New guy
Sep 28, 2013 00:28:47 #
I've been reading this forum for a few weeks now and have been shocked by how quickly this group resorts to name calling. For a group of presumably adults there are a lot of members who get childish and start throwing around meaningless insults that do nothing to further the discussion. It seems this is a microcosm of our two party political system and the reason nothing of actual worth comes out of Washington.
Sep 28, 2013 01:03:43 #
GPat wrote:
I've been reading this forum for a few weeks now and have been shocked by how quickly this group resorts to name calling. For a group of presumably adults there are a lot of members who get childish and start throwing around meaningless insults that do nothing to further the discussion. It seems this is a microcosm of our two party political system and the reason nothing of actual worth comes out of Washington.
Which side slings the most insults, and calls the most names? 1 word answere please.
Sep 28, 2013 01:18:49 #
archie bunker wrote:
Which side slings the most insults, and calls the most names? 1 word answere please.
Maybe you should modify that, to read which side excluding banjojack slings the most insults. I will say mine were in response to repeated slurs which I felt demanded an answer.
Sep 28, 2013 01:35:55 #
banjojack wrote:
Maybe you should modify that, to read which side excluding banjojack slings the most insults. I will say mine were in response to repeated slurs which I felt demanded an answer.
No argument here! I believe you were right in your indignation and responses.
Sep 28, 2013 02:18:47 #
cesspool jones
Loc: atlanta
GPat wrote:
I've been reading this forum for a few weeks now and have been shocked by how quickly this group resorts to name calling. For a group of presumably adults there are a lot of members who get childish and start throwing around meaningless insults that do nothing to further the discussion. It seems this is a microcosm of our two party political system and the reason nothing of actual worth comes out of Washington.
get real on this. you fight back. i don't really like all this sh*t either but 'adolesent liberals...even old age' who are just like the taliban(ememies of the state) will even piss off dead people!!!!!get used to it!!!
Sep 28, 2013 02:25:00 #
archie bunker wrote:
No argument here! I believe you were right in your indignation and responses.
Thank You
Sep 28, 2013 20:57:16 #
Sep 28, 2013 21:11:51 #
markusdecarcus wrote:
The more I read the more I like...
You haven't seen us get wound up yet..... .
Sep 28, 2013 21:20:27 #
archie bunker wrote:
No argument here! I believe you were right in your indignation and responses.
He was absolutely correct to be indignant; however, the Vocabulary Visigoth is held to a higher standard on language.
Sep 28, 2013 21:35:40 #
AuntiE wrote:
He was absolutely correct to be indignant; however, the Vocabulary Visigoth is held to a higher standard on language.
That's why my profanity is so much more profane. Speaking of higher standards, the Vocabulary Visigoth, who knows all, sees all, sleeps not and strikes from the shadows when you least expect, has been asked to wear yet another hat, that of culinary critic. In keeping with my decision to become more culturally inclusive, while maintaining the barbarian themed persona, I shall take my new title from the depths of the mysterious Orient. What shall it be, oh supplicants? (Remember, the theme is culinary, yet barbaric and Oriental). Shall it be the "Mongolian Macerator, or, to stay in character, would the "Genghis of Goulash" be more appropriate?
Sep 28, 2013 21:39:56 #
banjojack wrote:
That's why my profanity is so much more profane. S... (show quote)
I like the first; however, considering the considerable hair on the avatar the second may be more appropriate. The second, further, blends cultures.
Sep 28, 2013 21:45:05 #
GPat wrote:
I've been reading this forum for a few weeks now and have been shocked by how quickly this group resorts to name calling. For a group of presumably adults there are a lot of members who get childish and start throwing around meaningless insults that do nothing to further the discussion. It seems this is a microcosm of our two party political system and the reason nothing of actual worth comes out of Washington.
It seems that people on both sides have their minds made up. A few come up with facts but many accept their own opinion as fact.
It would be nice to be able to discuss the pros and cons in a civilized manner, but that takes deeper thought and more patience than most care to put into it.
Sep 28, 2013 21:45:09 #
AuntiE wrote:
I like the first; however, considering the considerable hair on the avatar the second may be more appropriate. The second, further, blends cultures.
Slattern needs to v**e, however, I believe he is at a family function. He mentioned something of the sort to me.
Sep 28, 2013 21:49:16 #
banjojack wrote:
Slattern needs to v**e, however, I believe he is at a family function. He mentioned something of the sort to me.
Longhorn ladies softball game. They won, 5-1 over Holy Incarnate.
Sep 28, 2013 22:07:26 #
AuntiE wrote:
Longhorn ladies softball game. They won, 5-1 over Holy Incarnate.
That's right. Was it his daughter or granddaughter on the team?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.