One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Cristin Padgett is Running for Texas State House and She’s Not Hiding Her Atheism
Nov 25, 2015 20:11:35   #
SamDawkins
 
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/11/25/cristin-padgett-is-running-for-texas-state-house-and-shes-not-hiding-her-atheism/
Over the summer, Texas State Rep. Scott Turner, a Republican, announced that he would not be running for re-e******n next year, leaving a vacancy in House District 33 (which includes the cities of Frisco and Rockwall).
Cristin Padgett, a Democrat, wants that seat. And before anyone can “out” her, she’s coming right out and letting everyone know she’s an atheist:

… Padgett is going out on a limb to let v**ers know from the outset that she has “no religious affiliation or belief in a higher being.”
“I don’t want to make it a big deal, but I do want people to open up and think critically about it,” Padgett told the Observer…
She said she wanted to get the question out of the way early in her campaign. “It’s going to be a concern for people,” she said. “People are afraid of what they don’t understand.”
I love that she’s not trying to hide it. By getting in front of the label, it blunts any potential “attacks” from opponents who may want to use it against her.
But she still has a very uphill climb. She’s in a predominantly Republican (and heavily gerrymandered) district where “Democrat” is almost as dirty a word as “godless.” In 2012, Turner won with 85% of the v**es against a Libertarian candidate. In 2014, he ran unopposed.
Atheists haven’t fared well in other parts of Texas, either. Daniel Moran, an atheist who ran for the Texas House in 2014, barely earned 25% of the v**es. And other candidates for public office in the state have previously used atheism as a punchline or black mark (even when it wasn’t true).
But we don’t win any of these e******ns unless we run, and the anti-atheist stigma doesn’t go away unless more people are willing to embrace the label. Padgett is running on a platform of defending civil liberties, improving education, and bringing back economic stability. She may be an atheist, but she’s not interested in pushing her non-belief on her constituency. And that may be the best (and only) way to win over v**ers who may be turned off by the fact that she doesn’t believe in their God.
If you’d like to make a donation, you can do that here.
And as an added bonus, keep in mind that Texas is one of seven states where the Constitution still has a ban on atheists in public office. It’s not enforceable, due to the Supreme Court case Torcaso v. Watkins, but Article 1, Section 4 still says:
No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.
Those bans tend to stay in place, even when they’re nothing but relics of an older time, unless someone forces the change by getting elected. (It’s the reason Herb Silverman ran for Governor of South Carolina decades ago.) If Padgett wins, maybe that clause requiring belief in God finally gets wiped away.
It’s too early to know who will run against her in the primary or general e******n. I promise you it won’t be a cakewalk, though. We’ll keep following her race on this site.
(via Texas Observer)



Reply
Nov 25, 2015 20:46:05   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
SamDawkins wrote:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/11/25/cristin-padgett-is-running-for-texas-state-house-and-shes-not-hiding-her-atheism/
Over the summer, Texas State Rep. Scott Turner, a Republican, announced that he would not be running for re-e******n next year, leaving a vacancy in House District 33 (which includes the cities of Frisco and Rockwall).
Cristin Padgett, a Democrat, wants that seat. And before anyone can “out” her, she’s coming right out and letting everyone know she’s an atheist:

… Padgett is going out on a limb to let v**ers know from the outset that she has “no religious affiliation or belief in a higher being.”
“I don’t want to make it a big deal, but I do want people to open up and think critically about it,” Padgett told the Observer…
She said she wanted to get the question out of the way early in her campaign. “It’s going to be a concern for people,” she said. “People are afraid of what they don’t understand.”
I love that she’s not trying to hide it. By getting in front of the label, it blunts any potential “attacks” from opponents who may want to use it against her.
But she still has a very uphill climb. She’s in a predominantly Republican (and heavily gerrymandered) district where “Democrat” is almost as dirty a word as “godless.” In 2012, Turner won with 85% of the v**es against a Libertarian candidate. In 2014, he ran unopposed.
Atheists haven’t fared well in other parts of Texas, either. Daniel Moran, an atheist who ran for the Texas House in 2014, barely earned 25% of the v**es. And other candidates for public office in the state have previously used atheism as a punchline or black mark (even when it wasn’t true).
But we don’t win any of these e******ns unless we run, and the anti-atheist stigma doesn’t go away unless more people are willing to embrace the label. Padgett is running on a platform of defending civil liberties, improving education, and bringing back economic stability. She may be an atheist, but she’s not interested in pushing her non-belief on her constituency. And that may be the best (and only) way to win over v**ers who may be turned off by the fact that she doesn’t believe in their God.
If you’d like to make a donation, you can do that here.
And as an added bonus, keep in mind that Texas is one of seven states where the Constitution still has a ban on atheists in public office. It’s not enforceable, due to the Supreme Court case Torcaso v. Watkins, but Article 1, Section 4 still says:
No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.
Those bans tend to stay in place, even when they’re nothing but relics of an older time, unless someone forces the change by getting elected. (It’s the reason Herb Silverman ran for Governor of South Carolina decades ago.) If Padgett wins, maybe that clause requiring belief in God finally gets wiped away.
It’s too early to know who will run against her in the primary or general e******n. I promise you it won’t be a cakewalk, though. We’ll keep following her race on this site.
(via Texas Observer)
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/... (show quote)


Atheist would not be a deal breaker for me. Liberalism would.

Reply
Nov 25, 2015 20:46:18   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
SamDawkins wrote:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/11/25/cristin-padgett-is-running-for-texas-state-house-and-shes-not-hiding-her-atheism/
Over the summer, Texas State Rep. Scott Turner, a Republican, announced that he would not be running for re-e******n next year, leaving a vacancy in House District 33 (which includes the cities of Frisco and Rockwall).
Cristin Padgett, a Democrat, wants that seat. And before anyone can “out” her, she’s coming right out and letting everyone know she’s an atheist:

… Padgett is going out on a limb to let v**ers know from the outset that she has “no religious affiliation or belief in a higher being.”
“I don’t want to make it a big deal, but I do want people to open up and think critically about it,” Padgett told the Observer…
She said she wanted to get the question out of the way early in her campaign. “It’s going to be a concern for people,” she said. “People are afraid of what they don’t understand.”
I love that she’s not trying to hide it. By getting in front of the label, it blunts any potential “attacks” from opponents who may want to use it against her.
But she still has a very uphill climb. She’s in a predominantly Republican (and heavily gerrymandered) district where “Democrat” is almost as dirty a word as “godless.” In 2012, Turner won with 85% of the v**es against a Libertarian candidate. In 2014, he ran unopposed.
Atheists haven’t fared well in other parts of Texas, either. Daniel Moran, an atheist who ran for the Texas House in 2014, barely earned 25% of the v**es. And other candidates for public office in the state have previously used atheism as a punchline or black mark (even when it wasn’t true).
But we don’t win any of these e******ns unless we run, and the anti-atheist stigma doesn’t go away unless more people are willing to embrace the label. Padgett is running on a platform of defending civil liberties, improving education, and bringing back economic stability. She may be an atheist, but she’s not interested in pushing her non-belief on her constituency. And that may be the best (and only) way to win over v**ers who may be turned off by the fact that she doesn’t believe in their God.
If you’d like to make a donation, you can do that here.
And as an added bonus, keep in mind that Texas is one of seven states where the Constitution still has a ban on atheists in public office. It’s not enforceable, due to the Supreme Court case Torcaso v. Watkins, but Article 1, Section 4 still says:
No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.
Those bans tend to stay in place, even when they’re nothing but relics of an older time, unless someone forces the change by getting elected. (It’s the reason Herb Silverman ran for Governor of South Carolina decades ago.) If Padgett wins, maybe that clause requiring belief in God finally gets wiped away.
It’s too early to know who will run against her in the primary or general e******n. I promise you it won’t be a cakewalk, though. We’ll keep following her race on this site.
(via Texas Observer)
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/... (show quote)


Well Sam you got your add in,is that it for today or will you be making a pitch for more godless freaks.

Reply
 
 
Nov 25, 2015 20:47:45   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
Loki wrote:
Atheist would not be a deal breaker for me. Liberalism would.


Is there a difference here Loki?

Reply
Nov 25, 2015 20:52:07   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Hemiman wrote:
Is there a difference here Loki?


Lots of Atheists oppose gun control and think g****l w*****g is bulls**t. Can you think of any Libs who do?

Reply
Nov 26, 2015 06:39:01   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
SamDawkins wrote:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/11/25/cristin-padgett-is-running-for-texas-state-house-and-shes-not-hiding-her-atheism/
Over the summer, Texas State Rep. Scott Turner, a Republican, announced that he would not be running for re-e******n next year, leaving a vacancy in House District 33 (which includes the cities of Frisco and Rockwall).
Cristin Padgett, a Democrat, wants that seat. And before anyone can “out” her, she’s coming right out and letting everyone know she’s an atheist:

… Padgett is going out on a limb to let v**ers know from the outset that she has “no religious affiliation or belief in a higher being.”
“I don’t want to make it a big deal, but I do want people to open up and think critically about it,” Padgett told the Observer…
She said she wanted to get the question out of the way early in her campaign. “It’s going to be a concern for people,” she said. “People are afraid of what they don’t understand.”
I love that she’s not trying to hide it. By getting in front of the label, it blunts any potential “attacks” from opponents who may want to use it against her.
But she still has a very uphill climb. She’s in a predominantly Republican (and heavily gerrymandered) district where “Democrat” is almost as dirty a word as “godless.” In 2012, Turner won with 85% of the v**es against a Libertarian candidate. In 2014, he ran unopposed.
Atheists haven’t fared well in other parts of Texas, either. Daniel Moran, an atheist who ran for the Texas House in 2014, barely earned 25% of the v**es. And other candidates for public office in the state have previously used atheism as a punchline or black mark (even when it wasn’t true).
But we don’t win any of these e******ns unless we run, and the anti-atheist stigma doesn’t go away unless more people are willing to embrace the label. Padgett is running on a platform of defending civil liberties, improving education, and bringing back economic stability. She may be an atheist, but she’s not interested in pushing her non-belief on her constituency. And that may be the best (and only) way to win over v**ers who may be turned off by the fact that she doesn’t believe in their God.
If you’d like to make a donation, you can do that here.
And as an added bonus, keep in mind that Texas is one of seven states where the Constitution still has a ban on atheists in public office. It’s not enforceable, due to the Supreme Court case Torcaso v. Watkins, but Article 1, Section 4 still says:
No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.
Those bans tend to stay in place, even when they’re nothing but relics of an older time, unless someone forces the change by getting elected. (It’s the reason Herb Silverman ran for Governor of South Carolina decades ago.) If Padgett wins, maybe that clause requiring belief in God finally gets wiped away.
It’s too early to know who will run against her in the primary or general e******n. I promise you it won’t be a cakewalk, though. We’ll keep following her race on this site.
(via Texas Observer)
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/... (show quote)



It certainly doesn't surprise me that she is an atheist and a Democrat since the Democratic Party is 100% socialist. Progressives, liberals, socialists worship Man in the various religions of Government - progressivism, socialism, f*****m, c*******m. It's an easy segue from one to the other.

It is time for states such as Texas to enforce their ban of atheists holding office in defiance of The Supreme Court and its unconstitutional decisions.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.