Why States Must Revitalize the M*****A - A C T I O N - R E Q U I R E D !
Nov 30, 2015 20:27:36 #
To All State Governors and State Legislators:
Written by: Publius Huldah Nov 30, 2015
War is coming to America. Obama is importing young able-bodied males to make civilizational jihad on us; and Congress cant summon up the moral courage to stop him.
To see what is ahead for us, watch this 20 minute video. It depicts the Islamic takeover which is right now going on throughout Europe as European countries are being repopulated by millions of young able-bodied Muslim males (euphemistically called refugees) who are explicit about their intention to breed the native Europeans out of existence, and replace the European cultures with Islamic culture.
And Obama is bringing it here.
This paper discusses the two courses of action set forth in Federalist Paper No. 46 for situations such as this: (1) The States must refuse to cooperate with the federal government; but if that doesnt solve the problem, (2) The States must use their State M*****a to defend their State and Citizens.
Invaders are not Refugees or Immigrants
Those pushing for an Islamic takeover of Europe and North America are referring to these able-bodied young Muslim males as refugees. The use of that term brings the Muslims who are brought into the United States within the federal Refugee Resettlement Act. And since the Constitution delegates power over immigration to Congress, and Congress re-delegated refugee policy to the President, the States must submit to Obamas Will and accept the refugees he forces on them.
Thus goes the specious argument recently made by Ian Millhiser.
But we will look at the T***h.
What does our Constitution say about Immigration and Naturalization?
Immigration (or migration) pertains to new people coming to this Country to live.
1
Naturalization refers to the process by which an immigrant becomes a Citizen.
Our Constitution does delegate power over immigration and naturalization to Congress. Article I, §9, clause 1, delegates to Congress (commencing January 1808) power to control migration. 2 Article I, §8, clause 4, delegates to Congress power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.
But what is going on now with the importation of large numbers of able-bodied young Muslim males is not immigration as contemplated by our Constitution.
It is an act of war being committed against the People of the United States by their President. The plan is to o*******w our Constitutional Republic and set up an Islamic Caliph**e over America.
3
That is Treason it is I**********n. It is not immigration, and it is not refugee resettlement.
The States must refuse to cooperate
Michael Boldins recent informative article explains how the federal resettlement program works: The federal government coordinates resettlement of refugees with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) located within the States, and thus circumvents state and local governments.
Accordingly, the States should promptly stop all such NGO involvement; take control of the programs themselves; and then refuse to cooperate with the federal government.
James Madison, Father of our Constitution, spells this out in Federalist No. 46 (7th para). Respecting unpopular acts of the federal government:
the means of opposition to it are powerful and at hand. The disquietude of the people; their repugnance and, perhaps, refusal to co-operate with the officers of the Union; the frowns of the executive magistracy of the State; the embarrassments created by legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions, would oppose, in any State, difficulties not to be despised; would form, in a large State, very serious impediments; and where the sentiments of several adjoining States happened to be in unison, would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.
But if the federal government persists, then the States must move to the next Step.
Our Constitution Imposes the Duty on the Federal Government to protect us from Invasion
Article IV, §4, requires The United States to protect each of the States against Invasion:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion [emphasis mine]
In Federalist No. 43 (3rd para under 6.), Madison says of this provision:
A protection against invasion is due from every society to the parts composing it [emphasis mine]
Article I, §8, clause 15 delegates to Congress the power:
to provide for calling forth the M*****a to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress I**********ns and repel Invasions.
Article 1, §8, clause 16 delegates to Congress the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the M*****a. The States retain the power to appoint the Officers and conduct the training.
Article II, §2, clause 1 makes the President Commander in Chief of the M*****a of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States. [But remember: the federal government may call forth the M*****a only for the three purposes listed in Art. I, §8, cl. 15].
But the federal government hasnt called forth the M*****a to protect the States from the Islamic invasion. To the contrary, the President is importing the invaders and foisting them on the States.
So! What are States and The People to do? Because the President is aligned with the invaders, and Congress filled with moral cowards, must we passively submit to having ourselves and our
Christian and Jewish children k**led, and then let our surviving burka dressed daughters and granddaughters be handed over to the clitoris cutters?
No! The People have the Natural Right of self-defense; and the States have the reserved Power to defend their Citizens. With the State M*****a, The People and the States have the means to exercise this Natural Right and reserved Power.
The States must Revitalize their State M*****a
What is the M*****a? As Dr. Edwin Vieiras excellent series
4 on the M*****a and how it guarantees the right to keep and bear arms shows, the M*****a has a long history in America. That history began with the English settlements in the early 1600s. Every free male was expected to be armed and prepared at all times to protect himself, his family, and his community. Laws in the Colonies gave effect to this requirement. So at the time of the drafting of our Constitution in 1787, everyone knew of this 150 year long history of free American males being required to be armed, trained, and ready at a moments notice to answer the call of Duty.
Accordingly, the above identified m*****a clauses were written into our Constitution of 1787.
In 1792, Congress implemented these m*****a clauses and passed An Act more effectually to provide for the National Defense by establishing an Uniform M*****a throughout the United States. This Act required all able-bodied male citizens (with a few exceptions) between the ages of 18 and 45 to enroll in their State M*****a, get a rifle and ammunition pouch, and train.
As Section 1 of the Act shows, the adult able-bodied male Citizens of a State are The Members of their State M*****a. So, continuing the long-standing colonial tradition, Members of Congress in 1792 thought it such a fine idea that all male citizens be armed and trained and members of their State M*****a, they required it by federal law!
So! As Art. I, §8, cl. 15 shows, Congress is authorized to provide for calling the M*****a into national service to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress I**********ns and repel Invasions. But what if the federal government refuses to act?
Alexander Hamilton provides the answer in Federalist No. 29. Hamilton shows that one of the purposes of the M*****a is to protect the Citizens of the States from threats to their liberties posed by the federal government (7th & 12th paras); and that the States reservation of power to appoint the Officers secures to them an influence over the M*****a greater than that of the federal government (9th para).
And on the use of the M*****a to repel Invasions, Hamilton says (13th para):
In times of i**********n, or invasion, it would be natural and proper that the m*****a of a neighboring State should be marched into another, to resist a common enemy, or to guard the republic against the violence of faction or s******n
True, it was contemplated that the United States would be the entity which protects the States against Invasion (Art. IV, §4). But when the federal government has demonstrated its determination that the States ARE TO BE OVERRUN BY INVADERS, then the People have the natural right to defend themselves, and their States have the retained Power to employ the M*****a to defend them from those into whose hands the federal government has demonstrated its determination to deliver them.
The States are within their retained Sovereign Power to call up their State M*****a to fend off invaders. Article I, §10, last clause, is an expression of this retained sovereign Power of States of self-Defense:
No State shall engage in War, unless actually invaded
Clearly, the States may use their State M*****a to engage in War to defend the States from Invasion.5
James Madison spoke to the same effect as Hamilton respecting federal tyranny. In Federalist No. 46(9th para), Madison speaks of a federal government so consumed with madness that it sends its regular army against the States:
Let a regular army be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger.
[To the regular army] would be opposed a m*****a amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether a m*****a thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the m*****a officers are appointed, forms [an insurmountable] barrier against the enterprises of ambition [boldface mine]
Look to Your State Constitution for Provisions re Your State M*****a
Article VIII of the Constitution for the State of Tennessee provides for Tennessees M*****a.
Consistent with the tradition which has existed in this Country since the early 1600s, all Tennessee Citizens are members of this M*****a. Article I, §28, TN Constitution says:
That no citizen of the state shall be compelled to bear arms, provided he will pay an equivalent, to be ascertained by law.
Read your State Constitution. What does it say about the M*****a? What do the implementing State Statutes say? Is your State M*****a active? Why not? For information on revitalizing your State M*****a, see Dr. Vieiras three part series, Are You Doing Your Constitutional Duty For Homeland Security?
Conclusion
Madison closes his magnificent 9th paragraph in Federalist No. 46 with this:
Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion, that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession, than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors. Let us rather no longer insult them with the supposition that they can ever reduce themselves to the necessity of making the experiment, by a blind and tame submission to the long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it. [emphasis mine]
But we became debased subjects of arbitrary power. So now, will we lay down before the Invaders and I**********nists and those in our federal government who aid and abet them? Or we will man up, revitalize our State M*****a, and show the world that we still have some free and gallant Citizens of America in this land?
Endnotes:
1 Our Framers contemplated that immigration would be restricted to people who shared our culture and values e.g.,
Federalist No. 2, 5th para.
But Americans got conned into believing that an ideal culture is multicultural. Thus, with Teddy Kennedys immigration reform act of 1965, our borders were opened to all. We congratulated ourselves on our new virtues of tolerance and diversity. But the goal of the multiculturalists was to eradicate our unique Culture we were too gullible to see it. So now, the enemy is inside the gates, and more are coming in. And Islam doesnt tolerate m**************m.
2 Open borders adherents bristle at the assertion that Congress has constitutional authority to restrict immigration. They insist that Art. I, §9, cl. 1 addresses only the importation of s***es and says nothing about free immigrants. But the text distinguishes between migrations and importations, and the Duty is levied on importations, not migrations.
S***es, being property, were imported. Free Europeans migrated. The power of the States to determine such persons as it was proper to admit, expired January 1808. There are various letters and speeches from our early days confirming this. Ill write it up when I get time (if this doesnt turn on the light). For now, see Federalist No. 42 (6th para):
Attempts have been made to pervert this clause [Art. I, §9, cl. 1] into an objection against the Constitution, by representing it on one side as a criminal toleration of an illicit practice [s***ery], and on another as calculated to prevent voluntary and beneficial emigrations from Europe to America. I mention these misconstructions, not with a view to give them an answer, for they deserve none, but as specimens of the manner and spirit in which some have thought fit to conduct their opposition to the proposed government. [boldface mine]
Our Framers understood that the national government must be able to determine who is allowed to come here. Thats why Art. I, §9, cl. 1 delegates to Congress power to control immigration, commencing January 1808. And isnt one of your complaints against the federal government that it has refused for so long to control our Borders?
3 See the website for The Center for Security Policy (Frank J. Gaffney) HERE. There you can read The Plan of the Muslim Brotherhood to infiltrate and take over all American Institutions. They are working to make this Country part of a global Islamic caliph**e. Open your eyes NOW.
4 Do read all 8 of Dr. Vieiras papers in this series. They get very moving.
5 Troops as in Art. I, §10, last clause, are professional full-time soldiers. States may not keep Troops absent consent of Congress. But the States M*****a is a permanent State institution. The States retain their pre-constitutional powers over their M*****a, subject only to the federal governments limited supremacy set forth in the 3 M*****a clauses [See Part 2 of Dr. Vieiras paper HERE.] PH
Written by: Publius Huldah Nov 30, 2015
War is coming to America. Obama is importing young able-bodied males to make civilizational jihad on us; and Congress cant summon up the moral courage to stop him.
To see what is ahead for us, watch this 20 minute video. It depicts the Islamic takeover which is right now going on throughout Europe as European countries are being repopulated by millions of young able-bodied Muslim males (euphemistically called refugees) who are explicit about their intention to breed the native Europeans out of existence, and replace the European cultures with Islamic culture.
And Obama is bringing it here.
This paper discusses the two courses of action set forth in Federalist Paper No. 46 for situations such as this: (1) The States must refuse to cooperate with the federal government; but if that doesnt solve the problem, (2) The States must use their State M*****a to defend their State and Citizens.
Invaders are not Refugees or Immigrants
Those pushing for an Islamic takeover of Europe and North America are referring to these able-bodied young Muslim males as refugees. The use of that term brings the Muslims who are brought into the United States within the federal Refugee Resettlement Act. And since the Constitution delegates power over immigration to Congress, and Congress re-delegated refugee policy to the President, the States must submit to Obamas Will and accept the refugees he forces on them.
Thus goes the specious argument recently made by Ian Millhiser.
But we will look at the T***h.
What does our Constitution say about Immigration and Naturalization?
Immigration (or migration) pertains to new people coming to this Country to live.
1
Naturalization refers to the process by which an immigrant becomes a Citizen.
Our Constitution does delegate power over immigration and naturalization to Congress. Article I, §9, clause 1, delegates to Congress (commencing January 1808) power to control migration. 2 Article I, §8, clause 4, delegates to Congress power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.
But what is going on now with the importation of large numbers of able-bodied young Muslim males is not immigration as contemplated by our Constitution.
It is an act of war being committed against the People of the United States by their President. The plan is to o*******w our Constitutional Republic and set up an Islamic Caliph**e over America.
3
That is Treason it is I**********n. It is not immigration, and it is not refugee resettlement.
The States must refuse to cooperate
Michael Boldins recent informative article explains how the federal resettlement program works: The federal government coordinates resettlement of refugees with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) located within the States, and thus circumvents state and local governments.
Accordingly, the States should promptly stop all such NGO involvement; take control of the programs themselves; and then refuse to cooperate with the federal government.
James Madison, Father of our Constitution, spells this out in Federalist No. 46 (7th para). Respecting unpopular acts of the federal government:
the means of opposition to it are powerful and at hand. The disquietude of the people; their repugnance and, perhaps, refusal to co-operate with the officers of the Union; the frowns of the executive magistracy of the State; the embarrassments created by legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions, would oppose, in any State, difficulties not to be despised; would form, in a large State, very serious impediments; and where the sentiments of several adjoining States happened to be in unison, would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.
But if the federal government persists, then the States must move to the next Step.
Our Constitution Imposes the Duty on the Federal Government to protect us from Invasion
Article IV, §4, requires The United States to protect each of the States against Invasion:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion [emphasis mine]
In Federalist No. 43 (3rd para under 6.), Madison says of this provision:
A protection against invasion is due from every society to the parts composing it [emphasis mine]
Article I, §8, clause 15 delegates to Congress the power:
to provide for calling forth the M*****a to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress I**********ns and repel Invasions.
Article 1, §8, clause 16 delegates to Congress the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the M*****a. The States retain the power to appoint the Officers and conduct the training.
Article II, §2, clause 1 makes the President Commander in Chief of the M*****a of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States. [But remember: the federal government may call forth the M*****a only for the three purposes listed in Art. I, §8, cl. 15].
But the federal government hasnt called forth the M*****a to protect the States from the Islamic invasion. To the contrary, the President is importing the invaders and foisting them on the States.
So! What are States and The People to do? Because the President is aligned with the invaders, and Congress filled with moral cowards, must we passively submit to having ourselves and our
Christian and Jewish children k**led, and then let our surviving burka dressed daughters and granddaughters be handed over to the clitoris cutters?
No! The People have the Natural Right of self-defense; and the States have the reserved Power to defend their Citizens. With the State M*****a, The People and the States have the means to exercise this Natural Right and reserved Power.
The States must Revitalize their State M*****a
What is the M*****a? As Dr. Edwin Vieiras excellent series
4 on the M*****a and how it guarantees the right to keep and bear arms shows, the M*****a has a long history in America. That history began with the English settlements in the early 1600s. Every free male was expected to be armed and prepared at all times to protect himself, his family, and his community. Laws in the Colonies gave effect to this requirement. So at the time of the drafting of our Constitution in 1787, everyone knew of this 150 year long history of free American males being required to be armed, trained, and ready at a moments notice to answer the call of Duty.
Accordingly, the above identified m*****a clauses were written into our Constitution of 1787.
In 1792, Congress implemented these m*****a clauses and passed An Act more effectually to provide for the National Defense by establishing an Uniform M*****a throughout the United States. This Act required all able-bodied male citizens (with a few exceptions) between the ages of 18 and 45 to enroll in their State M*****a, get a rifle and ammunition pouch, and train.
As Section 1 of the Act shows, the adult able-bodied male Citizens of a State are The Members of their State M*****a. So, continuing the long-standing colonial tradition, Members of Congress in 1792 thought it such a fine idea that all male citizens be armed and trained and members of their State M*****a, they required it by federal law!
So! As Art. I, §8, cl. 15 shows, Congress is authorized to provide for calling the M*****a into national service to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress I**********ns and repel Invasions. But what if the federal government refuses to act?
Alexander Hamilton provides the answer in Federalist No. 29. Hamilton shows that one of the purposes of the M*****a is to protect the Citizens of the States from threats to their liberties posed by the federal government (7th & 12th paras); and that the States reservation of power to appoint the Officers secures to them an influence over the M*****a greater than that of the federal government (9th para).
And on the use of the M*****a to repel Invasions, Hamilton says (13th para):
In times of i**********n, or invasion, it would be natural and proper that the m*****a of a neighboring State should be marched into another, to resist a common enemy, or to guard the republic against the violence of faction or s******n
True, it was contemplated that the United States would be the entity which protects the States against Invasion (Art. IV, §4). But when the federal government has demonstrated its determination that the States ARE TO BE OVERRUN BY INVADERS, then the People have the natural right to defend themselves, and their States have the retained Power to employ the M*****a to defend them from those into whose hands the federal government has demonstrated its determination to deliver them.
The States are within their retained Sovereign Power to call up their State M*****a to fend off invaders. Article I, §10, last clause, is an expression of this retained sovereign Power of States of self-Defense:
No State shall engage in War, unless actually invaded
Clearly, the States may use their State M*****a to engage in War to defend the States from Invasion.5
James Madison spoke to the same effect as Hamilton respecting federal tyranny. In Federalist No. 46(9th para), Madison speaks of a federal government so consumed with madness that it sends its regular army against the States:
Let a regular army be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger.
[To the regular army] would be opposed a m*****a amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether a m*****a thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the m*****a officers are appointed, forms [an insurmountable] barrier against the enterprises of ambition [boldface mine]
Look to Your State Constitution for Provisions re Your State M*****a
Article VIII of the Constitution for the State of Tennessee provides for Tennessees M*****a.
Consistent with the tradition which has existed in this Country since the early 1600s, all Tennessee Citizens are members of this M*****a. Article I, §28, TN Constitution says:
That no citizen of the state shall be compelled to bear arms, provided he will pay an equivalent, to be ascertained by law.
Read your State Constitution. What does it say about the M*****a? What do the implementing State Statutes say? Is your State M*****a active? Why not? For information on revitalizing your State M*****a, see Dr. Vieiras three part series, Are You Doing Your Constitutional Duty For Homeland Security?
Conclusion
Madison closes his magnificent 9th paragraph in Federalist No. 46 with this:
Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion, that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession, than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors. Let us rather no longer insult them with the supposition that they can ever reduce themselves to the necessity of making the experiment, by a blind and tame submission to the long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it. [emphasis mine]
But we became debased subjects of arbitrary power. So now, will we lay down before the Invaders and I**********nists and those in our federal government who aid and abet them? Or we will man up, revitalize our State M*****a, and show the world that we still have some free and gallant Citizens of America in this land?
Endnotes:
1 Our Framers contemplated that immigration would be restricted to people who shared our culture and values e.g.,
Federalist No. 2, 5th para.
But Americans got conned into believing that an ideal culture is multicultural. Thus, with Teddy Kennedys immigration reform act of 1965, our borders were opened to all. We congratulated ourselves on our new virtues of tolerance and diversity. But the goal of the multiculturalists was to eradicate our unique Culture we were too gullible to see it. So now, the enemy is inside the gates, and more are coming in. And Islam doesnt tolerate m**************m.
2 Open borders adherents bristle at the assertion that Congress has constitutional authority to restrict immigration. They insist that Art. I, §9, cl. 1 addresses only the importation of s***es and says nothing about free immigrants. But the text distinguishes between migrations and importations, and the Duty is levied on importations, not migrations.
S***es, being property, were imported. Free Europeans migrated. The power of the States to determine such persons as it was proper to admit, expired January 1808. There are various letters and speeches from our early days confirming this. Ill write it up when I get time (if this doesnt turn on the light). For now, see Federalist No. 42 (6th para):
Attempts have been made to pervert this clause [Art. I, §9, cl. 1] into an objection against the Constitution, by representing it on one side as a criminal toleration of an illicit practice [s***ery], and on another as calculated to prevent voluntary and beneficial emigrations from Europe to America. I mention these misconstructions, not with a view to give them an answer, for they deserve none, but as specimens of the manner and spirit in which some have thought fit to conduct their opposition to the proposed government. [boldface mine]
Our Framers understood that the national government must be able to determine who is allowed to come here. Thats why Art. I, §9, cl. 1 delegates to Congress power to control immigration, commencing January 1808. And isnt one of your complaints against the federal government that it has refused for so long to control our Borders?
3 See the website for The Center for Security Policy (Frank J. Gaffney) HERE. There you can read The Plan of the Muslim Brotherhood to infiltrate and take over all American Institutions. They are working to make this Country part of a global Islamic caliph**e. Open your eyes NOW.
4 Do read all 8 of Dr. Vieiras papers in this series. They get very moving.
5 Troops as in Art. I, §10, last clause, are professional full-time soldiers. States may not keep Troops absent consent of Congress. But the States M*****a is a permanent State institution. The States retain their pre-constitutional powers over their M*****a, subject only to the federal governments limited supremacy set forth in the 3 M*****a clauses [See Part 2 of Dr. Vieiras paper HERE.] PH
Dec 1, 2015 05:40:44 #
lpnmajor
Loc: Arkansas
Sicilianthing wrote:
To All State Governors and State Legislators: br ... (show quote)
There is no longer a provision for a State to have a m*****a. Haven't you heard? The 2nd amendment, which originally guaranteed the State's right to keep and arm a "well regulated m*****a", has been rewritten. It now reads simply "the right to bear arms shall not be infringed upon", with the "well regulated m*****a" phrase deleted.
Sorry. Blame the NRA if you must blame anyone.
Dec 1, 2015 08:25:26 #
It was the ' M*****as' from various states that appeared at the Bundy Ranch in Nevada and the Feds ' backed off' up there if you will recall...
The Oklahoma M*****a was there also woth scoped rifles watching the Fed snipers...
The Oklahoma M*****a was there also woth scoped rifles watching the Fed snipers...
Dec 1, 2015 08:56:08 #
lpnmajor wrote:
There is no longer a provision for a State to have a m*****a. Haven't you heard? The 2nd amendment, which originally guaranteed the State's right to keep and arm a "well regulated m*****a", has been rewritten. It now reads simply "the right to bear arms shall not be infringed upon", with the "well regulated m*****a" phrase deleted.
Sorry. Blame the NRA if you must blame anyone.
Sorry. Blame the NRA if you must blame anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Huh ?
Dec 1, 2015 08:57:20 #
okie don wrote:
It was the ' M*****as' from various states that appeared at the Bundy Ranch in Nevada and the Feds ' backed off' up there if you will recall...
The Oklahoma M*****a was there also woth scoped rifles watching the Fed snipers...
The Oklahoma M*****a was there also woth scoped rifles watching the Fed snipers...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And they will do the same for the Oregon Rancher next at any moment...
OathKeepers and others are watching...
I created the Topic last week: 'M*****a on Level 2 Alert'
Dec 1, 2015 09:26:58 #
okie don wrote:
It was the ' M*****as' from various states that appeared at the Bundy Ranch in Nevada and the Feds ' backed off' up there if you will recall...
The Oklahoma M*****a was there also woth scoped rifles watching the Fed snipers...
The Oklahoma M*****a was there also woth scoped rifles watching the Fed snipers...
Thanks okie .. it will be freemen who will save our country, hey Scillianman I got your back ,,no matter the miles between us .. Live free or die hard..!!
Dec 1, 2015 09:30:06 #
reconreb wrote:
Thanks okie .. it will be freemen who will save our country, hey Scillianman I got your back ,,no matter the miles between us .. Live free or die hard..!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Same with you and all other Patriots...
I will be heading to the Oregon Ranch shortly if all goes well... depends on timing.. I have a work trip to make up there WA an OR so I'll make it a point to rendevouz over there...
10/4
Dec 1, 2015 11:27:25 #
Dec 1, 2015 20:16:35 #
okie don wrote:
Some are vigilant,
Most have their heads buried in Sand.
Sad state of affairs allright...(:
Most have their heads buried in Sand.
Sad state of affairs allright...(:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Not enough are paying attention yet...
I ask and engage in conversations all the time when I'm out there and people are mostly spooked by it...
Dec 1, 2015 20:24:15 #
I've noticed.
I try to throw out ' tidbits' of information hoping
they will realize they may not be as intelligent as
they think they are.
I get disgusted when some get Gross in their
expressions.
I keep thinking of what Alert Einstein said:
" We don't know what we don't know"
That is indeed a truism...
I try to throw out ' tidbits' of information hoping
they will realize they may not be as intelligent as
they think they are.
I get disgusted when some get Gross in their
expressions.
I keep thinking of what Alert Einstein said:
" We don't know what we don't know"
That is indeed a truism...
Dec 1, 2015 20:34:52 #
okie don wrote:
I've noticed.
I try to throw out ' tidbits' of information hoping
they will realize they may not be as intelligent as
they think they are.
I get disgusted when some get Gross in their
expressions.
I keep thinking of what Alert Einstein said:
" We don't know what we don't know"
That is indeed a truism...
I try to throw out ' tidbits' of information hoping
they will realize they may not be as intelligent as
they think they are.
I get disgusted when some get Gross in their
expressions.
I keep thinking of what Alert Einstein said:
" We don't know what we don't know"
That is indeed a truism...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
yes and that scares me all the time...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.