Was JFK 1st victim of New World Order?
Sep 17, 2013 01:03:01 #
NEW YORK Was John F. Kennedy assassinated as the first p**********l victim of the emerging New World Order championed by former CIA directors Allen Dulles and George H. W. Bush?
Armed with recently declassified documents, New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi tackles that question in Who Really K**led Kennedy as the 50th anniversary of the assassination approaches.
Corsi points out Kennedy had refused to authorize the Navy to launch a military strike from an aircraft carrier to save the faltering U.S.-backed invasion of Cuba known as the Bay of Pigs attack.
Kennedy also refused to authorize the use of U.S. military force in Laos and, just before he was assassinated, he had decided to pull out of Vietnam.
Secret details of JFKs assassination are finally unlocked. Get your autographed copy of Who Really K**led Kennedy? by Jerome Corsi now!
Hot war in Vietnam
On Sept. 2, 1963, Labor Day, at Hyannisport, Mass., JFK had a relaxed interview outdoors with CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite, who that sunny day was inaugurating a new television news program.
About midway into the interview, Cronkite asked about Vietnam: Mr. President, the only hot war weve got running at the moment is of course the one in Vietnam, and we have our difficulties there, quite obviously.
Kennedy answered directly, careful to set the stage for explaining why a military withdrawal from Vietnam was beginning to make sense to him.
I dont think that unless a greater effort is made by the government [of South Vietnam] to win popular support that the war can be won out there, Kennedy explained.
In the final analysis, it is their war. They are the ones who have to win it or lose it. We cant help them, we can give them equipment, we can send our men out there as advisers, but they have to win it, the people of Vietnam, against the c*******ts.
In the interview, notes Corsi, Kennedy distanced himself from saying the U.S. should withdraw from Vietnam, insisting it would be a great mistake.
Corsi says Kennedy properly worried that no direct U.S. military intervention in a region like Southeast Asia could succeed, regardless of how many troops were sent or what type of arms were provided, unless the indigenous population was ready to fight and die for their own freedom.
JFK also worried, Corsi writes, that the type of corrupt regimes common in countries such as Laos and Vietnam almost certainly promised defeat, since any victories won on the battlefield would be c*********d as corrupt elites in power oppressed the very people they were claiming to save from c*******m.
By offering military assistance, the president believed he could test the resolve and the ability of a nation such as Vietnam to win in a war against indigenous c*******ts supported by China and Russia with a wide range of financial assistance, military training and sophisticated military equipment.
That policy, to withdraw the bulk of U.S. military personnel from Vietnam by the end of 1965, became official government policy on Oct. 11, 1963, when Kennedy signed National Security Action Memorandum No. 263.
The goal was to have the Defense Department announce the withdrawal of 1,000 military advisers from Vietnam by the end of 1963.
The speech JFK never gave
On Nov. 22, 1963, the day he was assassinated, JFK was on his way to the Dallas Trade Center to give a luncheon address.
This, the Unspoken Speech, contained a strong and clear statement of Kennedys determination to support U.S. allies and to fight back c*******m worldwide through a military and economic assistance program, not through the direct intervention of military forces.
But American military might should not and need not stand alone against the ambitions of international c*******m, JFKs prepared remarks read.
Our security and strength, in the last analysis, directly depend on the security and strength of others, and that is why our military and economic assistance plays such a key role in enabling those who live on the periphery of the c*******t world to maintain their independence of choice.
The day he died in Dallas, Kennedy had intended to deliver a clear policy preference for providing military aid to nations such as Vietnam, rather than the alternative of committing U.S. military forces directly to the conflict.
Beginning with the first days of his administration, when confronted with Laos, to the last hours of his administration, concerning Vietnam, JFK was under constant pressure from the military to ramp up U.S. military presence in Southeast Asia.
White House historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr., on page 338 of his 1965 book A Thousand Days, observed that starting with Laos, the military left a predominant impression that they did not want ground troops at all unless they could send at least 140,000 men equipped with tactical nuclear weapons.
The Pentagon was unrelenting in its position, calling for the possibility even of nuclear bombing of Hanoi and Beijing.
Kennedy was moving in a different direction, Cori writes.
The New World Order
In the final analysis, Corsi asserts, JFK was k**led because he saw U.S. military action in shades of gray, whereas New World Order warriors such as the Dulles brothers, George H. W. Bush, and Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon saw only black and white.
Since the time Dulles headed the CIA in the 1950s, the CIA shared a belief with LBJ, Nixon and the military-industrial complex that even if U.S. military action failed in Cuba or in Laos and Vietnam, as it had in Korea, the military intervention would be good for business and the U.S. economy, according to Corsi.
The New World Order view pursued as U.S. foreign policy by Allen Dulles as head of the CIA and his brother John Foster Dulles, as secretary of state under Eisenhower, envisioned employing U.S. military action to preserve U.S. business interests, whether or not the wars were truly in U.S. national security interests.
George H. W. Bush did not blink to engage in the Gulf War, fully realizing U.S. oil interests in Kuwait were being preserved.
This was in sharp contrast to JFK. Under the ideologies of nationalism and self-determination that Kennedy used to analyze Cuba, Laos and Vietnam, it was clear JFK believed U.S. military involvement was ill-advised in each conflict, Corsi writes.
Kennedy cared about U.S. business interests, but not necessarily to the point of going to war in a conflict that was basically a civil war, incidental to U.S. national security interests, he says.
Had JFK lived, according to Corsi, the c*******t insurgency in Vietnam and the takeover of South Vietnam by North Vietnam would have been relegated to a footnote, the answer to an obscure question on a high school history test.
As it happened, there are over 58,200 names carved into black granite walls of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C.
Both Presidents Johnson and Nixon made the Vietnam War a centerpiece of their p**********l administrations, says Corsi.
In retrospect, he contends, JFK was correct; the Vietnam War was not a war the U.S. could win, if fought the way the military-industrial complex wanted the conflict to be fought.
The classic declaration of a New World Order is properly attributed to President George H. W. Bush.
On Aug. 2, 1990, some 100,000 Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait, starting what became known as the Gulf War.
On Sept. 11, 1990 the original 9/11 of the George H. W. Bush presidency Bush addressed a joint session of Congress, proclaiming a big idea he characterized as the New World Order.
You need to have the Adobe Flash Player to view this content.
Please click here to continue.
In the speechs key passage, Bush said:
We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective a new world order can emerge: a new era freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor.
Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one weve known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. This is the vision that I shared with President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and other leaders from Europe, the Gulf, and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come.
What George H. W. Bush made clear with his New World Order speech to Congress on Sept. 11, 1990, was that the use of U.S. military power to protect U.S. bussiness interests was especially justified when backed by an international coalition.
Today, WND reports that critics charge President Obamas intention to launch a pre-emptive military strike on Syria has been motivated by New World Order instructions from Saudi Arabia, whose Sunni regime wants to eliminate the government of Bashar al-Assad in Syria to weaken its Shiite arch-enemies in Iran.
That JFK would have gone to war to protect Kuwaits petroleum interests in 1991 or Saudi Arabias petroleum interests today in Syria is a stretch to argue, especially when JFK backed off using U.S. military power to defeat c*******m in Cuba, Laos and Vietnam, despite the urging of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that intervention in these conflicts was vital to U.S. national security.
Note: Media wishing to interview Jerome Corsi, please contact us here.
Secret details of JFKs assassination are finally unlocked. Get your autographed copy of Who Really K**led Kennedy? by Jerome Corsi now!
You need to have the Adobe Flash Player to view this content.
Please click here to continue.
Armed with recently declassified documents, New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi tackles that question in Who Really K**led Kennedy as the 50th anniversary of the assassination approaches.
Corsi points out Kennedy had refused to authorize the Navy to launch a military strike from an aircraft carrier to save the faltering U.S.-backed invasion of Cuba known as the Bay of Pigs attack.
Kennedy also refused to authorize the use of U.S. military force in Laos and, just before he was assassinated, he had decided to pull out of Vietnam.
Secret details of JFKs assassination are finally unlocked. Get your autographed copy of Who Really K**led Kennedy? by Jerome Corsi now!
Hot war in Vietnam
On Sept. 2, 1963, Labor Day, at Hyannisport, Mass., JFK had a relaxed interview outdoors with CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite, who that sunny day was inaugurating a new television news program.
About midway into the interview, Cronkite asked about Vietnam: Mr. President, the only hot war weve got running at the moment is of course the one in Vietnam, and we have our difficulties there, quite obviously.
Kennedy answered directly, careful to set the stage for explaining why a military withdrawal from Vietnam was beginning to make sense to him.
I dont think that unless a greater effort is made by the government [of South Vietnam] to win popular support that the war can be won out there, Kennedy explained.
In the final analysis, it is their war. They are the ones who have to win it or lose it. We cant help them, we can give them equipment, we can send our men out there as advisers, but they have to win it, the people of Vietnam, against the c*******ts.
In the interview, notes Corsi, Kennedy distanced himself from saying the U.S. should withdraw from Vietnam, insisting it would be a great mistake.
Corsi says Kennedy properly worried that no direct U.S. military intervention in a region like Southeast Asia could succeed, regardless of how many troops were sent or what type of arms were provided, unless the indigenous population was ready to fight and die for their own freedom.
JFK also worried, Corsi writes, that the type of corrupt regimes common in countries such as Laos and Vietnam almost certainly promised defeat, since any victories won on the battlefield would be c*********d as corrupt elites in power oppressed the very people they were claiming to save from c*******m.
By offering military assistance, the president believed he could test the resolve and the ability of a nation such as Vietnam to win in a war against indigenous c*******ts supported by China and Russia with a wide range of financial assistance, military training and sophisticated military equipment.
That policy, to withdraw the bulk of U.S. military personnel from Vietnam by the end of 1965, became official government policy on Oct. 11, 1963, when Kennedy signed National Security Action Memorandum No. 263.
The goal was to have the Defense Department announce the withdrawal of 1,000 military advisers from Vietnam by the end of 1963.
The speech JFK never gave
On Nov. 22, 1963, the day he was assassinated, JFK was on his way to the Dallas Trade Center to give a luncheon address.
This, the Unspoken Speech, contained a strong and clear statement of Kennedys determination to support U.S. allies and to fight back c*******m worldwide through a military and economic assistance program, not through the direct intervention of military forces.
But American military might should not and need not stand alone against the ambitions of international c*******m, JFKs prepared remarks read.
Our security and strength, in the last analysis, directly depend on the security and strength of others, and that is why our military and economic assistance plays such a key role in enabling those who live on the periphery of the c*******t world to maintain their independence of choice.
The day he died in Dallas, Kennedy had intended to deliver a clear policy preference for providing military aid to nations such as Vietnam, rather than the alternative of committing U.S. military forces directly to the conflict.
Beginning with the first days of his administration, when confronted with Laos, to the last hours of his administration, concerning Vietnam, JFK was under constant pressure from the military to ramp up U.S. military presence in Southeast Asia.
White House historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr., on page 338 of his 1965 book A Thousand Days, observed that starting with Laos, the military left a predominant impression that they did not want ground troops at all unless they could send at least 140,000 men equipped with tactical nuclear weapons.
The Pentagon was unrelenting in its position, calling for the possibility even of nuclear bombing of Hanoi and Beijing.
Kennedy was moving in a different direction, Cori writes.
The New World Order
In the final analysis, Corsi asserts, JFK was k**led because he saw U.S. military action in shades of gray, whereas New World Order warriors such as the Dulles brothers, George H. W. Bush, and Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon saw only black and white.
Since the time Dulles headed the CIA in the 1950s, the CIA shared a belief with LBJ, Nixon and the military-industrial complex that even if U.S. military action failed in Cuba or in Laos and Vietnam, as it had in Korea, the military intervention would be good for business and the U.S. economy, according to Corsi.
The New World Order view pursued as U.S. foreign policy by Allen Dulles as head of the CIA and his brother John Foster Dulles, as secretary of state under Eisenhower, envisioned employing U.S. military action to preserve U.S. business interests, whether or not the wars were truly in U.S. national security interests.
George H. W. Bush did not blink to engage in the Gulf War, fully realizing U.S. oil interests in Kuwait were being preserved.
This was in sharp contrast to JFK. Under the ideologies of nationalism and self-determination that Kennedy used to analyze Cuba, Laos and Vietnam, it was clear JFK believed U.S. military involvement was ill-advised in each conflict, Corsi writes.
Kennedy cared about U.S. business interests, but not necessarily to the point of going to war in a conflict that was basically a civil war, incidental to U.S. national security interests, he says.
Had JFK lived, according to Corsi, the c*******t insurgency in Vietnam and the takeover of South Vietnam by North Vietnam would have been relegated to a footnote, the answer to an obscure question on a high school history test.
As it happened, there are over 58,200 names carved into black granite walls of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C.
Both Presidents Johnson and Nixon made the Vietnam War a centerpiece of their p**********l administrations, says Corsi.
In retrospect, he contends, JFK was correct; the Vietnam War was not a war the U.S. could win, if fought the way the military-industrial complex wanted the conflict to be fought.
The classic declaration of a New World Order is properly attributed to President George H. W. Bush.
On Aug. 2, 1990, some 100,000 Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait, starting what became known as the Gulf War.
On Sept. 11, 1990 the original 9/11 of the George H. W. Bush presidency Bush addressed a joint session of Congress, proclaiming a big idea he characterized as the New World Order.
You need to have the Adobe Flash Player to view this content.
Please click here to continue.
In the speechs key passage, Bush said:
We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective a new world order can emerge: a new era freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor.
Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one weve known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. This is the vision that I shared with President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and other leaders from Europe, the Gulf, and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come.
What George H. W. Bush made clear with his New World Order speech to Congress on Sept. 11, 1990, was that the use of U.S. military power to protect U.S. bussiness interests was especially justified when backed by an international coalition.
Today, WND reports that critics charge President Obamas intention to launch a pre-emptive military strike on Syria has been motivated by New World Order instructions from Saudi Arabia, whose Sunni regime wants to eliminate the government of Bashar al-Assad in Syria to weaken its Shiite arch-enemies in Iran.
That JFK would have gone to war to protect Kuwaits petroleum interests in 1991 or Saudi Arabias petroleum interests today in Syria is a stretch to argue, especially when JFK backed off using U.S. military power to defeat c*******m in Cuba, Laos and Vietnam, despite the urging of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that intervention in these conflicts was vital to U.S. national security.
Note: Media wishing to interview Jerome Corsi, please contact us here.
Secret details of JFKs assassination are finally unlocked. Get your autographed copy of Who Really K**led Kennedy? by Jerome Corsi now!
You need to have the Adobe Flash Player to view this content.
Please click here to continue.
Sep 17, 2013 01:16:31 #
For all we know it could have been a jealous Lover of Marilyn Monroe that hired a hit-man, the one in the bushes you know~
ABBAsFernando wrote:
NEW YORK Was John F. Kennedy assassinated as the... (show quote)
Sep 17, 2013 01:42:45 #
Rhonda Minden wrote:
For all we know it could have been a jealous Lover of Marilyn Monroe that hired a hit-man, the one in the bushes you know~
Perhaps, Norma Jean was his lover who was going to go public with their affair. Why some believe the Kennedy Brothers had her murdered.
JDK pissed off all the wrong people and most like that got him murdered. His father Joe Kennedy was basically a N**I who tried to get England to support Hitler during WWII. The reason he got recalled from the English ambassadorship. JFK had an affair with a N**I female spy that Joe had to cover up. JFK was part of Naval Intelligence up until then. Joe covered it all up and JFK was sent to the PT Boats. Hence the srory of PT 109.
The Kennedy's got their wealth from running booze during prohibition. So Joe was a drug dealer profiting from the lack of booze during the era.
Ted Kennedy was a c*******t agent until the day he died.
Sep 17, 2013 02:00:26 #
The Kennedy family has lived under their own self made curse for several generations. My concern is the here and now, and what we do as adults with this time given to us for our Nation.
ABBAsFernando wrote:
i Perhaps, Norma Jean was his lover who was going... (show quote)
Sep 17, 2013 06:35:17 #
ABBAsFernando wrote:
i Perhaps, Norma Jean was his lover who was going... (show quote)
About ten days before he was murdered, JFK gave a speech at Columbia University, in shich he named the Federal Reserve as a"Plot to destroy Americans freedom." He vowed to use the presidency to expose the Fed, (part and parcel of the cartel of international financiers who make up the IMF). He signed an Executive Order which was the printing of US Notes, under control of Congress, to replace Federal Reserve Notes. This is easily verifiable. Upon LBJ's swearing in, one of, if not his first, official acts was to rescind JFK's US Note order and reinstate Federal Reserve Notes. JFK's plan to draw down US troop strength in 'Nam was also scrapped, as he increased it from around 10,000, I think it was, to half a million.
Sep 17, 2013 06:35:37 #
ABBAsFernando wrote:
i Perhaps, Norma Jean was his lover who was going... (show quote)
About ten days before he was murdered, JFK gave a speech at Columbia University, in which he named the Federal Reserve as a "plot to destroy Americans freedom." He vowed to use the presidency to expose the Fed, (part and parcel of the cartel of international financiers who make up the IMF). He signed an Executive Order which was the printing of US Notes, under control of Congress, to replace Federal Reserve Notes. This is easily verifiable. Upon LBJ's swearing in, one of, if not his first, official acts was to rescind JFK's US Note order and reinstate Federal Reserve Notes. JFK's plan to draw down US troop strength in 'Nam was also scrapped, as he increased it from around 10,000, I think it was, to half a million.
Sep 17, 2013 06:43:52 #
Michael Nestorick
Loc: Northeastern Pa.
Before President Eisenhower left office he warned us about letting the Military Industrial Complex having complete power. President Roosevelt said nothing happens by accident that it was planned that way. The New World Order which is controlled by the Secret Socities has an agenda and it is not in the American peoples intrest.
Sep 17, 2013 23:58:26 #
Rhonda Minden wrote:
The Kennedy family has lived under their own self made curse for several generations. My concern is the here and now, and what we do as adults with this time given to us for our Nation.
Excellent point! We the People of America are the sovereign rules of this nation. We the People must hold those in authority fully accountable to the LAW. This is their weakness and we must exploit it fully.
Sep 18, 2013 00:06:18 #
banjojack wrote:
About ten days before he was murdered, JFK gave a ... (show quote)
How much do you know about the Federal Reserve System? Have you read the Creature from Jekyll Island? Satan worshippers created the Federal Reserve System to control Americans and the IRS to control political opponents. I believe this Brotherhood of Darkness to commit murder to preserve their theft of American wealth. The more I read and discover more and more I must conclude this conspiracy exists.
JFK certainly made many enemies to include the FBI, CIA and others. The American Mafia did not like his not keeping his promise to retake Cuba. They had given a lot of money to JFK's campaign for his promise to give them back the gaming houses stolen by Castro.
Sep 18, 2013 00:08:11 #
Michael Nestorick wrote:
Before President Eisenhower left office he warned us about letting the Military Industrial Complex having complete power. President Roosevelt said nothing happens by accident that it was planned that way. The New World Order which is controlled by the Secret Socities has an agenda and it is not in the American peoples intrest.
This is my conclusion as well. Many good books are in print along with some reprinted to support this.
Sep 18, 2013 04:22:57 #
ABBAsFernando wrote:
i How much do you know about the Federal Reserve ... (show quote)
I have read the book. More than once, I have commented on the act that everyone should read it. You're right, JFK made many enemies, I just found it "convenient" that his assassination should occur right after his speech, and the EO replacing Federal Reserve Notes with US Notes, effectively rendering the Fed powerless. I found it even more "convenient" that one of the first, if not the first, official act of LBJ after he was sworn in was to rescind the EO, and put us back on Federal Reserve Notes. The US notes had already begun printing. They are rare, but they exist. Thoughts?
Sep 18, 2013 07:03:38 #
JFK's assassination has always been laid to the far left, but until fairly recently the banksters had not been identified as the culprits. There is too much coming out now for one to deny the connection, and the clear threat to the fed his U S Notes posed should have been seen by him as a reason to secure himself first. His planning in that respect was unforgivably sloppy, especially since remarks I heard recently from a former Secret Service agent suggest he suspected he might be at risk from his own security people. I have never read of the process whereby the Warren Commission staffing came to be totally controlled by the banksters; though the hour is late, it may yet be an area deserving of research.
Sep 18, 2013 09:59:46 #
terrylm56
Loc: SW Missouri
YES! President Kennedy's Assassination was the beginning of the New World Order.
There is a book call Plausible Denial. If you have not read it, you really need to. This is a no bull crap book. It actually is about the court proceedings and who k**led the President is laid out.
The President and his brother were k**led because the CIA was going to be disbanded. It was NOT doing what it was supposed to be doing.
I know some of you just cannot believe that!
The name of the ships that were used in the botched Cuban attack was Barbara and Houston. Just a coincidence!
I would go into it further but that is enough.
There is a book call Plausible Denial. If you have not read it, you really need to. This is a no bull crap book. It actually is about the court proceedings and who k**led the President is laid out.
The President and his brother were k**led because the CIA was going to be disbanded. It was NOT doing what it was supposed to be doing.
I know some of you just cannot believe that!
The name of the ships that were used in the botched Cuban attack was Barbara and Houston. Just a coincidence!
I would go into it further but that is enough.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.