One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Carson's Right: In 2008 The Media Ignored More Than 30 Lies In Obama's Bio
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
Nov 9, 2015 10:32:06   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
For just a moment, forget about how the DC Media allowed President Obama to PrettySpeech his way out of a 20 year relationship with a r****t, anti-Semitic preacher. For just a moment, forget about how the DC Media ignored the bombshell that Obama lied about his relationship with a terrorist. As we watch the racially-motivated DC Media lie through omission and commission about “inaccuracies” in Ben Carson’s bio, let us never forget that during the 2008 e******n, this same DC Media covered up more than 30 inaccuracies in Obama’s biographies.

First off, I need to stop to ensure I give every bit of credit for this piece to Young Conservatives, a site that put this incredible list together over the weekend. Nothing below would have been possible without their fine work. Please check it out.

Prior to Obama winning the 2008 p**********l e******n, no less than The New York Times found a lie in Obama’s biography. During a Memorial Day campaign appearance, Obama claimed an uncle of his had liberated Auschwitz during WWII. When he was called on it, Obama lied again and said it was Buchenwald. The t***h was that it was Ohrdruf, a sub-camp of Buchenwald.

Another 2008 New York Times article, that was buried under a headline that had nothing to do with the falsehoods the reporter found, reported that Obama had “added some writerly touches in his memoir to make the challenges he overcame seem more dramatic.”

Finally, prior to winning the 2008 p**********l e******n, no less than The Washington Post discovered that Obama lied about the role the Kennedy family took in helping his own family. In an effort to craft a mythological Camelot Connection, Obama falsely claimed the Kennedy family paid to for his “Kenyan father to travel to America on a student scholarship and thus meet his Kansan mother.”

Two whoppers from an inexperienced, insurgent p**********l candidate running in large part on his biography.

Was the result a massive DC Media Narrative questioning Obama’s honesty?

Nope. Never happened. Not even close.

Was the result an even more intensive look into Obama’s biographical details?

Nope. In fact, quite the opposite happened. Fearing what they would discover, the DC Media stopped vetting Obama’s biography altogether. How do we know this? Because it was only after Obama was elected president that more than 30 additional inaccuracies were discovered.

I’m not asking you believe me. But you can certainly believe one of Obama’s biggest fans and protectors: BuzzFeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith. Of course this was written more than 3 years after Obama was sworn into office:

Maraniss’s Barack Obama: The Story punctures two sets of falsehoods: The family tales Obama passed on, unknowing; and the stories Obama made up. The 672-page book closes before Obama enters law school, and Maraniss has promised another volume, but by its conclusion I counted 38 instances in which the biographer convincingly disputes significant elements of Obama’s own story of his life and his family history.

Thirty-eight falsehoods. I’ll be generous and say that maybe the DC Media publicized five prior to Obama being sworn into office in January of 2009. Nevertheless, no matter how many inaccuracies were reported, there is no question that the DC Media downplayed them in a way that ensured the biographical falsehoods did the least amount of political damage.

What biographical inaccuracies of Obama’s did the DC Media choose not to disclose to us prior to 2008? Here is just a handful, again courtesy of Young Conservatives. These claims have either been proven false or cannot be verified — and that revelation came only after Obama was sworn into office:

- Obama lied the historic civil rights march in Selma, Alabama as the inspiration for his conception.

- A story of British Obama’s grandfather facing British brutality.

- Obama’s claim that his heroic step-grandfather died fighting the Dutch.

- Obama outright lied about his own mother’s health insurance problems.

- Obama’s composite girlfriend.

- A tale of his mother being abandoned by his father in 1963.

Is this Bright Shining Double Standard only the usual-usual political bias we see every day from the corrupted and rotting DC Media?

Nope.

It is also racial.

For hundreds of years, from s***ery to segregation, Democrats have been socialized to destroy free-thinking black people who threaten their power. The DC Media is almost exclusively infested with Democrats, and therefore they see (correctly) Carson as an existential threat to their Jenga Tower national power structure. If Democrats lose even 10% of their current black v**e, they are done as a national party.

For behavior that made Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton look like choir boys, the DC Media turned Clarence Thomas and Herman Cain into scary black sexual predators. Now, using lies and innuendo, the DC Media is in the process of organizing a high-tech lynching of Dr. Ben Carson, whose only sin is straying from The Leftwing Thought Plantation.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/11/09/carsons-right-in-2008-the-media-ignored-more-than-30-lies-in-obamas-bio/

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 10:38:41   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Okay they did not do a good job then.... do we use that as the new standard? We ignore issues because it has always been done that way? And that worked out so well for our nation? When do we turn the page, when do we start really looking at candidates again? It is only our future and that of our children and grandchildren at stake.....

JMHO wrote:
For just a moment, forget about how the DC Media allowed President Obama to PrettySpeech his way out of a 20 year relationship with a r****t, anti-Semitic preacher. For just a moment, forget about how the DC Media ignored the bombshell that Obama lied about his relationship with a terrorist. As we watch the racially-motivated DC Media lie through omission and commission about “inaccuracies” in Ben Carson’s bio, let us never forget that during the 2008 e******n, this same DC Media covered up more than 30 inaccuracies in Obama’s biographies.

First off, I need to stop to ensure I give every bit of credit for this piece to Young Conservatives, a site that put this incredible list together over the weekend. Nothing below would have been possible without their fine work. Please check it out.

Prior to Obama winning the 2008 p**********l e******n, no less than The New York Times found a lie in Obama’s biography. During a Memorial Day campaign appearance, Obama claimed an uncle of his had liberated Auschwitz during WWII. When he was called on it, Obama lied again and said it was Buchenwald. The t***h was that it was Ohrdruf, a sub-camp of Buchenwald.

Another 2008 New York Times article, that was buried under a headline that had nothing to do with the falsehoods the reporter found, reported that Obama had “added some writerly touches in his memoir to make the challenges he overcame seem more dramatic.”

Finally, prior to winning the 2008 p**********l e******n, no less than The Washington Post discovered that Obama lied about the role the Kennedy family took in helping his own family. In an effort to craft a mythological Camelot Connection, Obama falsely claimed the Kennedy family paid to for his “Kenyan father to travel to America on a student scholarship and thus meet his Kansan mother.”

Two whoppers from an inexperienced, insurgent p**********l candidate running in large part on his biography.

Was the result a massive DC Media Narrative questioning Obama’s honesty?

Nope. Never happened. Not even close.

Was the result an even more intensive look into Obama’s biographical details?

Nope. In fact, quite the opposite happened. Fearing what they would discover, the DC Media stopped vetting Obama’s biography altogether. How do we know this? Because it was only after Obama was elected president that more than 30 additional inaccuracies were discovered.

I’m not asking you believe me. But you can certainly believe one of Obama’s biggest fans and protectors: BuzzFeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith. Of course this was written more than 3 years after Obama was sworn into office:

Maraniss’s Barack Obama: The Story punctures two sets of falsehoods: The family tales Obama passed on, unknowing; and the stories Obama made up. The 672-page book closes before Obama enters law school, and Maraniss has promised another volume, but by its conclusion I counted 38 instances in which the biographer convincingly disputes significant elements of Obama’s own story of his life and his family history.

Thirty-eight falsehoods. I’ll be generous and say that maybe the DC Media publicized five prior to Obama being sworn into office in January of 2009. Nevertheless, no matter how many inaccuracies were reported, there is no question that the DC Media downplayed them in a way that ensured the biographical falsehoods did the least amount of political damage.

What biographical inaccuracies of Obama’s did the DC Media choose not to disclose to us prior to 2008? Here is just a handful, again courtesy of Young Conservatives. These claims have either been proven false or cannot be verified — and that revelation came only after Obama was sworn into office:

- Obama lied the historic civil rights march in Selma, Alabama as the inspiration for his conception.

- A story of British Obama’s grandfather facing British brutality.

- Obama’s claim that his heroic step-grandfather died fighting the Dutch.

- Obama outright lied about his own mother’s health insurance problems.

- Obama’s composite girlfriend.

- A tale of his mother being abandoned by his father in 1963.

Is this Bright Shining Double Standard only the usual-usual political bias we see every day from the corrupted and rotting DC Media?

Nope.

It is also racial.

For hundreds of years, from s***ery to segregation, Democrats have been socialized to destroy free-thinking black people who threaten their power. The DC Media is almost exclusively infested with Democrats, and therefore they see (correctly) Carson as an existential threat to their Jenga Tower national power structure. If Democrats lose even 10% of their current black v**e, they are done as a national party.

For behavior that made Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton look like choir boys, the DC Media turned Clarence Thomas and Herman Cain into scary black sexual predators. Now, using lies and innuendo, the DC Media is in the process of organizing a high-tech lynching of Dr. Ben Carson, whose only sin is straying from The Leftwing Thought Plantation.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/11/09/carsons-right-in-2008-the-media-ignored-more-than-30-lies-in-obamas-bio/
For just a moment, forget about how the DC Media a... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 10:42:40   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
JMHO wrote:
For just a moment, forget about how the DC Media allowed President Obama to PrettySpeech his way out of a 20 year relationship with a r****t, anti-Semitic preacher. For just a moment, forget about how the DC Media ignored the bombshell that Obama lied about his relationship with a terrorist. As we watch the racially-motivated DC Media lie through omission and commission about “inaccuracies” in Ben Carson’s bio, let us never forget that during the 2008 e******n, this same DC Media covered up more than 30 inaccuracies in Obama’s biographies.

First off, I need to stop to ensure I give every bit of credit for this piece to Young Conservatives, a site that put this incredible list together over the weekend. Nothing below would have been possible without their fine work. Please check it out.

Prior to Obama winning the 2008 p**********l e******n, no less than The New York Times found a lie in Obama’s biography. During a Memorial Day campaign appearance, Obama claimed an uncle of his had liberated Auschwitz during WWII. When he was called on it, Obama lied again and said it was Buchenwald. The t***h was that it was Ohrdruf, a sub-camp of Buchenwald.

Another 2008 New York Times article, that was buried under a headline that had nothing to do with the falsehoods the reporter found, reported that Obama had “added some writerly touches in his memoir to make the challenges he overcame seem more dramatic.”

Finally, prior to winning the 2008 p**********l e******n, no less than The Washington Post discovered that Obama lied about the role the Kennedy family took in helping his own family. In an effort to craft a mythological Camelot Connection, Obama falsely claimed the Kennedy family paid to for his “Kenyan father to travel to America on a student scholarship and thus meet his Kansan mother.”

Two whoppers from an inexperienced, insurgent p**********l candidate running in large part on his biography.

Was the result a massive DC Media Narrative questioning Obama’s honesty?

Nope. Never happened. Not even close.

Was the result an even more intensive look into Obama’s biographical details?

Nope. In fact, quite the opposite happened. Fearing what they would discover, the DC Media stopped vetting Obama’s biography altogether. How do we know this? Because it was only after Obama was elected president that more than 30 additional inaccuracies were discovered.

I’m not asking you believe me. But you can certainly believe one of Obama’s biggest fans and protectors: BuzzFeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith. Of course this was written more than 3 years after Obama was sworn into office:

Maraniss’s Barack Obama: The Story punctures two sets of falsehoods: The family tales Obama passed on, unknowing; and the stories Obama made up. The 672-page book closes before Obama enters law school, and Maraniss has promised another volume, but by its conclusion I counted 38 instances in which the biographer convincingly disputes significant elements of Obama’s own story of his life and his family history.

Thirty-eight falsehoods. I’ll be generous and say that maybe the DC Media publicized five prior to Obama being sworn into office in January of 2009. Nevertheless, no matter how many inaccuracies were reported, there is no question that the DC Media downplayed them in a way that ensured the biographical falsehoods did the least amount of political damage.

What biographical inaccuracies of Obama’s did the DC Media choose not to disclose to us prior to 2008? Here is just a handful, again courtesy of Young Conservatives. These claims have either been proven false or cannot be verified — and that revelation came only after Obama was sworn into office:

- Obama lied the historic civil rights march in Selma, Alabama as the inspiration for his conception.

- A story of British Obama’s grandfather facing British brutality.

- Obama’s claim that his heroic step-grandfather died fighting the Dutch.

- Obama outright lied about his own mother’s health insurance problems.

- Obama’s composite girlfriend.

- A tale of his mother being abandoned by his father in 1963.

Is this Bright Shining Double Standard only the usual-usual political bias we see every day from the corrupted and rotting DC Media?

Nope.

It is also racial.

For hundreds of years, from s***ery to segregation, Democrats have been socialized to destroy free-thinking black people who threaten their power. The DC Media is almost exclusively infested with Democrats, and therefore they see (correctly) Carson as an existential threat to their Jenga Tower national power structure. If Democrats lose even 10% of their current black v**e, they are done as a national party.

For behavior that made Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton look like choir boys, the DC Media turned Clarence Thomas and Herman Cain into scary black sexual predators. Now, using lies and innuendo, the DC Media is in the process of organizing a high-tech lynching of Dr. Ben Carson, whose only sin is straying from The Leftwing Thought Plantation.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/11/09/carsons-right-in-2008-the-media-ignored-more-than-30-lies-in-obamas-bio/
For just a moment, forget about how the DC Media a... (show quote)


Do these young conservatives also think Joseph built the pyramids to store grain? Poor Boo Boo Carson thinks he's getting all picked on by that evil "liberal" media, as if Obama had never been picked on by the likes of Fox, Levine, Limbaugh and the rest of the pro-conservative media sources.

If its just too hot in the kitchen Mr Carson, get out and for heavens sake, stop with the theories about pyramids and the like. You are proof that seemingly great men can actually be brainwashed by religion and religious dogma. Despite being vague enough about these scholarships claims to imply you were offered them when you actually weren't and your constant bragging about how outstanding you are, having seen your picture of you and Jesus I guess discussing the way Joseph built those pyramids to store, grain, you are still pretty high in the polls. My God in Heaven, only in the USA.

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2015 10:46:59   #
bahmer
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Okay they did not do a good job then.... do we use that as the new standard? We ignore issues because it has always been done that way? And that worked out so well for our nation? When do we turn the page, when do we start really looking at candidates again? It is only our future and that of our children and grandchildren at stake.....


When they use the same theoretical microscope on both sides of the isle they will once again become credible. Right now they are ignoring things on the left side that should be brought out and fabricating things on the right side to determine who runs against their candidate. There was a time in the past when the MSM didn't have an agenda and didn't try to make politics but merely reported the facts and allowed the reader or viewer make up his or her mind. Now they are lying for one side and distorting the other to sway people into their way of belief which is liberal.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 10:50:29   #
Pulfnick Loc: Knoxville, TN
 
The media is agenda driven and has not functioned as legitimate news organizations for decades. The obvious problem with journalistic malpractice is the norm, and journalism classes in schools promote agenda driven crusading, not factual reporting.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 11:15:57   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Do these young conservatives also think Joseph built the pyramids to store grain? Poor Boo Boo Carson thinks he's getting all picked on by that evil "liberal" media, as if Obama had never been picked on by the likes of Fox, Levine, Limbaugh and the rest of the pro-conservative media sources.

If its just too hot in the kitchen Mr Carson, get out and for heavens sake, stop with the theories about pyramids and the like. You are proof that seemingly great men can actually be brainwashed by religion and religious dogma. Despite being vague enough about these scholarships claims to imply you were offered them when you actually weren't and your constant bragging about how outstanding you are, having seen your picture of you and Jesus I guess discussing the way Joseph built those pyramids to store, grain, you are still pretty high in the polls. My God in Heaven, only in the USA.
Do these young conservatives also think Joseph bui... (show quote)


Oh, but v****g for, and supporting an incompetent pathological liar in the WH, and another one running for office is okay? As long as it is a Democrat, lying and corruption is okay with you, and your ilk? The more lies, and the bigger the lies, the more you eat it up. You're pathetic, pal...and, a hypocrite to the max.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 11:16:57   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
What the media is doing is driven by those who buy their papers or view them on line. When we start our own research and start asking questions of the media, they will comply because this is their livelihood, to sell their information to the public. If we only sit on our sofa and drink in the misinformation, who is to blame? Did you know that the media reads our facebook and twitter inputs? These outlets drive most of the stories. Liberals are much more active in blogging and social outlets than conservatives, that is the big reason that CNN, MSN, NBC, and so on focus on their input. As far as the canidates running on the democratic ticket, well Clinton's past has been examined and everyone knows what she is and as I said, tigers do not change their stripes if you v**e for her you know you will be getting a criminal, liar, and someone (once again) without regard for unborn babies, the poor, elderly, and our military. Not much has been said about O'Malley and only little attention given to Sanders. Right now, they seem to be noncontenders. On the Republican side, well there are 15 people running. Just so happens, Trump and Carson are the front runners so they will get the most press. But, we can change that.... open an account on facebook and make comments to MSN and the like about those running.... if enough people do, then I think the message will become clear. Same with twitter, open an account and start commenting to MSN about their coverage. If we do nothing, then expect them not to change their approach. Complaining on OPP will allow us to vent but will change nothing. Open communication to the news, well if enough complain about them to them, they will have no choice but adjust the way they report and on whom they report. What I am suggesting, be a squeaking wheel....adopt the Liberal's method of getting heard.
Be a Marine, adapt and overcome!!

bahmer wrote:
When they use the same theoretical microscope on both sides of the isle they will once again become credible. Right now they are ignoring things on the left side that should be brought out and fabricating things on the right side to determine who runs against their candidate. There was a time in the past when the MSM didn't have an agenda and didn't try to make politics but merely reported the facts and allowed the reader or viewer make up his or her mind. Now they are lying for one side and distorting the other to sway people into their way of belief which is liberal.
When they use the same theoretical microscope on b... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2015 11:22:06   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
JMHO wrote:
Oh, but v****g for, and supporting an incompetent pathological liar in the WH, and another one running for office is okay? As long as it is a Democrat, lying and corruption is okay with you, and your ilk? The more lies, and the bigger the lies, the more you eat it up. You're pathetic, pal...and, a hypocrite to the max.


Once again you continue to act as if anyone who might disagree with you on any issue what so ever is a liberal democrat. That's not my ilk.

The guy is stupid enough to proclaim belief that Joseph built the pyramids to store grain. The right there is totally enough for me.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 11:34:12   #
EL Loc: Massachusetts
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Do these young conservatives also think Joseph built the pyramids to store grain? Poor Boo Boo Carson thinks he's getting all picked on by that evil "liberal" media, as if Obama had never been picked on by the likes of Fox, Levine, Limbaugh and the rest of the pro-conservative media sources.

If its just too hot in the kitchen Mr Carson, get out and for heavens sake, stop with the theories about pyramids and the like. You are proof that seemingly great men can actually be brainwashed by religion and religious dogma. Despite being vague enough about these scholarships claims to imply you were offered them when you actually weren't and your constant bragging about how outstanding you are, having seen your picture of you and Jesus I guess discussing the way Joseph built those pyramids to store, grain, you are still pretty high in the polls. My God in Heaven, only in the USA.
Do these young conservatives also think Joseph bui... (show quote)


It's not too hot in the kitchen for Dr. Carson. Sounds like he's getting too hot for you to handle, though.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 11:38:17   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Once again you continue to act as if anyone who might disagree with you on any issue what so ever is a liberal democrat. That's not my ilk.

The guy is stupid enough to proclaim belief that Joseph built the pyramids to store grain. The right there is totally enough for me.


You are denying that you're a liberal Democrat???? Just can't stand some one pegging you right, can you?

So, the pyramid story is enough for you? So what? Who gives a rat's ass what you believe anyway? You won't buy that story, but you swallow all the lies the left feeds you...hmmmmm

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 11:40:00   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
EL wrote:
It's not too hot in the kitchen for Dr. Carson. Sounds like he's getting too hot for you to handle, though.


Carson is taking it to the media, and in the meantime he is cashing in on campaign donations because of those l*****t attacks...and nwtk2007 just can't deal with that. He would much rather swallow the lies of Hillary or Sanders.

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2015 11:40:00   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
EL wrote:
It's not too hot in the kitchen for Dr. Carson. Sounds like he's getting too hot for you to handle, though.


That's a pretty weak attempt there el.

Let me guess, you also believe that Joseph built the pyramids to store grain??

This one is even beyond a creationists belief in a seven day creation or the Noah/flood myth. LOL!!!

This dude may get v**ed in and start hearing voices from almighty GAWD. You really want that?

With Trump I can believe that he knows himself how he exaggerates his claims and ego, but Carson truly appears to believe how great he is.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 11:42:14   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
That's a pretty weak attempt there el.

Let me guess, you also believe that Joseph built the pyramids to store grain??

This one is even beyond a creationists belief in a seven day creation or the Noah/flood myth. LOL!!!

This dude may get v**ed in and start hearing voices from almighty GAWD. You really want that?

With Trump I can believe that he knows himself how he exaggerates his claims and ego, but Carson truly appears to believe how great he is.


Were you there when they built the Pyramids? So, you're an expert on the topic? I think not.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 11:42:36   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
JMHO wrote:
You are denying that you're a liberal Democrat???? Just can't stand some one pegging you right, can you?

So, the pyramid story is enough for you? So what? Who gives a rat's ass what you believe anyway? You won't buy that story, but you swallow all the lies the left feeds you...hmmmmm


There are two things I find funny about you jmho; one is that I know who I am and what I support and two, I also know that you yourself don't buy into that BS that Carson claims to believe.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 11:44:11   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
JMHO wrote:
Were you there when they built the Pyramids? So, you're an expert on the topic? I think not.


LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The pyramids are essentially solid rock. Not too much in the way of anything being stored in there. Not to mention they were built quite a number of years BEFORE Joseph walked the earth. Get it?

Reply
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.