Doc110 Loc: York PA

The Left's and Obama's Motive For Importing Muslim Terrorists

http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/the-lefts-motive-for-importing-terrorists/

Erik Rush predicts 'a more well-developed surveillance and police state'

Since the Nov. 13 terror attacks in Paris, we have seen a distinct spike in the vociferous defense of Islam on the part of the left.

Along with patent denials that Islam and Muslims have anything to do with terrorism, those on the left have been shilling for the Obama administration’s desire to admit thousands of potential jihadis from war-torn areas of the Middle East into the United States.

Despite the reticence of the American press to report on the chaos being wrought by Muslim refugees entering Europe, world press reports are replete with the evidence of same.

Additionally, such trifles as the recent Paris terror attacks and the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing having been executed by Muslim “refugees” give clear indication that it is impossible to discern who among any population of Muslim refugees to America will become chain store franchisees versus becoming terrorists.

Barack Hussein Obama and his co-conspirators continue to advance the narrative of benign Muslim refugees and the existence of sound vetting processes for their admission.

Obama ridicules those in America who urge caution, labeling them as ninnies who are afraid of “widows and orphans” despite women and children being a clear minority among the European refugees.

Through all of this, the l*****t press and politicos alike parrot Obama’s talking points verbatim.

On an average day, l*****t media operative and activist Sally Kohn (against whom I’ve faced off publicly once or twice) engages in some of the most odious subversive activity against the American people, the rule of law and liberty itself.

Recently, her social media has exhibited an incomprehensibly craven defense of Islam and its adherents.

Here, Kohn employs the most decrepit illogic imaginable in opposing American prudence in considering Muslim refugees for admission into the United States.

If we violate our core values and refuse to show kindness to refugees, anger and desperation drives them to ISIS. https://t.co/ypng2nBAmR

— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) November 16, 2015

This feeble emotional blackmail extrapolates Americans’ characteristic generosity to suicidal proportions, and is the same raison d’être liberals have used to keep us awash in i*****l a***ns from Latin America.

That aside, the premeditation of people who slithered into Europe expressly to abuse Europeans’ generosity (not to mention maiming and k*****g them) apparently doesn’t raise a red f**g for Kohn.

Nor apparently does she take into account the 1,400-year history of Muslims celebrating their patron demon Allah having “clouded the minds” of enemies who showed compassion toward Muslim populations, only to be cruelly subjugated by the same Muslim populations later on.

CNN’s Elise Labott was recently suspended for two weeks by her network after tweeting her low opinion of the House of Representatives’ v**e to tighten the screening process for Syrian refugees.

The measure’s intent was not to refuse admission to any, nor to admit only 10 per year – it was simply to reinforce the vetting process, which Obama’s own FBI director says is a futile pursuit anyway.

House passes bill that could limit Syrian refugees. Statue of Liberty bows head in anguish @CNNPolitics https://t.co/5RvZwVftgD — Elise Labott (@eliselabottcnn) November 19, 2015

Again, we have someone who apparently advocates pretty much nothing in the way of requirements for admitting these refugees.

The correlation between the rise in Muslim violence and liberals rushing to their defense is undeniable:

The more that Muslims, by their actions, affirm our need for vigilance against Islam, the more their advocates on the left engage in damage control through disinformation calculated to placate native populations whilst Islamists advance their agenda.

The liberal narrative concerning these refugees has been beyond Orwellian, and to the rational mind, it all appears quite surreal.

This widespread, toadying defense of Muslim brutality by liberals is an exquisite example of mind control via all of the methods of propaganda brought to bear against a population.

Take Hillary Clinton’s Nov. 19 tweet, for example:

"Let’s be clear: Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism."

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) November 19, 2015

To give an idea of how deeply narcissistic l*****ts are, consider this: The Clinton campaign was so proud of Hillary’s remark that they concocted a hard-hitting graphic for their social media that actually showcased the treasonous tweet.

Hillary on confronting an ideology of h**e: http://pic.twitter.com/Hl6iKdsdQY

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) November 19, 2015

It is widely known among those who do not get their news from the alphabet TV networks that Obama has been clandestinely importing Muslims from Syria, Iraq, Somalia and other destabilized Muslim nations for several years.

Now, on the pretext of humanitarianism, he intends to prey upon Americans’ sympathy to import tens of thousands more.

Why do l*****ts advocate for a policy that will domestically destabilize America? As with so many harmful policies they’ve supported, they do so that they may later offer a statist, liberty-k*****g remedy.

In this case, the cure will be a more well-developed surveillance and police state, which they surmise Americans will welcome when we’re being hacked to death on our streets by Muslims.

The bipartisan legislation upon which the House v**ed last week to augment screening procedures for Syrian refugees passed 289-137.

Although Obama said he would veto this measure if it got to his desk, the upside is that we now have a list of 137 members of Congress who should be stripped of their citizenship and exiled to Syria.

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

[quote=Doc110]The Left's and Obama's Motive For Importing Muslim Terrorists

http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/the-lefts-motive-for-importing-terrorists/

Erik Rush predicts 'a more well-developed surveillance and police state'

Since the Nov. 13 terror attacks in Paris, we have seen a distinct spike in the vociferous defense of Islam on the part of the left.

Along with patent denials that Islam and Muslims have anything to do with terrorism, ....

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Their ultimate goal could be a declaration of martial law and a delay in the P**********l e******n. Hopefully it won't work!

mark13 Loc: usa

thanks... here are related thoughts

You’ve heard Barack Obama say that opposing the resettlement of thousands of Syrian “refugees” plays right into the hands of ISIS.
You’ve heard him demonize those who oppose this act of treachery and insanity as r****ts.
You’ve heard him say the only thing that we have to fear from ISIS is fear itself – or words to that effect.
You’ve watched him ignore the will of the people and the law of the land to force this irresponsible resettlement of mostly Sunni Muslims in America at the expense of those truly threatened by ISIS – for instance, Syrian Christians who face genocide.
Maybe you have wondered what’s behind this willful, condescending, harebrained, immoral insistence – this sick compulsion.
I think I can explain it to you.
Do you understand “m**************m”? No matter what you’ve heard about it and no matter how compassionate and open-minded it sounds, it’s a patently r****t ideology, a suicidal mindset that truly believes most if not all the evil in the world is caused by white European men. If only we could elevate and empower the non-white population, all would be well with the world.
This policy is m**************m on display.
It’s also part of Obama’s agenda to “fundamentally t***sform America” before he leaves office in January 2017 by bringing in as many likely Democratic v**ers as possible.
But, also, you need to understand that Obama doesn’t care about the national security threat and the risks to public safety that his plan, in conjunction with the United Nations, spells for America. He doesn’t even consider it. It’s simply collateral damage as he sees it. If you want to make an omelet, as Josef Stalin explained, you have to break a few eggs.
Obama wants to make an omelet out of the greatest and freest nation in the history of the planet – a really bad, poisonous omelet.
How do I know all this?
As a Syrian-Christian American and a former radical l*****t myself, I think it’s fair to say that I have a little insight into his psyche.
As a young man, very much like Obama, I learned all the jargon, I bought into all the precepts, I can still cite chapter and verse and argue his positions on such matters by rote memory. I’ve been there.
In addition, we have the benefit of statements by some of his friends, political allies and fellow travelers who sometimes speak more candidly than Obama himself.
Experience more of Joseph Farah’s no-nonsense t***h-telling in his books, audio and video products, featured in the WND Superstore
Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings describes himself as “all in” for Obama. Obama has brought him to Washington when he needs an echo chamber. There’s almost no space between them politically. Rawlings is just a little more candid or naïve or doesn’t have as much to lose politically.
Recently, he appeared on MSNBC defending Obama’s notion that ISIS does not represent Islam and that America is playing right into the uber-terrorists’ hands by trying to halt immigration by Syrian Sunni “refugees” who are completely unvetted in terms of national security threats they may pose to the civilian population of the U.S.
This is what he had to say: “ISIS wants us to demonize these Syrian refugees, wants us to alienate these children. We have got to build a coalition of Middle Eastern states and we need to reach out. They’re Muslims, and we have got to use the words carefully to show them that we care about them. ISIS is no more Islamic than the N**i senior staff was Christian. So we have got to differentiate between the two.”
We’ve heard that kind of thing from Obama himself. But then Rawlings went further – showing his true r****t colors, saying that he is “more fearful” of “young white men” performing mass shootings in theaters or schools than he is of the unknown Syrian Sunni Muslims headed our way.
“I am more fearful of large gatherings of young white men that come into schools, theaters and shoot people up,” he said. “But we don’t isolate young white men on this issue.”
That’s r****m no matter how you slice it.
That’s the unadulterated, multicultural ideological blindness on parade.
That’s what the fundamental t***sformation of America looks like in black and white.
That’s how pro-”refugee” r****ts make a poisonous omelet.
Media wishing to interview Joseph Farah, please contact media@wnd.com.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/the-pro-refugee-r****ts/#dB7tWWlF8hZaRF7z.99