Obama does is calculated to destroy America, which he despises. This man no more cares about legacy than he fears being properly prosecuted by the white political leaders, whose responsibility it is to remove him from office.

I focus on white leaders, because w****s are still in the majority and they fill the majority of political offices. If the majority of political operatives were of some other ethnicity, I would lodge my complaint against that group. Ethnicity is an issue only because Obama is half-black and he uses that fact to intimidate guilt-conflicted white people. Otherwise, he would have been impeached and likely in prison for treason by now.
Barack Obama's sole aim has been, since he first entered politics and continues as he winds down this presidency, the complete destruction of America as it was founded.

It is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans who must listen to elitist pundits on Fox news and elsewhere, and political drones in either party endeavor to make Obama's behavior fit a pattern of normalcy. Attributing his destructive policies to "legacy building" is either self-delusion on the part of the people who make that claim or cowardliness.

This is my take:
Obama's nuclear deal with Iran has nothing to do with legacy but rather to enable a Muslim nation to wage nuclear war with America and Israel – the two nations that he most despises. Does anyone wonder why Russians praise Vladimir Putin, despite what the rest of the world might think of him? Putin cares about his country, that's why.

Obama despises the American military because traditionally it has been a mainstay of America's strength, and our strength infuriates him.
Imposition of a polluting homosexual, anti-Christian agenda upon the military ranks destroys unit cohesion and literally terrorizes male members with the prospect of sodomy rape. Such rapes have increased since the forcing of open homosexuality in the ranks, against the will of a majority of members, I might add. Couple that with an infiltration of women, for whom all standards of strength must be reduced, and Obama attains his goal of emasculating and demoralizing the forces.
He could not care less about a legacy of making the forces more diverse. Besides, President Truman diversified the military as much as it should be when he integrated it. Obama's objective is its destruction.
Obama reopened relations with Cuba because Cuba is C*******t. Legacy is not his concern here either, but rather to scuttle America's attempts to keep C*******t influence out of the Americas. That Cuba has major issues with human rights does not matter. Like his Marxist African father before him, he despises the West and all that it represents.
Obama lawlessly declares open borders and amnesty for i*****l a***ns, because he wants to overrun America with third-world people who bring little more than dependency with them. This tactic not only does not ensure a legacy, but rather it guarantees the eventual conversion of America itself into third-world status, if it is allowed to continue.

Bill Clinton started the travesty of increasing the numbers of third-world immigrants at the expense of culturally more suited immigrants from European and European-influenced nations, but Obama has taken the trend to lawless, destructive extremes. He is fully aware that many of these invaders have no intention of assimilating.
It is only the outcry of a majority of Americans that holds back this h**eful invasion scheme, and Donald Trump's entry onto the political scene to oppose that scheme is a saving grace for our nation.

These are but a few instances of behavior that display the loathsome character of Barack Hussein Obama. And he is allowed to roam freely through the American landscape, poisoning and polluting as he goes, sure in the realization that no one will stop him because he is "black."

The day that we no longer have to hear the prattle about his "legacy building" will not be soon enough for me.

Many, many Americans are thoroughly fed up with Barack Obama and the spineless crop of political leaders who ignore his criminality. It is yet unknown whether Republicans will ever garner the backbone to become a true opposition party and hold him accountable. Promising signs are the House conservatives' getting rid of establishment types John Boehner and Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker and Speaker hopeful, respectively, and Donald Trump's entry into the 2016 p**********l race with enough money and testicular fortitude to tell the Establishment and the Left where to shove it.

Should these positive trends not continue and the 2016 e******n cycle yield no movement to counter all the harm that Barack Obama has done to this nation, I think there will be massive disruption. Those folks in the National Rifle Association ads currently running on television seem very serious to me, and that is a good thing.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

No, they really didn't.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Those ME leaders to which you refer might have kept some semblance of peace, but they either openly or indirectly supported Al Qaeda and terrorism against the west.

kburns50

NO... They did not support THEM. They just didn't care what they did (elsewhere) just not in their BACKYARD....

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Wrong. They actually funded them, provided weapons to them and hid them from us. And, they cheered when the terrorists were successful. And lets look back on how long this has been going on, shall we?

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

They gave them safe haven.

That's like saying that you knew someone was processing cocaine in your house and did nothing, but don't feel responsible for the next door neighbor's kid that died of an overdose from that same cocaine.

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

===================================

He has been successful because of one fact.

The people in government who have the power to stop him refuse to do anything.

grumpymarine Loc: Florida

Thank goodness we have a p**********l e******n coming up and we can reverse things.

Babsan

The HOPE and CHANGE the STUPID v**ed for.Enjoy your burkhas

VladimirPee

Assad has been allied with Shiite such as Hezzbollah. Al Qaida is Sunni.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

So is ISIS yet they fight each other.