Supreme court ruling good for obamacare, but....
Sep 27, 2013 23:12:39 #
http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/09/26/motion-filed-against-doj-witch-hunt-on-texas-v**er-id-n1710294 Someone please explain to me why showing I.D. equals supression. If in fact it does I will be sueing every business who tries to supress me. The Supreme Court ruling is plenty good to uphold obamacare. I guess not in this case.
n..
n..
Sep 27, 2013 23:17:47 #
The supreme court ruled in Obamas favor over his Affordable Care Act so they would not be deemed r****t towards the first colored president. Simple as that. This is why Obama is handed everything, and he knows it plus takes advantage of it. Pelose and Reid just keep provided him with obsurd ideas the rest of us have to endure.
archie bunker wrote:
http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/09/26/motion-filed-against-doj-witch-hunt-on-texas-v**er-id-n1710294 Someone please explain to me why showing I.D. equals supression. If in fact it does I will be sueing every business who tries to supress me. The Supreme Court ruling is plenty good to uphold obamacare. I guess not in this case.
n..
n..
Sep 27, 2013 23:19:44 #
Rhonda Minden wrote:
The supreme court ruled in Obamas favor over his Affordable Care Act so they would not be deemed r****t towards the first colored presidents first request of them. Simple as that. This is why Obama is handed everything, and he knows it plus takes advantage of it. Pelose and Reid just keep providing him with obsurd ideas the rest of us have to endure.
Sep 27, 2013 23:28:26 #
Rhonda Minden wrote:
I agree with you on all of that. It just blows my mind, the hypocrasy, and absurdity of it all. And people buy into it!! GRRRRRR!!The supreme court ruled in Obamas favor over his Affordable Care Act so they would not be deemed r****t towards the first colored president. Simple as that. This is why Obama is handed everything, and he knows it plus takes advantage of it. Pelose and Reid just keep provided him with obsurd ideas the rest of us have to endure.
Sep 28, 2013 00:00:16 #
Just another over reach of government and unnecessary law. Folks already have to fill out v***r r**********n paper work that has to be verified at check-in or they turn you away. More bureaucracy and government control is never good policy. DOJ has low likelihood in case - state law makers rule in this matter unless there's evidence of being unfair.
Sep 28, 2013 00:16:59 #
UncleJesse wrote:
Just another over reach of government and unnecessary law. Folks already have to fill out v***r r**********n paper work that has to be verified at check-in or they turn you away. More bureaucracy and government control is never good policy. DOJ has low likelihood in case - state law makers rule in this matter unless there's evidence of being unfair.
I understand what you are saying, but with all due respect..paperwork is B.S. Anyonr with a computer, printer, and a bit of imagination can come up with paperwork. Look at Mexico's v****g system Everryone must have an I.D. card to v**e. Why is that wrong here? (I already knoww the answere) Just askin.
Sep 28, 2013 00:26:19 #
archie bunker wrote:
I understand what you are saying, but with all due respect..paperwork is B.S. Anyonr with a computer, printer, and a bit of imagination can come up with paperwork. Look at Mexico's v****g system Everryone must have an I.D. card to v**e. Why is that wrong here? (I already knoww the answere) Just askin.
Yepper, you know its wrong because people have become so accustomed to socialistic controls that even the conservatives convinced themselves it is a good thing. Times have changed.
Sep 28, 2013 00:33:37 #
UncleJesse wrote:
Yepper, you know its wrong because people have become so accustomed to socialistic controls that even the conservatives convinced themselves it is 'a good thing. Times have changed.
So you are telling me that the integrity of our e******ns is not an issue, and v***r f***d is good with you?
Sep 28, 2013 00:46:02 #
archie bunker wrote:
So you are telling me that the integrity of our e******ns is not an issue, and v***r f***d is good with you?
I believe, and you can fact check me on this. The constitution of the United States of America says one must be a citizen of this country to v**e. Why is it too much to ask for everyone to have proof of citizenshiip? Please explain why that is unreasonable. How is it unconstitutional? Please explain.
Sep 28, 2013 01:01:39 #
archie bunker wrote:
I believe, and you can fact check me on this. The constitution of the United States of America says one must be a citizen of this country to v**e. Why is it too much to ask for everyone to have proof of citizenshiip? Please explain why that is unreasonable. How is it unconstitutional? Please explain.
Because it's RAAAAAACCCIST!!!!!! I mean, after all, simplamente porque alguien no puede hablar o entender el Ingles, el no puede votar. Como Republicano! (Simply because someone cannot speak or understand English, they won't let him v**e. How Republican!).
Sep 28, 2013 01:31:17 #
banjojack wrote:
Because it's RAAAAAACCCIST!!!!!! I mean, after all, simplamente porque alguien no puede hablar o entender el Ingles, el no puede votar. Como Republicano! (Simply because someone cannot speak or understand English, they won't let him v**e. How Republican!).
So every time I go to the bank, pay my taxes, pay my equipment leased, buy a six pack(kinda nice to show it there even thouhg they know better) anyway, doesn't matter what I do, I have to show a picturd I.D. I think I'm being profiled. Dang it!! Im an honest white guy with a job!! I must always be ready to present papers on demand. Dang it sucks being white!!
Sep 28, 2013 05:58:47 #
archie bunker wrote:
http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/09/26/motion-filed-against-doj-witch-hunt-on-texas-v**er-id-n1710294 Someone please explain to me why showing I.D. equals supression. If in fact it does I will be sueing every business who tries to supress me. The Supreme Court ruling is plenty good to uphold obamacare. I guess not in this case.
n..
n..
I can't produce anything that proves suppression...when I write a check, I show ID. I want them to ask for my ID, so that they know I am who I say I am. I get pissed when they don't.
Sep 28, 2013 06:39:29 #
Dummy Boy wrote:
I can't produce anything that proves suppression...when I write a check, I show ID. I want them to ask for my ID, so that they know I am who I say I am. I get pissed when they don't.
The whole idea that having to show a picture i.d . tov
v**e is v**er supression is absurd at best. I can't believe any court would even waste their time with it. It's about stealing e******ns not supression.
Sep 28, 2013 06:55:43 #
Unclejesse, quite frankly, I have become very weary of the term over reach, that's gone above and beyond, it's BECOME nothing but pure unadulterated dictatorial, this outfit.plus rino's are nothing but bottom feeders and scum of the earth, this kind of change has turned America upside down, mandate after mandate, penalty after penalty and they don't play by their own f'en rules, this freak has 3 years left to reek havoc and we ain't seen NOTHING YET!!!
Sep 28, 2013 15:39:12 #
alex
Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
UncleJesse wrote:
Just another over reach of government and unnecessary law. Folks already have to fill out v***r r**********n paper work that has to be verified at check-in or they turn you away. More bureaucracy and government control is never good policy. DOJ has low likelihood in case - state law makers rule in this matter unless there's evidence of being unfair.
how do you prove who you are when you fill out said paperwork and when it comes time to v**e how do you prove that the person that shows up claiming to be you is you how would you like to go to v**e only to find three others had already v**ed in your name
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.