hprinze Loc: Central Florida

I heard a talk radio show today in which Bobby Jindal was a guest. He spoke well, with very good ideas.

It's too bad that he, along with Cruz and Rubio are not natural born citizens, eligible for the presidency'
It is appalling that these people would lower themselves to the level of Obama by running for an office where they know they are not eligible.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oIW5lPsfZM


http://www.resonoelusono.com/naturalborncitizen.htm

MrEd Loc: Georgia

I think the reason they are running is because obama got away with it, so why can't they????

There are i***ts on here they insist they would v**e for them and they are the best people running. I have written to them and they will not answer me let alone tell me how they figure they are eligible to run.........

vernon

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

==================================

Yes, Obama got away with it, so far. I am hopeful, but not optimistic that he will eventually pay for his crimes.

I too have written them asking the same question. I was polite and respectfully asked for a reply.

After a month I wrote again noting that I was making a second request for a reply. No reply.

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

Vernon wrote
i dont care what you read jindal was born in baton rouge la went to school here and married here.

===========================

That does not make him a natural born citizen. It does make him a citizen.

The constitution requires the president to be a natural born citizen. The U.S. Supreme Court defines natural born citizen as a person born in the USA of TWO U.S. citizen parents.

Obama, Cruz, Jindal, and Rubio were all born of foreigner parents.


If you will go to the links I furnished, maybe you will understand the difference in citizen and NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

All three are eligible to run. Rubio was born in Miami, Jindal in Baton Rouge, and Cruz in Calgary.

If you are going to focus only on the citizenship issue as a way to compare these men's character to that of Obama, you have a serious problem. Any one of these three men stand light years above Obama in character, principles, integrity, and patriotism. I do hope that shallow thinkers such as yourself are few and far between.

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

===========================

McCain was born of two U.S. citizen parents who were on military assignment in the Panama CANAL ZONE on a U.S. military base, territory of the U.S.

If you go to the links I furnished, maybe you would understand that the definition by the Supreme Court cannot be changed by the Senate, president, or anybody else. Only way to change it is by a later SUPREME COURT ruling or by constitutional amendment

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

===========================

McCain was born of ouo U.S. citizen parents who were on military assignment in the Panama CANAL ZONE on a U.S. military base, territory of the U.S. And the court has ruled that a person born of TWO u.S. citizens on military or diplomatic assignment overseas are considered to be born oin the USA.

If you go to the links I furnished, maybe you would understand that the definition by the Supreme Court cannot be changed by the Senate, president, or anybody else. Only way to change it is by a later SUPREME COURT ruling or by constitutional amendment

Airforceone

What crimes give me a list

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

At this stage of the game, I really don't give a damn what the Supreme Court says about this, or anything else for that matter. 9 people in black robes do not rule the earth.

I'll take a Cruz, Jindal, or Rubio over ten million Obamas, and I don't care if they were born on the dark side of the moon.

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

====================================

You are not alone in your disdain and lack of respect for the Constitution,

Sad, but true.

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

Just the tip of the ice berg.

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps. The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. This may have been sensible—insurers and employers need time to comply with rapidly changing regulations—but changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate. The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself.

3. Delay of Obamacare’s insurance requirements. The famous pledge that “if you like your plan, you can keep it” backfired when insurance companies started cancelling millions of plans that didn’t comply with Obamacare’s requirements. President Obama called a press conference last month to proclaim that people could continue buying non-complying plans in 2014—despite Obamacare’s explicit language to the contrary. He then refused to consider a House-passed bill that would’ve made this action legal.

4. Exemption of Congress from Obamacare. A little-known part of Obamacare requires Congressmen and their staff to get insurance through the new healthcare exchanges, rather than a taxpayer-funded program. In the quiet of August, President Obama directed the Office of Personnel Management to interpret the law to maintain the generous congressional benefits.

5. Expansion of the employer mandate penalty through IRS regulation. Obamacare grants tax credits to people whose employers don’t provide coverage if they buy a plan “through an Exchange established by the State”—and then fines employers for each employee receiving such a subsidy. No tax credits are authorized for residents of states where the exchanges are established by the federal government, as an incentive for states to create exchanges themselves. Because so few (16) states did, however, the IRS issued a rule ignoring that plain text and allowed subsidies (and commensurate fines) for plans coming from “a State Exchange, regional Exchange, subsidiary Exchange, and federally-facilitated Exchange.”

6. Political profiling by the IRS. After seeing a rise in the number of applications for tax-exempt status, the IRS in 2010 compiled a “be on the lookout” (“BOLO”) list to identify organizations engaged in political activities. The list included words such as “Tea Party,” “Patriots,” and “Israel”; subjects such as government spending, debt, or taxes; and activities such as criticizing the government, educating about the Constitution, or challenging Obamacare. The targeting continued through May of this year.

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.

8. Recess appointments. Last year, President Obama appointed three members of the National Labor Relations Board, as well as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, during what he considered to be a Senate recess. But the Senate was still holding “pro forma” sessions every three days—a technique developed by Sen. Harry Reid to thwart Bush recess appointments. (Meanwhile, the Dodd-Frank Act, which created the CFPB, provides that authority remains with the Treasury Secretary until a director is “confirmed by the Senate.”) In January, the D.C. Circuit held the NLRB appointments to be unconstitutional, which ruling White House spokesman Jay Carney said only applied to “one court, one case, one company.”

9. Assault on free speech and due process on college campuses. Responding to complaints about the University of Montana’s handling of sexual assault claims, the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, in conjunction with the Justice Department, sent the university a letter intended as a national “blueprint” for tackling sexual harassment. The letter urges a crackdown on “unwelcome” speech and requires complaints to be heard in quasi-judicial procedures that deny legal representation, encourage punishment before trial, and convict based on a mere “more likely than not” standard.

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

Just the tip of the ice berg.


In those immortal words of the character Jeff Spicoli in Fast Times at Ridgemont High, " Hey bub, what's your problem ?"

Can't help it. Dipsy Doodle won't understand you !!!!

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

I know he will never understand, the left will never admit these and many other wrongs.

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

Most all human beings have slight disorder's of one thing or another and some non symmetrical physical aspects. It's just the way it is. Unless your dealing with some of these nutters. They somehow don't see their own tics, twitches slightly off center facial characteristics etc. etc. and worse of all, haven't a clue of just how full of bulls**t they are.

But hey, colleges keep giving out those expensive sheepskins reinforcing their misbegotten self worth. Don't Cha know ?
As witnessed right here on OPP by many who claim being correct because they have a degree or two or three from some university full of over rated overpaid dingbats who haven't personally created one thing including original thought.