What should happen to Loretta Lynch for her "new interpretation" of the constitution? I would like to hear what we all on OPP think of Loretta lynch's statement that no one is allowed...

cesspool jones Loc: atlanta

I would like to hear what we all on OPP think of Loretta lynch's statement that no one is allowed to speak of muslims in a derogatory way....or else! I especially would like to hear what the Lib-kids have to say. Capeichio.

Babsan

cesspool jones wrote:

I would like to hear what we all on OPP think of Loretta lynch's statement that no one is allowed to speak of muslims in a derogatory way....or else! I especially would like to hear what the Lib-kids have to say. Capeichio.

The Libs/C****es are Obama ass kissers so they will be MUM

CowboyMilt

cesspool jones wrote:

I would like to hear what we all on OPP think of Loretta lynch's statement that no one is allowed to speak of muslims in a derogatory way....or else! I especially would like to hear what the Lib-kids have to say. Capeichio.

I believe she violated the Constitution, so what else is new with the F**e's administration. Is she muslim?

Loki Loc: Georgia

cesspool jones wrote:

I would like to hear what we all on OPP think of Loretta lynch's statement that no one is allowed to speak of muslims in a derogatory way....or else! I especially would like to hear what the Lib-kids have to say. Capeichio.

Her interpretation is about what you would expect; the same as the Muslim sympathizer who nominated her, and the Socialist Democrats and chancre sucking RINOs who confirmed her.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

Loki wrote:

Her interpretation is about what you would expect; the same as the Muslim sympathizer who nominated her, and the Socialist Democrats and chancre sucking RINOs who confirmed her.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

cesspool jones wrote:

I would like to hear what we all on OPP think of Loretta lynch's statement that no one is allowed to speak of muslims in a derogatory way....or else! I especially would like to hear what the Lib-kids have to say. Capeichio.

Notice how she cares so much about the possibility of Muslims being offended but apparently next to nothing about the security of the country when it comes to terrorist attacks. Hopefully soon we'll get a REAL attorney general.

Kevyn

cesspool jones wrote:

I would like to hear what we all on OPP think of Loretta lynch's statement that no one is allowed to speak of muslims in a derogatory way....or else! I especially would like to hear what the Lib-kids have to say. Capeichio.

Her comment wasn't that the h**e speach wasn't allowed, it clearly is, incendiary h**e speach and out and out right wing lies are constitutionaly protected speech. What the AG did say is that they would prosicute those who act on that speach if they act outside the law.

Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...

cesspool jones wrote:

I would like to hear what we all on OPP think of Loretta lynch's statement that no one is allowed to speak of muslims in a derogatory way....or else! I especially would like to hear what the Lib-kids have to say. Capeichio.

She should be impeached for threatening that unless the entire population of the United States surrender their free speech practice of the First Amendment, they would face persecution from the Justice Department.

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Loki wrote:

Her interpretation is about what you would expect; the same as the Muslim sympathizer who nominated her, and the Socialist Democrats and chancre sucking RINOs who confirmed her.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

Kevyn wrote:

Her comment wasn't that the h**e speach wasn't allowed, it clearly is, incendiary h**e speach and out and out right wing lies are constitutionaly protected speech. What the AG did say is that they would prosicute those who act on that speach if they act outside the law.

And if she had showed half as much concern about there just having been a terrorist attack in our country as she did about protecting Muslims from offensive speech her comments might have been appropriate.

Ricko Loc: Florida

Kevyn wrote:

Her comment wasn't that the h**e speach wasn't allowed, it clearly is, incendiary h**e speach and out and out right wing lies are constitutionaly protected speech. What the AG did say is that they would prosicute those who act on that speach if they act outside the law.

Kevyn-she said,"if Muslim children are bullied in school, that parents should contact her." What a crock of crap. Protect the little Muzzies at all costs. It is time for the Joint Chiefs to step in and send this crowd back to Barnum and Bailey. Good Luck America !!!

boatbob2

I would love to see THE DONALD elected POTUS,Then The DONALD appoint Judge Napolitano,or JUDGE PIRRO as head of the Department of Justice.

jimahrens Loc: California

It is unconstitutional. But of-course this administration does not follow the Constitution. Like I said before Ferricon can ask for 10.000 B****s to k**l w****s . But thae is not h**e. That is pure r****m on our Governments part. part.

cesspool jones wrote:

I would like to hear what we all on OPP think of Loretta lynch's statement that no one is allowed to speak of muslims in a derogatory way....or else! I especially would like to hear what the Lib-kids have to say. Capeichio.

Ricko Loc: Florida

LAPhil wrote:

And if she had showed half as much concern about there just having been a terrorist attack in our country as she did about protecting Muslims from offensive speech her comments might have been appropriate.

LAPhil-looks like she is in Obama's pocket. Protect the Muzzies and screw the American citizen. Good Luck America !!!

jimahrens Loc: California

We all knew she was another clone but Congress in there brilliance could not wait to seat her.

Ricko wrote:

LAPhil-looks like she is in Obama's pocket. Protect the Muzzies and screw the American citizen. Good Luck America !!!