0bama's Last Two Years in Office
Nov 18, 2015 20:56:00 #
0bama is making it quite apparent that he intends to make the focus of his last two years in office, none other than GUN CONTROL! My, my! Is anyone really surprised? He recently made this statement as posted in GQ. GQ posed Hillary Clinton's assertion of using executive orders to impose more gun control to Obama and here was his response:
Well, keep in mind that after Sandy Hook, we put forward 23 executive actions. So we haven't been asleep at the switch in terms of executive actions that we've tried. There are maybe a few more that had to be scrubbed by lawyers because, essentially, with every executive action, we can count on it being challenged by somebody in Congress or, in this case, the NRA. We want to make any executive action we take as defensible as possible legally. In the absence of a movement politically in which people say, "Enough is enough," we're going to continue to see, unfortunately, these tragedies take place. The main thing that I've been trying to communicate over the last several of these horrific episodes is that, contrary to popular belief, Americans are not more violent than people in other developed countries. But they have more deadly weapons to act out their rage, and that's the only main variable that you see between the U.S. and these other countries.
Read the full article here: http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/11/obama-ill-give-sustained-attention-to-gun-control-my-last-year-in-office/
Beware the onslaught that is coming and be prepared. The last two years can make or break the whole structure of our Constitution and this United States. He cannot legally abolish the 2nd Amendment, nor can Congress change it in any way --- But he will certainly try!! And he will use Executive Orders to try and accomplish his 'mission'.
Well, keep in mind that after Sandy Hook, we put forward 23 executive actions. So we haven't been asleep at the switch in terms of executive actions that we've tried. There are maybe a few more that had to be scrubbed by lawyers because, essentially, with every executive action, we can count on it being challenged by somebody in Congress or, in this case, the NRA. We want to make any executive action we take as defensible as possible legally. In the absence of a movement politically in which people say, "Enough is enough," we're going to continue to see, unfortunately, these tragedies take place. The main thing that I've been trying to communicate over the last several of these horrific episodes is that, contrary to popular belief, Americans are not more violent than people in other developed countries. But they have more deadly weapons to act out their rage, and that's the only main variable that you see between the U.S. and these other countries.
Read the full article here: http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/11/obama-ill-give-sustained-attention-to-gun-control-my-last-year-in-office/
Beware the onslaught that is coming and be prepared. The last two years can make or break the whole structure of our Constitution and this United States. He cannot legally abolish the 2nd Amendment, nor can Congress change it in any way --- But he will certainly try!! And he will use Executive Orders to try and accomplish his 'mission'.
Nov 18, 2015 21:00:24 #
Nov 18, 2015 21:06:14 #
Those are my sentiments exactly. There was VERY GOOD reasoning for that amendment to be there - we would still be under British rule had it not been for our freedom to own and keep our guns. The snake-in-the-grass now working on ruining this country and our freedoms, will try everything he can pull out of his rear end to make our being disarmed happen.
Nov 18, 2015 21:11:34 #
MsAtta2d wrote:
Those are my sentiments exactly. There was VERY GOOD reasoning for that amendment to be there - we would still be under British rule had it not been for our freedom to own and keep our guns. The snake-in-the-grass now working on ruining this country and our freedoms, will try everything he can pull out of his rear end to make our being disarmed happen.
You do know who this is ?
Nov 18, 2015 21:26:17 #
Personally, I think if we did all stand up against 0vomit, it would scare the pants off him! What we definitely need are our police forces, our military, and our Sheriffs offices to stand with us. I do believe the sheriffs will do just that. The military more than likely; but our police forces may not be as willing because this bodes of civil unrest. So as not to leave them in a lurch, we should be having meetings with them to assure them we are not creating deliberate unrest against our towns and cities, but rather a solid and formidable push back against tyranny.
Notice also what is happening now with his allowing the Syrians in here. They are not coming over here as families (women and children). NO! It is adult males he is bringing in. That is NOT caring for the people who have been uprooted -- rather that is seeding a m*****a to stand against us. Perhaps I should have used the word caliph**e rather than m*****a. Make no mistake about it - 0vomit IS a sworn Muslim FIRST!
Notice also what is happening now with his allowing the Syrians in here. They are not coming over here as families (women and children). NO! It is adult males he is bringing in. That is NOT caring for the people who have been uprooted -- rather that is seeding a m*****a to stand against us. Perhaps I should have used the word caliph**e rather than m*****a. Make no mistake about it - 0vomit IS a sworn Muslim FIRST!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.